Benn: NI gains from Windsor Framework will face consequences of US tariffs
Conservative former Northern Ireland secretary Sir Julian Smith said the Windsor Framework arrangements give the region 'a unique competitive advantage', while TUV leader Jim Allister claimed Northern Ireland may be 'used as a conduit' by the EU to export goods to the US.
President Donald Trump implemented a 10% tariff on the UK and a 20% tariff on the European Union as part of a slate of international measures on what he deemed 'liberation day'.
The leaders of EU countries are due to vote on a package of counter-measures responding to US tariffs on steel and aluminium already in effect.
If the EU decides to impose retaliatory tariffs on goods imported from the US, they would apply in Northern Ireland as the region continues to follow the EU's rules in some areas of trading due to the Windsor Framework.
On Tuesday, the Northern Ireland Secretary said only 2% of imports to Northern Ireland come from the US, equivalent to about £800 million.
Mr Benn stated that businesses who lost out as a result would be able to claim the disparity in levy back from the duty reimbursement scheme – if the goods have not entered the EU first – and the custom duty waiver scheme.
In the House of Commons, he told MPs: 'Tariffs are not good news for anyone, and no-one wants a trade war.
'The Government is doing everything possible to keep Britain secure during this new era of global instability, and it will always act in the best interests of businesses in Northern Ireland.'
He added: 'HMRC is continuing to talk to and support any businesses that might be affected to help them understand how to use the duty reimbursement and customs duty waiver schemes.'
Later in response to DUP MP Carla Lockhart (Upper Bann), he stated: 'Northern Ireland gains from the Windsor Framework because of its access – it does gain from its access to the EU market, other parts of Great Britain do not enjoy.
'But there is a consequence, which is what we're discussing in relation to the imposition of tariffs by the United States of America, which is a decision that the US administration has taken and all of us are going to have to deal with the consequences.'
As Northern Ireland secretary from 2019 to 2020, Sir Julian helped negotiated the 'New Decade, New Approach' that triggered the return of powersharing in after a three-year suspension.
He said the '2019 Brexit deal and the Windsor Framework give Northern Ireland a unique competitive advantage – 10% exports and access to the single market', and asked for a 'rapid automatic reimbursement scheme' for tariffs paid by NI businesses.
Mr Benn replied: 'Rapid automatic doesn't quite square with the need for the businesses in Northern Ireland that are importing American goods in the eventuality of EU retaliatory tariffs because they do have to demonstrate that they're not then moving on to the European Union, and that does require them to provide evidence to HMRC in order to get the tariff reimbursed.'
Mr Allister asked Mr Benn if he was 'embarrassed that he and his Government have no control over the tariffs in respect of goods imported into Northern Ireland'.
He continued: 'Isn't the obvious and inevitable answer to repatriate to the United Kingdom control over trade laws?
'And what happens if Northern Ireland is used as a conduit by the Republic of Ireland or the EU to export goods to the US? Who checks those goods and where?'
DUP MP Jim Shannon (Strangford) said: 'The promise was made to Northern Ireland MPs that we would not be disadvantaged by any EU retentions. This is clearly not to be the case.'
Mr Benn reiterated that the Windsor Framework 'brings benefits' to businesses in Northern Ireland.
He added: 'The single most important reason for sticking with the implementation of the Windsor Framework is we want to negotiate closer economic relationships with the European Union, including a SPS (sanitary and phytosanitary) and a veterinary agreement.
'And members from Northern Ireland have on many occasions raised the consequences of the current arrangement. Things could be a lot easier if we get that agreement.
