logo
The anti-doomscroll phone that wants to mix it up with Apple

The anti-doomscroll phone that wants to mix it up with Apple

The Age13-07-2025
'When you talk about spec wars, we're not there fighting to win that. We're making holistic products that for the majority of users are really wonderful, well-balanced experiences,' said Nothing global marketing director Hollie Bishop.
'We truly believe that NothingOS is the best operating system for consumers, and for us as users as well. People might do comparisons, but how can you compare the Glyph Matrix experience? It doesn't exist anywhere else in the industry.'
'It's very functional, it still sits within our mission of making tech fun, but also making tech work for your life, instead fuelling the addiction of 'I need to pick up my phone every five seconds',' Bishop said.
The current version of NothingOS is built on top of Android 15, though a version built on Android 16 is due later this year. Its key differentiator from other flavours of Android is its range of features designed to manage your screen time. App icons can be automatically made monochrome or hidden in themed folders, while Nothing's widgets and sound effects all evoke the LCD displays and low-fi bloops of pre-internet tech.
The company has shied away from integrating AI as a creative tool, in contrast to basically every other phone-maker, but it does allow you to make use of Gemini or ChatGPT if you choose. It also launched its own AI suite this year called Essential Space, where you can store screenshots, photos or voice notes about things you want to remember, and have them automatically categorised, turned into reminders or suggested as calendar entries.
With Phone 3, Nothing is introducing Essential Search, which can surface information from your files and apps but can also answer questions using the web, with reference links provided.
Bishop said the phone had benefited from expansions in Nothing's hardware and camera teams and was competitive as a flagship experience, but that its more joyful elements and software offerings would continue to evolve as it would receive major updates for at least five years.
'We're a four-year-old company – the strides we've made in such a short time we're super proud of,' she said.
And the only way we're able to do that is because we're still agile – we're not trapped within multiple layers of process or held down through bureaucracy, which shows in our AI roadmap. From Essential Space opening in March, to Essential Search already being available.'
Meanwhile, the new Headphone 1 is a set of $550 noise-cancelling cans designed to hold up against the more expensive offerings from Apple and Sony. They feature enthusiast-favourite features that are often left out of expensive commuter headphones, such as support for wired high-res sound over USB-C or 3.5mm cable, and have custom drivers tuned by iconic British audio firm KEF.
When paired with a Nothing phone, they can integrate with Essential Space, but they also fully support AI voice assistants and a full array of settings and equaliser customisation on iPhones and other Androids. The Headphones feature a transparency mode to hear the world around you, and can intelligently adapt the level of noise-cancelling to save battery; with NC off, Nothing said they should last 80 hours on a charge.
Both devices carry Nothing's trademark approach to industrial design, with transparent panels exposing textured, overlapping elements, some of which represent the tech underneath and others of which are pure whimsy.
The controls also strike a balance between function and play; this is after all the same company that puts spinning fidget dials on the cases of its wireless earbuds. The Headphone 1 foregoes the touch controls and multifunction buttons of most rival over-ears, instead going for tactile controls that feel like something off a 90s disc player or compact synth. There's a roller for volume, a paddle for skipping tracks, a switch for power and a button that can summon an AI assistant or be set to any other function.
On Phone 3, aside from the expected smartphone controls, there's a glossy pill-shaped button to interact with Essential Space and a hidden pressure-sensitive zone on the back of the phone for activating the Glyph Matrix.
Nothing began in earbuds and moved to phones, and most recently waded into the burgeoning category of open-ear audio before tackling over-ear. Bishop said that the company's design team was full of ideas to put the Nothing spin on various products, but that it planned to be strategic.
'For us, it's a considered growth. We are very confident in our audio offering. A lot of the team internally have pleasure projects in the audio space; we've got a lot of DJs at the Nothing team. So we've made these products that we want to use, and that we don't think exist in the way that we see them in the industry,' she said.
'We could make anything. We have fan renders of laptops, tablets, all of these things. And we do have a roadmap of where we want to go. We've got a few other things coming up in the future that are more experimental and more playing into potentially new categories, or a new take on a current category.'
Loading
But on the subject of fans, some of the online Nothing community have had a viscerally negative reaction to Phone 3, variously blasting it as underpowered, criticising the price relative to previous Nothing products, complaining about the loss of the glyph lights, and rejecting the visual design as ugly.
Bishop said that the team enjoyed seeing any discussion of the aesthetics ('design should make you feel something, if it doesn't, then we're doing something wrong'), but that some of the reaction was an understandable response to the device targeting a different market.
'It's a stake in the ground. If [we're going to be] a tech company that really is different, we need to have a product offering for all consumer types. The choices we've made with Phone 3 is a flagship experience. If it's [not for you] we have the 3a, and the 3a Pro,' she said.
'We've recognised that we have different markets with different needs, and there are certain more price-sensitive markets that have been very vocal about Phone 3. But we're a global company, so we're open to hear the feedback, and we're always learning.'
Specifically regarding the Glyph Matrix, Bishop said she expected reactions to adjust once the phone was in the wild. The original Glyph Lights had been ridiculed before launch but had since seen significant use. She said the system would continue to evolve, and future products could potentially return to the lights or feature something new.
'We're not in a box – we can be dynamic and evolve. Depending on the product offering or the price point offering, or what the consumer's need is, we can offer different options which still have the same foundation: making tech that is more for your life.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Huge payout may be on the cards after Apple and Google's Epic loss
Huge payout may be on the cards after Apple and Google's Epic loss

