Thanks for the money lessons, mom!
Your children will pick up their attitude to money from you as their mother and they will also pick up your bad spending habits.
We learn many things from our mothers and one of the most important lessons is how to deal with money.
How to budget, what to spend money on and how to ensure you do not have too much month left at the end of your money are some of these important lessons.
In many South African households where every rand counts and a single income often supports everyone, mothers step in as the financial managers, ensuring that every expense is carefully planned, Sandi Richardson, HR executive at RCS and mother of a teenager, says.
'There is a reason for the saying that an apple does not fall far from the tree. Children absorb the behaviours instilled by their parents, regardless of whether it is intentional or not.
'When mothers demonstrate financial discipline, prioritise savings and make informed financial decisions, their children are more likely to adopt these habits.'
Similarly, children will also pick up on irresponsible spending behaviour, she warns.
ALSO READ: How to teach your children to save and invest
A mother's financial behaviour rubs off on her children despite money lessons
Richardson points out that parental financial socialisation, or the way parents teach and model financial behaviour, has a significant influence on children's financial literacy.
A study focusing on young adults in low-income areas revealed that parents' financial behaviour, monitoring and discussions directly affected their financial knowledge and future financial well-being.
Another study on families in the Eastern Cape found that a strong parent-child relationship enhances financial teaching and leads to better financial behaviours among young people.
'Financial education is not only about formal lessons but also the relationship, everyday interactions and experiences within families.'
Richardson encourages mothers to include their children in routine bill payments and monthly budgeting discussions to help them understand the ins and outs of money management.
'When our children see the reality of household expenses, they gain a better appreciation for financial responsibility.'
She says mothers can make financial education fun and engaging by incorporating creative activities that help children understand the value of money.
Practical approaches include envelope budgeting, where money is allocated into labelled envelopes for different expenses to demonstrate spending limits visually.
ALSO READ: Why parents should teach children the value of saving money
Setting savings goals is a good money lesson
Setting savings goals can teach children delayed gratification by encouraging them to save towards a specific reward, such as a toy or an outing.
Families can also introduce money challenges, such as finding the best deals on grocery items or earning extra money through getting paid for doing chores.
'There are also amazing budgeting apps these days designed especially for children to help them track their allowances and spending in an interactive way,' Tali Anderssen, legal and compliance executive at RCS and mother of three, says.
She has seen the benefits of financial education in her own home.
'We set up a monthly family finance challenge where the kids track their expenses and try to save a portion of their pocket money. Seeing their progress motivates them to make smarter spending choices.'
'Parents can access tools such as free credit reports, financial planning guides, and debt management advice,' says Richardson.
'These resources are designed to empower families with the knowledge and skills needed to make sound financial decisions, strengthening their own financial understanding and passing these lessons on to their children.'
ALSO READ: How to secure your child's financial future
Mothers are the chief of finances in the household
Robyn Edwards, senior brand and marketing manager at digital financial services provider Finchoice, says South African mothers are rewriting the rules of financial responsibility.
'Being a mother means you are a multitasker, a planner, a nurturer – and a chief financial officer.
'For millennial moms, caregiving is not limited to the home. It extends into every decision they make about wellbeing, time and money.
'From budgeting for school fees to investing in self-care, millennial mothers are doing the math daily. And they do it well.
'With 64% of millennials now parents and the majority of them being women, it is worth unpacking the unseen load that millennial moms carry and the smart ways in which they're using fintech solutions to lighten it.'
Millennial moms work more than previous generations of mothers and spend more time parenting their kids, often with less support from their families or with an additional responsibility for caring for elderly parents. And then there are the ever-rising costs of living and childcare.
'Our data shows that family commitments, home improvements and school fees are the top reasons moms use digital lending tools.
'These are not for frivolous spends, but investments in stability and growth. Millennial mothers are not just managing their households; they are making deeply strategic decisions every day.'
ALSO READ: Financial literacy at an early age is key for success later
Why moms are good at giving money lessons
Robyn Speelman, marketing operations lead at PayJustNow, says that the same trend is just as clear among their base of 2.6 million customers.
Millennial mothers use flexible payment tools to meet their families' needs while staying in control of their finances.
