Democrats wore pink, and other fashion statements at Trump's speech
Advertisement
At several high-profile political events in recent years - such as the Democratic National Convention and the State of the Union address in 2024 - Democratic women have organized to wear white as a show of unity and in homage to the suffragists who won women the right to vote in 1919. Some women in the chamber wore white at the joint-session address on Tuesday night, continuing tradition.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
This time around, the color pink was chosen not just because it's harder to miss or because it's traditionally associated with femininity. 'Pink has been used as a color of protest against Trump,' Leger Fernandez said, referring to the pink hats worn at the inaugural Women's March in 2017. 'Pink has also been used as a color of protest against [Russian President Vladimir] Putin.'
Leger Fernandez wore a magenta blazer, a pale pink blouse, a pink belt, pleated pink pants (bought on consignment, a spokeswoman noted) and a button that read, 'Betrayed for Billionaires.'
The collective effort among Democratic members of Congress materialized swiftly - and recently. 'Women are flexible and nimble,' Leger Fernandez said with a laugh, hours before the joint session. 'Suitcases were packed. People went to consignment stores. They shared clothes with each other. … We are sharing the color of pink with each other even as we speak.'
Some other notable looks are below.
Advertisement
Marjorie Taylor Greene's hat
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Georgia) wore a red Trump hat into the chamber - not with the traditional 'Make America Great Again' slogan on it, but instead a 'Trump Was Right About Everything!' across the front and a '45-47' on its side. Trump patted it approvingly on his way into the chamber.
Democrats' 'no king' shirts
A few Democratic members of Congress wore black T-shirts protesting Trump's expansion of his own executive powers. Rep. Maxwell Frost (D-Florida) staged a walkout of the address. The back of his black shirt visibly read, 'NO KINGS LIVE HERE.' Rep. Delia C. Ramirez (D-Illinois), meanwhile, sat in the audience in a shirt that read, 'NO KING. NO COUP.'
Blue and yellow for Ukraine
Several Democratic members of Congress appeared to signal their continuing support for Ukraine in its war against Russia. At least two blue-and-yellow striped ties were worn: Rep. Paul Tonko (D-New York) paired his with a 'Medicaid Matters' button, while Rep. Jim Costa (D-California) accessorized his with a pin juxtaposing the U.S. and Ukrainian flags. Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-New Hampshire) wore a yellow blouse and blue blazer.
Elon Musk in a suit
Elon Musk is recognized by President Trump during his speech.
Ricky Carioti/The Washington Post
The South African billionaire and presidential adviser has lately been photographed wearing T-shirts and baseball caps while visiting Trump in the White House. Musk's cleaned-up look, complete with a navy suit and a royal-blue tie - nary a pair of shades in sight - was a striking contrast to his Washington looks of late.
Usha Vance's oversize peach blazer
The relaxed shape of this suit is distinctly modern and trendy, not to mention somewhat androgynous - the kind of look a trailblazing female tech CEO might wear, especially with her hair back in an understated bun. At an event where many other Republican women sported their signature bouncy blowout curls, heavy eye makeup and decidedly traditional feminine silhouettes, the second lady looked like she was attending a different event entirely.
Advertisement
Trump's purple tie
President Trump sported a purple tie during his speech in the House.
