Assembly forms law & order panel
The committee will oversee measures taken for maintaining peace and stability across the province. Rules and terms of reference for the committee will be finalized in the next session, and an official notification will be issued accordingly.
During Friday's assembly session, chaired by Speaker Babar Saleem Swati, Law Minister Aftab Alam proposed suspending the routine proceedings to hold a debate on the worsening security situation. A prayer was also offered for victims of recent terrorist attacks.
Leader of the Opposition, Dr Ibadullah, said the House must conduct discussions that restore public trust. He stressed that unless lawmakers show seriousness about public issues, they cannot earn people's confidence. "We must unite on a single-point agenda for peace, but unfortunately, we remain divided," he said, adding that the lack of unity opens the door for other forces to intervene. He criticized the chief minister's inconsistent statements on security matters and said 95 per cent of debates in the House are irrelevant. "India has now taken the CM's remarks to FATF, threatening Pakistan's hard-earned exit from the grey list," he warned.
PPP Parliamentary Leader Ahmad Karim Kundi said that people from Chitral to Waziristan are protesting, yet the provincial government has failed to restore peace. "This government is the product of political generals," he said, accusing the CM of backtracking on the Peace Jirga's charter. "By morning, his statements change," he added.
Government MPA Ajmal Khan said that Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa is passing through a historically difficult time. "There is a climate of fear in Bajaur," he said, calling for implementation of promises made during the FATA merger. He emphasized the need for dialogue with Afghanistan and for providing shelter and necessities to displaced residents.
PTI's Shafiullah criticized repeated military operations in tribal and border regions. "Why are only our people turned into IDPs whenever foreign interests need to be satisfied?" he asked. "Despite a heavily funded border fence, why are terrorists still returning to our land?" He condemned the decades-long suffering of the Pashtun people and stressed that peace must come through negotiation, not force.
ANP MPA Arbab Usman said parliamentarians are being disrespected. "Our job isn't to build drains or streets; it's to legislate," he said. "We should compare ourselves with nations like Bangladesh or Afghanistan, but first, we must act like Pakistanis. Our human capital is our greatest asset."
The K-P Assembly session ended with a rare display of cross-party consensus on the need for unified political action to restore peace in the province.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Kashmir, Khan and echoes of betrayed promises
The writer is a public policy analyst based in Lahore. She can be reached at durdananajam1@ Listen to article August 5 has come to symbolise two distinct narratives in Pakistan. For supporters of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) — which now represents an overwhelming majority of the population, thanks to the establishment's relentless and illogical rivalry with Imran Khan — it marks the second anniversary of their leader's incarceration. At the official level, however, the day is commemorated in solidarity with the people of Indian-occupied Kashmir, whose semi-autonomous status and special rights were stripped following the abrogation of Articles 370 and 35-A of the Indian constitution. Yet, one suspects that most Pakistanis are aware of the constitutional intricacies affecting Kashmiris. Given the mass exodus from Pakistan and the alarming rise in poverty, it's understandable why many would hesitate to wish the same fate upon Kashmiris — being absorbed into a nation deliberately kept broken and dysfunctional by its ruling elite. The condition of those living in Pakistan-administered Azad Kashmir is, perhaps, evidence enough of this grim reality. In 2018, PTI emerged as one of Pakistan's most popular political parties. By 2025, it has reclaimed that status. In the intervening years, PTI governed for three years before being pushed to the political margins through a familiar tactic: the formation of a united opposition. In Pakistan, political unity is rare and usually reserved for two occasions — when legislation serves personal or business interests; and when the ruling party must be ousted under the guise of national interest. Many analysts and PTI loyalists argue that Imran Khan should have declined the premiership in 2018. They believe that leveraging his popularity from the opposition benches could have secured him a sweeping mandate in subsequent elections — free from establishment strings. With legislative strength, he could have pursued bold reforms with full institutional backing. Instead, Khan opted for hybrid governance, believing he would be treated differently than his predecessors. Like most Pakistanis, he assumed that his unwavering loyalty to Pakistan would earn him institutional support. After all, no previous leader had prioritised national interest over personal gain. From 2014 to 2018, Khan relentlessly branded the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) as "thieves", embedding this narrative deep into public consciousness. Despite reservations about his alliance with the establishment, many hoped Khan's government would be allowed to function independently, free from judicial interference. Over time, he cultivated