
Istanbul's 'suitcase trade' stalls as African merchants face crackdown
Porters roam the narrow streets of Laleli in central Istanbul carrying parcels ready for shipment to customers all over the world.
The maze of alleys that lead down to the Sea of Marmara have long been the centre of the "suitcase trade" to sub-Saharan Africa, a route through which merchants carry goods back and forth in their baggage.
But Laleli's informal shipping scene, once a bustling hub of cross-continental trade, is now facing growing pressure from rising costs and tougher residency rules imposed by Turkish authorities.
African traders, who helped drive demand for Turkish goods through the "kargo" system -- small-scale shipping services between Turkish wholesalers and buyers across Africa -- say business has slumped, even as official export figures continue to rise.
- Facing pressure -
While some still make round trips, most trade now moves through shipping services.
AFP | Yasin AKGUL
For agents like Fadil Bayero -- a Cameroonian who runs a kargo business that ships clothing, cosmetics and home textiles from Turkey to clients across Africa -- business is slow.
Turkish products have a very good reputation in Africa, he said.
"Before this room was filled to the ceiling. Today it is half-empty," the 39-year-old said.
Like many Africans in the neighbourhood, he claimed that shipments have dropped, even as Turkish exports to Africa have generally soared -- from $11.5 billion (10.1 billion euros) in 2017 to $19.4 billion last year.
Turkish textiles, once known for their affordability, have grown more expensive in recent years.
Merchants say inflation -- above 35 percent since late 2021 -- has pushed African buyers toward cheaper suppliers in China and Egypt.
But for Bayero, the explanation lies elsewhere.
"It's not inflation that's the problem, it's the arrests. Many people have been deported," he said.
- 'Everything is empty' -
Since 2022, Turkey's migration policy has toughened, with the authorities blocking new residence permit applications in several districts of Istanbul, including Fatih, where Laleli is located.
AFP | Yasin AKGUL
The goal is to limit the proportion of foreigners to 20 percent per neighbourhood.
"The stores, the streets, everything is empty now," said Franck, one of Bayero's colleagues.
"Look out the window -- the sellers sit all day drinking tea while waiting for customers."
A few streets away, Shamsu Abdullahi examined his spreadsheets.
In his dimly lit room, dozens of bundles are stacked on the white tiled floor, awaiting shipment.
Since January, he and his two colleagues have shipped over 20 tons of goods by air freight and filled the equivalent of 15 maritime containers.
The Nigerian has also made around 15 round trips to his homeland, bringing 80 kilos of goods with him on each journey.
"My residence permit expires in two months, and I think the authorities won't renew it," he said.
He and his associates generate over a million euros a year in revenue.
"It's money spent in Turkey that fuels the local economy," he said.
- 'Golden age' -
Historian Issouf Binate, a lecturer at Alassane Ouattara University in the Ivory Coast, said much of the trade is informal, making it hard to track.
"It's difficult to provide figures on the volume of Turkey's exports to Africa because many businesses are informal," he said.
AFP | Yasin AKGUL
"Kargos" are "transitional businesses", with improvised activity shared between friends or family members.
Many in Laleli now believe that the golden age of the "kargo" and suitcase trading is over.
"In one year we went from about three tons of shipments per week to 1.5," said a young Congolese who has lived in Istanbul for five years and asked not to be named.
"Even if we still manage to find low-cost products, we cannot compete with China," he added.
Arslan Arslan, a Turkish merchant who sells African dresses a few metres away, painted the same picture.
"Before, I had customers from morning to evening... but the authorities sent them back."
Now Arslan searches for his African customers on social media.
"I'm on Telegram, Instagram, Facebook. But here, everything has become expensive," he said.