Ricky Carioti/The Washington Post
The president's usual red tie is such a mainstay that Trump bobbleheads always sport one, and James Austin Johnson wears one in every SNL sketch in which he plays the president. Trump has been experimenting a little lately, though, reprising this purple-tie look from his inauguration in January. Purple and other combinations of red and blue are often invoked in politics as gestures toward bipartisanship. Trump's address itself, though, made clear this red-and-blue-checked tie was just a tie.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
8 minutes ago
- Forbes
AMA: Doctors And Patients Hurt By ‘Big Beautiful Bill'
The American Medical Association says legislation wending its way through the Republican-controlled ... More Congress would 'take us backward' as a country by cutting health benefits for poor and low-income Americans, the group's president said Friday, June 6. In this photo, the US Capitol in Washington, DC, US, on Tuesday, June 3, 2025. Photographer: Eric Lee/Bloomberg The American Medical Association says legislation wending its way through the Republican-controlled Congress would 'take us backward' as a country by cutting health benefits for poor and low-income Americans. Meeting for its annual policy-making House of Delegates this weekend in Chicago, the AMA is rallying physicians to thwart the legislation now before the U.S. Senate. Legislation known as the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' that narrowly passed the Republican-controlled U.S. House of Representatives two weeks ago 'would reduce federal Medicaid spending by $793 billion and that the Medicaid provisions would increase the number of uninsured people by 7.8 million,' a KFF analysis shows. 'We have to turn our anger into action,' AMA President Bruce A. Scott, M.D. said in a speech to AMA delegates Friday. 'I know our patience is being tested by this new administration and Congress.' The AMA said it has launched a 'grassroots campaign targeted at the Senate' in hopes of making changes to the legislation. The AMA is the nation's largest physician group with more than 200,000 members. 'The same House bill that brings us closer to finally tying future Medicare payments to the rising costs of running a practice, also takes us backwards by limiting access to care for millions of lower-income Americans,' Scott said. 'Medicare, Medicaid, and the Affordable Care Act are literal lifelines for children and families for whom subsidized health coverage is their only real option. We must do all we can to protect this safety net and continue to educate lawmakers on how best to target waste and fraud in the system without making it tougher for vulnerable populations to access care.' Scott, an otolaryngologist from Kentucky, said the Medicare physician payment system is broken and Congress hasn't addressed – as an increasing number of states have – prior authorization, the process of health insurers reviewing hospital admissions and medications. Prior authorization delays needed treatment and puts patient health in jeopardy, doctors say. 'I'm angry because the dysfunction in health care today goes hand in hand with years of dysfunction in Congress,' Scott added. 'I'm angry because physicians are bearing the brunt of a failed Medicare payment system. And while our pay has been cut by more than 33 percent in 25 years, we see hospitals and even health insurance companies receiving annual pay increases.' Meanwhile, the AMA says cuts to physician payments are pushing more physicians away from private practice and exacerbating the nation's doctor shortage. A recent analysis by AMN Healthcare shows only two in five physicians are now in doctor-owned private practices. And Americans in most U.S. cities face waits of at least one month before they can see certain specialists. 'Congress needs to know there is no 'care' in Medicare if there are no doctors," Scott said.
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sen. Ted Cruz proposes withholding broadband funding from states that regulate AI
The Brief Senator Ted Cruz proposed that states attempting to regulate AI should lose federal broadband funding. This proposal is an addition to a House-passed bill aiming for a 10-year ban on state AI regulation. Critics argue Cruz's plan is "undemocratic and cruel," forcing states to choose between broadband access and AI consumer protection. WASHINGTON - U.S. Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) proposed on Thursday an alternative punishment for planned legislation that would set a 10-year ban on state regulation of Artificial Intelligence model learning. Under Cruz's budget reconciliation proposal, an attempt to regulate AI would be prohibited from collecting federal funding provided by the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) program. The Proposal The U.S. House of Representatives passed their version of House Resolution 1, the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," on May 22. In part, the budget bill would ban state regulation on AI for 10 years. As chairman of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, Cruz authored a budget reconciliation that he says is intended to "fulfill President Trump's agenda." In a summary of the proposal, he refers to state regulation as "strangling AI deployment," comparing it to EU precautions against tech development. Cruz's proposal adds $500 million to the BEAD program, which has already administered $42.45 billion to the states in order to expand high-speed internet access across the country. It also prevents states from receiving any of that funding if they attempt to regulate AI. Dig deeper Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Georgia) has recently spoken out against HR 1, saying the anti-regulatory section alone will cost Congress her vote. Greene explained that she discovered the controversial provision, located on pages 278-279 of the bill, only after the House had already passed the legislation. Once the bill returns to the House following Senate deliberations, Greene says she will change sides based on the matter of AI. What they're saying Advocacy group Public Citizen released a commentary on Cruz's proposal, referring to it as a "display of corporate appeasement." In the article, J.B. Branch, a Big Tech accountability advocate, included the following statement: "This is a senatorial temper tantrum masquerading as policy. Americans have loudly rejected Senator Cruz's dangerous proposal to give tech giants a decade of immunity from state regulation. State legislatures, attorneys general, and citizens across all 50 states have demanded that Congress step away from overhauling consumer protections put in place in the absence of federal leadership. But instead of listening to the American people, Senate Republicans threw a fit and tied vital digital funding to corporate impunity. "With this move, Republicans are telling millions of Americans: 'You can have broadband but only if your state gives up the right to protect you from AI abuses.' It's undemocratic and cruel. Republicans would rather give Big Tech a 10-year hall pass to experiment on the American people unchecked, rather than give underserved rural and urban communities the ability to compete in the digital economy. Congress must reject this corporate giveaway and refocus their energy on representing the public interest." In her statements criticizing the anti-regulation portion of HR 1, Greene expressed concerns about developing rapidly evolving tech without checks and balances. "No one can predict what AI will be in one year, let alone 10," Greene said. "But I can tell you this: I'm pro-humanity, not pro-transhumanity. And I will be voting NO on any bill that strips states of their right to protect American jobs and families." What's next HR 1 is expected to continue undergoing changes in the Senate before returning to the House for another vote. Cruz's proposal has yet to be officially added to the legislation. The Source Information in this article comes from public U.S. Congress filings, Public Citizen, and previous FOX 4 coverage.
