More price hikes could be coming as another retailer increases prices
HONOLULU (KHON2) — Budget retailer Daiso is the latest to announce a bump in their prices across the board.
There is another change coming that could push prices everywhere even higher.
Spike in steel tariffs could imperil Trump promise of lower grocery prices
Bargain shoppers like to show off their haul after a stop at Daiso.
'Let's see, the stool was $8, but still cheaper than buying from Chinatown,' said Lynn Ishihara, Daiso shopper.
'I got house stuff, so like scrubber, stuff to hang your keys up, unnecessary stuff that I didn't need,' said Teysha Foster, Daiso shopper.
That stuff costs a little more now. Daiso Hawaiʻi recently announced they are raising its base price from $1.75 to $2.25 effective today.
'Whenever I need something I check with them first, cause they have a reasonable price,' said Ishihara.
Daiso Hawaiʻi did not give a reason for the increase, but consumers have been noticing a bump in everything because of tariffs.'I feel like it's happening, you know, and unfortunately it's stuff we have to deal with but I still need stuff,' said Foster. 'I have to keep buying stuff I mean, at this point what can I do.'
Experts predict another potential bump in prices next year. The minimum wage in Hawaii goes up from $14 dollars/hour to $16 dollars/hour on Jan. 1, 2026.
'If shipping costs goes up, labor costs goes up, that's all factored into it and there's only so much that the businesses can absorb before they have to pass it on to the customers, unfortunately,' said Tina Yamaki, Retail Merchants of Hawaiʻi.
Experts say it's a good idea to shop around to get the best bang for your buck. But they say price won't be the only factor in determining where a person spends their money. They say they'll also look at other things like convenience and customer service.
'If you're comfortable shopping there, if you feel, you know, like you're part of the ohana, people go back,' said Yamaki. 'They're also looking at who has the better prices, too. So it's kind of a combination of both.'
Download the free KHON2 app for iOS or Android to stay informed on the latest news
All that still adds up to a win for Daiso's shoppers.
'Are you still gonna come shopping here? Yeah I am,' said Foster.
'Even little bit higher, it's still a reasonable price,' said Ishihara. 'And then lot of stuff you cannot find at another store.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
5 hours ago
- New York Post
Appeals court denies Apple's bid to pause App Store order in yearslong feud against ‘Fortnite' maker
Apple has failed to persuade a US appeals court to pause key parts of a federal judge's order requiring the iPhone maker to immediately open its lucrative App Store to more competition. The 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday rejected Apple's request to put the provisions on hold as the tech company appeals the judge's order, which came in a long-running antitrust lawsuit brought by 'Fortnite' maker Epic Games. US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in April found Apple in contempt of an earlier injunction order she issued in the Epic Games case. Advertisement 3 A judge rejected Apple's request to pause key parts of a federal judge's order requiring the iPhone maker to immediately open its lucrative App Store to more competition. Apple CEo Tim Cook, above. AFP via Getty Images Apple in a statement said it was 'disappointed with the decision not to stay the district court's order, and we'll continue to argue our case during the appeals process.' The judge on April 30 ordered Apple to end several practices that she said were designed to circumvent the injunction, including a new 27% fee Apple imposed on app developers when its customers complete an app purchase outside the App Store. Advertisement The court also prohibited Apple from restricting where developers place links to make purchases outside of an app. Epic Games founder and chief executive Tim Sweeney said in a post on X after the appeals court ruling that the 'long national nightmare of the Apple tax is ended.' In its emergency appeal, Apple said the ruling blocked the company from 'exercising control over core aspects of its business operations' and forced it to give free access to its services. 3 'Fortnite' maker Epic Games has said Apple is trying to continue evading competition and collecting fees the judge had barred. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement Epic Games countered that Apple was trying to continue evading competition and collecting fees that the judge had barred. Apple has faced a 'surge of genuine competition' since Gonzalez Rogers issued her April injunction, as developers updated apps with 'better payment methods, better deals, and better consumer choice,' Epic said. Epic Games sued Apple in 2020 to loosen its control over transactions in applications that use its iOS operating system and how apps are distributed to consumers. 3 Epic Games sued Apple in 2020 to loosen its control over transactions in applications that use its iOS operating system and how apps are distributed to consumers. AP Advertisement Apple mostly won the case, but Gonzalez Rogers in 2021 said Apple must allow developers to more easily steer consumers to potentially cheaper non-Apple payment options. Apple defied that court order to maintain a revenue stream worth billions of dollars, Gonzalez Rogers wrote in April. She also said Apple had misled the court about its efforts to comply with her injunction and referred the company and one of its executives to federal prosecutors for a possible criminal contempt investigation.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Apple loses bid to pause app store reform order in Epic Games case
