
Minnesota Legislature approves increased electric vehicle fee to shore up funding for roads and bridges
The current $75 annual fee will double to at least $150. How much someone pays could be steeper if they have a more expensive, newer vehicle, similar to how the state calculates registration fees, which EV owners must still pay.
For example, a new EV with a $50,000 retail price would mean a $250 fee based on that calculation, which is more than three times the current rate.
The provision was part of a bipartisan transportation package that the divided Legislature approved during Monday's special session and the objective was to find a sustainable path forward for transportation at a time when gas tax revenue — a large source of that support — is declining, according to the Minnesota Department of Transportation.
More electric vehicles on the road, which is the state's goal, will mean even fewer dollars flowing into that account in the future.
"There's kind of an irony where we want more fuel-efficient vehicles, but that decreases the amount of money that's going into our roads and bridges to maintain them," said Rep. Jon Koznick, R-Lakeville, the Republican co-chair of the House Transportation Committee. "We have about a billion dollars a year funding gap just to maintain our roads and bridges. And so that's why electric vehicles were getting a really good deal before — they're still going to get a pretty good deal."
Koznick explained he would have preferred to make the fee flat across the board and not use the formula that would increase the costs for newer vehicles, which he called "convoluted." But it was part of a compromise with Democrats in a divided Capitol, where bipartisan support was required to advance any legislation.
EV owners should be paying higher fees because those cars are heavier and do more damage to the roads, he said.
The new surcharge takes effect for car registrations after Jan. 1.
There is also a new five-cent fee per kilowatt hour of electricity at public charging stations set to take effect in July 2027, at which point the annual surcharge minimum would drop from $150 to $100.
Meanwhile, EV advocates are worried increased fees will make consumers pump the brakes on buying one when it's better for the environment.
"We do have concerns that we could be discouraging adoption at this point, at a time when the state has said it really wants to support electrification and get more EVs on the roads," said Carolyn Berninger with Drive Electric Minnesota Coalition in a March interview.
Only 1% of cars in Minnesota are electric today, Berninger said, but sales are increasing. Seven percent of cars purchased in 2023 were electric, according to the Minnesota Department of Commerce. The state's goal is that 20% of all cars are electric by 2030.
"We feel like now is not the time to hike up EV fees because the market is still emerging," Berninger said.
Pat O'Brien of St. Paul told WCCO Wednesday that he loves his electric vehicle that he's had for the last few years. He estimates he has saved thousands in that time by not having to pay for gas.
He said he isn't quite sure how he feels about the changes.
"I understand the reasoning behind why there should be a surcharge, but I'm not sure about this extra—this is news to me that there's yet two more charges," he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
29 minutes ago
- Axios
Judge blocks Arkansas Ten Commandments law in 4 NWA school districts
Editor's note: The headline, URL and content of this story were corrected to reflect that the judge temporarily blocked the law from taking effect in four districts (not in the entire state). A federal judge Aug. 4 temporarily blocked in four school districts an Arkansas law that now requires public school classrooms to prominently display the Ten Commandments. Why it matters: Some supporters of the change see the Ten Commandments as a historical document that helped shape U.S. law, but the plaintiffs in Bentonville, Fayetteville, Springdale and Siloam Springs argue that displaying the document in public schools infringes on their constitutional right to freedom of religion. State of play: Arkansas Act 573, passed by the state Legislature this year and signed into law by Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, requires that every "public institution of higher education and elementary and secondary school library and classroom in the state" prominently display a copy of the "historical representation of the Ten Commandments." The posters areto be at least 16 inches by 20 inches and in a legible typeface. All copies are to be donated or purchased through private funds, but if a donated copy doesn't meet the requirements, the school can replace it using public funds. The big picture: In his ruling, U.S. Western District of Arkansas Judge Timothy Brooks cited similar laws in nearby Louisiana and Texas. The Louisiana law has been declared unconstitutional, and the Texas law is being challenged, though a ruling hasn't yet been declared. Oklahoma's state superintendent issued guidelines last year that every classroom have a copy of the Bible and the Ten Commandments and that teachers should include the documents in the curriculum. The guidance is being challenged. At least 15 other states had proposed some form of the law as of February. What they're saying: "Forty-five years ago, the Supreme Court struck down a Ten Commandments law nearly identical to the one the Arkansas General Assembly passed earlier this year. That precedent remains binding on this Court and renders Arkansas Act 573 plainly unconstitutional," Brooks wrote in the ruling. "Why would Arkansas pass an obviously unconstitutional law? Most likely because the State is part of a coordinated strategy among several states to inject Christian religious doctrine into public-school classrooms." The other side: "In Arkansas, we do in fact believe that murder is wrong and stealing is bad. It is entirely appropriate to display the Ten Commandments — the basis of all Western law and morality — as a reminder to students, state employees, and every Arkansan who enters a government building," Sanders said in a statement emailed to Axios. Several state lawmakers sponsoring the bill did not immediately respond to Axios' inquiries.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Americas Gold And Silver Corp (USAS) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Silver Production Soars ...