7NEWS

time11 hours ago

  • 7NEWS

Huge payout may be on the cards after Apple and Google's Epic loss

Tech giants Apple and Google have been found to have engaged in anti-competitive conduct, paving the way for a payout that could be worth hundreds of millions of dollars. Epic Games, the developer of popular online game Fortnite, sued the two tech giants in the Federal Court, claiming they engaged in anti-competitive and unconscionable conduct against those developing apps distributed through iOS and Android devices. The lawsuit was launched after Epic was booted from Apple's App Store and Google's Play Store after attempting to introduce its own payment system into Fortnite games in August 2020. Justice Jonathan Beach on Tuesday found Apple and Google had breached Australia's competition laws, upholding key elements of Epic's case. Apple had a 'substantial degree of market power' because of the restrictions placed on in-app payment systems and the distribution of iOS compatible apps, he said. Google also had a significant degree of market power and was the predominant supplier of Android apps, the court was told. The tech companies' dominance had the effect of substantially lessening competition and breached Australia's competition laws, Beach found. However, he rejected Epic's argument Apple had engaged in unconscionable conduct. Beach also found in favour of a class action lawsuit comprising Australian developers and gamers who claimed Apple and Google's monopolistic practices led to inflated prices. The app developers had to pay higher commissions than they otherwise would have if there was more competition in the market Lawyers for the plaintiffs welcomed the result as a significant win for consumer rights and digital fairness that could have global implications for how digital platforms operate. 'This judgment is a turning point,' Kimi Nishimura from Maurice Blackburn Lawyers said. 'It sends a clear message that even the most powerful corporations must play by the rules and respect the rights of consumers and developers alike.' The lawyers said the decision could result in 'one of the largest class action payouts in Australian legal history with potential compensation of several hundreds of millions of dollars to come from two global corporate Goliaths'. The parties have been given time to consider the 2000-page judgment and will return to the Federal Court at a later date to determine compensation and directives aimed at increasing transparency. A Google spokesperson said the company disagreed with the court's characterisation of its billing policies and practices and would review the full decision. Apple welcomed the 'rejection of some of Epic's claims, however, we strongly disagree with the court's ruling on others.' Epic Games took to social media to herald the result and say Fortnite would return to iOS soon. 'A federal judge just found that Apple and Google both engaged in anti-competitive conduct,' the company wrote. 'Another HUGE Win for Epic Games!' Epic won a separate US case against Google in 2023 after a jury found it had engaged in anti-trust conduct through the Google Play Store. It was less successful in its case against Apple, although the court found the tech giant had engaged in anti-competitive conduct. Apple has also been forced to implement changes to its App Store in Europe, including allowing third-party payment systems.