"I've lost 70 percent of my revenue in a year."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Maverick
9 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Novel carbon credits initiative gives Zimbabwe an edge, but concerns remain over cost barriers
A new blockchain-based carbon credit registry could have 'profound' implications, but the costs are prohibitive and the risks of greenwashing remain. Zimbabwe's establishment in May of a regulatory body and launch of a blockchain-based platform for carbon credits – the first of its kind worldwide – has received plaudits from some experts, who say the move will enhance transparency and also make the southern African country a leader in the burgeoning field. However, some are wary that high costs will deter investment. Carbon credits, also known as carbon offsets, are tradeable units in the form of a certificate or permit that represents the emission, reduction or removal of one metric ton of carbon dioxide or equivalent greenhouse gas into the atmosphere in exchange for a monetary payment. There are two main types of carbon credit, namely compliance credits, which are issued under regulated carbon markets, and voluntary credits, which are largely unregulated. Zimbabwe's digital platform has three components, which include the general website for the Zimbabwe Carbon Markets Authority, which oversees all issues related to carbon credits, and the Zimbabwe Carbon Registry, in compliance with the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. This requires parties participating in the new market mechanism to have a national registry or have access to a registry to track all the carbon credits generated within their jurisdiction. A third component of the platform, which the Ministry of Environment, Climate and Wildlife says is still under development, is the marketplace that will allow buyers to directly purchase credits from the Zimbabwe Carbon Registry, 'eliminating the need for third-party brokers, thereby ensuring that project developers accrue the maximum benefits possible'. In response to questions on the initiative, permanent secretary in the ministry Tadeus Chifamba told Daily Maverick, 'This is critical in making sure that carbon credits generated in Zimbabwe are of the highest quality and standards and fetch the highest possible price on the international market, thereby maximising benefits for the country and communities.' 'Profound implications' According to global carbon market players, Zimbabwe is ranked the third-largest contributor of carbon credits in Africa, providing nearly 13%, behind Kenya and Gabon. In 2023, the government cancelled carbon credit projects and compelled operators to re-register, demanding up to 50% of revenue, following reports of fraudulent activities by a local project, Carbon Green Africa, which was sponsored by Swiss-based South Pole, one of the world's biggest project development firms. Under the new system, Zimbabwe becomes the first country to do away with the issuance and use of voluntary credits, transitioning to a compliance-only market by 2026, but credits issued in the country can still be used for voluntary purposes, with the proviso that they must comply with the higher quality assurance and accountability measures of the compliance market. Kudakwashe Manyanga is the founder and CEO of the Africa Institute for Carbon Trading and an industry expert. He told Daily Maverick that while the global carbon credit market has largely been voluntary, establishing a robust regulatory framework 'can provide necessary oversight and legitimacy'. 'A blockchain-based system can help ensure that carbon credits are genuinely produced, verified and retired, thereby increasing the integrity of the market and potentially attracting more participants. The implications for Zimbabwe could be profound. 'By implementing a well-regulated carbon market with a transparent registry, Zimbabwe is likely to attract both local and international investments in carbon reduction projects. Investors are increasingly seeking assurance that their contributions lead to tangible environmental benefits. A credible carbon registry could enhance Zimbabwe's attractiveness as a destination for climate finance, positioning the country as a leader in sustainable development in the region.' Mnanyanga, however, said the high fees associated with participating in the market were prohibitive and could sideline community-based projects, which he said often lacked adequate funding. The Statutory Instrument on Carbon trading regulations [ S.I. 48 Carbon Trading (General) Regulations of 2025 ] sets out various fees required for participation in the industry. For instance, there are three project categories. The registration fee for the biggest project is US$20,000, the second-biggest is $15,000 and the third-biggest is $10,000. There are other fees, including a first-time registration fee as a project developer, which is set at $5,000 for foreigners and $2,500 for locals. Greenwashing risks Michael Musgrave, of Newt Natural Capital, an advisory firm, is an academic and expert in carbon finance. He agrees that the costs involved in Zimbabwe's new system are prohibitive and says that in an industry which does not yet have many experts, overregulation is not the answer to ensuring that problems like greenwashing – a practice in which corporates may make unsubstantiated claims that their products are environmentally friendly or have greater positive environmental impact than they really do – do not occur. 'There are barriers in place in terms of regulation and certification, and government regulations introducing another layer of costs just make carbon credits less viable. The problems around monitoring, reporting and verification are not unique to Zimbabwe or Africa; they are problems that every carbon project experiences and we need as an industry to solve the problems globally, or at least on the continent, by training or upskilling people and having more expertise applied to the implementation of these projects, not by introducing more regulations. 'I really don't see that as a way of reducing greenwashing. There is a role for government to play, but I think it is a small regulatory role that should be well thought out and avoid the approach of just saying, 'well, everybody else is making money and we are not making money and therefore we will introduce regulations that enable us to make money. The justification is that they are looking out for the interests of Zimbabweans, but this is hardly the case.' The Centre for Natural Resource Governance is a local environmental advocacy group. In its statement on the latest development, the civic organisation also bemoaned that upfront fees required to establish and maintain carbon credit projects could be a hurdle for Zimbabwean businesses and organisations, saying that a lack of financial resources might limit their ability to invest in renewable energy projects or implement carbon emissions reduction strategies. 