logo
Anger as Nationwide refuses members a binding vote on boss's 43% pay hike

Anger as Nationwide refuses members a binding vote on boss's 43% pay hike

Yahoo6 hours ago
Nationwide is under fire for refusing to give members a binding vote on a 43% pay rise for its chief executive, Debbie Crosbie, that could mean her pay package reaches up to £7m.
Campaigners say it leaves the building society's members with fewer rights than shareholders of listed UK banks and exposes a worrying 'loophole' in building society rules.
Nationwide says that after its £2.9bn takeover of Virgin Money, Crosbie's pay should compete with that offered by banks such as Lloyds and NatWest. However, the board is offering members only an 'advisory' vote at its annual general meeting (AGM) on 25 July, meaning there are no repercussions if they reject it.
Related: Virgin Money mortgage holders cry foul over owner Nationwide's better deals
Large high street banks are required to hold a binding vote on their pay policies at least once every three years, under laws governing large businesses listed on the London Stock Exchange. If shareholders reject the policy, they have to revert to the old pay plan and put a revised pay deal to shareholders within 12 months.
Nationwide could do the same, but said it is already going further than required under the Building Societies Act, which requires binding votes only for the election of board members.
A spokesperson said: 'As part of our commitment to member engagement and transparency, Nationwide voluntarily puts the remuneration policy to the membership on an advisory basis at the AGM and we currently have no plans to change this approach.'
While Nationwide has never held a binding vote on pay, it has also never proposed such a large renumeration package for its chief executive, which could result in a record payout, up from £4.8m now to £7m. That is close behind NatWest Group, which in April secured backing for a package worth up to £7.7m for its chief executive, Paul Thwaite.
Luke Hildyard, the director of the High Pay Centre thinktank, described the situation as a 'loophole in the governance of building societies'.
'Mutuals are supposed to have a more collective approach to business than corporate banks, but while the banks are required to revise pay policies that are rejected by a majority of shareholders, and provide a response to the stock market if more than 20% vote against, building societies can in theory ignore their members,' he said.
'The Nationwide case, where there may be significant discomfort with the huge pay out planned for the chief executive, highlights the need for the loophole to be closed.'
Crosbie's £7m pay deal has angered some members. 'I'm a Nationwide customer and didn't know about this? Please send me a voting form immediately,' one posted on X. 'Building societies are supposed to be the good guys. The apple has fallen far from the tree,' another said.
Sara Hall, the co-executive director at the campaign group Positive Money, said Nationwide 'hiking its chief executive's pay because that's what the big banks are doing would be completely at odds with what building societies are supposed to stand for'.
The move is 'counterintuitive for an institution whose main selling point is putting its customers before shareholders', Hall added.
A Nationwide spokesperson pushed back against the criticism, saying its pay proposals – although advisory – 'always received overwhelming member support'.
'Any suggestion that we would ever ignore a vote against it is simply ridiculous. We always consider their views and at the last AGM over 94% of votes were in favour of the proposed remuneration policy,' they said.
'Nationwide delivered record member value last year, we are still first for customer satisfaction among high street banks, and more people switched their current accounts to Nationwide than to any other brand.
'We have managed this because we can attract, retain and motivate talented leaders. Even after the changes that are being proposed at the AGM, Nationwide's chief executive will still be paid substantially less than the other large banks.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bessent says tariffs will ‘boomerang' to ‘Liberation Day' levels if countries fail to negotiate deals
Bessent says tariffs will ‘boomerang' to ‘Liberation Day' levels if countries fail to negotiate deals

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Bessent says tariffs will ‘boomerang' to ‘Liberation Day' levels if countries fail to negotiate deals

