Coalition plans Pacific labour review, unclear on aid
Major change is on the way for Pacific seasonal workers and, possibly, the government's flagship Pacific visa should Peter Dutton take office on May 3.
The coalition has pledged to bring back a dedicated agriculture visa and review - and likely axe - minimum weekly hours for visiting Pacific workers.
Australian Associated Press has quizzed the coalition on its regional policies, including foreign aid, the Pacific Australia Labour Mobility (PALM) system and the Pacific Engagement Visa (PEV).
The PEV is a lottery-style ballot offering up to 3000 permanent residency places each year.
It has been incredibly popular - the first cohort has drawn over 56,000 applications.
A coalition spokeswoman declined to say whether it would commit to the scheme, first promised by Labor in opposition.
"The coalition will review the operation of the Pacific Engagement Visa to ensure it meets needs of employers, workers and Pacific nations," she said.
On PALM, the coalition offered fulsome support, saying its importance to "thriving agriculture, meat processing, aged care, hospitality and tourism sectors cannot be overstated".
When it works, the scheme is held up as a "win-win" project supporting industry and Pacific workers who send remittances to their home communities.
It has also been abused by some employers, who have fallen short of pay or accommodation obligations.
Labor has heavily reformed the scheme, ditching an agriculture visa, mandating Pacific workers get the same pay levels as Australians in the same job, and a minimum 30-hour work week among other changes.
Nationals leader David Littleproud has previously linked the 30-hour commitment to runaway inflation.
"Common sense tells you near-impossible new rules and increased costs on our farmers created by Labor will result in increased costs on food for families," he said in 2023.
The coalition has pledged to review the scheme, which now includes more than 30,000 workers in 500 workplaces in every state and territory.
On aid spending, the coalition is yet to detail future funding levels, fuelling suspicion of cuts.
"With little promised in terms of tax hikes or expenditure cuts, foreign aid must be a tempting target," ANU Development Policy Centre director Stephen Howes said in an article on Wednesday.
Mr Howes adds "it is hard to believe that aid to the Pacific would be cut" given the developing region's many needs and its strategic importance.
"There is a bipartisan consensus that protects and promotes aid to the Pacific, based on the belief that aid cuts to this region could lead to greater influence for China," he said.
The geopolitical contest in the Pacific is not as big an issue in 2025 as it was in 2022, when a proposed tie-up between China and Solomon Islands allowed Labor to argue the coalition had failed to engage.
This time around, the coalition makes the same charge of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's administration, given China has intensified attempts to secure security ties in the region.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
Important first State Budget following landslide election for ambitious Rita Saffioti
It's a no-brainer to suggest Thursday's State Budget is important for the re-elected Cook Labor Government. Every Budget is important. But this is the first Budget after Labor's smashing of the Liberals at the March State election. So: people who voted for Labor — and that's the majority of West Aussies — will be eagerly awaiting their 'post-election dividend' on Thursday. But equally, this is an important Budget for the hard-nosed and driven Rita Saffioti, who will deliver her second Budget and, as Treasurer, has been a driving force behind how the Government's billions in royalties and GST payments are divvied up for next financial year. So, these days, where's Saffioti at in terms of future ambitions? I'm reliably told Saffioti still harbours a burning desire to be Labor's next premier. The size of Roger Cook's win in March — for mine, Labor's greatest victory since it won power in 2017 — has made the likelihood of the Kwinana MP retiring before the next election less than it would otherwise have been. Nevertheless, despite Cook's line that he is 'only just getting started' in terms of his premiership, I am unconvinced he will recontest the 2029 poll. I'm told Saffioti is still hoping to lead Labor to the next election. Her main rival is Energy Minister Amber-Jade Sanderson. I can confidently predict that should Sanderson get the nod to be Premier — if Cook resigns before the next poll — Saffioti will retire from politics quicker than an Italian Nonna can knock up a plate of spaghetti bolognaise. If Saffioti is to become Labor's next leader, she needs to be an outstanding Treasurer. Thursday is a big day for her. There's a few things for her to achieve this Budget. Saffioti needs to make sure WA's AAA credit rating remains intact; she needs to appease the business community; she needs to appease the general community; and she needs to appease Caucus. It's Caucus — under instructions from unions — that will vote for Labor's next leader. And my mail (from senior Labor sources) is that a number of