Release Date: August 11, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Positive Points Americas Gold And Silver Corp (USAS) significantly strengthened its balance sheet by closing a $100 million senior secured debt facility with SAF, providing capital for growth, particularly at the Galena complex. The company achieved a 54% increase in silver production in Q2 2025, producing 689,000 ounces, reflecting strong operational performance. A new 5-year offtake agreement for 100% of Galena's production was secured, providing revenue certainty and improved terms for byproduct credits. The introduction of long hole scoping at Galena has led to higher productivity rates and lower costs, marking a significant operational improvement. The company reported a cash balance increase to $62 million, up by $53 million from Q1, mainly due to the first tranche of the term loan facility and offtake financing. Negative Points Revenue decreased to $27 million in Q2 2025 from $33 million in Q2 2024, attributed to lower zinc and lead production. The company reported a net loss of $15 million, an increase from $4 million in Q2 2024, driven by investments in revitalizing the Galena mine and transitioning to EC 120 at Cosala. Cost of sales per silver equivalent ounce was approximately $28, with cash costs at $26.64 per silver ounce and all-in sustaining costs at $32.89 per silver ounce. The adjusted EBITDA was a $4 million loss, indicating ongoing financial challenges despite operational improvements. The transition to EC 120 at Cosala led to a dip in base metal output, impacting overall revenue despite increased silver production. Q & A Highlights Warning! GuruFocus has detected 9 Warning Signs with USAS. Q: Can you elaborate on the financial impact of the new $100 million senior secured debt facility? A: Paul Hewitt, CEO, explained that the $100 million debt facility with SAF Group significantly strengthens the company's balance sheet. It provides the necessary capital to fuel their growth strategy, particularly at the Galena complex, enabling increased development rates, boosted mining tonnages, and reduced unit costs. Q: What are the expected benefits of the new long hole stoping method at Galena? A: Paul Hewitt, CEO, highlighted that the long hole stoping method offers safety improvements, higher productivity rates, lower costs, increased backfill capacity, and reduced waste. This method allows for drilling and blasting up to 7,000 tons compared to the previous 50-70 tons, marking a significant operational shift. Q: How did the production numbers for Q2 2025 compare to previous quarters? A: Paul Hewitt, CEO, reported a 54% increase in silver production, reaching 689,000 ounces compared to 446,000 ounces in Q1. Galena saw a 34% increase, producing 420,000 ounces, while Cosala in Mexico achieved a 103% increase, contributing 269,000 ounces. Q: What are the financial highlights for Q2 2025? A: Warren Varga, CFO, stated that revenue was $27 million, down from $33 million in Q2 2024 due to lower zinc and lead production. The net loss was $15 million, driven by investments in Galena and the transition to EC 120 at Cosala. However, the cash balance increased to $62 million, supported by the debt facility and offtake financing. Q: What strategic developments are enhancing the company's market visibility? A: Oliver Turner, EVP of Corporate Development, mentioned hosting an analyst tour at Galena and achieving 82% of revenue from silver, surpassing their short-term goal. The upcoming share consolidation aims to expand the stock's investability, potentially enhancing liquidity and attracting larger institutional investors. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Intellinetics Inc (INLX) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Navigating Challenges with Strategic ...
Release Date: August 13, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Positive Points Intellinetics Inc (INLX) successfully renewed a five-year contract with its largest customer, with an additional five-year extension option. The company has rebuilt its backlog with orders that will restore transformation work to historical levels by the end of Q3. Intellinetics Inc (INLX) completed successful testing on a large microfilm conversion project, expected to add revenue in Q4 and beyond. The company has grown revenues at 12.6% in Q2 year-over-year, despite challenges in key vertical markets. Intellinetics Inc (INLX) has paid off $7.6 million in debt and earnouts, positioning itself to invest in sales, marketing, and development for future growth. Negative Points Total revenue for Q2 2025 decreased by 13.6% compared to the same period last year, primarily due to a reduction in professional services revenue. Operating expenses increased by 21.1% in Q2 2025, driven by investments in sales, marketing, and infrastructure. The company reported a net loss of $568,000 for Q2 2025, compared to a net income of $75,000 in the same period last year. Intellinetics Inc (INLX) expects 2025 revenues to be less than 2024 revenues due to weakness in professional services in the first half of the year. Adjusted EBITDA for Q2 2025 was significantly lower at $28,000 compared to $698,000 in the same period in 2024, due to reduced professional services and increased investment spending. Q & A Highlights Warning! GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with INLX. Q: In terms of the professional services ramping back up to historical levels, should we also model out that margins will be relatively healthy at historical levels or maybe even a little better than historical levels? A: Yes, we expect margins to be a little bit better than historical levels. The June 1 renewal, which includes a 5-year contract with an extension, comes with some price increases embedded, leading to anticipated margin improvement. (Respondent: CFO) Q: How many customers on the home builder side are live, and how many have paused but are expected to go live in the next 6 months? A: Currently, 80% of our customers are live, and the rest are moving aggressively towards live dates. The product has matured over the last year, and customers are satisfied, with many being referenceable. (Respondent: CEO) Q: From this point forward, should we expect double-digit growth in the fast line if nothing else out of the ordinary occurs? A: Yes, the pipeline is strong, and we haven't lost any business. We anticipate a strong fourth quarter, especially with the launch of our payables automation product into the K-12 market and other initiatives. (Respondent: CEO) Q: Has the pipeline for K-12 utilizing the IPA grown, and have more customers gone live? A: Yes, we now have four live customers in the K-12 market, up from three. We are also negotiating upsells and expanding our marketing efforts, expecting significant results in this sector. (Respondent: CEO) Q: Can you talk about any progress being made on entering new verticals or ERP verticals? A: We have a partner manager working diligently on this. We signed Spring Brook earlier in the year, and we are actively calling on new partners to expand our ecosystem. (Respondent: CEO) For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.