
UK plans for 'fighter jets carrying nuclear bombs' slammed
The Sunday Times reports that the Government is taking part in 'highly sensitive' talks and that US firm Lockheed Martin's F-35A Lightning stealth fighter jet and other aircrafts are under consideration.
READ MORE: Scottish independence support at 58 per cent if Nigel Farage becomes PM
However, Defence Secretary John Healey refused to comment on the talks during a media round on Sunday, instead stating that the strategic defence review, due to be published on Monday, would contain further details about the UK Government's plans.
It's understood the strategic defence review will not go so far as to back the purchase of the jets, but will suggest the UK looks at expanding its nuclear capability.
The newspaper reports that the F-35A can carry the B61 thermonuclear bomb, the kind primarily used by the US, which has a stockpile of more than 3700.
It's understood that as part of Nato's nuclear-sharing arrangements, the UK jets, if purchased, would carry these rather than its own nuclear weapons.
Before they were decommissioned after the Cold War, Britain previously had a stockpile of tactical nukes and V-bomber aircraft. Now, the Vanguard submarine programme is the only nuclear arsenal the UK has.
Healey was asked on the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg if the UK should have a 'new, extra way of delivering nuclear weapons'.
(Image: PA/BBC) He told the programme that the strategic defence review would 'talk about the new threats that we face, won't get into the sort of discussions that need to remain private, not public".
Healey insisted the UK's nuclear deterrent was the 'ultimate guarantee of security in this country'.
'It's what Putin fears most,' he added.
David Kelly, member of the executive of the Scottish Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (SCND), said he was 'not surprised, but shocked' at the possibility of an expansion of the UK's nuclear weapons.
'The British government drones on and on and on about independent nuclear deterrent,' he told The National.
READ MORE: Scots minister hits back at Defence Secretary 'student union politics' jibe
'And now the next way of strengthening that apparently is to use American airplanes, which we suspect have a kill switch, with American nuclear weapons, which unquestionably would have a kill switch, to be launched by standoff missiles.
'It's just not very well thought through, like the rest of our defence policies."
He added that discussions of war were 'astonishing'.
SNP MSP Bill Kidd said: "Many Scots will have concerns about Labour spending billions of pounds of taxpayer money to expand the UK's nuclear arsenal at a time when many families continue to face the impact of the cost of living crisis.
"The UK's nuclear capability is not independent, has leaked in recent years putting workers and wildlife at risk, frequently fails in safety tests and is highly unlikely to ever be used. We want an end to these dangerous weapons in Scotland, but Labour are determined to write them another blank cheque.
"Any further expansion of the UK's nuclear arsenal must therefore come before parliament for democratic scrutiny.'
Alba party leader Kenny MacAskill was also scathing in response to reports about the potential nuclear expansion.
The former Scottish justice secretary said: "When we need cool heads, Labour are lurching towards war.
READ MORE: SNP criticise Labour's plans to increase UK's defence spending
"The UK is already an onshore aircraft carrier for the United States and now British planes are to carry American nuclear weapons. Scotland is already endangered by Trident on the Clyde and the last thing we need is nuclear weapons in our skies.
"It's time for peace and investment in jobs, health and housing, not in machines of war and certainly not weapons which would see the annihilation of the human race."
Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie also pointed to reports of leaks of radioactive material into Scotland's lochs and rivers around Faslane.
'In the 30 years since it was first deployed, with constant stories of accidents and poor maintenance, Trident has posed a greater threat to people in Scotland than it has to anyone else," he said.
'The simple fact is that nuclear armaments are indiscriminate weapons of mass slaughter, an immoral and unsafe waste of hundreds of billions of pounds that could be far better spent.
(Image: Andrew Milligan) 'And relying on US technology at a time when the US president is not only proving to be an unreliable ally, but is an actively hostile threat to our allies in Canada and Greenland, make this an even more bizarre choice.
'I look forward to the day when an independent Scotland can join the 70 other nations who have already signed and ratified the Treaty on the Prohibition on Nuclear Weapons.'