Huge payout tipped after Apple and Google's Epic loss
Huge payout tipped after Apple and Google's Epic loss

The Advertiser

time11 hours ago

  • The Advertiser

Huge payout tipped after Apple and Google's Epic loss

Tech giants Apple and Google have been found to have engaged in anti-competitive conduct, paving the way for a payout that could be worth hundreds of millions of dollars. Epic Games, the developer of popular online game Fortnite, sued the two tech giants in the Federal Court, claiming they engaged in anti-competitive and unconscionable conduct against those developing apps distributed through iOS and Android devices. The lawsuit was launched after Epic was booted from Apple's App Store and Google's Play Store after attempting to introduce its own payment system into Fortnite games in August 2020. Justice Jonathan Beach on Tuesday found Apple and Google had breached Australia's competition laws, upholding key elements of Epic's case. Apple had a "substantial degree of market power" because of the restrictions placed on in-app payment systems and the distribution of iOS compatible apps, he said. Google also had a significant degree of market power and was the predominant supplier of Android apps, the court was told. The tech companies' dominance had the effect of substantially lessening competition and breached Australia's competition laws, Justice Beach found. However, he rejected Epic's argument Apple had engaged in unconscionable conduct. Justice Beach also found in favour of a class action lawsuit comprising Australian developers and gamers who claimed Apple and Google's monopolistic practices led to inflated prices. The app developers had to pay higher commissions than they otherwise would have if there was more competition in the market Lawyers for the plaintiffs welcomed the result as a significant win for consumer rights and digital fairness that could have global implications for how digital platforms operate. "This judgment is a turning point," said Kimi Nishimura from Maurice Blackburn Lawyers. "It sends a clear message that even the most powerful corporations must play by the rules and respect the rights of consumers and developers alike." The lawyers said the decision could result in "one of the largest class action payouts in Australian legal history with potential compensation of several hundreds of millions of dollars to come from two global corporate Goliaths". The parties have been given time to consider the 2000-page judgment and will return to the Federal Court at a later date to determine compensation and directives aimed at increasing transparency. A Google spokesperson said the company disagreed with the court's characterisation of its billing policies and practices and would review the full decision. Apple welcomed the "rejection of some of Epic's claims, however, we strongly disagree with the court's ruling on others." Epic Games took to social media to herald the result and say Fortnite would return to iOS soon. "A federal judge just found that Apple and Google both engaged in anti-competitive conduct," the company wrote. "Another HUGE Win for Epic Games!" Epic won a separate US case against Google in 2023 after a jury found it had engaged in anti-trust conduct through the Google Play Store. It was less successful in its case against Apple, although the court found the tech giant had engaged in anti-competitive conduct. Apple has also been forced to implement changes to its App Store in Europe, including allowing third-party payment systems. Tech giants Apple and Google have been found to have engaged in anti-competitive conduct, paving the way for a payout that could be worth hundreds of millions of dollars. Epic Games, the developer of popular online game Fortnite, sued the two tech giants in the Federal Court, claiming they engaged in anti-competitive and unconscionable conduct against those developing apps distributed through iOS and Android devices. The lawsuit was launched after Epic was booted from Apple's App Store and Google's Play Store after attempting to introduce its own payment system into Fortnite games in August 2020. Justice Jonathan Beach on Tuesday found Apple and Google had breached Australia's competition laws, upholding key elements of Epic's case. Apple had a "substantial degree of market power" because of the restrictions placed on in-app payment systems and the distribution of iOS compatible apps, he said. Google also had a significant degree of market power and was the predominant supplier of Android apps, the court was told. The tech companies' dominance had the effect of substantially lessening competition and breached Australia's competition laws, Justice Beach found. However, he rejected Epic's argument Apple had engaged in unconscionable conduct. Justice Beach also found in favour of a class action lawsuit comprising Australian developers and gamers who claimed Apple and Google's monopolistic practices led to inflated prices. The app developers had to pay higher commissions than they otherwise would have if there was more competition in the market Lawyers for the plaintiffs welcomed the result as a significant win for consumer rights and digital fairness that could have global implications for how digital platforms operate. "This judgment is a turning point," said Kimi Nishimura from Maurice Blackburn Lawyers. "It sends a clear message that even the most powerful corporations must play by the rules and respect the rights of consumers and developers alike." The lawyers said the decision could result in "one of the largest class action payouts in Australian legal history with potential compensation of several hundreds of millions of dollars to come from two global corporate Goliaths". The parties have been given time to consider the 2000-page judgment and will return to the Federal Court at a later date to determine compensation and directives aimed at increasing transparency. A Google spokesperson said the company disagreed with the court's characterisation of its billing policies and practices and would review the full decision. Apple welcomed the "rejection of some of Epic's claims, however, we strongly disagree with the court's ruling on others." Epic Games took to social media to herald the result and say Fortnite would return to iOS soon. "A federal judge just found that Apple and Google both engaged in anti-competitive conduct," the company wrote. "Another HUGE Win for Epic Games!" Epic won a separate US case against Google in 2023 after a jury found it had engaged in anti-trust conduct through the Google Play Store. It was less successful in its case against Apple, although the court found the tech giant had engaged in anti-competitive conduct. Apple has also