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said tariff letters will be sent to about 100 countries over the next several days, as the Trump administration's 90-day tariff pause comes to an end Wednesday. 'If you don't move things along, then on August 1 you will boomerang back to your April 2 tariff level,' Bessent said about trading partners Sunday on CNN's 'State of the Union with Dana Bash.' President Donald Trump has suggested the letters would include duty rates at the current 10% baseline, or as extensive as 70%. Bessent said Sunday the United States would not impose 70% tariff rates on major trading partners. Bessent said that about 100 letters will be sent to small countries 'where we don't have very much trade,' many of which are 'already at the baseline 10%.' Trump on Friday touted letters as the 'better' option for countries that fail to negotiate deals before the July 9 deadline. On April 9, Trump announced a complete three-month pause on all the 'reciprocal' tariffs after insisting historically high tariffs were here to stay. Later that month, he told Time magazine that he had already struck 200 trade deals but declined to say with whom. So far, Trump has only announced deals with three countries: the United Kingdom, which maintained a 10% tariff rate; China, which temporarily paused sky-high duties on most goods from 145% to 30%; and a minimum 20% tariff on goods from Vietnam. In response to the three deals being described as 'frameworks,' Bessent said the upcoming letters 'will set their tariff rates. So we will have 100 done in the next few days.' 'Many of these countries never even contacted us,' he said, adding that 'We have the leverage in this situation,' as the country facing a trading deficit. Bessent said there may be 'several big announcements' this week, but declined to name countries that could reach deals. Bessent pushed back against August 1 as a new deadline. He also described the administration's plan as applying 'maximum pressure.' 'It's not a new deadline. We are saying, 'This is when it's happening. If you want to speed things up, have at it. If you want to back to the old rate, that's your choice,'' Bessent said about America's trading partners, and used the European Union as an example of countries coming to the table after Trump threatened 50% tariffs on EU imports. Economists have warned that Trump's trade war, especially the wide-ranging tariffs on Chinese imports, will increase costs for consumers. Some companies, including Walmart, have said they will raise prices for customers despite pushback from Trump. 'We have seen no inflation so far,' Bessent said on 'Fox News Sunday,' calling such projections 'misinformation' and 'tariff derangement syndrome.' Bessent and other Trump officials have repeatedly argued in recent months that countries like China would bear the cost of tariffs. US wholesale inflation rose slightly in May, driven in part by costlier goods, though tariff-related effects were largely muted. The Producer Price Index, a closely watched measurement of wholesale inflation, showed that prices paid to producers rose 0.1% in May, lifting the annual rate to 2.6%, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data released in June. Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, who has blasted Bessent for undermining the economic impact of tariffs, said Sunday on ABC's 'This Week' that tariffs 'will probably collect some revenue' but would come at the expense of higher inflation and less competitiveness for American producers. Also appearing on 'This Week,' Stephen Miran, chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, said there was no 'lasting evidence' that tariffs imposed on China during Trump's first term hurt the economy and the administration has only 'repeated the same performance' this year. 'Tariff revenue is pouring in. There's no sign of any economically significant inflation whatsoever and job creation remains healthy,' Miran said. CNN's Kit Maher and Alicia Wallace contributed to this report. Sign in to access your portfolio

Hundreds of staff unpaid after £1bn AI start-up goes bust
Hundreds of staff unpaid after £1bn AI start-up goes bust

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Hundreds of staff unpaid after £1bn AI start-up goes bust