It comes as the UK Government is to set up at least six munitions factories, with one rumoured, but not confirmed, to be in Scotland.
Ministers pledged £1.5 billion for the factories and will support the procurement of up to 7000 UK-built long-range weapons in response to the strategic defence review, to be published on Monday.
The new funding will see UK munitions spending hit £6bn during this parliament.
Healey said the additional funding for defence was a 'message to Moscow'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
44 minutes ago
- BBC News
Watch: The BBC speaks to Jimmy Lai's son
Jailed Hong Kong pro-democracy tycoon Jimmy Lai could die in in prison if found guilty, his son told the BBC. Sebastien Lai was speaking to the BBC's Danny Vincent ahead of the final stage of his father's trial for national security offences. The 77-year-old British citizen is accused of colluding with foreign forces, which he denies. He faces life in prison if convicted. He has been in jail since December 2020, serving time for other convictions related to his role in the city's pro-democracy protests. He was due in court on Thursday for closing arguments but the hearing has been postponed because of a typhoon. Critics say the city's controversial national security law targets those who resist Beijing's control - but authorities argue the law maintains stability. Read more: Jimmy Lai: The jailed Hong Kong rebel mogul

The National
an hour ago
- The National
Alaska summit will reveal extent Trump borrows from Putin playbook
Trump's military takeover of the nation's capital, sending National Guard troops to Washington's streets and seizing control of the DC municipal police department, could have come straight from the Putin playbook. It matters little that there is no crime wave 'emergency' as Trump says. In fact, Washington's crime rate has fallen in recent years with violent crime overall down 26% compared with this time a year ago. It matters even less that in order to deploy the National Guard, Trump has invoked an obscure section of the 1973 DC Home Rule Act, which allows the president to take control of local law enforcement in the district for a period of one month. READ MORE: Healthcare in Gaza facing 'catastrophe' amid food shortages, doctor warns Back on January 6, 2021, Trump might have been relying on an incited mob of supporters to seize the Capitol building, but today, in an open show of power in his second term, he can use his presidential powers at will, it seems, to send out an unmistakeable message of his administration's willingness and capacity to wield power. At every turn, Trump is expanding his control in a way that poses a real threat to America's democracy. Just take the press as an example. As a report by the media watchdog the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) recently identified, there are three ways in which the Trump administration is chipping away at US press freedom: by limiting access to information, instituting new regulations and targeting journalists and newsrooms with lawsuits and investigations. Or to put this another way, you are rewarded for the 'right' coverage and vilified if it doesn't fit with Trump's thinking. As the CPJ also rightly points out, the fate of American democracy and journalists' ability to work without fear are intertwined. This threat to press freedom must then be seen as occurring in a larger context in which First Amendment rights more broadly are being eroded. Which takes me back to the meeting between Trump and Putin tomorrow. For while America admittedly might still be a long way off being the equivalent of Putin's authoritarian Russia, Trump so far is making a good go at showing he is working off the same political page as his Kremlin pal. What both leaders do domestically in political terms, of course, is one thing, but when it comes to imposing their will on another independent sovereign nation, that is something else again. The news that this will be a one-on-one meeting between Trump and Putin in Alaska and that neither of the two leaders will be flanked by their advisers has only added to the disquiet that between them they will come to a tawdry deal that will then effectively be imposed on Ukraine. Trump as we know has form when it comes to striking ill-considered agreements with whoever gets into a room with him. It's also a reminder of how autocrats often work, for when the tanks, troops or mobs can't get them what they covet in the first instance, too often shady deals with each other become an alternative. READ MORE: Acclaimed Scottish screenwriter wears 'Palestine Action' T-shirt at Fringe As Edward Luce, US national editor of the Financial Times, wryly put it a few days ago: 'The ghosts of Munich, Yalta and other sordid bargains ought to be stalking Alaska.' For make no mistake, what happens in that room at the Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson military facility in Anchorage tomorrow is a profoundly crucial moment not just for Ukraine, but for Europe and its future relations with the Trump administration and the US generally. If the intense diplomacy and virtual