Foreign workers in N.W.T. say they can't wait much longer for answers, after Nominee Program cuts
Singh, who had been working in the territory for nearly a year when cuts to the N.W.T. Nominee Program were announced, says he will have to move away when his work permit expires next month. He'd fallen 15 days short of the program's new requirement that applicants have a full year of work.
"This is it — I don't have any other option now," he said.
The town hall at the Northern United Place, held by Range Lake MLA Kieron Testart and Yellowknife Centre MLA Robert Hawkins, was meant to give the MLAs a better understanding of what people tied to the nominee program are facing, and what they'd like to see from the program in the future. Federal cuts to the program this year meant 150 people could apply, a vast reduction from previous years — and 60 of those spots were already reserved for previous applicants.
The program attracts foreign nationals looking to immigrate to Canada, those already here with expiring work permits and individuals seeking permanent residency.
Singh was among other attendees Tuesday that had heard there might be the potential for more nominees being accepted this year, after the federal government suggested provinces and territories could take more asylum seekers.
Hawkins and Testart said in a news release earlier this month that the deal would have allowed the N.W.T. to accept 50 asylum seekers in exchange for 150 extra nominee spots.
"So the federal government told our government that if you can demonstrate the utilization of your refugee programs, then we'll consider giving you your spots back," said Testart Tuesday.
Transcripts from the last sitting of the legislature show Testart questioned Industry, Tourism and Investment Minister Caitlin Cleveland in March about that proposal. At the time, Cleveland was waiting to hear more details from the federal government about the deal, including how asylum seekers would be supported.
Hawkins and Testart said they would take what they heard and continue advocating for more nominee program spots. They said it's likely the government will be holding their own sessions to speak with people about the program in the future. (Jocelyn Shepel/CBC)
With a federal election around the corner, Hawkins and Testart said they are advocating for the N.W.T. to take the deal but they believe the likeliness of that happening is uncertain.
"I think that that deal is getting farther and farther away," said Testart.
How many spots are being filled?
A heavy question on employers' and applicants' minds is how many spots are actually being filled.
One employer said they have more than 50 employees and can thus submit four applications under the new rules. However, none of their employees qualified to apply under the new requirements.
Others said they were in similar situations.
Testart and Hawkins said applications carrying over from 2024 and spots allocated for certain communities has had a large impact on what acceptance this year looks like.
Employees with Matonabee Petroleum attended the townhall with their employer. They say the process is a slow and painstakingly long one but attending the meeting helped them feel supported. (Jocelyn Shepel/CBC)
After the meeting, Simranjit Singh, a Yellowknife resident with a work permit quickly expiring, said he is still wondering about how many applications met the new requirements. He couldn't apply because he was short by 12 work experience days, and says most of the people he knows are facing the same problem.
"Nobody knows what the numbers here are, like how many files have been collected?" he asked.
A sentiment also shared by many attendees was an uneasiness about applications going through a lottery process. One attendee said running a person's chances to stay through a randomized selector reduces the feeling of humanity in the process.
The nominee program website states applications that are not selected will stay in the intake queue until Dec. 12.
"If a space becomes available due to application denials or withdrawals, the [program] will select an application for assessment from the intake queue at random," the website reads..
Many people stayed well after the meeting concluded, filling out and taking around 100 consent forms brought by MLAs so they could speak about and discuss their specific cases.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Premier says efforts have 'turned a corner', MHA to head committee for recovery of Conception Bay North
While Premier John Hogan says he's hopeful they've turned a corner when it comes to the fires in Newfoundland and Labrador, MHA Jamie Korab will head up a committee to get the C.B.N area back up and running. The CBC's Ryan Cooke has the latest.