been forced to implement changes to its App Store in Europe, including allowing third-party payment systems. Tech giants Apple and Google have been found to have engaged in anti-competitive conduct, paving the way for a payout that could be worth hundreds of millions of dollars. Epic Games, the developer of popular online game Fortnite, sued the two tech giants in the Federal Court, claiming they engaged in anti-competitive and unconscionable conduct against those developing apps distributed through iOS and Android devices. The lawsuit was launched after Epic was booted from Apple's App Store and Google's Play Store after attempting to introduce its own payment system into Fortnite games in August 2020. Justice Jonathan Beach on Tuesday found Apple and Google had breached Australia's competition laws, upholding key elements of Epic's case. Apple had a "substantial degree of market power" because of the restrictions placed on in-app payment systems and the distribution of iOS compatible apps, he said. Google also had a significant degree of market power and was the predominant supplier of Android apps, the court was told. The tech companies' dominance had the effect of substantially lessening competition and breached Australia's competition laws, Justice Beach found. However, he rejected Epic's argument Apple had engaged in unconscionable conduct. Justice Beach also found in favour of a class action lawsuit comprising Australian developers and gamers who claimed Apple and Google's monopolistic practices led to inflated prices. The app developers had to pay higher commissions than they otherwise would have if there was more competition in the market Lawyers for the plaintiffs welcomed the result as a significant win for consumer rights and digital fairness that could have global implications for how digital platforms operate. "This judgment is a turning point," said Kimi Nishimura from Maurice Blackburn Lawyers. "It sends a clear message that even the most powerful corporations must play by the rules and respect the rights of consumers and developers alike." The lawyers said the decision could result in "one of the largest class action payouts in Australian legal history with potential compensation of several hundreds of millions of dollars to come from two global corporate Goliaths". The parties have been given time to consider the 2000-page judgment and will return to the Federal Court at a later date to determine compensation and directives aimed at increasing transparency. A Google spokesperson said the company disagreed with the court's characterisation of its billing policies and practices and would review the full decision. Apple welcomed the "rejection of some of Epic's claims, however, we strongly disagree with the court's ruling on others." Epic Games took to social media to herald the result and say Fortnite would return to iOS soon. "A federal judge just found that Apple and Google both engaged in anti-competitive conduct," the company wrote. "Another HUGE Win for Epic Games!" Epic won a separate US case against Google in 2023 after a jury found it had engaged in anti-trust conduct through the Google Play Store. It was less successful in its case against Apple, although the court found the tech giant had engaged in anti-competitive conduct. Apple has also been forced to implement changes to its App Store in Europe, including allowing third-party payment systems. Tech giants Apple and Google have been found to have engaged in anti-competitive conduct, paving the way for a payout that could be worth hundreds of millions of dollars. Epic Games, the developer of popular online game Fortnite, sued the two tech giants in the Federal Court, claiming they engaged in anti-competitive and unconscionable conduct against those developing apps distributed through iOS and Android devices. The lawsuit was launched after Epic was booted from Apple's App Store and Google's Play Store after attempting to introduce its own payment system into Fortnite games in August 2020. Justice Jonathan Beach on Tuesday found Apple and Google had breached Australia's competition laws, upholding key elements of Epic's case. Apple had a "substantial degree of market power" because of the restrictions placed on in-app payment systems and the distribution of iOS compatible apps, he said. Google also had a significant degree of market power and was the predominant supplier of Android apps, the court was told. The tech companies' dominance had the effect of substantially lessening competition and breached Australia's competition laws, Justice Beach found. However, he rejected Epic's argument Apple had engaged in unconscionable conduct. Justice Beach also found in favour of a class action lawsuit comprising Australian developers and gamers who claimed Apple and Google's monopolistic practices led to inflated prices. The app developers had to pay higher commissions than they otherwise would have if there was more competition in the market Lawyers for the plaintiffs welcomed the result as a significant win for consumer rights and digital fairness that could have global implications for how digital platforms operate. "This judgment is a turning point," said Kimi Nishimura from Maurice Blackburn Lawyers. "It sends a clear message that even the most powerful corporations must play by the rules and respect the rights of consumers and developers alike." The lawyers said the decision could result in "one of the largest class action payouts in Australian legal history with potential compensation of several hundreds of millions of dollars to come from two global corporate Goliaths". The parties have been given time to consider the 2000-page judgment and will return to the Federal Court at a later date to determine compensation and directives aimed at increasing transparency. A Google spokesperson said the company disagreed with the court's characterisation of its billing policies and practices and would review the full decision. Apple welcomed the "rejection of some of Epic's claims, however, we strongly disagree with the court's ruling on others." Epic Games took to social media to herald the result and say Fortnite would return to iOS soon. "A federal judge just found that Apple and Google both engaged in anti-competitive conduct," the company wrote. "Another HUGE Win for Epic Games!" Epic won a separate US case against Google in 2023 after a jury found it had engaged in anti-trust conduct through the Google Play Store. It was less successful in its case against Apple, although the court found the tech giant had engaged in anti-competitive conduct. Apple has also been forced to implement changes to its App Store in Europe, including allowing third-party payment systems.