backbenchers are getting a bit testy about where the Government's billions are being spent. Hands up who remembers Colin Barnett's Emperor's Palace? Barnett's $26 million decision to relocate his office and the Cabinet room from rented accommodation in Governor Stirling Tower to the heritage-listed Hale House — instead of joining his ministers at Dumas House — was lambasted by Labor in opposition, in which Saffioti was finance spokesperson. Barnett moved into Hale House in 2012, at a time state debt had climbed from $3.6 billion to $19b under his rein. Labor pointed to the Hale House project as further proof of Barnett's and the Liberals' arrogance. Saffioti is the driving force behind a $217 million 'world-class motorsport street circuit.' That's what Labor called the project when it first publicly floated it in The Sunday Times in June last year. 'Imagine the noise, atmosphere and crowds as V8s fly around a new and specially designed racetrack in Burswood Park, just a stone's throw from the city. It'll be incredible,' Saffioti said at the time. These days, Saffioti calls it an entertainment precinct, because it includes a 20,000-seat amphitheatre for concerts and the like. Regardless of what you call it, backbenchers — and I'm sure members of the public who aren't revheads, are questioning whether that $217m could be better spent elsewhere. Will people think spending $65m on basing a new NRL side to Perth is a justifiable expense? Roger Cook might, but what about if you are one of 22,000 West Australians currently waiting, on average, 154 weeks for social housing? Labor's Budget will be inked in black — not red, like the Budgets of governments across the Nullarbor. The quarterly financial results released just a few weeks ago already show an operating surplus of $2.8b for the first nine months of this financial year. Saffioti will, on Budget day, detail spending on hundreds of millions of dollars in health, education and social housing. Great. But sometimes it takes just one project, one example of wasteful spending, to smear an administration. And mud sticks. Just ask The Emperor.
West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
Editorial: Cook and Saffioti ‘under pressure' as they prepare to deliver Labor's first post-election Budget
There's no way of knowing what might be running through the minds of Premier Roger Cook and Treasurer Rita Saffioti as they walk into Parliament House to deliver Labor's first post-election Budget on Thursday. If the people of Western Australia had any say in the matter, they might suggest the pair be humming the impossibly catchy melody to David Bowie and Queen's 1981 hit, Under Pressure. Because the pressure is certainly on for the re-elected Cook Government to deliver on a number of fronts — cost of living, health and housing, chief among them. Having been handed a landslide victory by WA voters, the Government must now offer real world solutions to the State's many problems. They've certainly got the means with an iron ore royalty windfall jacking the State's surplus to around $3.5 billion, $300 million higher than expected. Soaring gold prices have also helped boost the balance. But now is not the time to be frivolous, with many critics already pointing to Saffioti's $217 million Burswood Park racetrack as evidence Labor has its priorities wrong. Because while the Government may be cashed up, voters are not. And things are set to get worst with many WA households factoring in a 50 per cent hike in their annual electricity spend following speculation that Labor will dump its $400 power bill credits, which have been handed out for the past three years. It is expected to result in a $600 increase in annual electricity bills for the average household from next month. It would be very bad optics indeed if the Government opted to ditch the credits at a time when voters are still struggling with high cost of living, astronomical rent and mortgage pressures. Cook and Saffioti are no doubt well aware that there will be intense blowback if they do not offer some kind of fiscal solution to help fix WA's broken health system. Health Minister Meredith Hammat, in particular, will be hoping Saffioti has an ace up her sleeve when it comes to doing something about WA's seemingly ever-increasing hospital ramping figures. Housing is another major thorn in the Cook Government's side. WA currently holds the title of Australia's rough sleeping capital — a badge of shame given our State is the economic powerhouse of the nation. Experts also warn that without a major injection of funds, WA's housing crisis will likely hinder opportunities for economic growth and diversification into the future. The lack of adequate inner-city housing options could mean the skilled migrants that are expected to flood our shores as part of the predicted IT boom will simply bypass Perth in favour of other more affordable and better-equipped capitals. The Government holds all the cards, and the strings to a burgeoning purse. It's time to reward the confidence WA voters have placed in them by prioritising the needs of the community. To quote that earlier 80s hit, this may not be Labor's 'last dance' but it is certainly a government under pressure.