'But as I have pointed out to the House many times before, if we do not honour the last agreement that the United Kingdom as a country signed by the last government with the European Union, how exactly do we expect to get a new agreement?'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
25 minutes ago
- New York Post
Michael Goodwin: Trump's unique talents make him a true leader – and have redefined what it means to be commander in chief
If you need a laugh, try to imagine Joe Biden or any recent president holding court in the way Donald Trump is doing it. To double the laugh, try to imagine any of the current presidential wannabes sitting in the big chair in the Oval Office. It's an impossible exercise because of how dramatically Trump is redefining what it means to be president of the United States. His talents are vast and uniquely suited to the role he has created. For the most recent and dramatic example, take Monday's historic meeting of European leaders about Russia's unrelenting invasion of Ukraine. It was the kind of key event that, had it been held under past presidents or vice presidents, would have been smothered in formalities and endless bland statements. Yet there was Trump, sitting behind the Resolute Desk in the Oval Office, facing the heads of major allies, including Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky and the leaders of NATO and the EU. They were sitting in chairs, like so many students arrayed around their teacher. Skeptics miss the point The skeptics who scoff at Trump's gilding and redecorating of the Oval Office are missing the bigger and far more important aspect of what is happening there. No. 47 is the greatest impresario ever to hold the office, and he is bringing the presidency, its majesty and his quirks, into homes in America and around the world in ways that are as refreshing as they are unprecedented. Just as he remade the Republican Party into a diverse workers and middle-class party, Trump is creating new models and expectations for how presidents should conduct the public's business and carry out their duties. Start with the media. Including his first term but especially from the start of his second term, Trump has been the most accessible president ever. If there's a question he hasn't answered, it's because the question hasn't been asked. Because of how he lives out loud in front of the camera, never again will it be acceptable for a commander in chief to emerge from the Oval Office, read a canned speech from a teleprompter, take a few questions from pre-selected reporters, mumble incoherent answers, then shuffle off stage for a long nap. Enough about Biden, but Trump has expanded the presidential footprint and captured public attention in ways that will play a role in shaping the conduct of his successors. There is no way to turn back the clock, especially with the collapse of the media's credibility. Trump's way of speaking directly to the public curbs the power of partisan gatekeepers to distort the news and his views, which is why he does it. His broadcast of near-daily media availabilities, and a willingness to entertain loaded questions from people whose outlets have never had a good word to say about him, reflect an astonishing level of openness. It can be raw, as he moves from being angry to being gracious and cracking a joke within minutes. The effect is that, with his unparalleled bravado, a tireless work ethic and an instinct for hot takes, Trump is turning the White House into a giant television studio. And the programming isn't limited to media questions. Trump is also taking hugely important actions and explaining them in real time, allowing Americans everywhere to watch their president deliver on campaign promises, and explain why he is doing what's he doing. Taking back DC Last week, he used the cramped briefing room to reveal what he called 'a historic action to rescue our nation's capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse. This is Liberation Day in DC and we're going to take our capital back. We're taking it back.' The federalizing of policing and the influx of National Guard troops were hailed by frightened residents and the beleaguered police union, and of course denounced by Democrats and their media mouthpieces. A week later, the capital cleanup goes on, with some 500 arrests announced and nary an incident that would even remotely justify the scare-mongering predictions of a police-state roundup of the innocent. The upshot is that Dems and media outlets again made fools of themselves by defending an indefensible level of violent crime, and the people who commit it. It's a replay of how they denounced Trump for deporting violent illegal immigrants. For sheer drama, it will be practically impossible to top the two events related to Ukraine. Combined they form a two-part series about an issue of life and death and global importance. It was last February when the president and Vice President JD Vance teamed up for a heated argument in the Oval Office against Zelensky over American aid to help thwart the Russian invasion. Trump abruptly canceled a planned private meeting with Zelensky and booted him from the White House. Fast forward to the upbeat harmony of Monday, when he and seven European leaders came to craft a united front in the search for peace. It followed Trump's meeting last Friday with Russia's despot Vladimir Putin in Alaska. The president hoped for a cease-fire, and the attention he invited backfired when he came away empty-handed. Rosy view of Putin Putin's 'nyet' proves again that Trump, like former presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama, has too rosy a view of Putin. Face it: Putin's a monster who kills domestic dissenters and indiscriminately bombs foreign civilians, including women and children. Still, Trump should be commended for trying to salvage peace by advocating directly for a permanent end to the conflict. That idea underscored the Monday meeting, where the Europeans provided a showcase for Trump's skills and an upbeat coda to the February rupture with Zelensky. It also displayed how Putin's refusal to budge was catnip for Trump haters. Apparently many in the American media would rather see the war continue than see Trump get any credit for ending it. Fortunately, the leaders of Italy, France, Germany, Finland and the UK have a different view. They praised Trump's meeting with Putin as setting the stage for the next step and pushed for a detailed plan to help Ukraine's military, an effort being led by Secretary of State Marco Rubio. They are also hopeful that Zelensky and Putin can have their first direct meeting, and then one together with Trump. The key change is that Zelensky will get the NATO-like security guarantees he has demanded, including European troops to enforce any agreement with Putin. Trump, who smartly refuses to pledge American troops to foreign wars, said Tuesday on Fox that he's open to providing US air support for European forces. That's the proper answer for an America First president. It also happens to be the same role the US played in the successful takeout of Iran's nuclear facilities. In that historic mission, Israeli troops did the ground work as America delivered its unique bunker-buster bombs from high above. Hopefully, Putin will be smarter than the mullahs and end the war. But don't count on it.