an aura of indispensability. His trust in the establishment led him — and the public - to believe that the very "thieves" he helped remove would never return to power until held accountable. But like all constructs built on fragile assumptions, this belief crumbled under the weight of reality. By April 9, 2021, Khan's popularity had waned, largely due to the inevitable governance challenges arising from a hybrid and compromised system. Yet, overnight, he surged back to prominence when PTI was ousted and replaced by the very political actors the establishment had long vilified. The irony was not lost on the public. The next day, Pakistanis across the country — and in diaspora communities in the US and the UK — took to the streets. Their protest wasn't just about PTI's removal; it was a collective mourning of the collapse of trust in the establishment and the erosion of democratic values. When Shahbaz Sharif was appointed Prime Minister, he was facing indictment in a multi-million-dollar financial fraud case. Instead of facing justice, he was greeted with rose petals - a stark reminder of the selective accountability that plagues Pakistan's political system. By April 10, 2021, Imran Khan stood alone as the only credible figure in Pakistan's political landscape — for an vast majority of the population. As predicted, Khan remained the most popular leader in 2024 and won the elections with a resounding mandate. Had he trusted the democratic process instead of relying on power brokers, the trajectory might have been different. His two-year resistance to unconstitutional interventions and the public's shattered trust in the military have plunged the country into a state of collective frustration. The illegitimacy of the PDM 2.0 government is evident to all — except those who engineered it. The people stand with Khan because they see in him a reflection of their own victimhood at the hands of a power structure that, though designed to serve the nation, has become its greatest adversary. Today, the pressing question is: Can Imran Khan survive the ruthless persecution of his party and the inhumane conditions of his imprisonment? History offers a sobering pattern. Pakistan's most popular leaders — those who believed in the power of the people — Liaquat Ali Khan, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto and Benazir Bhutto — all met unnatural ends. Khan's defiance of absolute power and his rivals' surrender to it have set the tone for Pakistan's future. The king stands naked. No matter how desperately he tries to cloak himself, the people see through the hypocrisy, illegitimacy and usurpation of power. August 5 stands as a testament to the resilience of people who refuse to be silenced. In commemorating this day, Pakistanis are not just mourning losses — they are reclaiming their right to choose, to question, and to hope.
Express Tribune
5 hours ago
- Express Tribune
NA passes resolutions against honour killings, digital harassment
Listen to article The National Assembly on Wednesday unanimously passed resolutions against honour killings and digital harassment, calling for targeted public awareness campaigns and the introduction of educational modules on digital ethics, privacy rights, and anti-harassment laws in institutions. The resolution against honour killings, moved by Pakistan Peoples Party's (PPP) Shahida Rehmani during a National Assembly session chaired by Speaker Ayaz Sadiq, strongly condemned so-called honour killings and called for zero tolerance toward such crimes, the Associated Press of Pakistan reported. It also proposed the formation of an interprovincial task force to ensure coordinated efforts to eradicate honour-based violence. The lower house adopted several other resolutions, including one calling for stronger legal frameworks against unauthorised video recording, cyber harassment, and digital defamation. The House adopted a resolution moved by the Secretary Women's Parliamentary Caucus Dr. Shahida Rehmani, condemning the Honor killings across Pakistan.#NASession @ShahidaRehmani — National Assembly 🇵🇰 (@NAofPakistan) August 6, 2025 Moved by Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) MNA Syeda Nosheen Iftikhar, the resolution urged the federal government to strengthen law enforcement capacity and initiate public awareness campaigns on digital rights and safe reporting mechanisms. It also recommended the inclusion of educational modules on privacy, digital ethics, and anti-harassment laws in educational institutions and the establishment of dedicated complaint desks at police stations. The house also passed a resolution reaffirming Pakistan's historic and unwavering support for the Palestinian people and their legitimate struggle for freedom, dignity, and justice. The House, during the National Assembly session, unanimously adopted the resolution reaffirming Pakistan's historic and unwavering support for the Palestinian people and their legitimate struggle for freedom, dignity, and Justice. The resolution was moved by Member National… — National Assembly 🇵🇰 (@NAofPakistan) August 6, 2025 The resolution, tabled by PPP MNA Shazia Marri, expressed deep concern over the intensifying Israeli military aggression in Gaza, which has resulted in widespread civilian casualties and destruction of homes and infrastructure. It condemned the statements and actions of Israeli authorities suggesting a long-term occupation of Gaza, forced displacement of Palestinians, and systematic attempts to erase the territory's Palestinian identity. The