CIA hopes cinematic videos will persuade Chinese to spy for U.S.
The CIA on Thursday released two social media videos inviting disillusioned Chinese officials to spy for the United States, seeking to take advantage of government corruption and repression in China.
The cinematic, Mandarin-language videos released across multiple platforms resemble recruiting videos the agency has produced in the past few years aimed at encouraging Russians to share secrets with the U.S. Officials say the Russian-language videos have proved successful.
Director John Ratcliffe has vowed to make China a top priority for the CIA's intelligence gathering, and he cited the videos as the latest example of that effort.
'Today, the CIA released Mandarin-language videos aimed at recruiting Chinese officials to steal secrets,' Ratcliffe said in a statement.
'No adversary in the history of our Nation has presented a more formidable challenge or capable strategic competitor than the Chinese Communist Party,' he said, adding: 'Our Agency must continue responding to this threat with urgency, creativity, and grit, and these videos are just one of the ways we are doing this.'
The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Friday, a national holiday in China.
Six months ago, the CIA released a text-only video in Mandarin explaining how to safely reach out to the CIA using the 'dark web,' a part of the internet accessible only with specialized software. The video was viewed 900,000 times, agency officials said.
Although it is difficult to speak out because of China's authoritarian government, more Chinese are volunteering to share information via the dark web, a CIA official said.
'If it wasn't working, we wouldn't be making more videos,' the official said. 'We want Chinese citizens to know we always have an open door to them.'
The CIA official said the agency is interested in a wide variety of information from China beyond traditional espionage, including advanced science, military and cyber technology, as well as data and foreign policy secrets.
In one of the videos, a young man portrayed as a junior Chinese Communist Party official dutifully accompanies a more senior official who is trying on new suits and shopping for an expensive watch. The junior official narrates the video, sharing his frustration with the wealth gap between the party elite and the rest of Chinese society.
'We dedicate a lifetime, but they are the ones to benefit,' he says. 'We're taught that by following the rules and working hard, we can change our lives for the better. But why is that only a few people can enjoy that kind of happiness?'
The junior official laments that the party promised prosperity for all, 'but the gains of our collective efforts are indulged by a select few,' and he eventually concludes he 'must forge my own path.'
As dramatic music builds, he walks out of his modest apartment. 'The hardest part of a journey is the first step. It's time I start working toward my own dreams,' he says as he taps a link on his phone to secretly contact the CIA.
In a second video, a well-dressed senior party official attends a formal dinner while sensing his colleagues are maneuvering against him. He worries that he could share the fate of his comrades who have been ousted from power.
'It is easy to become a memory,' the official says. 'And much too commonplace to just disappear.'
He says he cannot allow his family's fate to rest in the hands of party officials and predicts that 'the whispers will grow louder.'
The official opts for 'another way' for the sake of his family and contacts the CIA over a secure portal on his phone. 'No matter what my fate will bring, my family will know a good life,' he says.
In February, Russia responded to the CIA's Russian-language recruitment videos with its own in an attempt to persuade American 'patriots' to share secrets with Russian spy services.