Boston Globe
25 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump administration revokes security clearances of 37 current and former government officials
Many of the officials who were targeted left the government years ago after serving in both senior national security positions and lower-profile roles far from the public eye. Some worked on matters that have long infuriated Trump, like the intelligence community assessment that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election on his behalf. And several signaled their concerns about Trump by signing a critical letter in 2019 that was highlighted on social media last month by right-wing provocateur and close Trump ally Laura Loomer. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The action is part of a broader Trump administration campaign to wield the levers of government against perceived adversaries, and it reflects the president's continued distrust of career intelligence officials he has long seen as working against his interests. Advertisement The revocation of clearances has emerged as a go-to tactic for the administration, a strategy that critics say risks chilling dissenting voices from a national security community accustomed to drawing on a range of viewpoints before formulating an assessment. 'These are unlawful and unconstitutional decisions that deviate from well-settled, decades-old laws and policies that sought to protect against just this type of action,' Mark Zaid, a national security lawyer whose own clearance was revoked by the Trump administration, said in a statement. Advertisement He called it hypocritical for the administration to 'claim these individuals politicized or weaponized intelligence.' Gabbard on Tuesday defended the move, which she said had been directed by Trump. 'Being entrusted with a security clearance is a privilege, not a right,' she wrote on X. 'Those in the Intelligence Community who betray their oath to the Constitution and put their own interests ahead of the American people have broken the sacred trust they promised to uphold.' The security clearance suspension comes amid a broader effort by Gabbard and other Trump administration officials to revisit the intelligence community's assessment on Russian election interference, including by declassifying a series of years-old documents meant to cast doubt on the legitimacy of its findings. Multiple government investigations have reached the same conclusion that Russia interfered in the 2016 election in sweeping fashion, including through a hack-and-leak operation of Democratic emails and a social media campaign aimed at sowing discord and swaying public opinion. But Trump has long resisted the assessment that Russian President Vladimir Putin interfered in his favor, and his Justice Department has authorized a grand jury investigation that could bring fresh scrutiny to Obama-era officials. Security clearances are important not only for current government workers but also former ones whose private-sector jobs require them to retain access to sensitive information. Stripping clearances from such employees could make it hard for them to do their jobs. On his first day of office, Trump said he would revoke the security clearances of the more than four dozen former intelligence officials who signed a 2020 letter saying that the Hunter Biden laptop saga bore the hallmarks of a 'Russian information operation.' Advertisement He's also revoked the clearances of former President Joe Biden and former Vice President Kamala Harris, and he attempted to do the same for lawyers at a spate of prominent law firms but was rebuffed by federal judges. Some of those who were targeted in the latest action were part of Biden's national security team. Many only learned of the Gabbard action from news reports Tuesday, said two former government officials who were on the list. Both spoke on the condition of anonymity as they ponder whether to take legal action.
UPI
26 minutes ago
- UPI
Trump upset Smithsonian shows 'how bad slavery was'
Aug. 19 (UPI) -- President Donald Trump stepped up his criticisms of the Smithsonian on Tuesday, deriding the museums for its negative portrayal of slavery in American history. Trump wrote in a post on his Truth Social platform that he would direct his attorneys to "review" the Smithsonian in the same way his administration has sought to reshape colleges and universities. The post comes a week after the White House announced it was subjecting the influential museum consortium to an unprecedented examination of its materials, signaling it had become a focal point in Trump's efforts to transform cultural institutions. In his post, Trump wrote that museums all over the country are the "last remaining segment of 'woke.'" "The Smithsonian is OUT OF CONTROL, where everything discussed is how horrible our Country is, how bad Slavery was and how unaccomplished the downtrodden have been -- Nothing about Success, nothing about Brightness, nothing about the Future," Trump wrote. Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass., reacted with a post on X, writing that if "Trump thinks slavery wasn't bad, he clearly needs to spend more time in a museum." Roughly 17 million people visited one of the Smithsonian's 21 museums and galleries last year. Smithsonian Institution Secretary Lonnie Bunch III, who is the first African American to lead the institution and has held the position since 2019, has previously commented on the importance of acknowledging slavery's impact on American history. "I believe strongly that you cannot understand America without understanding slavery, that our notions of freedom, our notions of liberty are juxtaposed with our notions of enslavement," he said in an interview on Face the Nation in 2021. "And so I think that it's not about pointing blame, it's not about remembering difficult moments just to hurt." Last week, three White House aides wrote to Bunch in a letter notifying him the museum would be subject to a review to "ensure alignment with the President's directive to celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions." The reshaping of the Smithsonian and its galleries and museums has been part the Trump administration's goal to remove left-leaning ideology from the federal government and cultural institutions. In March, Trump signed an executive order directing the Smithsonian to eliminate "divisive" and "anti-American ideology" from its museums, pointing to exhibits that "promoted narratives that portray American and Western values as inherently harmful and oppressive." He also named himself chairman of the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, seemingly in opposition to its having hosted performances he disagreed with for promoting so-called woke ideology. The move prompted many performances and performers to cancel shows.
