Trial opens for 3 women who allegedly organised procession outside Istana
SINGAPORE – Three women have gone on trial after they pleaded not guilty to organising a procession around the Istana without a permit.
Mossammad Sobikun Nahar, 26, Siti Amirah Mohamed Asrori, 30, and Annamalai Kokila Parvathi, 36, appeared in the State Courts for the first day of their joint trial on July 1.
The women each face one charge of organising a procession along the perimeter of the Istana, which is a prohibited area, under the Public Order Act.
They are accused of organising the procession on Feb 2, 2024 to publicise the cause of solidarity with Palestine.
Investigation Officer Muhammad Faizal, testifying as the first prosecution witness, said he was tasked to investigate an event called 'Letters for Palestine' at the Istana.
He took the court through closed circuit television (CCTV) footage that showed a group of around 70 people had gathered outside Plaza Singapura before walking to the Istana while holding open umbrellas painted with a watermelon graphic.
The footage showed that Sobikun led the group along Orchard Road, Buyong Road and Cavenagh Road as they made their way to the rear entrance of the Istana.
When the group reached the rear entrance of the Istana, they formed up, with a number of them holding up watermelon umbrellas and posing for photos, he said.
He also pointed to how Amirah was seen holding a stack of letters and fanning them out while taking photos.
During the cross-examination, defence lawyer Surian Sidambaram asked IO Faizal if this event, Letters for Palestine, involved people handing letters to the Prime Minister's Office.
The IO said yes.
Mr Surian asked if there were any signs along the route to the Istana warning that a group of people walking over to hand-deliver letters to the Prime Minister's Office constituted an offence. The IO replied no.
Mr Surian then asked IO Faizal if he was aware that on Jan 11, 2024, three weeks before the alleged procession in this current case, a group of 17 people had hand-delivered letters to the Prime Minister's Office using the same route.
The IO replied that he was made aware of that case through the course of his investigations, but could not speak on the cause the 17 people were showing support for.
Mr Surian said: 'One of my clients' defences is that they were not aware that using that route to hand-deliver letters to the Prime Minister's Office was an offence.
'Given that there had been a similar event three weeks prior for the same cause and no action was taken, that led them to believe that it was legal and that they were not organising a procession in a prohibited area.'
The defence lawyer then made an application to enter into evidence five past cases where people hand-delivered letters for various causes, but no action was said to have been taken.
Deputy Public Prosecutor Sunil Nair objected to this, noting that there were insufficient details of the past incidents to make accurate comparisons.
'There could be various reasons why no action was taken, but this cannot be a reason for an offender to contravene the law,' said the prosecutor.
In reply, Mr Surian said: 'My clients saw the past events and nothing happened, so they thought they had the rights to organise their own event.'
After hearing both sides, District Judge John Ng rejected the defence's application to enter evidence of the past cases for the current trial.
Addressing Mr Surian, Judge Ng said: 'If there's a boy throwing a stone at a shopping centre window, a second boy would not be able to say that the first boy was not caught and not charged, so 'I could do it too'. That is not a valid defence.'
The trial continues.
