OPEC+ countries to boost oil production by 547,000 barrels per day
The group met virtually on Sunday and announced that eight of its member countries would increase oil production by 547,000 barrels per day in September.
The countries boosting output, including Saudi Arabia, Russia, Iraq, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Kazakhstan, Algeria and Oman, had been participating in voluntary production cuts, initially made in November 2023, which were scheduled to be phased out by September 2026. The announcement means the voluntary production cuts will end ahead of schedule.
The move follows an OPEC+ decision in July to boost production by 548,000 barrels per day in August. OPEC said the production adjustments may be paused or reversed as market conditions evolve.
When production increases, oil and gasoline prices may fall. But Brent crude oil, which is considered a global benchmark, has been trading near $70 per barrel, which could be due to a potential loss of Russian oil on the market and a large rise in crude inventories in China, according to research firm Clearview Energy Partners.
"President Trump has not obviously relented from his threat to sanction Russian energy if the Kremlin does not reach a peace deal with Ukraine as of August 7, potentially via "secondary tariffs" on buyers," Clearview Energy Partners said in an analyst note Sunday.
The eight countries will meet again on Sept. 7, OPEC said in a news release.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Diplomat
7 hours ago
- The Diplomat
Will Trump's Tariffs Upend the India-US Relationship?
Shock and disappointment pervade policy circles in India following U.S. President Donald Trump's decision to impose a 50 percent tariff on Indian exports to the United States. Although India has reacted cautiously with its 'wait and watch' policy so far, it is expected that a more assertive response will emerge in the coming days and weeks. India and the United States have shared strong strategic ties for more than two decades. Despite highs and lows, the two countries have navigated their strategic partnership in the realm of security, space, trade, energy and technology. Trump's tariff decision has the potential to derail a relationship built through years of negotiations and investment by both sides. Trump's announcement on August 6 added a 25 percent secondary tariff on Indian exports for buying Russian oil to the 25 percent announced earlier on July 29. India now finds itself clubbed with Brazil, also hit with a 50 percent tariff rate. Trump supposedly lacks personal chemistry with current Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and has sanctioned the judge who is overseeing the investigations against former President Jair Bolsonaro. But Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi was thought to be in a different league. He shared a great personal rapport with Trump during the latter's first term. On the eve of Trump's inauguration in January 2025, Modi posted a warm congratulatory message on his X account for his 'dear friend,' looking forward to 'working closely together once again.' Even though Modi wasn't invited to the inauguration, unlike some other world leaders including Chinese President Xi Jinping, there was optimism and energy in the power corridors of New Delhi that the challenging four years of working with Democrats were over, and Indo-U.S. ties would reenter a new, bold phase unhinged from the Biden administration's frequent criticism of the diminishing religious and press freedom. Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar attended Trump's second inauguration. Modi himself travelled to Washington D.C. after being invited by Trump in February. There was a brief handshake between Trump and Modi during the G-7 summit in Canada, where he reportedly declined Trump's off-the-cuff invitation to visit the United States, citing existing plans. India plunged into the fray of deal-making on tariffs and hoped to be among the first to sign a trade deal with the United States. Vice President J. D. Vance confirmed the possibility of an early conclusion of such a deal during his unofficial India trip in May. India also hoped that, in exchange for defense purchases from the United States, it could remain the linchpin of the American Indo-Pacific strategy and evade punitive sanctions on its exports. After all, what are strategic partners and friends for? Indian diplomats, it now appears, grossly overestimated their optimism while not taking seriously enough the shifting dynamics and structural constraints that were bound to create roadblocks. Without their notice, the man they were trying to win over changed in his years away from office. 