
The world is now better positioned to call Trump's bluff as allies and markets push back
For the past three months or so, Donald Trump has kept the world guessing. On July 3, he told reporters his administration would start sending out letters the following day, setting unilateral tariff rates, ranging from 'maybe 60 or 70% tariffs to 10 and 20% tariffs', that countries would have to pay from August 1. According to the latest reports, these letters are now slated to go out on Monday.
'No,' said Trump early last week, when asked if the July deadline was cast in stone. 'We can do whatever we want.' Therein lies the problem. For all the column inches that have been written about how the sun is about to set on the US economy, the reality is that Trump can do pretty much whatever he wants. He will be able to do so as long as the US dollar remains the international reserve currency.
The 90-day period was supposed to see a 'flurry of trade deals'. 'Ninety deals in 90 days' was Trump's proud boast. What we have, instead, is a handful of limited trade deals with Britain and China and, more recently, a one-sided deal with Vietnam. To be sure, there are many deals in the works, including with India and the EU. But what is clear is that contrary to Trump's boast that countries would beat a line to his door to sign on the dotted line, it's not going to be a cakewalk for the US.
For one, Trump is on a much weaker wicket, both domestically and internationally, than in April when he announced reciprocal tariffs (a 10% baseline tax on imports with effect from April 5, plus country-specific higher tariffs with effect from April 9). Then, he was still in the early days of his presidency. His domestic support base was intact. Since then, we've seen fissures emerge, even within the Republican Party, as seen by the pushback to his One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), which is slated to hugely increase the budget deficit and add $2.4 tn to the national debt. True, the bill has been passed. But Trump had to expend a great deal of political capital to get it through. His once-trusted lieutenant, Elon Musk, has parted company with him and has come out openly against it, threatening to form an alternative party. Opposition from universities, especially Ivy League institutions, and the public has grown, as evidenced by recent street protests in California.
On the monetary policy front, despite Trump throwing the choicest of unsavoury epithets at fellow Republican and Fed chair Jerome Powell-even telling him to step down-the latter has not lowered interest rates. US growth is lower (the economy contracted 0.5% in the first quarter) and inflation is higher than the target 2%. The dollar witnessed its longest monthly slide since 2017, ending June with its worst first-half performance in four decades. Courts, especially lower courts, have thrown out many of his diktats, though the Supreme Court has given him a reprieve on some. All told, the harsh reality is that Trump has repeatedly been rebuffed-not only by critics from within and outside his party but, more importantly, by financial markets. His decision to allow a breather on tariffs was largely, if not entirely, the result of pushback from global bond markets that threatened to upend financial systems.On the trade front, friends and foes alike are finding their voice. Whether it is Emmanuel Macron, who bluntly described tariffs as a form of 'blackmail' rather than instruments to rebalance trade-a far cry from Trump's description of tariffs as the most beautiful word in the dictionary-or others who are more circumspect. Sure, there is a limit to how far US trade partners can flex their muscles. Mark Carney's initial tough talk did not last long. Canada has since dropped the tax on US tech giants under pressure from the US.
Globally, growth has slowed. Both IMF and World Bank have lowered their global growth estimates. 'The global economy is at a crossroads. Trade disruptions threaten to reshape the economic landscape,' says Hyun Song Shin, economic adviser, BIS, writing in this paper. In one of the biggest ironies, equity markets are soaring. After a 15% decline in April, US stocks have rallied, hitting all-time highs-riding on (premature?) signs of progress in US trade talks and hopes the Fed will cut interest rates. The Sensex, too, shows no sign of fatigue (or realism?).In all this, the Indian economy seems to be in fine fettle. It is naive, however, to assume that we-or the global economy-will sail along merrily despite headwinds posed by slowing growth in the world's two largest economies, the US and China. But we are nowhere near a recession-nor are we facing the kind of crisis witnessed during Covid or the 2008 financial crash.But hold on to your seats. The roller-coaster ride is not over. The good news, however, is that we're unlikely to fall off, regardless of what Trump unleashes on the tariff front in the coming days.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
28 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Tesla's money man Vaibhav Taneja joins Musk's America Party as treasurer