Hundreds of former staff at a collapsed AI company once worth £1bn have been left unable to access redundancy payments amid talks over a fire sale of its assets. Workers claim to have been left in limbo after being let go from the failed British AI champion in May. While Builder AI has filed for bankruptcy in the US, it has yet to appoint administrators in Britain where its main operations were based. This has meant around 200 UK-based staff cannot claim redundancy pay from the Insolvency Service, which requires a case number normally supplied by restructuring advisers in the event of an administration. A Builder AI spokesman said it was 'aware of the frustration' of staff, and confirmed investors and creditors were in advanced talks over a potential pre-pack administration, which would see its remaining assets and technology sold. Builder AI has been lining up Alvarez & Marsal, a restructuring consultancy, to handle the administration. One former Builder AI employee complained that they had been left in the dark during the process. They said: 'There's been no communication, no proper closure, and without the right paperwork, a lot of us still can't access the financial help we need.' Former UK employees have not received any money since April. The Telegraph understands that Jungle Ventures, Lakestar and US fund Insight Partners are among the parties involved in advanced talks to salvage parts of the business in a pre-pack deal. Such a deal should raise money to return funds to creditors, including ex-staff. Sachin Dev Duggal, Builder AI's founder, is also understood to have explored launching a rescue bid alongside other investors. However, a source close to the talks said this approach was rebuffed. Builder AI was backed by Microsoft and Qatar's sovereign wealth fund, and reached a valuation of $1.5bn (£1.1bn), making it one of Britain's rare 'unicorns' – a private tech company worth more than a billion. But it collapsed in May after lenders pulled tens of millions of pounds in funding amid claims that promised sales had come in far below expectations. The start-up was founded by 42-year-old Mr Duggal in 2016, and developed what he called 'human-assisted AI'. A chatbot called Natasha was assisted by human contractors to help customers, including the BBC, build apps cheaply. The venture unravelled after it emerged that sales forecasts had been wildly unrealistic. The business had predicted sales of $220m in 2024 when raising money from lenders. Sales for that year ultimately came in at around $50m. Mr Duggal was ousted in February and replaced by Manpreet Ratia, of investor Jungle Ventures. The company's lenders, including tech investor Viola Credit, then pulled $40m from the business's accounts, citing covenant breaches. That decision left the business with almost no cash available to pay staff. The Telegraph understands that New York prosecutors had issued a subpoena to Builder AI prior to its collapse for information about its accounting practices. The Financial Times reported that an investigation into the sales shortfall at Builder AI had raised concerns over potentially inflated sales and circular transactions in past years. A spokesman for Mr Duggal declined to comment. On LinkedIn, he said last month: 'There was no round-tripping,' referring to the allegations of circular transactions. A spokesman for Builder AI said: 'We are working closely with the US administrator to initiate liquidation proceedings for the UK entity. 'The company has actively explored the option of a pre-packaged administration. The company has been actively seeking funding from existing stakeholders. We are now at the conclusion of this process and expect to proceed with formal filings in the UK next couple of weeks.' Alvarez & Marsal and Lakestar declined to comment. Insight Partners was contacted for comment. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Crystal Palace closing in on signing of left-back Borna Sosa from Ajax
Crystal Palace closing in on signing of left-back Borna Sosa from Ajax

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

Crystal Palace closing in on signing of left-back Borna Sosa from Ajax

Crystal Palace are closing in on the signing of Borna Sosa from Ajax. Ajax have given the left-back permission to travel to the UK ahead of a proposed move and he is set to undergo a medical on Monday. The Athletic reported on Friday that Ajax had received an offer from Crystal Palace for the 27-year-old, who made 20 appearances on loan at Torino last season. The Premier League club also made a proposal to the Croatia international, as they look to add depth and competition for Tyrick Mitchell. Advertisement Mitchell has been Palace's first-choice left back since breaking into the team in 2021. Ben Chilwell spent the second half of the 2024-25 season on loan at Selhurst Park, making 11 appearances and just one Premier League start, after falling out of favour with Chelsea head coach Enzo Maresca. Sosa has made 25 appearances for Ajax since joining the club from Stuttgart in 2023, having made 115 appearances across a five-year spell with the German club following his move from Dinamo Zagreb. He was a key member of the Croatia side which reached the semi-finals of the World Cup in 2022, starting five of their six matches. Palace are awaiting UEFA's decision on whether they will be allowed to play in the Europa League next term. They qualified by winning the FA Cup but their participation was put in question by club shareholders Eagle Football also owning a majority stake in Ligue 1 side Lyon, who also qualified for next season's competition. The delay relates to UEFA waiting for a decision from French football authorities on whether Lyon will be relegated to Ligue 2 due to financial irregularities, in which scenario they will forfeit their Europa League place. Eagle Football controlling owner John Textor agreed to sell their 43 per cent stake in Palace to Woody Johnson, the owner of the NFL's New York Jets, last month. The deal is yet to be ratified by the Premier League. Sosa would become Palace's second signing of the summer, following the arrival of Argentinian international goalkeeper Walter Benitez on a free transfer. ()

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store