'Make America Great Again' (MAGA) — a nationalist approach — overtook the priorities that New Delhi thought were crucial to keeping the bond strong with the United States. New Delhi had several opportunities to confirm Trump's repeated claims of being a successful peace mediator in ending the Indo-Pak brief war in May. But it chose to repudiate him, apprehensive of the negative political fallout of internationalizing the Kashmir issue and its implications on domestic electoral politics, particularly the upcoming state elections in Bihar. India's relationship with Russia, Iran, and BRICS appear to be other stumbling blocks in its relationship with the U.S. Pakistan, on the other hand, played its hand astutely, not only by acknowledging Trump's role, but also by nominating him for the Nobel Peace Prize. That earned the Pakistani military chief a lunch in the White House. India was peeved, but chose to remain silent in the face of growing U.S.-Pakistan camaraderie. While the government was upbeat, relishing the American decision to ban The Resistance Front (TRF), allegedly responsible for the terror attack in Kashmir in April 2025, to analysts, it was obvious that Indo-U.S. relations were headed downhill. Interestingly, with Pakistan now being wooed by both the U.S. and China, the Trump administration may be hoping to get Islamabad out of Beijing's embrace. India signed a free trade agreement with the U.K. in July, while a host of countries like Japan, U.K, Indonesia and even Pakistan concluded deals with the U.S. India dug deep to protect its farm and dairy industries, despite U.S. pressures for access. The Americans dubbed the Indians ' tough negotiators' for denying access to Indian markets, while the Indian Commerce Ministry was lauding itself for protecting the national interest. New Delhi still hoped for relief and signed an interim deal. But with an unbridgeable and growing divide between the two sides, even that arrangement wasn't feasible. New Delhi responded aggressively to the charges of its buying Russian oil, accusing both Europe and the U.S. of doing similar purchases of fertilizers and other items from Moscow. And then came the announcements on July 29 by Trump and his extra punch on August 6. The impact of the tariff on India's pharmaceutical, jewelry, petrochemicals, textiles, leather, and gem industries can be devastating, cutting down growth, resulting in mass unemployment, and hitting foreign currency reserves. The net impact could also be on Modi's political fortunes. The prime minister has spoken twice in the past week, vaguely invoking the spirit of buying local produce and declaring that he is 'ready to pay a personal price to protect the interests of the farmers, livestock holders and fishermen.' The official response to Trump's announcements hasn't gone beyond expressions like 'unfair,' 'unreasonable,' 'disappointing,' and 'extremely unjustified.' While these hardly indicate what New Delhi's final official response will be, a plethora of advice has been heaped on policymakers by analysts and industry leaders. While a few suggest retaliation, most advocate that India seek alternatives and pursue its policy of strategic autonomy, without yielding to American pressure. On August 7, India's National Security Advisor Ajit Doval met with Russian officials to prepare for President Vladimir Putin's long-planned visit to New Delhi this year. 'The current escalation of the geopolitical situation will also be discussed. Apart from that, the topics will include such pressing matters as supplies of Russian oil [to India],' Russia's official TASS news agency reported, quoting an unnamed Indian source. In late August, Modi is also expected to travel to China to attend the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit. A bilateral meeting with Xi Jinping could be on the agenda. However, whether India is reaching out to new partners to offset the negative implications of the tariffs or reorient its foreign policy moorings at a time of changing global order remains to be seen. Despite warming ties with China, a sea of distrust over the boundary question and its close relationship with Pakistan continues to divide both countries. Sanctions-ridden Russia isn't an ideal replacement for the strong strategic ties built over the past years with the United States. Chinese exports have reportedly surged again, through their increased shipping to Southeast Asian and other regions that often re-export them to the United States. India may look to adopt a similar strategy, but replacing and diversifying $87 billion worth of exports to the U.S. will not be easy. In the strategic sphere, India has invested tremendously in building strong ties with the U.S.; unraveling those bonds would be a challenge in the short to medium term. New Delhi likely hopes that this phase of uncertainty is only temporary, and the negative fallout of the tariff regime will motivate Trump to renounce it in the coming months. India still hopes to host Trump for the Quad summit this year and win him over. Until then, quiet backroom negotiations will have to take precedence over the sense of blind optimism that characterized Indian diplomacy in recent years. Ultimately, India has to get back to the blackboard to work on the structural constraints, streamline processes, and institutionalize mechanisms to retrieve a doomed relationship.