'Millennial moms do not need to be told how to manage their money. Instead, they are proactively seeking out technology and brands that respect their reality and their time, while making it easier for them to be financially savvy,' Edwards says.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
24 minutes ago
- Daily Maverick
The strategic reforms that could transform South Africa's economy
The key is to break the strangleholds that Eskom and Transnet have on our electricity, ports and railways. Introducing real competition into electricity generation and the operation of ports and railways is the key to unlocking real growth in South Africa's stagnant economy. So said Deputy Finance Minister Ashor Sarupen at a seminar organised by the In Transformation Initiative last week, where Jakkie Cilliers, head of the African Futures unit at the Institute for Security Studies (ISS), presented the unit's latest report, co-written with Alize le Roux, which forecasts SA's growth trajectory to 2043. The seminar pondered why, despite the creation of a government of national unity (GNU) last June and the virtual end of load shedding, the South African economy only grew by a miserly 0.1% in the first quarter of 2025. Cilliers said South Africa was caught in a 'classic upper middle income growth trap'. From 1990 until 2025, South Africa's economy had grown by an average of 2.3% a year, and on its current path, without significant reforms, he forecast it would grow at an average 2.4% annually from now until 2043. That would expand GDP from about $402-billion in 2025 to about $628-billion in 2043, in constant 2017 US dollars. This 'slow but steady growth' would not be enough to dent poverty. It would barely keep pace with the population, which the unit forecast would expand from about 65.5 million in 2025 to about 77 million in 2043. Cilliers said annual GDP per capita would therefore rise from $12,600 in 2025 to about $14,700 in 2043 — with South Africa falling behind the rest of the world (except Africa) where he forecast average annual GDP per capita would climb from $20,300 in 2025 to $28,500 in 2043. He noted that on its current development trajectory it would take South Africa until 2037 to return to the peak GDP per capita of $13,800 that it reached in 2013. South Africa had been stagnating for years, with steady deindustrialisation, weak investment, and a growing dependence on social grants undermining growth, particularly during the Jacob Zuma presidency, Cilliers said. Cilliers noted that 740,000 South Africans entered the labour market every year, and because of slow growth and a very capital-intensive economy the number of unemployed people increased annually. In 2023, the International Labor Organization (ILO) found that South Africa had the highest unemployment rate globally after only Eswatini. Because being part of the informal sector is considered 'work' by the organisation, South Africa's relatively small informal sector contributed to this high percentage. In South Africa, only about 18% of the labour force is employed in the informal sector. Cilliers noted that about 62% of South Africans were now living below the World Bank's poverty datum line for upper middle income countries, of $6.85 per person a day. On South Africa's current economic path, that percentage would decline 'modestly' to 58% in 2043, though the absolute number of people living below that poverty datum line would increase, from some 40.9 million in 2025 to 44.4 million in 2043 (because the overall population would rise). Cilliers said South Africa should now be reaping a 'demographic dividend' because its ratio of working age population – aged 15 to 64 — to its dependent population (children and elderly) had now reached 2.1. In the African Futures calculations, the demographic dividend should kick in when the ratio of working people to dependents reached 1.7. he said, Economic growth stunted by poor human capital But South Africa was not earning this dividend largely because economic growth was being stunted by poor human capital, mainly an unhealthy population, many of whom were still afflicted by HIV/Aids and tuberculosis and low-quality education. The question, he said, was why South Africa did so poorly on social capital, education and health, given the very high levels of expenditure on those services. 'And the only answer that you can come up with is government inefficiency, the poor use of existing funds. And the question is, how do we escape the middle-income trap?' Cilliers asked. He said the African Futures team had modelled the effects of reforms in eight different sectors on South Africa's economic development. These were demographics and health; agriculture; education; manufacturing; infrastructure and 'leapfrogging' (i.e. bypassing older technologies); free trade; financial flows; and governance. They found that the largest return was from increased manufacturing, followed by freer trade and then better governance. So, for instance, all eight sectors combined would increase GDP per capita in 2043 by about 33%, from the $ 14,750 on the current path to $19,650. Of this, increased manufacturing would contribute about $930; freer trade (with the full implementation of the African Continental Free Trade Agreement) would contribute about $900; and better governance about $800. The combined impact of those eight reforms would decrease the percentage of South Africans living below the $6.85 a day poverty rate to 50% by 2043, down from 62% in 2023. This would represent 6.1 million fewer poor people than if the economy remained on its current path, though still leaving South Africa with a large poverty burden, Cilliers said. The African Futures team had compiled a laundry list of recommendations, starting with the need to strengthen governance and accountability through evidence-based policies, curtailing corruption and increasing accountability