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Singapore Law Watch
a day ago
- Singapore Law Watch
Ong Beng Seng's case back to Jul 8 pre-trial conference; previously meant to plead guilty on Jul 3
Ong Beng Seng's case back to Jul 8 pre-trial conference; previously meant to plead guilty on Jul 3 Source: Business Times Article Date: 03 Jul 2025 Author: Jessie Lim Postponement is for parties to file further written submissions on the sentencing. Property tycoon Ong Beng Seng, who was expected to plead guilty on Jul 3 in a case involving former transport minister S Iswaran, has had his court hearing adjourned. A request to reschedule the court hearing was approved by the State Courts on Wednesday (Jul 2). The hearing, which is now taking place on Jul 8, is no longer a plead guilty mention but instead a pre-trial conference. At a pre-trial conference, usually held in chambers, the court and the parties involved in a case meet. The aim is to sort out administrative matters and potentially schedule future court dates. It does not mean the case will necessarily proceed to trial. A Singapore Courts spokesman said that the parties involved applied for the Jul 3 further mention to be adjourned to a later date, for parties to file further written submissions on the sentencing. An Attorney-General's Chambers spokesman said the further mention for a guilty plea 'will be refixed for a later date'. Case involving Iswaran Ong, former managing director of Hotel Properties Ltd, is widely known for bringing the Formula 1 night race to Singapore in 2008. He owns the rights to the Singapore Grand Prix (GP). He faces one charge of abetting offences under Section 165 of the Penal Code – which forbids public servants from accepting gifts from people involved with them in an official capacity – and one charge of abetting the obstruction of justice. The first charge, for abetting an offence under Section 165, relates to flights and a hotel stay. Ong allegedly offered Iswaran a trip to Doha in December 2022, and arranged for his private jet to fly him there. The flight was worth US$7,700. Ong also allegedly made arrangements through race promoter Singapore GP for a one-night stay at Four Seasons Hotel Doha, valued at S$4,737.63, and is said to have offered Iswaran a business-class flight from Doha to Singapore worth S$5,700. The second charge was for allegedly instructing Singapore GP director Mok Chee Liang, in May 2023, to bill Iswaran for the business-class ticket from Doha to Singapore – an action that would have obstructed the course of justice. Those found guilty of offences under Section 165 can be jailed for up to two years, fined, or both. Abetting an offence would result in the same punishment, if the offence is committed as a consequence of the abetment. The maximum penalty for obstructing the course of justice is jail time of up to seven years, a fine, or both. Source: The Business Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction. Print
Straits Times
a day ago
- Straits Times
Ng Yu Zhi's bid for bail midway through trial over $1.46b nickel scam denied by High Court
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox SINGAPORE - Alleged fraudster Ng Yu Zhi, who is currently on trial in the High Court for masterminding a nickel-trading scam that attracted $1.46 billion from investors, was denied bail on July 3. The judge said there is a risk that Ng, who had previously breached his bail conditions, will flee Singapore if he is released on bail. Ng, 38, made his bid to be released on bail after 35 days of trial. The prosecution has called all its witnesses, while he has yet to give his defence. He was first charged in March 2021 and granted bail, which eventually increased to $6 million. On Feb 7, 2024, bail was revoked by the State Courts after Ng breached his bail conditions when he allegedly committed fresh offences by trying to get $500,000 from the sale of a shophouse. He has been remanded in prison since. On June 30, Judicial Commissioner Christopher Tan heard arguments from Ng's lawyer, Ms N. K. Anitha, and Deputy Public Prosecutor Lynn Tan on the bail application. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore $500 in Child LifeSG credits, Edusave, Post-Sec Education Account top-ups to be disbursed in July Singapore Over 40% of Singaporean seniors have claimed SG60 vouchers: Low Yen Ling Singapore Live: Is using Gen AI for schoolwork and tests cheating? Asia 4 dead, 38 missing after ferry sinks on way to Indonesia's Bali Singapore Jail for 'sugar daddy' who gave minor cash for sex, threatened to post her explicit videos online Singapore Train service resumes across Bukit Panjang LRT line after power fault led to 3-hour disruption Singapore 17-year-old youth charged with trespassing on MRT tracks; to be remanded at IMH Business Microsoft cutting 9,000 jobs companywide in second major wave of layoffs this year The judge said on July 3 there is evidence that Ng