Norway sovereign fund drops investments in 11 Israeli companies - International
Nicolai Tangen, chief of Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM), which manages the fund, said the decision was taken "in response to extraordinary circumstances".
"The situation in Gaza is a serious humanitarian crisis. We are invested in companies that operate in a country at war, and conditions in the West Bank and Gaza have recently worsened," Tangen said in a statement.
Norway's wealth fund, also known as the oil fund as it is fuelled by vast revenue from the country's energy exports, is the biggest in the world with a value of around $1.9 trillion, with investments spanning the globe.
Last week, Norwegian newspaper Aftenposten reported that the fund had invested in Israeli Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings, which makes parts for engines used in Israeli fighter jets.
Tangen later confirmed the reports, and said the fund had increased its stake after the Israeli offensive in Gaza began.
The revelations led Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Store to ask Finance Minister and former NATO secretary general Jens Stoltenberg for a review.
NBIM said it had investments in 61 Israeli companies at the end of the first six months of this year, 11 of which were not in its "equity benchmark index" -- which is set by the finance ministry and used to gauge the wealth fund's performance.
In a statement, it added that it had decided last week that "all investments in Israeli companies that are not in the equity benchmark index will be sold as soon as possible".
The fund also said that it had "long paid particular attention to companies associated with war and conflict".
"Since 2020, we have been in contact with more than 60 companies to raise this issue. Of these, 39 dialogues were related to the West Bank and Gaza," NBIM said.
It said that monitoring of Israeli companies had been intensified in the autumn of 2024, and that "as a result, we have sold our investments in several Israeli companies".
Follow us on:
Short link:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
See - Sada Elbalad
7 hours ago
- See - Sada Elbalad
Perplexity AI Makes $34.5 Billion Play for Google's Chrome
H-Tayea AI startup Perplexity has stunned the tech world with a $34.5 billion all-cash bid to acquire Google's Chrome browser, the most widely used web browser on the planet. The offer, made public on August 12, 2025, comes as Google faces mounting antitrust pressure in the U.S., where regulators and the Justice Department are weighing remedies that could force the tech giant to divest Chrome. The move follows a landmark ruling last year by U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta, who found that Google violated antitrust law by unlawfully maintaining its search dominance through default agreements with device makers and browser developers. Chrome, which serves as a crucial gateway to Google Search and its vast data ecosystem, is now a prime target for structural remedies. Perplexity, valued at $18 billion and known for its AI-native Comet browser, says it can operate Chrome as an independent entity and restore real competition to the search sector. The company's offer includes: $34.5 billion in cash—a figure close to analyst estimates of Chrome's standalone value. A commitment to keep Chrome's open-source Chromium engine intact. Google as the default search engine—while preserving users' ability to switch freely. $3 billion in development investment over two years to expand Chrome's capabilities. Guaranteed 100 months of continued Chrome availability after the deal closes. Perplexity says it has secured backing from major venture-capital firms to fully finance the acquisition. If approved, the deal could transform the browser and search landscape. Perplexity has signaled plans to integrate AI-driven features and privacy tools, potentially challenging Google's traditional search model. Regulators have argued that only major divestitures like Chrome will meaningfully reduce Google's market power. Google has yet to comment on the offer, and analysts caution the bid remains a long shot—Chrome is not formally for sale, and Google is expected to contest any forced breakup. Other potential suitors, including OpenAI and Yahoo, have also expressed interest if Chrome is put on the market. Judge Mehta's decision on remedies could come within weeks, making Chrome's future—and the balance of power in internet search—one of the most closely watched developments in global tech. read more Gold prices rise, 21 Karat at EGP 3685 NATO's Role in Israeli-Palestinian Conflict US Expresses 'Strong Opposition' to New Turkish Military Operation in Syria Shoukry Meets Director-General of FAO Lavrov: confrontation bet. nuclear powers must be avoided News Iran Summons French Ambassador over Foreign Minister Remarks News Aboul Gheit Condemns Israeli Escalation in West Bank News Greek PM: Athens Plays Key Role in Improving Energy Security in Region News One Person Injured in Explosion at Ukrainian Embassy in Madrid Videos & Features Story behind Trending Jessica Radcliffe Death Video News Israeli-Linked Hadassah Clinic in Moscow Treats Wounded Iranian IRGC Fighters Arts & Culture "Jurassic World Rebirth" Gets Streaming Date News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier News Ayat Khaddoura's Final Video Captures Bombardment of Beit Lahia Business Egyptian Pound Undervalued by 30%, Says Goldman Sachs Videos & Features Tragedy Overshadows MC Alger Championship Celebration: One Fan Dead, 11 Injured After Stadium Fall Arts & Culture South Korean Actress Kang Seo-ha Dies at 31 after Cancer Battle Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt Arts & Culture Lebanese Media: Fayrouz Collapses after Death of Ziad Rahbani