Wall Street Journal
2 days ago
- Wall Street Journal
How the United States Can Enhance Critical Minerals Supply
As the U.S. government considers how to strengthen America's economic and national security, many industry stakeholders are calling for a more cohesive and coordinated approach to the development of critical minerals, including rare earth minerals, to accelerate results. Why it matters: Progress in the past decade toward achieving resource security has been slow.1 More than 15 federal agencies are currently engaged in activities and programs aimed at increasing the United States' mineral security,2 but these initiatives have at times overlapped or lacked effective coordination. If U.S. industries from advanced manufacturing to energy, semiconductors, and defense applications continue to rely on foreign mineral supply chains, the United States will become increasingly vulnerable to potential disruptions of those same supply chains and industries. By the numbers: Of the 50 elements deemed critical to the American economy and national security by the U.S. Geological Survey,3 the United States is 100% dependent on foreign suppliers for 12 of them and is more than 50% reliant on non-domestic sources for another 29.4 What's next: Through an executive order, President Trump created and empowered the National Energy Dominance Council (NEDC) comprising at least 19 senior U.S. government officials to advise the White House on strengthening the U.S. energy sector, improving permitting and regulation, enhancing private sector investments, and facilitating cooperation among government agencies and industry, including for critical minerals.5 The Trump administration has made critical minerals security a key component of its energy-focused strategy, evident by several recent executive orders.6 The NEDC could coordinate, manage, and work closely with relevant U.S. government agencies and key private-sector stakeholders to implement the critical minerals action plan and help identify additional policy and investment measures that could increase the supply of key minerals and enhance supply chain security. Such a critical minerals action plan could focus on three priorities: Go deeper: The priorities of this critical minerals action plan could inform multiple actions to help advance three key outcomes: The bottom line: By designing a time-sequenced, prioritized plan that can be implemented with an effective accountability framework, the United States could significantly enhance the attractiveness of its domestic mining industry for new investments. It could also promote supply chain access, creating flexibility to respond to market movements and developing resilience against future supply chain shocks. By following a targeted strategy and working with industry toward the achievement of a set of common objectives, the U.S. government can make tangible and measurable progress toward its goal to promote U.S. critical mineral security and move from being a primary consumer and price-taker in a nontransparent market to being a supply maker in a transparent and resilient market. —Richard Longstaff, managing director; Cole Johnson, senior manager; Joe Figueiredo, senior manager; and Matt Austin, specialist leader, all in Infrastructure & Resilience with Deloitte's Government and Public Services Practice, Deloitte Consulting LLP
Fast Company
2 days ago
- Fast Company
U.S. Steel plant explosion raises questions about its future
The fatal explosion last week at U.S. Steel's Pittsburgh-area coal-processing plant has revived debate about its future just as the iconic American company was emerging from a long period of uncertainty. The fortunes of steelmaking in the U.S. — along with profits, share prices and steel prices — have been buoyed by years of friendly administrations in Washington that slapped tariffs on foreign imports and bolstered the industry's anti-competitive trade cases against China. Most recently, President Donald Trump 's administration postponed new hazardous air pollution requirements for the nation's roughly dozen coke plants, like Clairton, and he approved U.S. Steel's nearly $15 billion acquisition by Japanese steelmaker Nippon Steel. Nippon Steel's promised infusion of cash has brought vows that steelmaking will continue in the Mon Valley, a river valley south of Pittsburgh long synonymous with steelmaking. 'We're investing money here. And we wouldn't have done the deal with Nippon Steel if we weren't absolutely sure that we were going to have an enduring future here in the Mon Valley,' David Burritt, U.S. Steel's CEO, told a news conference the day after the explosion. 