and inclusivity. Deputy Finance Minister Sarupen, of the DA, said much of Cilliers' analysis resonated with assessments by the Treasury's own economic policy team and the work being done by the government's Operation Vulindlela and by various parties in the GNU. He agreed that merely 60% growth in the size of the economy over the next two decades 'will not get us out of the trap that we're in' and that South Africa was in danger of falling from upper middle to lower middle income status. Structural constraints The low growth was driven by structural constraints, weak productivity, low investment in capital, higher inequality and an underperforming formal labour market. The Treasury was 'acutely aware of this'. But he said the government had to prioritise its reforms to tackle the problem because of the many competing demands of a massive amount of social ills and a very strong active civil society. He noted that South Africa had a system of fairly autonomous government ministries that made it harder to pursue coherent policies. Cilliers had identified manufacturing and freer trade as South Africa's best paths forward. Sarupen noted that cheap reliable energy with stability of pricing and supply underpinned manufacturing and industrialisation . 'And one of the drivers of our de-industrialisation has been excessive pricing and inefficiency of supply that really hurts manufacturing in South Africa,' he said. He noted that while prices in the rest of the economy had risen 196% since 2009, Eskom's prices had increased by 403%. So Eskom was driving inflation and deterring investment. Sarupen added that part of the reason GDP growth had been so low over the past year, despite an end to load shedding, was because companies had sunk so much money into load-shedding-proof themselves over the past few years that they had not spent enough on actual business expansion and employment. Sarupen also noted that free trade — another key reform advocated by Cilliers — 'requires you to be able to actually move goods and services cheaply and easily around, so the logistics reforms need a lot of depth and need to maximise competition. 'And so in the reform process that we're undergoing we need to be careful to not just bring the private sector into Transnet's monopoly structure. But rather how do we create competition, across multiple ports for example.' Likewise, South Africa had to maximise competition in railway freight lines. He agreed with Cilliers that crime had to be tackled much better as it was discouraging investment as well as acting as a deterrent to economic activity inside South Africa because, for example, citizens were fearful of using public transport to go to work. Rule of law He said the rule of law was the foundation of all other economic reforms, followed by macroeconomic stability, and then better education and health, and only after that global competitiveness and industrial masterplans. Sarupen did note though that South Africa's foundation of macroeconomic stability was 'probably one of our saving graces'. He also said that the government had to reduce debt. He noted that about 90% of South Africa's debt was denominated in rands, and about 75% of that was purchased by domestic markets. Rand debt was generally better than debt in foreign currency but the scale of government borrowing, about R300 to R400-billion a year, was crowding out the amount of capital that could be invested in business ventures and therefore growth. He added that the relatively high premium of about 11% on a 10-year South African Government Bond was discouraging businesses from investing in riskier ventures. He noted that many of the investments in this year's controversial national Budget were important — such as in public transport. He said, for example, that while a lower income worker in Vietnam earned a similar wage to a lower income worker in South Africa, the Vietnamese worker spent about 10% of his or her income on transport, the South African workers spent around 50%. 'People are going to work to earn money to be able to go to work,' he said. And this was diverting money away from workers buying goods and services, which was essential for economic growth. DM
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
Manufacturer agrees to R500 000 fine for supplying contaminated peanut butter
A product recall is a request from a manufacturer to return a product after the discovery of safety issues or product defects. The manufacturer of various brands of peanut butter agreed to pay an administrative fine of R500 000 for supplying peanut butter for various brands that was contaminated with aflatoxin. Thousands of bottles of peanut butter were recalled in February last year. The National Consumer Tribunal recently confirmed a settlement agreement between the National Consumer Commission (NCC) and House of Natural Butters trading as Eden All Butters. The NCC investigated after it received peanut butter recall notifications from Dischem and Pick 'n Pay regarding elevated levels of aflatoxin in certain brands of peanut butter. When the NCC asked for more information from Dischem and Pick n Pay, its investigators discovered that both ordered their products from House of Natural Butters. The NCC then enquired about the processes when it makes peanut butter. During the investigation, House of Natural Butters informed the NCC that it also produced peanut butter for other suppliers and subsequently recalled all affected products through a series of product safety recalls during February last year. ALSO READ: More than just the spread: 'Urgent investigation' into all peanut products How are recalls regulated? Helen Michael, director at Werksmans Attorneys, says product recalls inevitably involve serious issues, including consumer welfare and manufacturer reputation and liability. Recalls are primarily regulated in South Africa by the Consumer