
China's Disappearing Middle Class
Commentary
China's middle class has enjoyed a remarkably rapid pace of growth for decades. From the late 1970s to the twenty-teens, expanding work opportunities allowed peasants to rise out of abject poverty and other workers to begin the process of accumulating a measure of wealth.
Such striking improvements have now begun to falter under the impact of the property crisis and the loss of export markets in the United States and Europe. And there are other challenges. Looking beyond the legacy of these difficult times is the effect of a shrinking population, especially the relative shortage of workers it will bring. Because Beijing has set out to cope with this situation by relying increasingly on robotics and artificial intelligence (AI), it is setting the stage for the kind of wage gap that already troubles developed economies in North America and Europe.
For the middle class, the immediate problem is the economy's pronounced slowdown.
Of late, Chinese exports to the United States have picked up, but that is less a sign of fundamental strength than of a purely temporary surge by American buyers to build inventory ahead of U.S. President Donald Trump's latest round of tariffs.
Most significant in this deteriorating economic situation is the property crisis that began in 2021. The failures of major property developers have depressed home buying and construction in China's important
Related Stories
4/3/2025
4/25/2025
Because Chinese households have so much of their wealth tied up in their homes, these value declines have had a powerful negative impact on households' net worth. To rebuild that wealth, people have turned from spending to saving, taking major support from China's economy. Combined, these effects make it doubtful that China can even realize Beijing's already downsized 5 percent real growth target for this year.
China's middle class has borne the brunt of this economic shortfall. Annual wages, which expanded at a 9 percent annual rate as recently as 2018, have increased by only 4 percent to 5 percent in recent years. Bonuses last year trailed 2023 levels by nearly 18 percent. Beijing's Statistics Bureau reports that income tax receipts for 2024 fell 16 percent from the prior year. European luxury brands report Chinese
Because Beijing has yet to bring out a program to remedy these problems, the adverse pressures on China's middle class seem set to continue. Trump's tariffs and Beijing's retaliations will further depress levels of U.S.–China trade and surely compound the general economic problems. Even if Beijing can find a remedy for China's immediate difficulties, other, more fundamental problems also threaten the middle class.
China's
With minimal immigration, China faces a severe shortage of workers. If nothing else were changing, this fact would tend to raise wages and salaries and enrich, if not enlarge, China's middle class. But much else is changing.
Beijing, for a number of reasons, one of which is the impending worker shortage, has taken a number of steps that alter the picture. It has rescinded the one-child policy, but the change in the law seems to have had little effect on fertility rates. Even if the birth rate were to rise, it would be 15 to 20 years before it could have any effect on China's workforce.
Meanwhile, Beijing has placed a great emphasis on robotics and AI, among other things, as a substitute for workers that the economy would otherwise need. Although this technical solution may sustain Chinese production levels despite the labor shortage, it will radically change the character of China's workforce, reducing the need for line workers and increasing demands for managers and technicians.
This is what is happening in the West and Japan. Like these other places, China's emphasis on technology will, as it did in the West, lead to an expanding wage gap and a more bifurcated income distribution. The managerial and technical sides of the workforce will see increased employment opportunities and, accordingly, gain income and wealth, while others—such as line workers and the country's large population of gig workers—will lose out and fall below any definition of the middle class, and indeed face poverty.
This wage bifurcation has already caused considerable political turmoil in the United States and Europe. In China, such matters have the potential to become even more extreme than in the West, as China's demographic situation is more severe, and the country has no hope of an influx of immigrant workers to supplement its reduced native-born workforce.
What is more, China has a limited social safety net to sustain those left out of this high-tech solution. Beijing can, of course, relieve some of this strain, and it is considering measures to beef up its social safety net, such as pensions for gig workers. But given Beijing's failures so far to deal with the nation's immediate economic problems, it remains an open question whether Chinese officials can step up to the needs of the longer-term situation.
Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
37 minutes ago
- New York Post
‘60 Minutes' correspondent Scott Pelley warns a CBS settlement with Trump would be ‘very damaging'
'60 Minutes' correspondent Scott Pelley spoke out about President Donald Trump's lawsuit against CBS and its parent company on Saturday, arguing that a settlement would be 'very damaging.' 'Well, it'd be very damaging to CBS, to Paramount, to the reputation of those companies,' Pelley said during a conversation with CNN's Anderson Cooper on Saturday, who asked how harmful a settlement and potential apology would be to the network. Trump filed a lawsuit against Paramount Global, CBS News' parent company, over a '60 Minutes' interview with former Vice President Kamala Harris in October 2024. Fox News Digital confirmed that Trump rejected a $15 million offer to settle his lawsuit, according to a source familiar with the matter, as the president's legal team is also demanding at least $25 million and an apology from CBS News. Cooper, who is also a correspondent on '60 Minutes,' also asked Pelley about former show producer Bill Owens resigning from the program in April. 'Bill's decision to resign may not have been much of a decision for him because he was always the first person to defend the independence of '60 minutes.' Bill didn't work for Paramount. Bill worked for our viewers, and he felt very keenly about that. And so I'm not sure Bill had any choice, once the corporation began to meddle in Bill's decisions about the editorial content, or just place pressure in that area, Bill felt that he didn't have the independence that honest journalism requires,' Pelley said. 4 Scott Pelley warned that a settlement between President Trump and CBS would be 'very damaging.' 4 President Trump rejected a $15 million offer to settle his lawsuit, according to Fox News Digital. AP Pelley also said he wished he had the public backing of CBS News, but added that his work was still making it onto the program. 'You really wish the company was behind you 100%, right? You really wish the top echelons of the company would come out publicly and say '60 Minutes', for example, is a crown jewel of American journalism, and we stand behind it 100%. I haven't heard that. On the other hand, my work is getting on the air, and I have not had anyone outside '60 Minutes' put their thumb on the scale and say, 'you can't say that. You should say this. You have to edit the story in this way. You should interview this person.' None of that has happened. So while I would like to have that public backing, maybe the more important thing is the work is still getting on the air,' Pelley said. 4 The Federal Communications Commission accused '60 Minutes' of heavily editing an interview with Kamala Harris in 2024. 60 Minutes / CBS 4 Former show producer Bill Owens resigned from the program in April. The '60 Minutes' correspondent recently went viral for calling out Trump during a commencement address. 'In this moment, this moment, this morning, our sacred rule of law is under attack. Journalism is under attack. Universities are under attack. Freedom of speech is under attack,' Pelley said during his commencement speech at Wake Forest University. 'And insidious fear is reaching through our schools, our businesses, our homes and into our private thoughts, the fear to speak in America. If our government is, in Lincoln's phrase, 'Of the people, by the people, for the people,' then why are we afraid to speak?' Pelley addressed the remarks during the CNN interview and told Cooper that he felt 'strongly' it needed to be said. 'I don't refer to him or the president or the White House or the administration. But I was talking about actions that have been taken by the government over these last many months. But, there was a little bit of hysteria among some about this speech, and I simply ask you, what does it say about our country when there's hysteria about a speech that's about freedom of speech?' the CBS correspondent added.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ukraine plots fracking revolution
Ukraine is working to unleash natural gas fracking with the goal of becoming a major exporter and revolutionising Europe's energy market. In plans critical to Volodymyr Zelensky's hopes of a post-war economic recovery, ministers in Kyiv are scrambling to lure private investment and gain access to new drilling technology to access the country's vast untapped shale gas resources. According to sources close to Kyiv, officials are racing to attract 'foreign technology and highly experienced subsoil users', with a focus on unconventional shale resources in western Ukraine. The hunt for cash - as revealed by the independent news platform Energy Flux - is being conducted in parallel to the rare earth minerals deal struck between Donald Trump and President Zelensky in April, which will allow the US to exploit Ukraine's natural resources, including aluminium, graphite, oil and natural gas. The priority is to rapidly revitalise Ukraine's ailing gas sector after a gruelling winter saw roughly 40pc of production capacity taken out by a fierce Russian campaign of drone and missile strikes. The attacks forced Ukraine to draw heavily on its gas stocks, which ended winter almost entirely depleted. But Ukraine's Ministry of Energy believes it is possible to refill the country's cavernous underground storage facilities and even produce a surplus for export 'within 18 months', according to a senior government source. Ukraine already has some experience with advanced drilling technology for old wells and has since carried out experimental trials that 'confirm its potential' for fracking, they said. However, to unlock Ukraine's shale reserves, the country needs to attract more investment and newer kit, primarily from America. 'Development and production can be quickly developed using available gas infrastructure with connections to the EU gas market that make it very attractive,' the source added. 