Germany's defense minister to press US on arms supply, missile deployment
Pistorius is likely to receive a warm reception as Europe's biggest economy recently emerged as a key player in NATO's largest military build-up since the Cold War, having for decades lagged behind in defense spending.
As European officials fret over a possible future attack from Russia and brace for a drawdown of US forces, Germany loosened its constitutional debt brake to meet NATO's new core military spending target of 3.5 percent of national output by 2029.
The move will boost German defense spending to 162 billion euros ($189 billion) in 2029 from 95 billion euros in the draft budget for 2025.
At a meeting with Hegseth at the Pentagon, Pistorius will discuss Berlin's offer to pay for American Patriot air defense systems for Ukraine, a proposal made public by Chancellor Friedrich Merz weeks ago after private discussions failed to elicit a response from Washington.
On Sunday, US President Donald Trump said he will send Patriot missiles to Ukraine. He did not give a number, but he said the United States would be reimbursed for their cost by the European Union.
Germany has already donated three Patriot units to Kyiv, as Ukraine endures some of the heaviest Russian attacks in recent weeks.
However, European allies remain uneasy about the new US administration's unpredictable stance on arms supplies. On Tuesday, Trump said he had approved sending defensive weapons to Ukraine and was considering additional sanctions on Moscow, just days after the Pentagon halted shipments of critical arms to Ukraine.
Pistorius will also seek clarity on whether Washington remains committed to temporarily deploying long-range missiles to Germany from 2026, as agreed under former President Joe Biden.
The deployment would include systems such as Tomahawk cruise missiles with a range of 1,800 kilometers (1,118 miles) and the developmental hypersonic weapon Dark Eagle with a range of around 3,000 km.
Russia has criticised the plans as a serious threat to its national security and dismissed NATO concerns that it could attack an alliance member.
Another key issue will be an ongoing review of the US force posture worldwide that could lead to troop cuts in Europe where around 80,000 US soldiers serve, including some 40,000 in Germany.
European allies are urging Washington to ensure any drawdown is coordinated to prevent capability gaps that might leave NATO members vulnerable to Russian aggression. ($1 = 0.8555 euros)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Saudi Gazette
29 minutes ago
- Saudi Gazette
'Not our war' — Trump's Nato weapons deal for Ukraine sparks MAGA anger
WASHINGTON — Some conservative members of Donald Trump's "Make America Great Again" movement have reacted angrily to the president's plans to sell weapons to Nato, arguing it is a betrayal of his promise to end US involvement in foreign wars. On Monday, Trump said he would send weapons to Ukraine via Nato, while also threatening Russia with more tariffs if a deal to end the war is not reached in 50 days. Republican Congresswomen Marjorie Taylor Greene, a key Trump ally, and former Trump strategist Steve Bannon are among those who have criticised the decision, with Bannon telling his podcast listeners that Ukraine is a "European war". The White House has emphasised that Europe will pay for the US-made weapons. In an interview with the New York Times, Greene - an isolationist member of Congress from Georgia who has been one of the most loyal Trump supporters on Capitol Hill - said the move was at odds with what she had promised voters on the campaign trail. "It's not just Ukraine; it's all foreign wars in general and a lot of foreign aid," she said. "This is what we campaigned on. This is what I promised also to my district. This is what everybody voted for. And I believe we have to maintain the course."Trump sought to emphasise that the weapons would be paid for rather than given as direct aid, saying on Monday: "We're not buying it, but we will manufacture it, and they're going to be paying for it."But in a rare public disagreement with the president, Greene expressed scepticism that US taxpayers would ultimately avoid bearing any cost and, in a post on social media, criticised "backdoor deals through Nato"."Without a shadow of a doubt, our tax dollars are being used," she told the New York Times, arguing that indirect costs such as US training missions and contributions to Nato qualify as US involvement."I said it on every rally stage: no more money to Ukraine. We want peace. We just want peace for those people," she said. "And guess what? People haven't changed."One former Trump campaign official, speaking on the condition of anonymity to Politico, said Europe's purchase of the weapons "mitigates" the anger from Trump's isolationist supporters."But we still hate it," the official said. "This is not our war, and escalation isn't in America's interest."Steve Bannon, a former adviser to Trump, said