Tesla's Chief Financial Officer, Vaibhav Taneja has been appointed the Treasurer and Custodian of Records for Elon Musk's newly formed political organisation, the America Party. Taneja's appointment comes a day after Elon Musk announced the formation of the America Party. The move follows a public disagreement with US President Donald Trump over the passage of a massive tax-cut and spending bill, the Financial Express reported. The legislation — called the 'One, Big, Beautiful Bill' by Trump — was signed last week. Musk, however, criticised the bill as 'fiscally irresponsible' and a 'betrayal' of efforts to reduce the size of government. Who is Tesla's money man Vaibhav Taneja? Indian-origin Vaibhav Taneja (47) is a Chartered Accountant and a commerce graduate from the University of Delhi. His career began at PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), where he worked for 17 years in both India and the US from 1999 to 2016. He later joined SolarCity Corporation in 2016 as Vice-President and Corporate Controller. That same year, following Tesla's acquisition of SolarCity, Taneja played a key role in integrating the accounting operations of the two companies. He joined Tesla in 2017 and rose steadily through the ranks, becoming Chief Accounting Officer in 2019 and Chief Financial Officer in August 2023. Taneja has also served as Director of Tesla India Motors and Energy Private Limited since 2021. Musk launches new political party Musk unveiled the party on his social media platform X, citing an online poll in which 65.4 per cent of respondents supported the idea of launching a new political party. 'By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it! When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy. Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom,' Musk posted on X. By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it! When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy. Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 5, 2025 On July 1, after the tax and spending bill was passed in the Senate, Musk posted on X, 'If this insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day. Our country needs an alternative to the Democrat-Republican uniparty so that the people actually have a VOICE.' After Musk announced the launch of his new party, Trump on Sunday brushed off Elon Musk's newly formed America Party, calling it 'ridiculous' and reaffirming his belief in the traditional two-party structure, Bloomberg reported. Musk exits Trump orbit, sparks shift When asked about Musk's announcement, Trump said, 'We've had tremendous success with the Republican Party. The Democrats have lost their way, but it's always been a two-party system.' He went on to say that 'starting a third party just adds to the confusion' and added, 'Third parties have never worked. He can have fun with it.' The world's richest man, once a prominent political donor to Donald Trump during the 2024 campaign, has gradually distanced himself from Trump. Musk previously led Trump's short-lived Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) but resigned from the role in May this year. Since stepping down, Musk has become increasingly vocal in his criticism of Republican lawmakers and has warned that he may support an alternative political movement if Trump's allies persist in backing his key economic proposal.


United News of India
31 minutes ago
- United News of India
Trump threatens to slap 10 pec additional tariffs on BRICS countries for ‘Anti American' policies
Washington, July 7 (UNI) US President Donald Trump has threatened to slap an additional 10% trade tariffs which supported the alleged 'Anti-American' policies of BRICS nations. "Any Country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS, will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10% Tariff. There will be no exceptions to this policy," Trump said on Truth Social. The international multilateral bloc which was founded by Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa as an alternative platform to challenge Western hegemony and promote the voices of developing countries, has long been criticised by the US President. BRICS has been viewed as a favourable bloc by many countries who have expressed their wish to join, and last year expanded to include Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, with Vietnam becoming a partner nation this year. Trump's comments came the bloc's members criticised the US tariff policies as well as proposing reforms to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and how major currencies are valued, reports BBC. BRICS countries, who started a meeting in Rio de Janeiro this weekend, have called for reforms to global institutions and positioned the alliance as a platform for diplomacy amid escalating trade conflicts and geopolitical tensions. A joint statement by the bloc's Finance Ministers slammed the tariffs, labelling them as a threat to the global economy, and accused it of bringing "uncertainty into international economic and trade activities". The leaders also condemned the military strikes on Iran in June, criticising the attacks as a violation of international law. The summit was attended in person by world leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa. Russian President Vladmir Putin attended it online, while China was represented by Premier Li Qiang who stood in President Xi Jinping. UNI ANV GNK 1240

The Wire
32 minutes ago
- The Wire
Modi's 'Act East Policy' Requires Him to In Fact 'Act' at Home
