logo
Life atop China's car market starts to look tough for BYD as sales stall

Life atop China's car market starts to look tough for BYD as sales stall

BYD's core domestic car deliveries fell 8% in June as rivals like Geely, Xpeng, and Xiaomi gained ground, even as overseas and commercial sales were excluded from the tally
Bloomberg
Life at the top is proving complex for China's leading automaker, and there are fresh challenges on the horizon.
BYD Co.'s monthly sales have stagnated of late and with the summer months being a traditionally slower time for consumer purchases, that trajectory isn't expected to reverse any time soon.
Discounting is also now being looked sternly upon by Beijing, with China last week pledging to rein in 'irrational competition' in the electric vehicle sector, reflecting authorities' wish to tackle the deflationary price wars that are threatening economic and industrial growth.
Some of BYD's international forays are also proving more challenging than expected, raising the question, is China's No. 1 automaker on shaky ground?
The Shenzhen-based behemoth currently looks like it will undershoot its annual sales target for 2025, in what would be a rare miss after a multi-year bull run. The number of electric and hybrid vehicles BYD needs to sell each month through December has hit 560,000 units, in excess of levels it could hope to achieve typically in a single month. The most vehicles BYD has ever sold in a month was just shy of 515,000, in December last year.
Analysts are now doubting whether BYD can hit 5.5 million units in 2025. Consensus estimates continue to be downgraded.
Deutsche Bank AG earlier this month said it now expects 5 million in wholesales, or deliveries to dealers, for this year, comprised of 4 million domestic units and 1 million overseas, while Morgan Stanley last month lowered its projection to 5.3 million, pointing to a smaller number of new models. Bloomberg Intelligence's Joanne Chen says BYD will need to sacrifice some profit and maintain its hefty discounting in the second half if it wants to stay on track.
'Regulatory scrutiny will temper direct cuts to vehicle sticker prices but competition isn't going away and retail promotions are still needed to sustain sales momentum,' she said. 'New model roll outs and steady tech upgrade are also crucial.'
Bing Yuan, a fund manager at Edmond de Rothschild Asset Management, said many market watchers now realistically expect sales of around 5 million. 'My sense is that is the consensus,' she said.
Stripping out overseas and commercial sales, BYD's core car deliveries in China are shrinking. In June, they slipped 8 per cent year-on-year as vehicles from brands like Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co., Xpeng Inc. and Xiaomi Corp. won over buyers. HSBC Holdings Plc data show that Geely was the largest gainer of market share in the first half, while BYD was among the biggest losers.
Overseas sales are faring better and those are looking on target to reach BYD's forecast of 800,000. Indeed, BYD is already almost 60 per cent of the way there. But while higher margin international sales will help BYD offset aggressive domestic discounting, some foreign markets are presenting new difficulties.
BYD has grand plans for Saudi Arabia, for example, hoping to triple its footprint after Tesla Inc. entered the country. But EVs account for just over 1 per cent of total car sales in the kingdom, with high costs, sparse charging infrastructure and extreme temperatures challenging EV adoption.
India, a potentially huge market, has meanwhile consistently blocked BYD's efforts to expand and despite rapid growth from a low base in Europe, there are substantial tariff headwinds and increasing competition from legacy automakers that already have consumers' trust, not to mention more extensive after-sales networks.
At home, regulatory scrutiny has also intensified around BYD as it continues to be at the fore of an EV price war. In late May, it slashed prices by as much as 34 per cent, triggering renewed sector-wide discounts. Its moves were later discouraged in a veiled warning by the Chinese Communist Party's mouthpiece the People's Daily, which slammed the 'rat-race competition.'
Whether Beijing can actually stop price discounting by a privately held company is a point of debate.
Tianlei Huang, a China program coordinator at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, said authorities may resort to administrative tools such as price reviews or cost investigations to establish a de facto price floor, or coordinate a concerted capacity reduction among leading EV makers, although he acknowledged those measures won't be easy.
Regardless, BYD must be careful. As the company gears up to release first-half results later next month and July sales data within weeks, analysts will have their spreadsheets at the ready, waiting to see whether those 2025 targets look even further in the distance.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sundram Fasteners Q1 net up 4% to record Rs 148 crore, exports dip
Sundram Fasteners Q1 net up 4% to record Rs 148 crore, exports dip

Business Standard

time13 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Sundram Fasteners Q1 net up 4% to record Rs 148 crore, exports dip