Apple, Google lose out to Fortnite developer in landmark ruling
Apple, Google lose out to Fortnite developer in landmark ruling

Sydney Morning Herald

time11 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Apple, Google lose out to Fortnite developer in landmark ruling

Tech giants Apple and Google have lost a landmark Federal Court trial in a judgment that will likely reshape Australia's digital app stores and potentially lead to one of the largest class action payouts in Australian history. In a 2000-page judgment on Tuesday, Justice Jonathan Beach ruled largely against the tech companies, finding they abused their market power to reduce competition. He rejected claims from Fortnite maker Epic Games, however, that Apple and Google had breached consumer law or engaged in unconscionable conduct. The high-stakes legal trial began five years ago as four separate cases: Epic vs Apple, a class action lawsuit brought by small Australian app developers against Apple dubbed 'Anthony v Apple', and two separate cases against Google. Each case dealt with overlapping issues, so they were heard as one 16-week trial last year. The trial centred largely around Apple and Google's fee that it takes from app purchases – in many cases a cut of up to 30 per cent – and allegations that the companies maintained an illegal monopoly over their app stores. The issues date to August 2020 when Epic implemented a direct payment option in Fortnite, bypassing Apple's 30 per cent commission fee. Apple, in response, kicked Fortnite off its App Store for breaching its rules, and Epic then filed suits in Australia against both Apple and Google in November 2020. Loading Epic argued that Apple and Google created 'walled gardens', effectively locking out competition, and misused their market power in breach of Australian competition law. 'The industry is being strangled by a few gatekeepers imposing insane amounts of control and extracting huge taxes, which not only raise prices for consumers but also make a lot of kinds of products just unviable,' Epic boss Tim Sweeney said in a past interview. Sweeney last year flew in from the US to appear at the trial. Apple and Google had argued that they do not have a monopoly, and that their app store restrictions are necessary for privacy and security reasons.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store