Indigenous people left 'out in the cold' by super funds
Rigid identification policies, culturally insensitive customer service and a push towards digital systems mean many First Nations people are locked out of their superannuation, according to a report from Super Consumers Australia and Mob Strong Debt Help.
Surveys of consumers in the Eastern Arnhem region and financial counsellors across Australia found more than half of Indigenous customers were unable to get through to their super fund, while 42 per cent did not understand the information they were given.
Super funds often use jargon or complex language or don't have interpreters available, Mob Strong Debt Help senior solicitor Mark Holden said.
"Financial counsellors try to be able to help out with the client to understand and try to advocate with the super funds, but the super funds don't accept their authority and leave both the financial counsellor and the client out in the cold," the Dunghutti man told AAP.
People face similar barriers across remote, rural and urban communities, Mr Holden said, and the challenges are not unique to those customers surveyed.
The system's rigidity also frustrates professionals working with communities, such as Indigenous Consumer Assistance Network financial counsellor Alex Price-Busch.
He has spent on the phone to super funds and the Australian Tax Office on behalf of clients who struggle to access their super.
"We see families fighting to claim death benefits while grieving. Many just give up because it's too hard," Mr Price-Busch said.
Super Consumers Australia chief executive Xavier O'Halloran said the impact on resources is huge for financial counsellors dealing with these issues.
"Some of the financial counsellors had told us they felt like they were working for the superannuation funds at times because they were spending hours on the phone dealing with really poor customer service processes ... having to teach the frontline staff at super funds what their actual obligations were," he said.
Super funds do not have mandatory customer service standards, and Mr Holden says many lack any cultural safety standards or are not implementing them.
This needs to change, says Mob Strong Debt Help, which also calls for better resourcing of financial counselling and legal support for First Nations people trying to access their superannuation.
The organisation also wants the Australian Tax Office and super funds to provide culturally safe support and help with identity checks.
"We need to see change now," Mr Holden said.
"Any delay on this is going to further the intergenerational harm that our mob faces when it comes to superannuation."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
11 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Vic Shadow Minister says state's treaty negotiations will be a ‘multi-billion-dollar process' with hundreds of millions already spent
Victorian Shadow Treasurer James Newbury has projected the state's treaty negotiations will become a 'multi-billion-dollar process', considering the hundreds of millions of dollars invested in proceedings already. The governments of Victoria Premier Jacinta Allan and former premier Daniel Andrews had spent at least $382 on negotiating a treaty with Indigenous Australians since 2016, according to analysis by the Herald Sun. A Victorian government spokesperson refused to verify the masthead's figure, but they said $308 million had been poured into the treaty process since the 2020-2021 budget. Referring to the almost $400 million that has reportedly been invested already, Mr Newbury took aim at the Allan government over the significant sum, questioning what it had been spent on. 'Victoria spent four hundred before we've even got to a treaty. So what have they spent the four hundred million on? 400 [million] without doing the treaty. I mean, that's why we're opposed to it as a Coalition," he told Sky News Australia on Monday. 'What the government we know will now do is spend billions of dollars on a treaty. If they're spending 400 [million] on the admin beforehand, we know it's gonna be a multi-billion dollar process.' 'And that's the government's hiding the figures in terms of the bigger treaty, because we know it's going to be a multi-billion dollar thing. It's wrong, we're opposed to it, we've said it loudly and clearly, and frankly Jacinta Allen owns this one and she's wrong.' Meanwhile, fresh research has claimed costs related to treaty negotiations have soared to close to $800 million within the last decade. Institute of Public Affairs (IPA) findings published on Sunday claimed that since 2016, the Victorian government had spent $776.2 million on programmes related to the treaty's development. Titled 'Victoria's expensive, secretive, and divisive treaty process', the report found $100.6 million of the alleged spending had been committed in the 2026 financial year alone. The research findings also said as much at 241 meetings regarding the development of a treaty could be held in the 2026 financial year, based on average meeting numbers in previous years. The research comes after the Victorian government's Yoorrook Justice truth telling inquiry handed down its final report earlier this month following four years of proceedings. The treaty is now set to progress to parliament, with Ms Allan and the state's First People's Assembly confirming that legislation to pass the agreement would be tabled after the winter break. The state is also negotiating with local Indigenous communities on separate treaties.