resolution further denounced the use of starvation, siege tactics, and collective punishment, terming them war crimes under international law. The House called on the United Nations and the broader international community to fulfil their legal and moral obligations by taking immediate steps to end the aggression, ensure civilian protection, and facilitate unrestricted humanitarian access. It also called for accountability of the occupying power for war crimes and reaffirmed support for the Palestinian right to self-determination. Also Read: Pakistan, Turkiye conclude first bilateral amphibious naval drill The resolution urged the government to continue raising the issue on global platforms, including the United Nations and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). Law Minister Senator Azam Nazeer Tarar moved the Whistleblower Protection and Vigilance Commission Bill, 2025 — already passed by the Senate — for consideration. However, an amendment moved by MNA Aliya Kamran referring the bill to the relevant committee was adopted. During the Question Hour, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf's (PTI) Syed Hussain Tariq, Chairperson of the Standing Committee on National Food Security and Research, raised concern over K-Electric's request for a waiver of Rs76 billion in unpaid dues and the practice of disconnecting entire feeders over non-payment by a few consumers. MNA Mir Munawar Ali Talpur also questioned the rationale behind collective punishment of entire neighbourhoods due to defaults by a few. Minister of State for Energy Abdur Rehman Khan Kanju and Parliamentary Secretary for Cabinet Division Sajid Mehdi responded to the queries. Speaker Sadiq took notice of the concerns and directed the minister to hold a special meeting with the concerned MNAs to find a viable solution.
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
Achakzai accuses ‘establishment' of undermining civilian governance
ISLAMABAD: In a scathing critique of the country's power dynamics, Mahmood Khan Achakzai on Tuesday accused the establishment of undermining civilian governance, asserting that the Constitution had been effectively 'shredded,' with unelected officials operating as the nation's real rulers. Achakzai, leader of both the Tehreek-e-Tahaffuz-e-Ayin-e-Pakistan – an alliance of opposition parties – and the Pakhtunkhwa Milli Awami Party (PkMAP), condemned the government's silence on what he described as a systematic dismantling of democratic institutions. Taking a pointed dig at National Assembly Speaker Ayaz Sadiq, Achakzai charged him with inaction as parliamentarians were 'dragged' out of the House. 'Speaker, members were dragged in your presence,' he thundered. 'So far, no one – including you – has taken any action.' He sharply criticised the military and bureaucracy, accusing them of enabling even junior officers – such as colonels and prison superintendents – to control access to political detainees, notably ex-prime minister Imran Khan, whom he termed the country's 'biggest leader.' 'How shameful and disgusting is the treatment meted out to him,' Achakzai lamented, expressing deep concern over the state of democracy in Pakistan. Achakzai also targeted the Pakistan People's Party (PPP), a key coalition partner of the ruling Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), expressing disbelief at its apparent complicity. 'The Constitution is being destroyed, and the PPP is supporting it,' he lamented. According to him, court orders are routinely flouted, and lower-level prison officials operate with impunity. 'The Constitution of Pakistan has been shredded,' he lamented. Adopting a populist tone, Achakzai asserted: 'This country does not belong to a few – Pakistan is not anyone's personal estate. Those who think so live in a fool's paradise.' Clarifying that he bore no personal animosity towards the military, Shehbaz Sharif, or Nawaz Sharif, he stressed that 'real rulers' must be those chosen by the people, not state employees. Returning to Speaker Sadiq, he criticised him over the alleged disqualification and mistreatment of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) lawmakers in connection with the May 9, 2023 events. 'You should have taken a stand,' Achakzai said. 'Why were your members mistreated.' He also lamented the government's silence on international matters, especially its failure to pass a resolution condemning Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, stating, 'Netanyahu should be taken to the International Court of Justice.' Despite his trenchant criticism, Achakzai concluded with a call for reconciliation. 'Let us all repent and forgive each other. Let us start a new politics where this House makes the decisions,' he urged, advocating a return to civilian supremacy and provincial autonomy. However, he ended with a stark warning: 'The way you marched into Bajaur– this will lead to civil war. And if it does, the Shehbaz Sharif government will be responsible.' Echoing the anti-establishment sentiment from the opposition benches, PTI MP Malik Aamir Dogar condemned the government's crackdown. 'You sentenced our members to ten years each,' he said, referring to punishments handed down to PTI activists. 'Ten members were removed from this House, and you took no action.' On Imran Khan, Dogar added, 'He didn't bow down – that's why he's in jail. Had he submitted, he'd be sitting here today. If this is how things are going to be, then just lock the Assembly.' Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
