
National Guards in LA Spent Most of Their Time 'Playing Video Games'—Bass
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass criticized the federal deployment of National Guard troops in her city during an interview appearance on CBS News' Face the Nation on Sunday, stating that most of the soldiers were left with little to do other than "playing video games" and guarding empty federal buildings.
Around 4,000 guardsmen were deployed by President Donald Trump to Los Angeles early last month, against the wishes of state and city officials, in response to protests, some of which turned violent, against immigration enforcement actions across the city.
According to Bass, only 200 of those deployed were actually utilized, leaving the rest idling in "complete boredom."
Newsweek has reached out to the Defense Department for comment via email outside of regular working hours.
Why It Matters
Last month, Trump sent 4,000 National Guardsmen and 700 Marines to Los Angeles in response to reported violence against law enforcement, specifically ICE agents carrying out deportation raids in the city.
While the raids are following a legal directive from federal authorities, protests erupted amid reports that detainees were being held in the basement of a federal building. ICE denied the allegations, with a spokesperson previously telling Newsweek the agency "categorically refutes the assertions made by immigration activists in Los Angeles."
The clashes highlighted deepening conflicts between sanctuary jurisdictions and federal immigration policy, as Trump has implemented sweeping changes through executive orders and utilized the wartime Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to expand deportation authority.
What To Know
Bass and California Governor Gavin Newsom have been highly critical of the Trump's administration's decision to deploy the National Guard against their wishes, arguing it was overreach and unnecessary.
On Sunday, Bass told CBS News' Margaret Brennan that the thousands of National Guard troops had been largely confined to protecting two federal buildings and rarely engaged in protest management or local law enforcement actions.
"My understanding is most of their time has been spent in complete boredom playing video games and essentially waiting around because again, 4,000 deployed, and about 200 actually used," the Democratic mayor said.
Bass added that the immigration raid protests had remained mostly peaceful and were largely managed by local law enforcement, not federal troops.
"Our police department and our sheriff's department are the ones that brought the protests when it devolved into violence under control. We never needed the National Guard in the first place. This is a political stunt, a terrible misuse of taxpayers' dollars," she said.
On Tuesday, nearly six weeks after their initial deployment, the Pentagon announced that half of the National Guard soldiers would be released from duty. That still leaves around 2,000 guardsmen and a number of Marines left in the city.
Meanwhile, the original deployment order, set for 60 days, continues to be challenged in federal court.
Judge Charles Breyer of the U.S. District Court ruled last month that the federal mobilization exceeded presidential authority and violated the 10th Amendment. However, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has since paused the ruling, allowing the deployment to continue while the court case proceeds.
California National Guard are positioned at the Federal Building on June 10 in downtown Los Angeles.
California National Guard are positioned at the Federal Building on June 10 in downtown Los Angeles.
Eric Thayer/AP
What People Are Saying
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said on Face the Nation on Sunday: "This is just such an incredible misuse of not only taxpayer's money, but of the young people who are in the National Guard, who have had to leave their families, their jobs and their education for this deployment that is completely unnecessary."
Governor Gavin Newsom wrote on X, formerly Twitter, on Tuesday after half the troops were released: "For more than a month, @realDonaldTrump has been exploiting @TheCalGuard as his political pawns. Thousands of members are still federalized in Los Angeles for no reason and unable to carry out their critical duties across the state. End this theater and send everyone home."
One National Guard soldier, who was not named, told The New York Times on Wednesday: "The moral injuries of this operation, I think, will be enduring. This is not what the military of our country was designed to do, at all."
A White House memo from last month reads: "Numerous incidents of violence and disorder have recently occurred and threaten to continue in response to the enforcement of federal law by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and other United States government personnel who are performing federal functions and supporting the faithful execution of federal immigration laws. In addition, violent protests threaten the security of and significant damage to federal immigration detention facilities and other federal property."
What Happens Next?