Perth Now
14 hours ago
- Perth Now
Banks to refund $60m to ripped-off customers
Thousands of Australians wrongly slugged with excessive bank charges will soon receive a refund, as the corporate regulator cracks down on these unfair practices. In a second round of payments announced on Tuesday, The Australian Securities and Investments Commission said a further 770,000 customers will be refunded $60m. These refunds will be paid to low-income customers of 21 financial institutions receiving government concession payments, who were placed in higher-fee bank accounts despite a lower fee option being available to them. This follows $33m in fees already refunded to 150,000 customers which was previously paid out. Three of the major banks featured in ASIC initial report have now committed to providing refunds of bank fees to a broader group of low-income customers who have been in high-fee accounts. ASIC shows the impact of getting the bank refund. Picture Supplied Credit: Supplied ANZ will be paying the most out of the big four banks. According to the report, ANZ will pay out an estimated $47.9m to almost 590,000 account holders for fees dating back until mid-2019 and Westpac $9.9m for fees incurred since 2013. Commonwealth Bank says it won't be paying any more after previously paying $25m to around 90,000 Indigenous concession customer accounts. National Australia Bank was not included in the probe as it stopped carrying dishonour, account-keeping or overdraw fees on transaction accounts in 2014. ASIC chair Joe Longo said, despite the improvements banks have made during our surveillance, there is clearly work to be done. 'It should not take an ASIC review to force $93 million in refunds or make banks assess their processes to ensure the trust and expectations placed in them are justified,' he said. 'Banks need to truly hear the messages in this report — read it, review it, and ask themselves some difficult questions about what led to this situation.' Australians are set to be paid $60m in the second round of payments. NewsWire / Nicholas Eagar Credit: NewsWire As part of the changes, ASIC also encouraged banks to consider introducing or improving First Nations service channels, with six more banks now collecting data to identify First Nations customers to inform appropriate and sensitive service delivery. ASIC commissioner Alan Kirkland said what started as an initiative focused on addressing avoidable bank fees for low-income customers in regional and remote locations, particularly First Nations consumers, revealed a much wider problem affecting customers nationwide. 'When you read in the report that refunds of $1,200, $2,600 and $5,200 were paid, it's important to understand what those amounts mean for people struggling to make ends meet,' Mr Kirkland said. 'A $1,200 refund was equivalent to one customer's fortnightly Age Pension. A $2,600 refund equalled around 110 hours of minimum-wage earnings for another customer, and a $5,200 refund matched 13 weeks of another customer's Jobseeker payment.' A spokesperson for ANZ said the bank had taken a 'deliberate decision to expand our remediation payments, leading to a larger cohort of customers being refunded fees and interest'.
7NEWS
14 hours ago
- 7NEWS
Banks forced to take action on high-fee accounts
Australian banks will refund more than $93 million to low-income customers who were charged high fees on their accounts. More than a million people have already been moved to low-fee accounts, saving an expected $50 million in annual fees, according the the Australian Securities and Investments Commission's (ASIC) Better and Beyond report released on Tuesday. The review follows the Better Banking for Indigenous Consumers report, released in July 2024, which revealed at least two million low-income Australians, who relied on Centrelink payments, had bank accounts charging high fees. There were 21 banks included in the latest report, which found even larger numbers of low-income Australians paying too much. 'What started as an initiative focused on addressing avoidable bank fees for low-income customers in regional and remote locations, particularly First Nations consumers, revealed a much wider problem affecting customers nationwide,' commissioner Alan Kirkland said. Since July 2024, the four banks involved in the initial report- ANZ, Bendigo Bank, Westpac and the Commonwealth Bank (including Bankwest) have paid more than $33 million in refunds to the customers identified. Three-of-those-four banks have committed to refunds to a broader group of low-income customers who have been in high-fee accounts. The Commonwealth Bank and Bankwest have indicated they don't intend making payments to customers outside the initial cohort, ASIC's report said. Several other banks have also reviewed the impact of high-fee accounts on low-income customers and have committed to remediation. A further $60 million will be refunded to more than 770,000 customers as a result. ASIC chairman Joe Longo said while banks had made improvements during the commission's surveillance, there was still work to be done. 'It should not take an ASIC review to force $93 million in refunds or make banks assess their processes to ensure the trust and expectations placed in them are justified,' he said. 'Banks need to truly hear the messages in this report - read it, review it, and ask themselves some difficult questions about what led to this situation.' Nine banks had made it easier to access low-fee accounts, while another seven had improved processes for moving customers to those types of accounts. Six more banks were now collecting data to identify First Nations customers, following a recommendations from the commission's initial review. 'Our intervention has forced many banks to take action, but more needs to be done to ensure financially vulnerable consumers are not put in this position again,' Mr Kirkland said. 'We encourage consumers to challenge their banks to ensure that they are in the best account for their needs. 'More importantly, we encourage banks to do more to proactively identify low- income customers and move them to low-fee accounts.'
