Hamas fails to overturn status as banned terrorist group in UK
The Islamist Palestinian group, which led the October 7 attacks that killed about 1,200 Israelis, launched a legal challenge in April claiming the designation breached the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
The proscription makes it a criminal offence to have any association with or show support for the group in the UK.
Hamas claimed the ban was contrary to the 'duties of the British state' to 'end genocide', that it was incompatible with the ECHR because it unlawfully restricts freedom of speech and that it was disproportionate since the group 'does not pose any threat to Britain or British citizens'.
Hamas also claimed proscription hindered its ability to broker a political solution to the conflict in Gaza and stifled conversations in securing a long-term political settlement.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
6 minutes ago
- Spectator
Why Australia is recognising Palestine
In 1968, the American broadcaster Walter Cronkite told his national TV audience the United Stated was losing the war in Vietnam, causing then-president Lyndon Johnson to remark, 'If I've lost Cronkite, I've lost America', soon after declaring he would not stand for re-election. As he moves to implement a total occupation of Gaza in his determination to extirpate Hamas and its soldiers of terror, Israel's prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, risks a similar realisation. A week after an estimated 90,000 people joined a court-sanctioned pro-Palestine protest march across Sydney's Harbour Bridge, Australia's Labor government announced that it will be voting to recognise a state of Palestine when the United Nations General Assembly meets next month, 'to contribute to international momentum towards a two-state solution, a ceasefire in Gaza and release of the hostages'. Australia joins the left-wing governments of France, Britain, and Canada in moving towards recognition, in the face of distressing images of death, suffering and misery in Gaza. New Zealand's centre-right coalition likely will join them in the coming days. In doing so, the Australian government at least had the courtesy of informing Netanyahu and American Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, of its intentions. Needless to say, Netanyahu is furious, and the Trump administration so far has been muted in its response. Addressing the media, Australian prime minister Anthony Albanese stressed that, in his opinion, recognition is the right thing to do. 'A two-state solution is humanity's best hope to break the cycle of violence in the Middle East and to bring an end to the conflict, suffering and starvation in Gaza', he said. Albanese made clear his mind was made up after speaking to Palestine Authority (PA) leader Mahmoud Abbas late last week. According to Albanese, Abbas repeated commitments he made to French president Emmanuel Macron in June. Abbas will recognise Israel as consistent with the 1993 Oslo Accords and also back: 'demilitarisation of any future Palestinian state; the potential role for international forces in security; the reform of governance, including of education as well as a call for elections; the isolation and opposition to Hamas playing any role in a future Palestinian state.' While Albanese affirmed Australia's grave concern for Israeli hostages still suffering at the evil hands of Hamas, and his government's earnest desire for their release and a ceasefire in Gaza, his account of the undertakings he obtained from Abbas did not include ensuring the hostages' freedom, nor the actual eradication of Hamas before recognition takes effect. Instead, Albanese chose to rely on the glib undertakings of an elderly Palestinian Authority leader who is in the third decade of his four-year term of elected office – a leader who has no real power in Gaza. There is no way Australia, or the other recognising governments, can go to the General Assembly next month certain that their preconditions for recognition will even be honoured, let alone ever met. Even if it is well-intended to give hope to the beleaguered people of Gaza, it also gives aid and comfort of a ruthless and unscrupulous Hamas. That Australia's Labor government chose the recognition path is, however, unsurprising. The left wing of the Labor party is stridently pro-Palestine, and Labor's Greens party allies are even more radical and incendiary in their anti-Israel rhetoric. A significant number of Labor constituencies in Sydney and Melbourne contain large Muslim minorities, which has focused the minds of influential Labor MPs in those normally ultra-safe seats. But Albanese also read a shifting public mood. Whatever the actual truth, or the selectivity of what is shown, the incessant mainstream and social media coverage of food aid failures in Gaza, with harrowing images of suffering and desolation, has touched the consciences of many Australians, just as the barbaric atrocities against innocent Israeli men, women and children did almost two years ago. Mass protests like that in Sydney, which saw ordinary people – not just the usual activists – turning out in large numbers will have assured Albanese that, in recognising Palestinian statehood, he is reflecting Australian public opinion. As so often happens in politics, the Australian government's decision today arguably was a case of, 'there go my people. I must follow them, for I am their leader'. Meanwhile, Australia's recognition decision sends a message to both Hamas and Israel's government. To Hamas, it is further evidence that western solidarity against them is faltering. For Israel, it is yet another indication that, despite 7 October, the justice of their cause, and the legitimacy of their determination to preserve's Israel's existence, the Netanyahu government is losing hearts and minds across the world. The truth of aid failures and food shortages in Gaza, and just who are responsible for them, has been lost in harrowing images and a morass of mis- and disinformation. In a furious response to Australia and other western nations who are recognising Palestine, Netanyahu told an Australian journalist at a press conference on Sunday, 'I think we're actually applying force judiciously, and [the Australian government] know it. They know what they would do if right next to Melbourne or right next to Sydney you had this horrific attack. I think they would do it.' Netanyahu is absolutely right. But just as Lyndon Johnson was winning his Vietnam war on the ground while losing it in sitting rooms around the world, Netanyahu's determination for Israel to prevail in Gaza and eradicate Hamas solely on its own terms is costing him, and his valiant, embattled nation, dearly in the court of international public opinion.