Sydney Morning Herald
8 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Australians must not follow Trump's road to ruin
It would appear as through Parnell McGuinness (' JD Vance chastised Europeans on free speech. He wasn't wrong ', June 8) and similar-minded conservative commentators such as Sky News After Dark, are continuing on their ideologically driven warpaths oblivious to the voice of the Australian people as expressed in the May 3 election. While these media darlings of the right still want to rant and rave and feed each other's egos with negativity, doom and gloom, the great mass of Australians are getting on with life, comfortable with their government which is safe, stable, secure and focused on traditional Australian positive values of a fair go, kindness and friendliness. To become relevant again and play a meaningful role in modern Australia, the right-wing media needs to jettison these antagonistic Trump-like approaches which were clearly rejected by the Australian people. Warren Marks, Richmond (Tas) Parnell Palme McGuinness warns against the suppression of ideas, quoting the US vice president's controversial advice to the Munich Security Conference in February that 'governments must listen to and respect their citizens'. However, she, like JD Vance, can't resist cherry-picking just which ideas and citizen groups are worthy of respect. She uses the case of the phrase 'identified as' being currently questioned and 'no longer [deemed] acceptable' by some activists, as an example of 'groups trying to control public conversation'. But is this really a 'kind of slippery censorship', or just the progression of an idea so it more accurately conveys the lived experience of a group? Wasn't JD Vance's speech realistically more of an attempt to control? It's a shame Palme McGuinness sabotages her own argument, adopts the culture war cover, and portrays progressive ideas as threats. Everyone counts, Parnell. Kerrie Wehbe, Blacktown EVs not for me After 60 years of driving, I recently explored the hybrid option (' The sweet spot: How to get the most out of your super and the pension', June 8). I currently drive a diesel SUV, and being a self-funded retiree, I receive no government pension. I spend about $100 per fortnight on fuel. The hybrid currently comes with no spare wheel and no tow-bar, which I need to tow my boat. The changeover figure is $12,000 in the dealer's favour. The cost of a one-off tow-bar is an extra $2000, and a spare wheel costs a couple of hundred more. That equates to about six years' driving if I continue to use diesel. There is no government incentive for me to change. Free rego for all EV-driving retirees might sway me. I think I will stay with my diesel as I am not that green. David Sayers, Gwandalan Undeserved reward This just brings discredit to the whole honours system (' Politicians, scientists and costume designer feature in King's awards ', June 8). The highest honours go to those who have already achieved a higher role in society, often just for doing what that job requires. Isn't achieving that position (and the salary that goes with it) reward enough? Meanwhile, those who make a real sacrifice and give true service to others might receive a lower honour (when nominated), if any at all. In the case of the honour given to Scott Morrison, one hopes that it is primarily because most ex-PMs have historically received a similar award. Otherwise, it wouldn't seem to be merited. The citation says it's for 'his leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic and his key role in the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal'. Doesn't that come with the job of being PM? His role in the pandemic overlooks the refusal to require those already wealthy to pay back JobKeeper payments for which they were ultimately found to be ineligible, the 'stroll-out' of vaccines, and the needless antagonism of China over the pandemic's origins (which damaged Australia's trade). And the value of the AUKUS deal remains questionable. And then there are the multiple ministries, robo-debt, claims to not hold a hose, and statements that women protesters were lucky not to be shot. I predict that this will prompt many other letters to the editor.