potentially has the ability to access fake foreign travel documents and potentially has financial resources overseas at his disposal. He also took into account the strength of the evidence that has been presented so far by prosecutors. The judge said bail should also be denied because there was evidence that Ng may have provided his bailors – his father and his father-in-law – with funds to post bail. He added that Ng's breach of his bail conditions previously was serious. Ng had allegedly arranged for a woman to impersonate his wife to sign a document to facilitate the sale of the shophouse. The Bussorah Street property is under an order prohibiting its sale. Ms Anitha had argued that being held in prison hampers Ng's ability to prepare for his case, citing concerns such as limited access to a pen. But the judge assessed that being in remand would not prejudice the conduct of Ng's defence. Ng faces a total of 108 charges over offences including cheating, forgery, fraudulent trading, money laundering and criminal breach of trust. The ongoing trial, which began in November 2024, relates to 42 of the charges. Ng is accused of telling investors he could buy nickel at a discount and then sell the metal for profit. The prosecution's case is that the purported nickel trades did not exist, and that earlier investors were paid with money put in by other investors. Ng's nickel scheme was first offered through Envy Asset Management in February 2016. After the firm was placed on the Monetary Authority of Singapore's investor alert list, the scheme was moved to Envy Global Trading from April 2020 to March 2021. During the trial, the court heard evidence that Ng splurged millions on lavish purchases, which the prosecution alleges were funded by his ill-gotten gains. These include luxury cars for his wife and girlfriends, a 20.25-carat yellow diamond ring, works of art, and a semi-detached house. A former employee also testified that Ng had 'five families' – his wife, an ex-wife and three girlfriends. The prosecution told the court on June 30 that while Ng claims to be married, investigations by the Commercial Affairs Department have revealed that he is divorced from his wife, Ms Coco Cai Meizhen.
International Business Times
2 days ago
- International Business Times
2 Crew Members Charged Over Fatal Oil Tanker Collision Near Singapore's Pedra Branca That Left One Dead
Two crew members on an oil tanker registered in Singapore have been charged in connection with a collision that left one man on the other vessel dead and another seriously injured. For the unversed, last year in July, the ship Hafnia Nile, registered in Singapore, collided with the Ceres I, registered in the African island nation of the Democratic Republic of Sao Tome and Principe. According to media reports at the time, the collision occurred approximately 55 kilometers northeast of Pedra Branca, within Singapore's maritime search and rescue region. Soosai Antony Vainer, a 35-year-old Indian national, and Wickramage Viraj Amila Shavinda Perera, a 40-year-old Sri Lankan, were the two crew members from the Hafnia Nile who were each charged under the Merchant Shipping Act. Charge sheets stated that Perera was the officer in charge of the navigational watch on the Hafnia Nile between 5.40 am and 6 am on Jul 19, 2024. He was accused of failing to maintain situational awareness of the area surrounding the Hafnia Nile, make "a full appraisal of the situation and the risk of dangers to navigation, and ensure that a proper lookout was maintained" in that capacity. This malfunction caused the ship to collide with the Ceres I, resulting in "serious damage" to both tankers and the death of Sellakkannu Shanmugasundaram, who was on board the Ceres I. According to the charge sheets, Ge Junfu, who was also on board the Ceres I, sustained severe injuries. The court documents noted that Vainer was the navigational watch's duty lookout on the Hafnia Nile at the time. He observed that the Hafnia Nile was "approaching close" to the Ceres I, but did not report this to the officer in charge of the navigational watch, his charge alleged. Instead, he allegedly failed to maintain a proper lookout and steered the Hafnia Nile without being instructed to do so. Consequently, the two tankers came into contact. Following the incident, Malaysia arrested the Ceres I tanker, although early reports claimed the ship had escaped. The Malaysian authorities later clarified that the Ceres I had "drifted away" rather than fled. The two men are being prosecuted by the Singaporean Maritime and Port Authority. Both cases were discussed further in the State Courts on Wednesday, July 2, and were postponed until later this month. Public records show that Perera is being defended by Wong Min Hui and Mato Kotwani of PDLegal, while Vainer is being represented by Andy Yeo of Andy Yeo Chambers. If convicted, the men can each be jailed for up to two years, fined up to S$50,000, or both.