Modi will find it difficult to commit to a trade deal with a maverick and unpredictable US President without exposing himself to criticism at home. Anybody who knows anything about the way politics works in this country would have known that US president Donald Trump's 9 July deadline for a US –India free trade agreement was unrealistic. While Union commerce minister Piyush Goyal and his officials have logged many flying miles travelling between New Delhi and Washington DC, it was only inevitable that in the end Mr. Goyal would say that India does not make trade deals based on deadlines. It would do so only on the basis of the national interest. While a deal may yet be struck at the eleventh hour and Mr. Goyal's tactics may pay off, it will be a politically risky gamble given that the Monsoon Session of Parliament is just two weeks away. Prime Minister Narendra Modi will find it difficult to commit to a trade deal with a maverick and unpredictable US president without exposing himself to criticism at home. While President Trump has promised a 'win-win' deal, he is now known to interpret every deal as a win for his 'America First' strategy. However balanced a trade deal might be between India and the US, in the competition between Mr. Trump's 'America First' and Mr. Modi's 'India First', the political Opposition in India would have enough to go to town accusing the Modi government of once again 'surrendering' to President Trump's diktat. Just as the BJP opposed trade deals signed by the Manmohan Singh government, the Congress and Left parties would oppose whatever deal India strikes with the United States, especially in the present context. The context is important. The Modi government is still pushing back on criticism that it agreed to a ceasefire with Pakistan under pressure from President Trump. It can ill afford to be seen as buckling under pressure on the trade front. The stakes are high. It is not just the criticism from the political Opposition that would worry the Modi government but, even more so, the criticism from within its own support ranks. Even on trade policy, there are as many protectionist hawks within the Sangh Parivar as there are in the Opposition. Given the difficulties associated with declaring victory on a trade deal with the United States, the Modi government had no option but to place the trade negotiations on the back burner. There can be no movement forward until the Monsoon Session of Parliament is over. A larger challenge stares India's trade negotiators in the face. Ever since the early 1990s, when India opted to enter into a multilateral trade agreement, the government has zealously defended the country's status as a developing economy. India signed on to the membership of the World Trade Organisation after being assured that, along with other developing economies, it would receive 'special and differential treatment' (SDT). India remains a protectionist economy by Asian standards. There was a time, during the tenures of the Atal Bihari Vajpayee and the Manmohan Singh governments, when India would declare that the objective of its trade policy was to bring India's tariffs down to 'ASEAN levels'. This objective has never been restated by the Narendra Modi government, which has in fact raised tariff barriers across many product lines over the past decade. India's trade partners have been protesting all along, and in President Donald Trump they have found a strong advocate of their grievances. There is, therefore, a two-fold problem for Prime Minister Modi with respect to trade and tariff policy. On the one hand, he remains under pressure from within the ranks of the Sangh Parivar to stick to a more protectionist stance. There are many reasons put forward to justify this. On the other hand, the world outside says that if India is indeed in its 'Amrit Kaal' and is the world's fourth or third largest economy and on its way to becoming 'Viksit Bharat' and is a 'rising power', a 'leading power', and so on and so forth, then why behave like a low-middle-income developing economy seeking 'special and differential' treatment? The argument for protecting the agrarian economy and the interests of farmers stands on an altogether different foundation. The highly developed economies of Europe and Japan have defended trade protectionism in agriculture on cultural, social and political grounds. The protection of farmers and the farming economy and the cultivation of local varieties of various products is a legitimate policy objective. India stands on firm ground in rejecting an open-ended policy of trade liberalisation in agriculture. If the United States continues to insist on this front, the Modi government will have no option but to reject and resist all pressure. Neither India nor Japan can agree to trade liberalisation in farm produce without risking a domestic political backlash. The protectionist argument in the case of manufactured goods is, however, much weaker. A policy option that can be pursued would be for the government to come out with a timetable for trade liberalisation and tariff reduction, setting firm dates for sectors, and gradually allowing the rupee to depreciate to partly compensate for tariff cuts. This would be in tandem with the earlier and oft-repeated promise of bringing Indian tariffs 'down to ASEAN levels'. This is a long-stated goal and is one that should be implemented. Rather than berate the ASEAN countries and call them the 'B-team' of China, as Mr Goyal has ill-advisedly done, it is time India caught up with ASEAN on the trade and manufacturing fronts. It may be recalled that India's trade and industrial policy liberalisation began in the early 1990s inspired by the experience of ASEAN. It was after his visit to Malaysia that the then prime minister Vishwanath Pratap Singh tasked an official in the Prime Minister's Office, Montek Singh Ahluwalia, to come up with a roadmap that would enable India to catch up with Malaysia. Mr Ahluwalia's 'M Paper' was the result and formed the basis of Prime Minister P. V. Narasimha Rao's trade and industrial policy. The time has come again for India to 'catch up' with East and Southeast Asia as far as trade and industrial policies are concerned. Mr Modi's 'Act East Policy' requires him to in fact act at home. This article was originally published in Deccan Chronicle. It has been lightly edited for style. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.