'Ukraine has enough deposits of traditional gas to cover its own consumption and to become a net exporter, and shale gas production has quite a profound effect on its development.' Such a turnaround would help transform the fortunes of Europe's energy markets, which remain on edge following the loss of Russian pipeline gas exports via Ukraine at the start of 2025. Refilling Ukraine's depleted gas storage – the largest in Europe, at 32bn cubic metres – is one of the main factors tightening energy markets in Central and Eastern Europe ahead of next winter. Ukraine's gas stocks are today just 7pc full compared to the EU average of 50pc. Efforts to pipe natural gas from Southern and Eastern Europe into Ukraine have also been thwarted by red tape and a lack of market cohesion. However, if Ukraine could unleash its own shale revolution and create a surplus for export, the need to keep pumping European gas into Ukraine would effectively disappear overnight. It would also help reduce Europe's reliance on costly liquefied natural gas (LNG) supplies from overseas. Gas-starved Europe leaned heavily on LNG after Gazprom, the Kremlin-backed energy giant, halted exports to the EU following Vladimir Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Ukrainian shale gas exports, if scaled up quickly, would erase a large chunk of European energy demand currently being met by LNG, potentially sparking a sharp drop in energy prices around the world. However, Kyiv's proposed fracking revolution hinges largely on the country's ability to secure overseas investment. Officials from Ukraine's Ministry of Energy are tapping Western diplomatic ties to find private capital funds with a high tolerance for risk to bankroll drilling and bring in technology partners. A senior government team attended the Baku Energy Forum in Azerbaijan last week in part to promote Ukraine's potential as a shale hub. Speaking at the event, one high-ranking statesman said the Lviv-Lublin geological area that straddles the Ukraine-Poland border is 'superior on the Ukrainian side' thanks to higher porosity and lower clay content, making it 'better for fracking'. The most promising prospect is the Oleska (Olesskaya) shale block, which contains an estimated 0.8 to 1.5 trillion cubic metres of shale gas resources – enough to meet Ukraine's domestic needs for decades. How much of this resource is economically recoverable is an open question. Chevron walked away from a 50pc interest in the Oleska project in 2014 before drilling could begin. Chevron's stated reason for leaving was not because of political instability or lack of resources, but rather Kyiv's failure to enact specific tax reforms necessary to enable shale gas foreign investment. Now, the Zelensky administration is moving to streamline operations and reduce bureaucratic hurdles that previously deterred foreign investors. Ownership of the Olesskaya production sharing agreement (PSA) was transferred in April 2025 from government holding company Nadra Ukraine to Ukraine's largest oil and gas producer, Ukrnafta. The move signalled a strategic shift in the country's approach to fracking, particularly in the Oleska block. Ukrnafta is a state-owned enterprise following the nationalisation of strategic industries and declaration of martial law in 2022, which remains in force to this day. Attracting significant private capital into Ukrainian shale exploration would normally be impossible under these circumstances. However, the source said there are laws in place to ensure they can be overwritten.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
US firms say Trump trade war is hitting production as dollar nears three-year low
US manufacturers have warned that Donald Trump's trade war is hitting production, pushing the dollar close to a three-year low against sterling on Monday. The greenback suffered a fresh sell-off, after the closely watched ISM survey of the manufacturing sector signalled a third monthly decline in output in a row. The ISM purchasing managers' index fell to 48.5% in May – below 50 signals contraction. Related: China accuses US of 'seriously violating' trade truce Comments from participants in the monthly poll underlined the damage being caused by the president's on-off tariff policies. 'Uncertainty due to the recent tariffs continues to weigh on profitability and service. An unresolved (trade deal with) China will result in empty shelves at retail for many do-it-yourself and professional goods,' a paper producer said. A chemicals producer reported: 'Most suppliers are passing through tariffs at full value to us.' Many US companies have struggled to keep track of the rapid reversals in trade policy in recent weeks. The dollar dipped to $1.3542 against sterling after the downbeat manufacturing survey was published, close to the three-year lows in late May. It also fell by about 0.5% against a basket of currencies. Concern about the probable economic impact of Trump's tariff policies intensified over the weekend, after he announced a 50% tariff on steel on Friday – up from 25%. Trump also suggested China had 'violated' the terms of a 90-day pause in the trade war between the two countries. Tariffs of 145% on Chinese exports were slashed last month to 30% for 90 days as the two sides agreed to discuss details of a wider deal. It is unclear what aspect of this truce Trump was accusing Beijing of breaching. The status of Trump's 'reciprocal' tariffs on a string of countries remains unclear, after a US court ruled last week that he overstepped his powers in imposing them – a decision the White House is challenging. The dollar has repeatedly come under pressure since Trump's 'liberation day' tariff blitz in April. At the same time, the yield on US Treasuries has risen – potentially a signal of anxiety among investors about the government's ability to repay its debts. The Treasury secretary, Scott Bessent, said on Sunday that the US would 'never default', amid growing concerns about the financial sustainability of plans for significant tax cuts, contained in Trump's 'big, beautiful' budget bill. 'We are on the warning track and we will never hit the wall,' Bessent told CBS, rebuffing comments by the JP Morgan Chase chief executive, Jamie Dimon, that bond markets could 'crack' under the weight of US government debts.