Nikkei Asia
7 hours ago
- Nikkei Asia
Intel CEO responds after Trump calls for his resignation
Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan delivers a speech during the Computex 2025 exhibition in Taipei on May 19. © AP (AP) -- Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan says he's "always operated within the highest legal and ethical standards" after President Donald Trump said he should resign. On Thursday Trump said on Truth Social platform that "The CEO of Intel is highly CONFLICTED and must resign, immediately. There is no other solution to this problem. Thank you for your attention to this problem!" Trump's post landed after Sen. Tom Cotton sent a letter to Intel Chairman Frank Yeary expressing concern over Tan's investments and ties to semiconductor firms that are reportedly linked to the Chinese Communist Party and the People's Liberation Army, and asked the board whether Tan had divested his interests in these companies to eliminate any conflicts of interest. It was not immediately clear on Thursday if Tan, who took over as Intel's CEO in March, had divested his interests in the companies. The economic and political rivalry between the U.S. and China are increasingly focused on computer chips, AI and other digital technologies that are expected to shape future economies and military conflicts. Intel said in a statement that it's "deeply committed to advancing U.S. national and economic security interests and are making significant investments aligned with the President's America First agenda." Tan also addressed the situation, saying in a message to employees that there was misinformation circulating about his past roles at Walden International and Cadence Design Systems and that he's always followed proper standards. Tan also said Intel was in contact with the Trump administration. "We are engaging with the Administration to address the matters that have been raised and ensure they have the facts," Tan said. "I fully share the President's commitment to advancing U.S. national and economic security, I appreciate his leadership to advance these priorities, and I'm proud to lead a company that is so central to these goals." The company's stock rose slightly in premarket trading on Friday.
Nikkei Asia
10 hours ago
- Nikkei Asia
Letter from Nikkei Asia's editor: Apple caught in crosshairs as Trump tariff pressure mounts
Hello from Tokyo. The turmoil over U.S. tariffs under the Trump administration continued this week, and Apple -- a symbol of American technological pride -- is now caught in the crosshairs. On Thursday, Japan time, Apple CEO Tim Cook announced an additional $100 billion investment in U.S. component production. The move comes as both China and India, where the company manufactures iPhones, face the threat of steep tariffs. This follows an earlier pledge made in February to invest $500 billion in the U.S. Now, the complex global supply chain the tech giant has spent years building -- centered around Asia -- appears headed for major upheaval just over six months into the Trump administration. Trump said at a White House event on the same day that he would impose an "approximately 100%" tariff on chips and other semiconductor products. If implemented, this would place a heavy burden on the U.S. tech industry and, ultimately, consumers. For business leaders navigating these unpredictable policies, one option might be to "duck and wait." It's impossible to continually overhaul billion-dollar investment plans every time the president makes a new announcement. Even if a company agrees to build a U.S. factory to meet Trump's "Made in America" demands, the administration may already have changed by the time the facility is up and running. Still, when people like Apple's Cook are publicly singled out by Trump, they have little choice but to act. Asia is home to many technologies that cannot be manufactured in the U.S., such as the cutting-edge semiconductors made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Apple has long relied on these advanced capabilities to develop innovative products such as the iPhone, keeping itself at the forefront of the tech industry. Unpredictable tariffs not only disrupt this global ecosystem, they also place a drag on one of America's most iconic companies. For more on this evolving story, log in to Nikkei Asia. My suggested reads 1. Nikkei Asia's Cheng Ting-Fang broke the story that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. fired several workers over the suspected theft of trade secrets related to the chipmaker's most cutting-edge technology, 2-nanometer production. The case is now being investigated under Taiwan's National Security Act of 2022, aimed at protecting the island's vital tech supply chain. 2. China's automakers have made inroads in global markets with a combination of affordable prices and impressive technology. Now they have set themselves a new goal: cutting foreign-made chips out of their cars. They are particularly keen to replace Nvidia, as unpredictable U.S. trade polices put their continued access to the American chip titan in question. 3. Australia is set to acquire Japanese-built frigates for its navy in a landmark agreement with Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and others, our correspondent in Sydney reported on Aug. 4, a day before the decision was officially announced. If the deal goes through, it would mark Japan's first export of a warship. Wishing you a wonderful weekend! Akito Tanaka Follow us on LinkedIn and Instagram