Sundram Fasteners, the Chennai-based auto components major, reported its highest-ever consolidated net profit of Rs 147.94 crore for the first quarter of FY26, a 4 per cent increase from Rs 142.69 crore in the same quarter last year. The company also posted record consolidated revenue of Rs 1,533.39 crore, marking a 2 per cent year-on-year growth. The consolidated earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, stood at Rs 7.06. Managing Director Arathi Krishna attributed the strong performance to resilient domestic demand and robust execution. 'This progress is a testament to the dedication and expertise of our teams, who continue to drive operational excellence and uphold the highest standards of product quality,' she said. Operational highlights Standalone revenue from operations rose to Rs 1,350.17 crore, up from Rs 1,310.33 crore last year. Export sales, however, declined to Rs 379.14 crore from Rs 422.65 crore, reflecting pressures from global economic and geopolitical uncertainties. The EBITDA for the quarter reached Rs 238.77 crore, the highest in the company's history, up from Rs 223.06 crore in Q1 FY25. The EBITDA margin improved to 17.5 per cent, supported by stable commodity prices, a favourable product mix, and stronger domestic sales. Gross margins improved significantly, from 57.5 per cent to 59.9 per cent. Outlook and strategy Despite global headwinds, Krishna emphasised the company's continued focus on long-term growth. 'We remain confident in the competitive strength of our product portfolio and the durability of our long-term partnerships,' she said. Sundram Fasteners plans to continue investing in innovation, capacity expansion, and customer engagement, aiming to fortify its leadership in the Indian and global automotive component markets. The company's robust quarterly performance highlights its ability to weather external shocks, even as exports slow, and positions it for continued expansion through strategic domestic investments.

Section 232 returns: Trump's tariff hits $360-mn Indian copper exports
Section 232 returns: Trump's tariff hits $360-mn Indian copper exports

Business Standard

time13 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Section 232 returns: Trump's tariff hits $360-mn Indian copper exports

In a sweeping new trade measure, US President Donald Trump has signed a proclamation imposing a 50 per cent tariff on copper imports effective 1 August, citing national security concerns under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. The tariff, announced amid a broader re-emergence of Trump's protectionist trade agenda, is aimed at reducing the United States' reliance on foreign copper. Washington argues that such dependence poses a risk to critical domestic sectors such as defence, clean energy, power infrastructure, and semiconductors. India among impacted exporters India exported $360 million worth of copper products to the US in FY25, comprising plates, tubes, and other semi-finished forms. These shipments will now become significantly more expensive for US buyers. However, since the tariff applies uniformly to all countries—including US allies such as Japan and the European Union (EU)—India is unlikely to be specifically disadvantaged compared to other global exporters. According to a research brief by New Delhi-based think tank Global Trade Research Initiative, the policy could end up hurting the US economy more than its intended targets. 'Copper is a foundational raw material for electric vehicles, power grids, semiconductors, and defence electronics. A sudden 50 per cent hike in input costs will ripple through these sectors—slowing production, raising prices, and undermining the US clean energy transition,' the brief stated. What is Section 232? Section 232 of the US Trade Expansion Act of 1962 allows the President to impose tariffs or quotas if imports are deemed to threaten national security. The process begins with a Department of Commerce investigation, which includes public input and ends with a report to the President within 270 days. The President then has 90 days to determine whether and what action to take. Although statutory timelines are fixed, investigations are often accelerated under exigent circumstances. Trump, known for invoking Section 232 during his first term, previously used it to impose: A 25% tariff on steel and 10% on aluminium in 2018; Increased both to 50% in June 2025; A 25% tariff on automobiles and auto parts in April and May this year. The latest copper tariff is seen as part of a broader trade reconfiguration strategy. More industries under review The Trump administration has launched additional Section 232 investigations covering: Lumber Pharmaceuticals Semiconductors Critical and processed minerals Commercial aircraft and jet engines Trucks and truck parts The ongoing semiconductor investigation, launched in April 2025, has already been expanded to include consumer electronics such as smartphones and laptops. The findings are expected within two weeks, and trade experts warn of potential spillover effects on India's iPhone exports to the US if these are deemed to pose a national security threat. While the new copper tariff may align with Trump's political strategy of reshoring industrial supply chains, its downstream effects on the US defence, clean energy, and technology ecosystems could be far-reaching. For India, the move adds a new layer of complexity in its export growth strategy, particularly as it expands its presence in global manufacturing supply chains.