Powys County Times
6 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Al Jazeera correspondents among journalists killed in Gaza City air strike
Israel's military has targeted a prominent Al Jazeera correspondent with an air strike, killing him, another journalist and at least six other people. Anas al-Sharif and his Al Jazeera colleague Mohamed Qreiqeh were among those killed while sheltering outside the Gaza City Hospital complex late on Sunday. Officials at Shifa Hospital confirmed the deaths and said the strike also killed four other journalists and two other people. It also damaged the entrance to the hospital complex's emergency building. Israel's military described Mr al-Sharif as the leader of a Hamas cell – an allegation that Al Jazeera and Mr al-Sharif had previously dismissed as baseless. The incident marked the first time during the war that Israel's military has swiftly claimed responsibility after a journalist was killed in a strike. It came less than a year after Israeli army officials first accused Mr al-Sharif and other Al Jazeera journalists of being members of the militant groups Hamas and Islamic Jihad. In a July 24 video, Israel's army spokesman Avichay Adraee attacked Al Jazeera and accused Mr al-Sharif of being part of Hamas's military wing. Al Jazeera called the strike a 'targeted assassination' and accused Israeli officials of incitement, connecting Mr al-Sharif's death to the allegations that both the broadcaster and correspondent had denied. 'Anas and his colleagues were among the last remaining voices from within Gaza, providing the world with unfiltered, on-the-ground coverage of the devastating realities endured by its people,' Al Jazeera said in a statement. Apart from rare invitations to observe Israeli military operations, international media have been barred from entering Gaza for the duration of the war. Al Jazeera is among the few outlets still fielding a big team of reporters inside the besieged strip, chronicling daily life amid air strikes, hunger and the rubble of destroyed neighbourhoods. The broadcaster has suffered heavy losses during the war, including 27-year-old correspondent Ismail al-Ghoul and cameraman Rami al-Rifi, killed last summer, and freelancer Hossam Shabat, killed in an Israeli air strike in March. Like Mr al-Sharif, Mr Shabat was among the six that Israel accused of being members of militant groups last October. Hundreds of people, including many journalists, gathered on Monday to mourn Mr al-Sharif, Mr Qreiqeh and their colleagues. Mr al-Sharif reported a nearby bombardment minutes before his death. In a social media post that Al Jazeera said was written to be posted in case of his death, he bemoaned the devastation and destruction that war had wrought and bid farewell to his wife, son and daughter. 'I never hesitated for a single day to convey the truth as it is, without distortion or falsification,' the 28-year-old wrote. The journalists are the latest to be killed in what observers have called the deadliest conflict for journalists in modern times. The Committee to Protect Journalists said on Sunday that at least 186 have been killed in Gaza. Mr al-Sharif began reporting for Al Jazeera a few days after war broke out. He was known for reporting on Israel's bombardment in northern Gaza, and later for the starvation gripping much of the territory's population. Mr Qreiqeh, a 33-year-old Gaza City native, is survived by two children. Both journalists were separated from their families for months earlier in the war. When they managed to reunite during the ceasefire earlier this year, their children appeared unable to recognise them, according to video footage they posted at the time. In a July broadcast he cried on air as a woman behind him collapsed from hunger. 'I am talking about slow death of those people,' he said at the time. Al Jazeera is blocked in Israel and soldiers raided its offices in the occupied West Bank last year, ordering them to close. Mr al-Sharif's death comes weeks after the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists said Israel had targeted him with a smear campaign. Irene Khan, the UN special rapporteur on freedom of expression, on July 31 said that the killings were 'part of a deliberate strategy of Israel to suppress the truth, obstruct the documentation of international crimes and bury any possibility of future accountability'. The Committee to Protect Journalists said on Sunday that it was appalled by the strike. 'Israel's pattern of labelling journalists as militants without providing credible evidence raises serious questions about its intent and respect for press freedom,' Sara Qudah, the group's regional director, said.
The Independent
6 minutes ago
- The Independent
Chagos deal to cost UK ‘10 times more than claimed'
A deal to transfer the Chagos Archipelago to Mauritius, while retaining control of the Diego Garcia military base, is projected to cost the UK £34.7 billion over 99 years. Conservative Dame Priti Patel has accused ministers of attempting to "cover up" the true cost of the agreement, alleging an "accountancy trick" was used to present the figure as £3.4 billion. The higher £34.7 billion figure, released by the Government Actuary's Department, is a nominal amount, which, when adjusted for inflation, is estimated to be around £10 billion in today's money. The government reportedly used a "social time preference" principle, in use since 2003, to reduce the figure by between 2.5 per cent and 3.5 per cent per year. Dame Priti criticised Labour figures, including Foreign Secretary David Lammy and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, for what she called a "terrible deal".