Protection Act (CPA) and enforced by the NCC. The CPA applies generally to goods supplied to consumers, and the CPA broadly defines goods as anything marketed for human consumption or any other tangible product. Recalls of certain specific products are also regulated more directly in sector-specific legislation. Section 61 of the CPA provides for strict liability for producers, importers, distributors and retailers of goods where goods cause harm when they are 'unsafe', suffer from a 'product failure, defect or hazard' or where goods were not accompanied by appropriate instructions or warnings. ALSO READ: Peanut butter health risk spreading: More brands recalled due to high toxin levels This is what the NCC investigation into peanut butter found The NCC established that the affected products had higher than legally acceptable levels of aflatoxin as set out under R1145 Regulation Governing Tolerance of Fungus-Produced Toxins in Foodstuffs. Based on this information, the NCC initiated an investigation into the affairs of the House of Natural Butters. The investigation revealed that House of Natural Butters imported and supplied contaminated, decayed and impure peanuts, groundnuts and byproducts to South African consumers through various retailers between 11 May 2023 and 6 November 2023. After completing the investigation, the NCC concluded that House of Natural Butters' conduct was in contravention of regulation 3 of Regulation 638 of 20181 and regulation 2(b) of Regulation 1145 of 2004, read with section 2(1)(b)(i) of the Foodstuffs, Cosmetics and Disinfectants Act 1972, read with section 55(2)(b) and (d) of the CPA. The NCC and the supplier concluded a settlement agreement on 25 February 2025, where the supplier agreed to pay an administrative fine. The NCC then referred the settlement agreement to the Tribunal to confirm the settlement agreement and make it a consent order in terms of ALSO READ: How product recalls protect SA consumers Tribunal not happy with how peanuts for peanut butter were transported In granting the consent order, the Tribunal noted that House of Natural Butters imported the peanuts from Malawi and Zambia using trucks and trailers, via land borders and port entries. 'The trucks and trailers did not have the requisite certificates of acceptability required for transporting food. 'Further laboratory test results from various accredited food testing laboratories established that the products were contaminated, decayed and impure,' the Tribunal said. According to an article developed by Anelich Consulting, which specialises in food safety, certain food commodities are prone to aflatoxin contamination. ALSO READ: Peanut butter recall: What are aflatoxins and why are they dangerous? What are aflatoxins and why are they dangerous? Professor Lucia Anelich, a food safety expert, says in the article that aflatoxins are a group of toxins produced by several fungi, most importantly Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasitics, which are found naturally in the environment as are most other fungi. 'Therefore, they can be present on different crops, such as cottonseed, maize, rice, some spices, cocoa beans, tree nuts and peanuts while growing in the field. The aflatoxins are then produced by the fungi, mainly when these crops are stored incorrectly in warm and humid conditions after harvesting.' She says in some cases, the toxins are produced in the commodities while still in the field and even figs have been found to be contaminated with aflatoxins. Aflatoxins are potent liver carcinogens, capable of causing cancer in all animal species studied, including humans. 'However, an important point to make is that one of the most important concepts when dealing with any toxin is dosage.' Hardin Ratshisusu, acting consumer commissioner, says the NCC welcomes this consent order as it finalises this matter against House of Natural Butters. 'Suppliers of food must ensure strict compliance with food safety regulations and the CPA.'
The South African
2 hours ago
- The South African
How rich are South Africa's 7 richest men this week?
It's comparatively 'easy' to make money – when you have money to start with. Compound interest is indeed the eighth wonder of the world! As they say, the rich get richer, while the poor stay, well, poor. Money makes money – and these seven South African men have made a lot of it over the years. And by a lot, we mean a LOT ! According to Forbes' real-time tracking of billionaires, Johann Rupert and his family are the richest in South Africa, with a net worth of $14 billion. The Ruperts are followed by diamond magnate Nicky Oppenheimer, who boasts a net worth of $10.5 billion. They are followed by Koos Bekker, Patrice Motsepe, Michiel Le Roux, Jannie Mouton and Christo Wiese. South Africa's seven dollar billionaires all made their money in different ways – from luxury goods, diamonds, mining, media, banking and retail. In the last week alone, Bekker, Motsepe and Wiese all added $100 million (R1.77 billion) to their net worths. Rupert was the big 'loser' as his net worth dropped by $600 million (R10.6 billion). Cumulatively, South Africa's seven dollar billionaires are worth $37.4 billion (R663 billion). Meanwhile, in terms of the overall world list, South Africa-born Elon Musk remains the world's richest person with a reported $393.8 billion. Below, the list of the top seven richest South Africans in the world as of 9 June 2025. Rank Name Last week This week Source 179 Johann Rupert & family $14.6bn $14bn Luxury goods 270 Nicky Oppenheimer & family $10.5bn $10.5bn Diamonds 1 061 Koos Bekker $3.5bn $3.6bn Media, investments 1 147 Patrice Motsepe $3.2bn $3.3bn Mining 1 481 Michiel Le Roux $2.5bn $2.5bn Banking 2 023 Jannie Mouton & family $1.8bn $1.8bn Retail 2 112 Christo Wiese $1.6bn $1.7bn Financial services TOTAL $37.7bn $37.4bn Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