meetings between European leaders, Ukraine's president Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Trump are anything to go by, then it's evident that every party realises that what comes out of tomorrow's meeting could be a gamechanger with profound geopolitical consequences. It's no coincidence too that the meeting comes at precisely the moment when Moscow has upped the ante on eastern Ukraine's battlefields. There in the Donbas these past days, Russian forces have breached the frontline along a narrow corridor parallel to Dobropillia, a coal-mining town turned key logistical hub north of the stronghold of Pokrovsk that Moscow's troops have almost encircled. In short, grab as much territory as possible before any 'swapping of land', as Trump puts it, becomes part of the deal between him and Putin. That European countries are outraged that Zelenskyy will not be present in Alaska as any deal is cut is justified. In a worst possible scenario, Ukraine and its European allies could be left with a very stark choice. Either sign up to the deal and accept a rewriting of European security over their heads or reject it and risk Trump walking away from US military support for Ukraine. Speaking to the US-based Foreign Policy magazine, John Foreman, a former UK defence attache to Moscow and Kyiv, summed up the worst fears of many about the outcome. 'I worry that his (Trump's) shared authoritarian instincts with Putin, lack of clarity in his mind about his own position and wish to be seen as a big man deciding the fate of nations at the stroke of a Sharpie will lead to him agreeing to terms which are wholly unacceptable,' Foreman warned. For Putin, meanwhile, tomorrow's summit will mark his first visit to the US since 2015 and his first visit to the country since 2007 that has come outside of the context of the United Nations General Assembly in New York. Should things go the way of the Russian leader, Trump would be giving away Ukrainian land that Putin could not win by force of arms. Few doubt that the Kremlin's man would relish the humiliation of European leaders who have insisted that nothing about Ukraine should be decided without Ukraine. Speaking earlier this week about the summit, Trump said it would be 'a feel-out meeting a little bit', adding that he would know within two minutes whether progress is possible. 'I may say 'lots of luck, keep fighting', or I may say 'we can make a deal',' Trump added. Only tomorrow will tell which of those outcomes win the day. To say that nerves will remain frayed until then would be an understatement. In fact, they could well be in tatters in its aftermath.


Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
Scottish water bosses should not be getting eye-watering bonuses
It is a kick in the teeth that the company's boss Alex Plant has received a boost in his pension pot while we are all paying more for our water. Rewarding failure is never a good look. But that is what the Scottish Government seems to have done with the bosses of Scottish Water. Bills have gone up for Scots by nearly 10 per cent this year, after an 8.8 per cent hike the year before. This has come as other bills have skyrocketed over recent years - with rents, food and council tax all going up. Too many people have been struggling to make ends meet, and water bills have played their part in that. You would expect that we would have a better service by paying more, but Scottish Water has been failing when it comes to dealing with our waste. Its sewage sites breached its licences more than 250 times in three years. Sewage spilled into the environment over 24,000 times last year. In England, private firms have received fines for this kind of performance. But the publicly-owned water firm in Scotland hasn't faced similar measures. It is a kick in the teeth that the company's boss Alex Plant has received a boost in his pension pot while we are all paying more for our water. Other bosses at Scottish Water have also had their salaries and pension pots increased. Scottish Labour's Jackie Baillie is right that water rates should be frozen and that bosses should not be receiving such eye-watering sums. They should only be receiving bumper pay rises if they bring bills down and make our water system fit for purpose. If they fail they should have to make do with their existing sky-high salaries. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. JD's Scot us wrong JD Vance is on holiday in Scotland with his family. He claims to have ancestors in our country. But the US Vice President should get his facts right next time he wants to wade in on Scottish politics. Vance suggested Scots could be prosecuted for praying in their own homes as a result of a law that says protests outside abortion clinics must be at least 200m away. Let's be clear - no one is being arrested for praying in their own home. The law protects women from harassment while seeking medical treatment. free speech no longer exists. While he is in Scotland we hope the US Vice President spends more time enjoying the stunning Ayrshire scenery - and less time lecturing us on subjects he knows nothing about.