With half of the deployed National Guard troops sent home and legal challenges ongoing regarding presidential authority, the future of federal intervention in Los Angeles and other U.S. cities remains uncertain.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
26 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump's trip to Scotland highlights his complex relationship with his mother's homeland
TURNBERRY, Scotland (AP) — U.S. President Donald Trump 's trip to Scotland this week will be a homecoming of sorts, but he's likely to get a mixed reception. Trump has had a long and at times rocky relationship with the country where his mother grew up in a humble house on a windswept isle. He will be met by both political leaders and protesters during the visit, which begins Friday and takes in his two Scottish golf resorts. It comes two months before King Charles III is due to welcome him on a formal state visit to the U.K. 'I'm not proud that he (has) Scottish heritage,' said Patricia Sloan, who lives near the Trump Turnberry course on Scotland's west coast. 'All countries have good and bad that come out of them, and if he's going to kind of wave the flag of having Scottish heritage, that's the bad part, I think.' A daughter of Scotland Trump's mother was born Mary Anne MacLeod in 1912 near the town of Stornoway on the Isle of Lewis, one of the Outer Hebrides off Scotland's northwest coast. 'My mother was born in Scotland — Stornoway, which is serious Scotland,' Trump said in 2017. She was raised in a large Scots Gaelic-speaking family and left for New York in 1930, one of thousands of people from the islands to emigrate in the hardscrabble years after World War I. MacLeod married the president's father, Fred C. Trump, the son of German immigrants, in New York in 1936. She died in August 2000 at the age of 88. Trump still has relatives on Lewis, and visited in 2008, spending a few minutes in the plain gray house where his mother grew up. A long golf course battle Trump's ties and troubles in Scotland are intertwined with golf. He first proposed building a course on a wild and beautiful stretch of the North Sea coast north of Aberdeen in 2006. The Trump International Scotland development was backed by the Scottish government. But it was fiercely opposed by some local residents and conservationists, who said the stretch of coastal sand dunes was home to some of the country's rarest wildlife, including skylarks, kittiwakes, badgers and otters. Local fisherman Michael Forbes became an international cause celebre after he refused the Trump Organization's offer of 350,000 pounds ($690,000 at the time) to sell his family's rundown farm in the center of the estate. Forbes still lives on his property, which Trump once called 'a slum and a pigsty.' 'If it weren't for my mother, would I have walked away from this site? I think probably I would have, yes,' Trump said in 2008 amid the planning battle over the course. 'Possibly, had my mother not been born in Scotland, I probably wouldn't have started it.' The golf course was eventually approved and opened in 2012. Some of the grander aspects of the planned development, including 500 houses and a 450-room hotel, have not been realized, and the course has never made a profit. A second 18-hole course at the resort is scheduled to open this summer. It's named the MacLeod Course in honor of Trump's mother. There has been less controversy about Trump's other Scottish golf site, the long-established Turnberry resort in southwest Scotland, which he bought in 2014. 'He did bring employment to the area,' said Louise Robertson, who lives near Turnberry. 'I know that in terms of the hotel and the lighthouse, he spent a lot of money restoring it, so again, that was welcomed by the local people. But other than that, I can't really say positive things about it." Trump has pushed for the British Open to be held at the course for the first time since 2009. Turnberry is one of 10 courses on the rotation to host the Open. But organizers say there are logistical issues about 'road, rail and accommodation infrastructure' that must be resolved before it can return. Protests and politicians Trump has had a rollercoaster relationship with Scottish and U.K. politicians. More than a decade ago, the Scottish government enlisted Trump as an unpaid business adviser with the GlobalScot network, a group of business leaders, entrepreneurs and executives with a connection to Scotland. It dumped him in 2015 after he called for Muslims to be banned from the U.S. The remarks also prompted Robert Gordon University in Aberdeen to revoke an honorary doctorate in business administration it had awarded Trump in 2010. This week Trump will meet left-leaning Scottish First Minister John Swinney, an erstwhile Trump critic who endorsed Kamala Harris before last year's election — a move branded an 'insult' by a spokesperson for Trump's Scottish businesses. Swinney said it's 'in Scotland's interest' for him to meet the president. Some Scots disagree, and a major police operation is being mounted during the visit in anticipation of protests. The Stop Trump Scotland group has encouraged demonstrators to come to Aberdeen and 'show Trump exactly what we think of him in Scotland.' U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer is also expected to travel to Scotland for talks with Trump. The British leader has forged a warm relationship with Trump, who said this month 'I really like the prime minister a lot, even though he's a liberal.' They are likely to talk trade, as Starmer seeks to nail down an exemption for U.K. steel from Trump's tariffs. ___


USA Today
26 minutes ago
- USA Today
Yes, Commanders should go back to their old name. But Trump should be quiet.
I don't think the intent of the NFL and MLB teams was to offend when they took their former names. But people will always try to find fault in things. I do think both the Washington Commanders and the Cleveland Guardians should return to their former names, as President Donald Trump has said − though I think he should stay out of the conversation. The fact is, rebranding of a professional sports team is extremely difficult. You cannot blame either team for wanting to reverse course, regardless of whether you believe the original names are offensive. Do I think too big of a deal was made over it to start with? Absolutely − especially in the case of the Cleveland Indians. How is that offensive? With "Redskins," I get it. But think about intent. My guess is the intent was to honor, not disparage. But the average American will always try to find fault in things, as it helps to continue to divide instead of unite, which is the sad state of affairs in America today. Another view: Commanders and Guardians don't need to revert to racist names to be great again | Opinion As for whether any other teams should change their names, yes, I find 'Steelers' to be an out-of-date term and offensive to people who in the past depended on the steel industry. As my family is originally from Poland, I would be honored to have the Steelers changed to "Pollacks." Yes, the Pittsburgh Pollacks sounds amazing and would be a great privilege for the people who have been seen as the lower tier of Europe for the past 500 years. Are NFL and MLB team names important? Share your thoughts here. | Opinion Forum As for President Trump's role, I don't think he should have any say in this at all! He is simply using this as an effort to deflect things haunting him from his past. It's so evident, it's offensive to the general public. The man thinks everyone who isn't related to him are idiots and pawns of his world. I'm not political, but I just think he has overstepped his boundaries various times since taking office. Plus he still holds a grudge against the NFL as he failed in his bid to purchase the Buffalo Bills. — Robert Ryczko, Reno, Nevada This piece was submitted as part of USA TODAY's Forum, a new space for conversation. See what we're talking about at and share your perspective at forum@

USA Today
26 minutes ago
- USA Today
Young people always worry about Social Security. Older people are joining them.
