Palmer Moland pleads no contest to healthcare fraud
All cases against him are now resolved.
Moland, 37, a former trustee with the Fairfax School District, entered no contest pleas to fraudulently receiving healthcare benefits and altering medical records, and unlawfully obtaining public aid in an amount exceeding $950.
Judge Gloria Cannon set sentencing for July 15. She said the sentence will run concurrent with and will not exceed what Moland is sentenced to in his voter fraud case.
The maximum penalty in that case is four years and eight months in prison.
According to prosecutors, Moland began misrepresenting his health status in 2018 to become eligible for the In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program, which overpaid $78,012.55 for services that included laundry, cleaning, meal preparation and assistance while showering, according to prosecutors. He received IHSS assistance for four years.
In the voter fraud case, Moland was accused of using an address he didn't live at when filling out elections paperwork in 2018 and 2022 and running for governing board member of the Fairfax School District.
He was elected to the board in 2018.
At trial, Deputy Public Defender Ajaib Gill argued Moland actually did live at the address he listed on paperwork for the 2018 election. He said Moland divided his time between that address and an apartment outside the district, but the one within the district was his home address.
After that home was sold in 2021, Moland looked for another residence within the district but was unable to find one, and was 'functionally homeless,' Gill said.
Moland contacted the elections division to try to have his name removed from the ballot — he'd listed the old address on elections paperwork — but it was too late, Gill said. The ballots had already been printed.
Moland was found guilty of perjury and filing false candidacy papers in connection with the 2022 election, charges which Gill conceded. Not guilty verdicts were returned on the six remaining counts; two other charges were dismissed before trial began.
Sentencing in that case is set for July 9.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
A Governor Celebrated Free School Lunches And MAGA Absolutely LOST IT In Her Comment Section
Recently, New York Governor Kathy Hochul celebrated the state's new universal free meals program that will go into effect this school year and ensure that public schools have free breakfast and lunch for all students. Yay! No child going hungry. That's something we can all agree on, right? WRONG. Governor Hochul's celebratory post has a comment section with 10,000 replies, and many of them are from livid conservatives. Before I unleash their thoughts, just a quick reminder: ALL SHE SAID WAS THAT FEEDING KIDS HELPS THEM SUCCEED. And here's how MAGA responded. 🚨 Warning. It's quite a doozy. 🚨 Related: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Related: 6. 7. 8. 9. Related: 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Related: 16. 17. 18. In conclusion: Twitter: @trouble_man90 Share your thoughts in the comments. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Grandville orthodontist facing federal child exploitation charges
GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. (WOOD) — An orthodontist who formerly practiced in Grandville is now facing federal child exploitation charges. Thomas Shannon, 43, was arrested in Frankfort, Michigan, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Western District of Michigan announced Wednesday. He is charged by criminal complaint with sexual exploitation of a minor, attempted sexual exploitation of a minor, possession of child pornography, receipt of child pornography and attempted receipt of child pornography, according to the attorney's office. According to a criminal complaint filed in federal court Monday, a therapist reported in 2021 that a teenager had been sexually exploited. The victim told police that she had received money in exchange for sending illicit images, the complaint continues, and investigators traced the Snapchat and CashApp accounts to Shannon, who lived in Byron Township. Sex offender, busted in sting but not arrested, snagged again In 2022, amid a Kent County investigation, the complaint says Shannon hired a private forensic investigator to search his phone 'in an attempt to prove that he did not possess any child pornography.' 'The examiner, however, found child pornography and turned it over to police,' the U.S. Attorney's Office wrote in a release. Authorities found evidence that Shannon possessed and received child pornography, according to the complaint. Investigators found that Shannon had communicated with multiple minor victims whom he met online, the complaint alleges. One was just 12 years old. The complaint placed most of the victims out of state. Shannon was in January 2023. But according to the federal complaint, he was released on bond. Investigators found that he was on bond for those charges while communicating with one victim — a 13-year-old — in 2024, the complaint alleges. The state case against Shannon is pending. A status conference in that case has been set for early October. In the federal case, a detention hearing is scheduled for Friday. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Vox
4 hours ago
- Vox
Want your company's merger approved? Pay a MAGA influencer.