See - Sada Elbalad
11 hours ago
- See - Sada Elbalad
The Jessica Radcliffe Orca Attack? 100% Fake and AI-Generated
By Ahmad El-Assasy The viral video claiming to show Jessica Radcliffe's death by an orca attack is entirely fabricated. It portrays an event featuring a marine trainer named Jessica Radcliffe at a made-up venue called Pacific Blue Marine Park, where she is supposedly killed during a performance. However, thorough investigations have debunked this video, highlighting several facts: - There is no evidence of Jessica Radcliffe's existence; no records, employment details, or credible accounts support the claim that she was a marine trainer or involved in such an incident. - The video in question is created using artificial intelligence, blending AI-generated voices with either manipulated or old footage to craft a false narrative. - It contains sensational details, such as the attack being provoked by menstrual blood, aimed at enhancing the emotional response and viral potential of the story. - This hoax draws on real-life tragedies, such as the deaths of trainers Alexis Martínez in 2009 at Loro Parque in the Canary Islands and Dawn Brancheau in 2010 at SeaWorld Orlando, which was featured in the documentary "Blackfish." These true events likely lent the video a semblance of credibility. - No credible evidence or official statements support the video's claims, underscoring its role as a stark example of how AI and social media can be used to propagate misinformation quickly. In essence, the story of Jessica Radcliffe's death is a fictional, AI-generated hoax without any factual basis, crafted to mislead and garner views by mimicking real orca attack incidents. read more Gold prices rise, 21 Karat at EGP 3685 NATO's Role in Israeli-Palestinian Conflict US Expresses 'Strong Opposition' to New Turkish Military Operation in Syria Shoukry Meets Director-General of FAO Lavrov: confrontation bet. nuclear powers must be avoided News Iran Summons French Ambassador over Foreign Minister Remarks News Aboul Gheit Condemns Israeli Escalation in West Bank News Greek PM: Athens Plays Key Role in Improving Energy Security in Region News One Person Injured in Explosion at Ukrainian Embassy in Madrid Videos & Features Story behind Trending Jessica Radcliffe Death Video News Israeli-Linked Hadassah Clinic in Moscow Treats Wounded Iranian IRGC Fighters Arts & Culture "Jurassic World Rebirth" Gets Streaming Date News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier News Ayat Khaddoura's Final Video Captures Bombardment of Beit Lahia Business Egyptian Pound Undervalued by 30%, Says Goldman Sachs Videos & Features Tragedy Overshadows MC Alger Championship Celebration: One Fan Dead, 11 Injured After Stadium Fall Arts & Culture South Korean Actress Kang Seo-ha Dies at 31 after Cancer Battle Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt Arts & Culture Lebanese Media: Fayrouz Collapses after Death of Ziad Rahbani
Daily News Egypt
12 hours ago
- Daily News Egypt
The Reoccupation of Gaza
When former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon executed his unilateral withdrawal plan from the Gaza Strip on September 11, 2005, the main selling point was clear: 'Protecting the settlers in the Strip is too costly.' Under this plan, Israel dismantled its military bases in Gaza, withdrew all soldiers, and evacuated over 9,000 Israeli settlers from 25 settlements. In reality, the unilateral pullout served as a calculated strategy to relocate several thousand illegal settlers from Gaza to other equally illegal settlements in the West Bank, while effectively sealing off the entire Strip from the outside world—a blockade that endures to this day. Now, nearly two decades later, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu appears to be turning back the clock, following the Israeli Security Cabinet's decision to reoccupy Gaza. In truth, however, this move is a leap into the unknown—an unpredictable gamble at a time when the humanitarian crisis within the enclave has reached catastrophic levels, with consequences that may spiral out of control. From a military standpoint, senior Israeli commanders have openly rejected the plan, deeming it both operationally exhausting and perilous—not only for soldiers but also for the remaining hostages still held by Hamas. Of the 251 people abducted on October 7, 2023, 50 remain in captivity. Given that 75% of Gaza is already under Israeli control, and to avoid further political-military fractures, the likely outcome is a hybrid strategy: neither a full siege nor a complete reoccupation. Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir, who voiced strong reservations about the plan, has instead advocated for fortifying the areas already under IDF control and launching targeted strikes from those positions to wear down and exhaust Hamas. These attack lines would lie west of the buffer zone, which is currently being cleared of tunnels and Hamas infrastructure. Zamir warned that reoccupation would erode both regular and reserve forces, drain resources, and overextend armored units, whose maintenance is already costly and logistically demanding. Military assessments suggest that fully occupying Gaza City and the central refugee camps could take years, not months, as some political leaders assume—with the longer timeline inevitably translating into higher casualties, deeper financial strain, and further deterioration of Israel's already tarnished global image, as accusations of genocide mount. Moreover, any attempt to seize the remainder of Gaza could result in the execution of all remaining hostages, making Netanyahu liable for an inevitable political showdown with their families. In fact, during the Cabinet meeting that approved reoccupation, Zamir urged the removal of 'hostage recovery' from the official objectives, warning that Hamas would kill them the moment Israeli troops re-enter the Strip. Reoccupation would also require calling up 250,000 reservists—a massive economic and social burden—and would drag Israel deeper into the Gaza quagmire, with the likelihood of more casualties among an already war-weary military entering its third year of sustained engagement on at least three fronts. According to Maariv, the psychological toll is intensifying, with suicide rates rising among soldiers who see no end in sight to a war that has failed to achieve any of its stated goals—neither freeing the hostages nor dismantling Hamas's military capacity. Another looming challenge is the question of supplying and feeding over two million displaced and unemployed Gazans—a responsibility the IDF is ill-equipped to bear. Zamir has categorically opposed assigning this burden to the military. Domestically, the relationship between political decision-makers and the military leadership has broken down, with each side blaming the other for the hostage crisis. The generals accuse Netanyahu of assuming a prisoner exchange was imminent, thereby holding back the military from delivering a decisive blow to Hamas. Netanyahu, in turn, claims the army failed both to prevent the October 7 attack and to defeat Hamas afterward. Adding to this internal friction is the opposition's exploitation of Netanyahu's crisis in a bid to collapse his coalition government—an outcome that could trigger early elections, a scenario that Israel can ill afford in its current predicament, as the political and diplomatic fallout could prove disastrous, resetting the conflict to square one. Regionally, Egypt has categorically rejected any large-scale ground invasion of Gaza, warning that such a move would threaten Egyptian national security and could jeopardize the 1979 Camp David peace treaty. Cairo is likely to view reoccupation as an attempt to impose a new status quo in Gaza—one that 'will not go unanswered' diplomatically and could prompt a reassessment of bilateral agreements with Tel Aviv. Meanwhile, another front is simmering: Lebanon—specifically Hezbollah—which has been trying to regroup after sustaining heavy losses since October 8, 2023. The Lebanese government has recently endorsed a policy to disarm the group and place all weapons under state control. Hezbollah's Deputy Secretary-General, Naim Qassem, has warned that if Israel intensifies operations against the movement, it will resume rocket fire into Israeli territory. For Hezbollah, the reoccupation of Gaza could provide a powerful pretext to re-enter the conflict, reshuffle the strategic deck, and improve its negotiating position—particularly now that it has little left to lose. The American role in this equation remains opaque. President Biden has publicly opposed the reoccupation plan, yet continues to grant Israel the necessary assurances—both in arms supplies and in ready-to-use UN Security Council vetoes. Some policy circles in Washington are increasingly embracing the view that Gaza's 'next phase' begins with force, not diplomacy—treating the Strip as rebellious territory that must first be subdued militarily before being rebuilt politically and securely. Global opposition to the plan, coupled with eroding domestic support, may ultimately force Netanyahu to abandon the illusion of reoccupation in favor of a single comprehensive deal—ending the war outright and withdrawing from most of Gaza in one stroke. This would require Hamas to be ready for such an agreement. The lingering question is: Does Netanyahu have an exit strategy? History suggests he usually finds one—but only for himself. The deeper problem is that no one in Israel's political or military leadership seems to have a viable plan for navigating the political, military, and humanitarian impasse. For now, everyone is simply waiting. Dr. Hatem Sadek – Professor at Helwan University