'You can count on this facility to be around for a long, long time.' Will the explosion change anything? The explosion killed two workers and hospitalized 10 with a blast so powerful that it took hours to find two missing workers beneath charred wreckage and rubble. The cause is under investigation. The plant is considered the largest coking operation in North America and, along with a blast furnace and finishing mill up the Monongahela River, is one of a handful of integrated steelmaking operations left in the U.S. The explosion now could test Nippon Steel's resolve in propping up the nearly 110-year-old Clairton plant, or at least force it to spend more than it had anticipated. Nippon Steel didn't respond to a question as to whether the explosion will change its approach to the plant. Rather, a spokesperson for the company said its 'commitment to the Mon Valley remains strong' and that it sent 'technical experts to work with the local teams in the Clairton Plant, and to provide our full support.' Meanwhile, Burritt said he had talked to top Nippon Steel officials after the explosion and that 'this facility and the Mon Valley are here to stay.' U.S. Steel officials maintain that safety is their top priority and that they spend $100 million a year on environmental compliance at Clairton alone. However, repairing Clairton could be expensive, an investigation into the explosion could turn up more problems, and an official from the United Steelworkers union said it's a constant struggle to get U.S. Steel to invest in its plants. Besides that, production at the facility could be affected for some time. The plant has six batteries of ovens and two — where the explosion occurred — were damaged. Two others are on a reduced production schedule because of the explosion. There is no timeline to get the damaged batteries running again, U.S. Steel said. Accidents are nothing new at Clairton Accidents are nothing new at Clairton, which heats coal to high temperatures to make coke, a key component in steelmaking, and produces combustible gases as byproducts. An explosion in February injured two workers. Even as Nippon Steel was closing the deal in June, a breakdown at the plant dealt three days of a rotten egg odor into the air around it from elevated hydrogen sulfide emissions, the environmental group GASP reported. The Breathe Project, a public health organization, said U.S. Steel has been forced to pay $57 million in fines and settlements since Jan. 1, 2020, for problems at the Clairton plant. A lawsuit over a Christmas Eve fire at the Clairton plant in 2018 that saturated the area's air for weeks with sulfur dioxide produced a withering assessment of conditions there. An engineer for the environmental groups that sued wrote that he 'found no indication that U.S. Steel has an effective, comprehensive maintenance program for the Clairton plant.' The Clairton plant, he wrote, is 'inherently dangerous because of the combination of its deficient maintenance and its defective design.' U.S. Steel settled, agreeing to spend millions on upgrades. Matthew Mehalik, executive director of the Breathe Project, said U.S. Steel has shown more willingness to spend money on fines, lobbying the government and buying back shares to reward shareholders than making its plants safe. Will Clairton be modernized? It's not clear whether Nippon Steel will change Clairton. Central to Trump's approval of the acquisition was Nippon Steel's promises to invest $11 billion into U.S. Steel's aging plants and to give the federal government a say in decisions involving domestic steel production, including plant closings. But much of the $2.2 billion that Nippon Steel has earmarked for the Mon Valley plants is expected to go toward upgrading the finishing mill, or building a new one. For years before the acquisition, U.S. Steel had signaled that the Mon Valley was on the chopping block. That left workers there uncertain whether they'd have jobs in a couple years and whispering that U.S. Steel couldn't fill openings because nobody believed the jobs would exist much longer. Relics of steelmaking's past In many ways, U.S. Steel's Mon Valley plants are relics of steelmaking's past. In the early 1970s, U.S. steel production led the world and was at an all-time high, thanks to 62 coke plants that fed 141 blast furnaces. Nobody in the U.S. has opened a new blast furnace in decades, as foreign competition devastated the American steel industry and coal fell out of favor. Now, China is dominant in steel and heavily invested in coal-based steelmaking. In the U.S., there are barely a dozen coke plants and blast furnaces left, as the country's steelmaking has shifted to cheaper electric arc furnaces that use electricity, not coal. Blast furnaces won't entirely go away, analysts say, since they produce metals that are preferred by automakers, appliance makers and oil and gas exploration firms. Still, Christopher Briem, an economist at the University of Pittsburgh's Center for Social and Urban Research, questioned whether the Clairton plant really will survive much longer, given its age and condition. It could be particularly vulnerable if the economy slides into recession or the fundamentals of the American steel market shift, he said.