'Despite the potential financial windfalls that can accrue from carbon trading, we must state that it remains a false solution to climate change and is subject to manipulation by the private sector. Governments can also generate massive revenues for and on behalf of communities without ever ensuring the benefits extend to the communities,' the organisation said. 'National asset' Permanent secretary Chifamba dismissed concerns that the costs were a barrier to entry and that local communities were disadvantaged, saying the regulations actually protected communities 'from prejudice of the past', under the voluntary trade, which he said lacked transparency. 'It costs money for the government of Zimbabwe to assess proposed projects before approval or rejection in line with internationally set environmental integrity, social safeguards and sustainable development guidelines. The government cannot be expected to take money from treasury to subsidise profit-making project developers. 'Additionally, the export of carbon credits should be recognised as the export of any other asset, such as gold, diamonds or platinum and should be subject to royalties and export taxes by the government. These are national assets which belong to all Zimbabweans and there should be a mechanism to ensure that treasury or a designated national fund set out for the purposes of addressing climate change benefits from a certain percentage of the share of proceeds,' he said. Dr Francis Vorhies, the director of Stellenbosch University's African Wildlife Economy Institute and a research associate at the Wildlife Conservation Research Unit at Oxford University, told Daily Maverick that the distribution of revenue from carbon credits was a domestic issue. He believed that in Zimbabwe, the arrangements between government, business and landowners, as well as local communities, could be discussed and debated robustly for the benefit of all parties. Dr Vorhies said that while the initiative could give Zimbabwe a competitive edge because of its technical sophistication, which could guarantee transparency, Zimbabwe's global image could be a setback. 'The country does not have the best of reputations for doing business, and so investors may fear that such a state-run mechanism risks being too burdensome and too costly, and thus stay away.' DM

IOL News
12 hours ago
- IOL News
Airlines less optimistic for 2025, facing 'headwinds': IATA
Willie Walsh, Director General of the International Air Transport Association (IATA), speaks during a press conference at the IATA annual general meeting and World Air Transport Summit (WATS) in New Delhi on June 2, 2025 Image: AFP Airlines on Monday revised down their traffic and profit forecasts for 2025, citing "headwinds" for the global economy, with industry chiefs warning of the risk of increased tariffs impacting the sector. The International Air Transport Association (IATA) estimates fewer than five billion air journeys will take place this year, compared with the previously forecast 5.22 billion. "The first half of 2025 has brought significant uncertainties to global markets," IATA's Director General Willie Walsh told its annual general meeting in New Delhi. But he added: "Considering the headwinds, it's a strong result that demonstrates the resilience that airlines have worked hard to fortify." Cumulative airline profits will reach $36 billion (R646bn) this year, $600 million less than expected, IATA said. Commercial aviation revenues are expected to remain below the $1 trillion forecast in the previous December projections, with IATA now reporting $979bn. Walsh, addressing IATA delegates, called for the aviation sector to be spared from increased tariffs - though he did not name US President Donald Trump, who unveiled sweeping duties on trading partners in April. 'Trade tensions' While looking at profits, Walsh warned that "perspective is critical" to put industry-wide figures into context, saying that per passenger, it was still a narrow margin. "It's still a thin buffer and any new tax, increase in airport or navigation charge, demand shock or costly regulation will quickly put the industry's resilience to the test," he said. "Policymakers who rely on airlines as the core of a value chain that employs 86.5 million people and supports 3.9 percent of global economic activity must keep this clearly in focus." The organisation also expects 69 million tonnes of cargo to be transported by air this year, down from the 72.5 million previously expected. A barrel of Brent North Sea crude, the international benchmark, stands below $65 as a result of Trump's tariffs, his call to "drill baby drill" and especially a decision by OPEC+ to hike crude output quotas. This represents an immediate boon for airlines. Jet fuel is expected to average $86 a barrel in 2025, well below the $99 average in 2024, "accounting for 25.8 percent of all operating costs", IATA added. The 2025 total fuel bill of $236 billion is $25 billion lower than in 2024. Among the "risks" weighing on commercial aviation, IATA identified conflicts such as the war in Ukraine, as well as "trade tensions". "Tariffs and prolonged trade wars dampen demand for air cargo and potentially travel," IATA said. "Additionally, the uncertainty over how the Trump administration's trade policies will evolve could hold back critical business decisions that drive economic activity, and with it the demand for air cargo and business travel." AFP

TimesLIVE
13 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Nigeria imports Danish cows in bid to slash $1.5bn milk import bill
Nigeria is importing dairy cattle from Denmark as it aims to double its milk output within five years, part of a plan to cut dairy imports that cost the country $1.5bn (R26.78bn) a year, livestock minister Idi Maiha said on Monday. Despite boasting one of Africa's largest cattle populations, Nigeria's milk output of 700,000 tonnes a year lags its annual consumption of 1.6-million tonnes. This shortfall means the country imports about 60% of its milk. 'Our goal is ambitious but achievable; to double Nigeria's milk production from 700,000 tonnes to 1.4-million tonnes annually in the next five years,' he said. Maiha said Nigeria's cattle population, exceeding 20-million, consists largely of low-yield pastoralist breeds. A Nigerian farm has already imported more than 200 heifers from Denmark, building its herd through intensive breeding, Maiha said. So far, eight new pasture species have been registered, the first in 48 years, and a national strategy for animal genetic resources with support from the Food and Agriculture Organisation has been launched, he said. 'With more than 20.9-million cattle, 60-million sheep, and 1.4-million goats already, we are not starting from zero, we are building from strength,' Maiha said.