Swiggy falters under quick commerce strain as losses nearly double in Q1
Swiggy falters under quick commerce strain as losses nearly double in Q1

Mint

time13 minutes ago

  • Mint

Swiggy falters under quick commerce strain as losses nearly double in Q1

Swiggy's losses nearly doubled in the April-June period despite a jump in revenue, as its quick-commerce business Instamart continued to bleed cash. The Bengaluru-based food delivery platform posted a revenue of ₹ 4,961 crore in April-June, 54% higher from a year ago, driven by a surge in its supply chain and distribution (SCD) business, the company said in an exchange filing on Thursday. The SCD business, which provides tech services to wholesalers and retailers, rose 56% to ₹ 2,259 crore in the three months through June. It accounts for 45% of Swiggy's total revenue, and grew at more than three times the pace of its mainstay food delivery business, which rose 18.5% during the quarter. Instamart saw its revenue grow to ₹ 806 crore in the April–June quarter, up from ₹ 374 crore a year ago. But its losses also shot up to ₹ 797 crore, compared to ₹ 280 crore last year. This steep rise in Instamart's losses is the main reason why Swiggy's total loss nearly doubled to ₹ 1,197 crore, from ₹ 611 crore in the same period last year. The food delivery business accounted for 36% of Swiggy's revenue, while quick commerce brought in 16%. Swiggy's quarterly revenue of ₹ 4,961 crore was slightly below Elara Capital's estimate of ₹ 5,088 crore. Meanwhile, Swiggy's larger rival Eternal Ltd, formerly Zomato, maintained its dominance by staying profitable despite similar cost pressures. Eternal posted a ₹ 25 crore net profit for the same period, as its quick commerce unit Blinkit gained significant traction—tightening its grip in a vertical Swiggy once led through Instamart. Swiggy has not issued a formal guidance for the year ahead, but chief executive officer (CEO) Sriharsha Majety said the company had moved past the peak of quick commerce losses seen in March. 'We will modulate investments to ensure that we drive the business towards scale-led profitability,' he said. Still, pressure is mounting. 'The real problem is that Swiggy is not the category leader anywhere,' said Satish Meena, founder of Datum Intelligence. 'That makes the capital burn much harder to justify, especially in a post-IPO environment where public market patience is thinning.' 'Losses in Instamart are significantly higher compared to Blinkit, and it is indeed troubling for Swiggy,' Meena said. 'These losses cannot be attributed only to expansion of dark stores—there has been a heavy investment in customer acquisition and discounting.' Swiggy's adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (Ebitda) loss widened 75% to ₹ 813 crore. Total expenses jumped to ₹ 6,244 crore, with marketing and promotional spend up 114% to ₹ 1,036 crore, and delivery-related costs rising 63% to ₹ 1,313 crore. Instamart accounted for 38% of Swiggy's total Gross Order Value (GOV) in the quarter. Order volumes more than doubled, and average order value rose 25% to ₹ 612. However, the segment's adjusted Ebitda margin stood at –15.8%, meaning Swiggy lost nearly ₹ 16 for every ₹ 100 worth of goods sold. Gross order value in e-commerce refers to the value of all orders placed on a platform during a specific period, and includes discounts and refunds etc. Food delivery remained the most profitable business for Swiggy. It contributed 54.6% of total GOV and posted a segment profit of ₹ 202 crore in Q1FY26. Food delivery GOV rose nearly 19% year-on-year to ₹ 8,086 crore. Zomato's Blinkit benefited from customer familiarity, having evolved from Grofers. 'Blinkit created buzz and scaled quickly, especially in NCR. Instamart, in contrast, is still building that presence,' said Meena. Swiggy added 1.2 million monthly transacting users (MTUs) during the June quarter—its highest quarterly addition in two years—taking the total to 16.3 million. Overall platform GOV rose 45% year-on-year to ₹ 14,797 crore. Beyond food and Instamart, the dining out and events segments— Dineout and SteppinOut—contributed 7.3% to total GOV and turned marginally profitable with an adjusted Ebitda margin of 0.5%. Swiggy did not disclose performance data for its ultra-fast delivery platform Bolt. A fresh source of concern also emerged with Rapido, a company in which Swiggy owns a 12% stake. Rapido recently announced its entry into the food delivery space, creating a potential conflict of interest. Swiggy acknowledged this in its earnings release: 'As a shareholder, we are extremely happy with their success and value-creation; but do acknowledge a potential conflict of interest that may arise in the future. We are actively re-evaluating our investment due to the above developments.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store