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kharkiv hit with attacks as Ukraine, Russia dispute prisoner swap
The eastern Ukrainian city of Kharkiv was hit by a Russian glide bomb attack on Saturday, after suffering heavy Russian airstrikes earlier in the day. A 30-year-old woman was killed, Kharkiv's military governor, Oleh Syniehubov, wrote on Telegram. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said more than 40 people were injured in the glide bomb attack. "This makes no military sense. It is pure terrorism," he wrote on Telegram. Russia dropped four glide bombs on the city centre, damaging two buildings belonging to a children's railway, train carriages and two houses, Syniehubov said. He said the area is a popular place for families to spend their free time at the weekend. On Saturday morning, Kharkiv Mayor Ihor Terekhov reported three deaths in Russian airstrikes on the city, which also hit residential buildings. He said the strikes injured 21 people, including a baby and a 14-year-old girl. According to Ukrainian sources, 53 drones, four glide bombs and a missile struck various locations in the earlier attack. Terekhov said the attack was the most severe that the city had experienced since the war began more than three years ago. Kharkiv, Ukraine's second-largest city, is located close to the Russian border and has repeatedly been the target of Russian attacks. A disputed exchange Meanwhile Russia and Ukraine are wrangling over the implementation of the prisoner exchange and return of 6,000 dead soldiers agreed on Monday in Istanbul. Moscow's chief negotiator, Vladimir Medinsky, said on Telegram on Saturday that the Russian side was waiting at the handover point with 1,212 frozen bodies in refrigerators ready to begin the initiative, but the Ukrainian envoys were absent. In addition, he said a list of 640 detainees had been handed over to Ukraine for the latest planned prisoner exchange. The other remains were also said to be on their way. The Defence Ministry released a video showing white bags, allegedly containing the bodies, being transported in lorries. Medinsky accused Ukraine of not honouring the agreement and delaying the prisoner swap. The Ukrainian coordination staff responded that the timing of the handover had not been agreed upon but was unilaterally set by the Russians. In a statement on Telegram, the staff referred to "dirty games" and called on the Russian side to return to constructive work. The implementation of the agreements could take place "in the coming days," the staff in Kiev said. At the same time, Ukraine rejected Russian accusations that the exchange of prisoners and the handover of the bodies were being delayed. Ukraine criticizes flawed prisoner lists The coordination staff said it had handed over its lists for the prisoner exchange to the Russian side, in line with the agreement. According to Russian reports, the exchange is to involve 1,200 prisoners on each side. However, the staff in Kiev complained that Moscow had provided lists that did not comply with the Istanbul agreement. It is now Russia's turn, it said. The prisoner exchange was expected to take place this Saturday and Sunday. Lorries full of bodies In a video released by the Russian Defence Ministry, Lieutenant General Alexander Sorin, a member of Moscow's negotiating team, stated that the Ukrainian side had not confirmed the prisoner exchange on Saturday and had postponed it indefinitely. Russia is ready to implement all agreements reached in Istanbul, the general emphasized. "We are prepared to hand over all the bodies and also carry out the exchange of prisoners of war according to the agreed formula," Sorin said. The talks in Istanbul were the second direct negotiations since 2022, following a first round in May, which led to the largest prisoner exchange to date in the same month. A total of 1,000 soldiers and civilians were freed on each side.