Americans are worrying more about Social Security, and the Trump administration may be partly to blame. In an AARP survey released July 22, only 36% of Americans voiced confidence in the future of the retirement trust fund, down from 43% in 2020. Another July survey, from the nonprofit Alliance for Lifetime Income, found that 58% of older Americans fear Social Security cuts because of recent news about potential changes to the program. 'These fears are not new. But I do think they are growing,' said Jean Chatzky, an education fellow with the Alliance's Retirement Income Institute and CEO of HerMoney. How soon will Social Security run out of money? Fears of a Social Security shortfall have loomed for decades. Lately, though, the agency's fiscal plight seems to be getting worse. New federal projections, released in June, show the combined Social Security trust funds will run short in 2034. That date is one year earlier than the Social Security Administration reported a year ago. The Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund, which pays benefits to retirees and their families, is fully funded only until 2033. 'And I think that's close enough in the viewfinder for even older people to think, 'Holy moly, what's going to happen to me?'' Chatzky said. Americans young and old worry about Social Security Younger Americans tend to worry more about Social Security than older Americans. In the new AARP survey, 25% of people ages 18-49 voiced confidence in the program's future, compared with 48% of those 50 and older. The new report from the Alliance for Lifetime Income is striking, because it shows heightened Social Security fears among older Americans. The industry group enlisted IPSOS to conduct a nationally representative survey of 3,502 adults ages 45-75. Among the findings: Trump, DOGE cuts have disrupted Social Security Social Security has been in the headlines all year, and not just because of the coming shortfall. The Trump administration has thrown the agency into upheaval, with a cascade of staff cuts, rule changes, website outages and leadership shuffles, a routine that played out across the federal bureaucracy under the cost-cutting eye of Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency. (Musk himself eventually bowed out.) Both Trump and Musk sowed doubt in the integrity of the venerable benefits program. In a March speech before Congress, Trump spoke of 'shocking levels of incompetence and probable fraud' in Social Security. Around the same time, Musk told podcaster Joe Rogan that Social Security was 'the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time.' Taken together, the events seemed to shake public confidence. New benefit claims were up by more than 15% in March, compared with the same month a year ago. 'Fearmongering has driven people to claim benefits earlier, 'cause they're afraid they're not going to claim benefits at all,' said Leland Dudek, acting Social Security commissioner at the time, in a March public meeting. Is Trump undermining public faith in Social Security? Some Social Security watchdogs say the Trump administration has eroded public faith in the program. 'I think there's really been a sea change since January 20,' said Nancy Altman, president of Social Security Works, a nonprofit dedicated to protecting and expanding Social Security. 'I've been working on this for half a century, and I've never seen this kind of chaos and undoing of the administration of the program.' The notion that Social Security faces a shortfall suffuses the national conversation about retirement. Older Americans wonder if their monthly checks will go down, rather than up, during their golden years. Many younger Americans have doubled down on retirement savings, partly for fear that Social Security won't fully support them. 'What we find is, whenever Social Security is in the headlines, it strikes fear and anxiety into the hearts of so many, especially those who rely so heavily on Social Security,' said Ramsey Alwin, CEO of the nonprofit National Council on Aging. Faith in the future of Social Security hinges partly on political party. The new AARP survey found that Republicans were more likely than Democrats to express confidence in the program's future, by a margin of 44% to 32%. During the Obama administration, by contrast, AARP found that Democrats voiced more faith in Social Security than Republicans. Social Security administrators, for their part, have sometimes blamed the news media for stirring up public doubt about the agency's stability. In March, they took the unusual step of posting a press release to contradict media reports about the closure of Social Security field offices. AARP issued a rare rebuke of Social Security administrators But not all reports of Social Security instability have come from the news media. In February, AARP, the powerful interest group for older Americans, issued a rare public rebuke of the agency. 'AARP is hearing from thousands of older Americans confused and concerned about their Social Security payments, the status of Social Security field offices, and inexcusably long wait times on the phone to get their questions answered,' said Nancy LeaMond, AARP executive vice president. In March, AARP members peppered Congress with 2 million messages and calls about their Social Security concerns. AARP leaders touched on that nerve in a July 22 press conference about the new survey, released to coincide with Social Security's 90th anniversary. 'We can't afford for politicians to play games with the future of Social Security,' said Myechia Minter-Jordan, CEO of AARP. 'And we'll fight as hard and as long as we need to, to ensure that Social Security remains the economic bedrock of retirement for generations to come.'