Xi urges greater cooperation with Vietnam as trade tensions with U.S. flare
Xi starts a three-nation tour of Southeast Asia this week, beginning his state visits with Vietnam on Monday and Tuesday.
The trip comes with an aim to consolidate economic ties with some of China's closest neighbors at a time when the world's top two economies are locked in a tariff tussle.
China hiked its levies on imports of U.S. goods to 125% on Friday, hitting back at U.S. President Donald Trump's decision to single out the world's No. 2 economy for higher duties.
Xi also urged strengthening coordination and cooperation through regional initiatives such as the East Asia Cooperation and the Lancang-Mekong Cooperation, the ministry said, citing an article by the Chinese leader published in Vietnam media.
He called such efforts necessary to "inject more stability and positive energy into a chaotic and intertwined world."
"There are no winners in trade wars and tariff wars, and protectionism has no way out," Xi said, without mentioning the U.S. specifically.
"We must firmly safeguard the multilateral trading system, maintain the stability of the global industrial and supply chains, and maintain the international environment for open cooperation," he said.
Last week, China sought to get ahead of U.S. negotiators, holding video calls with the EU and Malaysia, which is chairing the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) this year, as well as Saudi Arabia and South Africa, by way of reaching out to Gulf countries and the Group of 20 and BRICS nations.
In hope of avoiding punishing U.S. tariffs, Vietnam is prepared to crack down on Chinese goods being shipped to the United States via its territory and will tighten controls on sensitive exports to China, according to a person familiar with the matter and a government document seen by reporters.
In the article, Xi said China welcomes more high-quality imports from Vietnam and encourages more Chinese enterprises to invest and start businesses in the Southeast Asian country.
Both countries should expand cooperation in emerging fields such as 5G, artificial intelligence and green development, the article said.
Vietnam has long pursued a "bamboo diplomacy" approach, striving to stay on good terms with both China and the United States.
The two countries have close economic ties, but Hanoi shares U.S. concerns about Beijing's increasing assertiveness in the contested South China Sea. China claims almost all of the South China Sea as its own, but this is disputed by the Philippines, Malaysia, Vietnam, Indonesia and Brunei.
The Chinese leader in his Monday article insisted Beijing and Hanoi could resolve those disputes through dialogue.
"We should properly manage differences and safeguard peace and stability in our region," Xi wrote. "With vision, we are fully capable of properly settling maritime issues through consultation and negotiation."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Diplomat
17 minutes ago
- The Diplomat
Southeast Asia's Tax Policy Discussion Needs Some Counterintuitive Thinking
The two most important underlying economic factors of the next decade in Southeast Asia will be taxation and demography. Most countries will face a decline in working-age adults (taxpayers) and a major increase in retirees (sappers of state money). People are living longer, yet the elderly are going to have fewer relatives to look after them. In many countries in the region, pension systems are either non-existent or already at breaking point, while the intended pension-by-property solution has backfired in most countries. Most healthcare systems are certainly not ready for the pending increase in demand. All of this comes as governments need to get creative with revenue collection. One little-spoken-about impact of the Trump tariffs is that with most Southeast Asian governments agreeing to cut duties on U.S. imports to nearly zero, they're losing a significant chunk of their revenue. Indeed, this and the boom in free trade agreements mean that Southeast Asian governments are having to rely far more on domestic taxes, instead of customs and excise (the usual source of funds), at the same time as revenue collection must massively increase. The expected rational response will be to coerce people into paying higher taxes. However, cheaper, more effective ways are available. For instance, taxpayers could be given a list of five areas in which they want their money to be spent. For example: education, healthcare, defense, public infrastructure, and social development. From the five, they would select three. A ministry would collect all the votes and aggregate them. At a national level, 50 percent of all taxes would be allocated into a common fund, from which the government could spend as it sees fit. But the other 50 percent would be divided up based on how taxpayers voted. This wouldn't significantly alter how governments allocate their expenditures since the percentages involved would be relatively small. And if only a small percentage of people voted for defense spending, say, then the government could still allocate more towards security from the 50 percent common fund. First, this system would make taxpaying seem like a personal investment. If you're particularly aggrieved by the state of your country's education system (maybe you've got young kids) or healthcare system (you're getting old) but aren't bothered by issues such as transport infrastructure or the military, you would be more inclined to think that your money is going to be returned to you in the future. This could alleviate the negative sentiment that your money will be wasted by the government. Second, it would be a useful way of learning what public services the masses actually want their government to deliver. Third, it would greatly reduce a government or leader's ability to indulge in wasteful megaprojects. Yes, they might have 50 percent of the revenue to play with, but they won't control all of it. Another idea. Most human activity is unconsciously motivated by two main things: status-seeking and social copying. For smaller businesses, plaques could be given to display on their premises, indicating that they have paid their taxes for that year. Thus, the absence of a plaque would show customers that the owner hasn't done their duty, making taxpaying a socially reinforced practice. One might combine this with some other form of social embarrassment. In Pakistan, I'm told the authorities have for centuries hired transgender people as tax collectors: the idea is to embarrass business owners into paying, which apparently works quite well. Additionally, state titles could be given to the highest taxpayers. Thailand already does this in a way. So, too, does the Philippines. It also exists in a somewhat different guise in Cambodia, where the honorific oknha (lord) is given to individuals who donate money to the ruling party. Such titles could instead be conferred on people who pay their taxes. There could be fancy awards parties for the rich to flaunt their status as taxpayers. Importantly, titles should be given and taken away each year. For example, they would only be given to the top 50 taxpayers for that year. If you drop out of this index the following year, your title is taken away and given to someone else. When I moved to Phnom Penh, it took me a while to realize why tycoons would drive around in the city's potholed, asphalt-stripped streets in Lamborghinis and Ferraris. People think of 'conspicuous consumption' as showing off luxury and wealth, but it's actually about conspicuous impracticality. By traveling in the least practical way, the tycoons were signalling that they could easily afford the costly repairs. It's the same reason why a male peacock grows such a big, cumbersome plumage that makes them more liable to be attacked by predators. It's also why deer grow the most debilitating antlers and why some people choose to walk around the most violent neighborhoods in expensive jewellery that screams, 'try to rob me if you think you're tough enough.' I also suspect it's the root motivation behind philanthropy. Maybe giving your money away is virtue status-signalling, but it's also a public display that you have enough money that you can afford to spaff some of it on other people. Given this universal impulse, a government could include an option for people or businesses to pay more tax than is required. A 10 percent, 20 percent, or 30 percent surcharge on top of what's expected, for instance. Those who pay this voluntarily would receive some sort of public recognition, a way for them to peacock their seemingly self-effacing act: 'I am so rich that I can afford to pay more taxation than I should.'