By Mike Scarcella (Reuters) -Apple has failed to persuade a U.S. appeals court to pause key parts of a federal judge's order requiring the iPhone maker to immediately open its lucrative App Store to more competition. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday rejected Apple's request to put the provisions on hold as the tech giant appeals the judge's order, which came in a long-running antitrust lawsuit brought by 'Fortnite' maker Epic Games. U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in April found Apple in contempt of an earlier injunction order she issued in the Epic Games case. The judge on April 30 ordered Apple to end several practices that she said were designed to circumvent the injunction, including a new 27% fee Apple imposed on app developers when its customers complete an app purchase outside the App Store. The court also prohibited Apple from restricting where developers place links to make purchases outside of an app. In its emergency appeal, Apple said the ruling blocked the company from "exercising control over core aspects of its business operations" and forced it to give away free access to its services. Epic Games countered that Apple was trying to continue evading competition and collecting fees that the judge had barred. Apple has faced a "surge of genuine competition" since Gonzalez Rogers issued her April injunction, as developers updated apps with "better payment methods, better deals, and better consumer choice," Epic said. Epic Games sued Apple in 2020 to loosen its control over transactions in applications that use its iOS operating system and how apps are distributed to consumers. Apple mostly won the case, but Gonzalez Rogers in 2021 said Apple must allow developers to more easily steer consumers to potentially cheaper non-Apple payment options. Apple defied that court order to maintain a revenue stream worth billions of dollars, Gonzalez Rogers wrote in April. She also said Apple had misled the court about its efforts to comply with her injunction and referred the company and one of its executives to federal prosecutors for a possible criminal contempt investigation. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Apple loses bid to pause app store reform order in Epic Games case
By Mike Scarcella (Reuters) -Apple has failed to persuade a U.S. appeals court to pause key parts of a federal judge's order requiring the iPhone maker to immediately open its lucrative App Store to more competition. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday rejected Apple's request to put the provisions on hold as the tech giant appeals the judge's order, which came in a long-running antitrust lawsuit brought by 'Fortnite' maker Epic Games. U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in April found Apple in contempt of an earlier injunction order she issued in the Epic Games case. The judge on April 30 ordered Apple to end several practices that she said were designed to circumvent the injunction, including a new 27% fee Apple imposed on app developers when its customers complete an app purchase outside the App Store. The court also prohibited Apple from restricting where developers place links to make purchases outside of an app. In its emergency appeal, Apple said the ruling blocked the company from "exercising control over core aspects of its business operations" and forced it to give away free access to its services. Epic Games countered that Apple was trying to continue evading competition and collecting fees that the judge had barred. Apple has faced a "surge of genuine competition" since Gonzalez Rogers issued her April injunction, as developers updated apps with "better payment methods, better deals, and better consumer choice," Epic said. Epic Games sued Apple in 2020 to loosen its control over transactions in applications that use its iOS operating system and how apps are distributed to consumers. Apple mostly won the case, but Gonzalez Rogers in 2021 said Apple must allow developers to more easily steer consumers to potentially cheaper non-Apple payment options. Apple defied that court order to maintain a revenue stream worth billions of dollars, Gonzalez Rogers wrote in April. She also said Apple had misled the court about its efforts to comply with her injunction and referred the company and one of its executives to federal prosecutors for a possible criminal contempt investigation.