on his War Room podcast that "Ukraine is getting so dangerous"."It's a European war. Let Europe deal with it," he said. "They have the resources. They have the manpower.""We're about to arm people we have literally no control over," Bannon said of Ukraine. "This is old-fashioned, grinding war in the bloodlands of Europe - and we're being dragged into it."In a statement quoted by Politico, White House Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly said that Trump's MAGA base "aren't panicans like the media"."They trust in Trump, and they know that this president is restoring peace through strength."The BBC has contacted the White House for comment.A White House official who spoke to Politico on the condition of anonymity disagreed that the president's base opposed his moves. They pointed to one recent poll that suggested nearly two-thirds of Trump voters support continuing to send arms to in the Trump administration have also defended the president's decision, with Under Secretary of Defense Elbridge Colby writing on X that Trump's "America First message is that our alliances have to be fair and equitable"."This is eminently reasonable but was treated for many years as heresy," he added. "Yet now with the historic Nato commitment we see that it can work."That recent commitment from Nato leaders to ramp up defence spending to 5% of their economic output was praised by Trump supporters on Monday, who argued that even with the new weapons deal Europe was taking on more responsibility for its in an exclusive interview with the BBC on Monday, just hours after he met Nato chief Mark Rutte at the White House, Trump said the alliance was now "paying its own bills".He affirmed his support for the organization's common defence principle, and said he was "disappointed but not done" with Russia's Vladimir president said that he had thought a deal to end the war in Ukraine was on the cards with Russia four different times. — BBC
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Trump says UK would fight for US, suggests EU may not
US President Donald Trump said he believed Britain would fight to defend the United States but suggested he could not say the same for the European Union, a factor in his decision not to sign a trade deal with the bloc. Trump told the BBC in an interview published on Tuesday that he also still had doubts about support from NATO members, even after they agreed to increase defense spending. 'One of the problems with NATO, as I said, we have to fight for them, but will they actually fight for us if we had a war?' 'And I'm not sure I can say it, but I will say this, I believe that the UK would fight with us,' he said. 'I think that they would be with us. I'm not sure that a lot of the other countries would be.' Trump said this was a factor in his willingness to grant Britain some exemptions from his tariff program. In contrast, he has threatened a 30 percent tariff on European goods. 'Look, that's why I made a deal with them, and I haven't made a deal, I mean, I've made some other deals, but for the most part, in terms of your competitors, and in terms of the European Union, I haven't made a deal,' he told the BBC. The only time NATO has activated Article 5 - the cornerstone of its founding treaty which stipulates that an attack on one is an attack on all - was on behalf of the United States, in response to the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks. British troops supported the US in conflicts that followed in Afghanistan and Iraq but since then, the army has reduced in size.
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Alleged Danish spy for Iran handed over to Germany after spying on Jewish targets
Denmark has extradited to Germany a man accused of spying on Jewish institutions in Berlin on behalf of Iran, German prosecutors said Tuesday. Germany's Federal Court of Justice formally ordered the Danish national's detention on Tuesday, the prosecutor's office said in a statement. The suspect, identified only as Ali S., was extradited to Germany on Monday, nearly three weeks after his arrest in the Danish city of Aarhus, the office said. Prosecutors allege that Ali S. in June gathered intelligence on three Jewish sites in Berlin, possibly in preparation for future attacks. Suspected of acting on behalf of Iranian intelligence, Ali S. could face up to 10 years in prison if convicted. His arrest followed intelligence provided by Germany's domestic security agency, the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution. Germany's Federal Criminal Police Office was also involved in the investigation. News magazine Der Spiegel and public broadcaster ARD reported that the suspect is 53, has Afghan roots and might have been acting on behalf of Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps. They also reported that he had monitored the headquarters of the German-Israeli Society. Germany's foreign ministry summoned the Iranian ambassador on July 1 following the man's arrest.