Nikkei Asia
2 hours ago
- Nikkei Asia
Pakistan presses China for more Belt and Road investment in Gwadar
Pakistan wants Chinese partners to invest more in developing Gwadar Port and free zone. (Nikkei montage/Source photos by AP) ADNAN AAMIR August 19, 2025 10:21 JST ISLAMABAD -- Pakistan recently urged the Chinese operator of Gwadar Port to make additional investments in a nearby industrial area where Belt and Road Initiative projects have stalled, but experts say the business case for such a move is weak, particularly at a time when bilateral ties are frail.
The Diplomat
2 hours ago
- The Diplomat
Myanmar Military Administration Sets Date For Long-awaited Election
Myanmar's military junta yesterday finalized the timing of the election that it plans to hold at the end of the year, despite its limited hold over large parts of the country. 'The first phase of the multi-party democratic general election for each parliament will begin on Sunday 28 December 2025,' Myanmar's Union Election Commission said in a statement quoted by the AFP news agency. The dates for the subsequent phases of the elections, which the military authorities plan to hold across December and January due to the uncertain security situation, 'will be announced later,' it added. At the end of July, the military-dominated National Defense and Security Council (NDSC) lifted the state of emergency that had been in place since the coup of February 2021, in order to prepare for the election. In doing so, it dissolved the State Administration Council junta and replaced it with a National Defense and Peacekeeping Commission, which will remain in power until the formation of a parliament and government after the planned elections. During a speech in Magwe Region yesterday, Senior Gen. Min Aung Hlaing, the country's military chief, 'underscored that the multiparty democratic general election will begin on 28 December and will be conducted in stages, with measures in place to prevent any irregularities in voting,' the state-run Global New Light of Myanmar reported. The military has argued (if not in so many words) that the election will create the conditions for the resolution of the country's conflicts. In Magwe yesterday, Min Aung Hlaing told an audience that 'problems arising from political differences must be resolved through political means.' However, with resistance groups and opposition political parties either barred from running or refusing to do so, the election has been dismissed nearly universally as a ploy to preserve the generals' hold on power. As in 2010, any government that emerges from the election is set to be dominated by proxies of the military, and its legitimacy is likely to be hotly contested. The question that continues to hang over the election plan is whether and to what extent it will be possible to administer an electoral process, even a superficial one, outside of the country's ethnic Bamar core. Since the 2021 coup, resistance groups, including long-established ethnic armed organizations, have seized large parts of territory from the central authorities, particularly in Shan, Kachin, Rakhine, Chin, Kayan (Karenni), and Kayin (Karen) states, as well as parts of Mandalay, Magwe, and Sagaing regions. In addition to this, more than 3.5 million people have now been displaced by conflict, according to the U.N., while the country's economic has atrophied. While the pace of territorial losses has slowed over the past six months, and even been reversed under Chinese pressure in northern Shan State, the junta remains on the defensive in many parts of the country. On the same day that it lifted the nationwide state of emergency, the NDSC also announced local states of emergency in 63 townships in nine of the country's 14 states and regions, many of them under the control of resistance groups of one sort or another. As a result, the run-up to the elections is likely to see an intensification of the military's attempts to eliminate the resistance to its rule or 'liberate' territory under the control of anti-regime groups. To take just one example, 'at least 25 civilians, including children,' were killed in a Myanmar regime airstrike on the resistance-controlled town in Kayah State's Hpasawng Township on Sunday, according to a report by The Irrawaddy. A local civil society group described it as the state's 'deadliest airstrike ever.' In this context, the military's election plans have the feel of an attempt to widen divisions in the already multifarious opposition movement and normalize Myanmar's relationship with the outside world, particularly its regional neighbors.