is a senior politics correspondent at Vox, covering the White House, elections, and political scandals and investigations. He's worked at Vox since the site's launch in 2014, and before that, he worked as a research assistant at the New Yorker's Washington, DC, bureau. Attorney General Pam Bondi delivers remarks as President Donald Trump looks on during a press conference in the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room of the White House August 11, 2025, in Washington, DC.A former Trump Justice Department appointee blasted some of his ex-colleagues in a speech Monday, saying they 'perverted justice and acted inconsistent with the rule of law' — and he named names. Roger Alford was a top appointee in the DOJ's antitrust division in both President Donald Trump's first and second terms. He and his boss, DOJ antitrust division chief Gail Slater, are associated with a faction on the right that wants tougher antitrust enforcement. They take a more skeptical view of mergers in sectors where only a few major companies are competing. But Alford was fired last month. And now, he's gone public about what happened, outlining what he said amounted to a 'pay-to-play' scandal, where companies paid well-connected outside MAGA influencers to try to get mergers approved, and certain top DOJ officials played ball. 'For 30 pieces of silver, MAGA-in-Name-Only lobbyists are influencing their allies within the DOJ and risking President Trump's populist conservative agenda,' Alford said. 'Their goal is to line their own pockets by working for any corporation that will pay top dollar to settle antitrust cases on the cheap.' 'Perverted justice and acted inconsistent with the rule of law' Though Alford didn't have anything negative to say about Trump or Attorney General Pam Bondi, he pointed the finger at two officials in particular: Bondi's chief of staff, Chad Mizelle, and Associate Attorney General nominee Stan Woodward. Mizelle 'makes key decisions depending on whether the request or information comes from a MAGA friend,' Alford said. He continued: 'Aware of this injustice, companies are hiring lawyers and influence peddlers to bolster their MAGA credentials and pervert traditional law enforcement.' The background to this is that back in January, shortly after Trump was sworn in, the DOJ's antitrust team sued to block IT company Hewlett Packard Enterprise from buying a rival, Juniper Networks. But in June, DOJ suddenly backed off, agreeing to a settlement that let the deal proceed with minor concessions. This, Alford clearly believes, was because Hewlett Packard hired two outside MAGA figures to grease the wheels for them: Mike Davis (a conservative legal activist) and Arthur Schwartz (a longtime ally of Donald Trump Jr.). 'Mike Davis and Arthur Schwartz have made a Faustian bargain of trading on relationships with powerful people to reportedly earn million-dollar success fees by helping corporations undermine Trump's antitrust agenda, hurt working class Americans, break the rules, and then try to cover it up,' Alford said in his speech. Alford didn't go into all the details about what happened, but Semafor has reported that Mizelle overruled Slater and Alford to push through the Hewlett Packard settlement — and Alford was fired soon afterward. (The drama spilled out into public, and even Laura Loomer got involved, as the antimonopoly advocate Matt Stoller has chronicled.) Urging a judge reviewing the merger to dig into the matter more, Alford's speech continued: 'It is my opinion that in the HPE/Juniper merger scandal, Chad Mizelle, and Stanley Woodward perverted justice and acted inconsistent with the rule of law. I am not given to hyperbole, and I do not say that lightly.' A DOJ spokesperson pushed back in a statement: 'Roger Alford is the James Comey of antitrust — pursuing blind self-promotion and ego, while ignoring reality. He was fired from the Department, and all should treat his comments for what they are — the delusional musings of a disgruntled ex.' What this is really all about Over the past decade, a new antitrust movement skeptical of Big Tech and big corporations generally has gained some traction on both the left and right. Biden's FTC chair, Lina Khan, became the face of this movement for Democrats, and certain up-and-coming Republicans seeking a populist brand, such as JD Vance, professed admiration for her. Most Republicans, though, loathed Khan, sympathizing with complaints from business leaders that she was overly scrutinizing mergers, and took the GOP's traditional pro-corporate line. When Trump won his second term, though, he nominated a Vance staffer, Gail Slater, as his DOJ antitrust chief. Antitrust reformers like Stoller liked Slater and took her appointment as an encouraging sign that 'Trump wants to take on big tech.' In practice, though, Trump's administration has been most defined by its weaponization of government for shakedown tactics. Trump likes deals, and he likes getting companies (or universities) to cough up money. He likes it when people ask him for favors, and he likes asking for things from them in return. He was never truly committed to an ideological agenda of tough antitrust enforcement. And he's fine with Big Tech, so long as Big Tech gives him what he wants. Slater and Alford apparently didn't get the memo and thought they'd have a free hand to enforce the law as they felt appropriate. But this earned them enemies inside and outside the administration, CBS News reported last month. There were deals to be had — and money to be made. In his speech, Alford referred to 'people inside and outside government' who 'consider law enforcement not as binding rules but an opportunity to leverage power and extract concessions.' But though Alford put the blame on those two DOJ officials, his description seems to fit Trump's approach to governance quite well. We don't know whether Trump himself got involved in the Hewlett Packard matter. But, as the saying goes, the Cossacks work for the Czar.