U.S. officials have warned that Chinese and Russian intelligence officials hope to take advantage of the Trump administration's reductions in the federal workforce. Their hope is to recruit employees of the CIA and other U.S. spy agencies who were recently offered buyouts to spy for Beijing and Moscow.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US, Chinese officials exchange barbs at Shanghai event over trade
By Casey Hall SHANGHAI (Reuters) -U.S. and Chinese officials traded barbs at a celebration held by a U.S. business chamber in Shanghai on Friday, as the chamber appealed to both countries to provide more certainty to American businesses operating in China. Scott Walker, consul general of U.S. consulate in Shanghai, told a gathering of U.S. businesses aimed at celebrating the 110th anniversary of the American Chamber of Commerce (AmCham) in Shanghai that the U.S.-China economic relationship had been unbalanced and non-reciprocal "for far too long." "We want an end to discriminatory actions and retaliation against U.S. companies in China," he said. In a speech that directly followed Walker's, Chen Jing, a Shanghai Communist Party official who is also the president of the Shanghai People's Association for Friendship with Foreign Countries, countered Walker's view. "I believe the consul general's view is prejudiced, ungrounded and not aligning with the phone call of our heads of states last night," he said. The interaction reflects the continued strained relationship between both countries as the trade war continues to simmer. U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping spoke over a long anticipated call on Thursday, confronting weeks of brewing trade tensions and a battle over critical minerals. Trump later said they agreed to further talks. It came in the middle of a dispute between Washington and Beijing in recent weeks over "rare earths" minerals that threatened to tear up a fragile truce in the trade war between the two biggest economies. The countries struck a 90-day deal on May 12 to roll back some of the triple-digit, tit-for-tat tariffs they had placed on each other since Trump's January inauguration but the deal has not addressed broader concerns that strain the relationship and Trump has accused China of violating the agreement. Eric Zheng, president of AmCham Shanghai which counts over 1,000 companies among its membership, told reporters on the sidelines of the event that many companies had put their decision-making on pause due to the uncertainty. "People are looking for some more definitive, durable statements on both sides that enable businesses to feel more secure," he said. "Our number one ask from the two governments is to give us some certainty so that we can plan accordingly." Erreur lors de la récupération des données Connectez-vous pour accéder à votre portefeuille Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - Trump and Musk fell out because Trump just doesn't get principled people
There are limitations to President Trump's transactional view of the world. This is evident in his growing tension with Elon Musk, which risks creating political problems that threaten his agenda. Trump usually gets his way through a mix of flattery, favors and intimidation, but Musk is less inclined than most to respond to these techniques. Musk holds a lot of cards. His Tesla factories employ tens of thousands of American workers. His SpaceX rockets underpin our national aspirations in space. He is also the wealthiest person on the planet, and his wealth facilitates a natural tendency to speak out when his principles are challenged. That was illustrated in late 2023 when he invited advertisers to stay off his social media platform. It is possible to disagree with everything Musk does and still concede that the man is principled. This is why our less principled President is struggling to understand Musk's hostility to the tax and spending bill, the oddly named One Big Beautiful Bill Act, so named after an utterance by Trump. Musk carried out his work at the Department of Government Efficiency without humanity and with childish antics. But if his methods were wrong, his beliefs were real. His opposition to a spending bill that negates his work by increasing federal debt by more than $2 trillion is rooted in deeply held principles. His life would be easier and his businesses more secure if he had stayed quiet and joined other Republicans in supporting a bill they know leads our nation one step closer to fiscal ruin. Musk is different. He was willing to alienate himself from liberal consumers by taking up his position at DOGE and supporting Trump, but equally willing to alienate himself from MAGA consumers by opposing the Trump tax bill on principle. This type of principled stand is difficult for someone like Trump to understand, and I believe he is being honest when he says he can't understand Musk's opposition to the bill. In Trump's eyes, he offered Musk a favorable transaction: Publicly support my policies, and I will maintain your access and influence. Musk refused the deal because staying quiet meant violating his principles. This is foreign to Trump, who values public appearance and profit over principles. Musk isn't the only person President Trump is struggling to understand. Chinese president Xi Jinping is equally principled and believes what he says about the 21st century belonging to China. Xi is committed to erasing the last vestiges of China's subordination to the West. He is telling the truth when he discusses the belief that China should play a central role in the world and dominate Asia. The Chinese president is committed to taking control of Taiwan because its de facto independence represents a contemporary manifestation of an earlier and weaker time in Chinese history. American power can deter Xi from invading, but there is no deal imaginable that will cause him to change his mind about the inevitability of seizing Taiwan. Xi holds the principle too deeply to let it go, and here again Trump struggles to understand. Xi cannot capitulate to American demands on either trade or Taiwan without resurrecting in his own mind the idea of a weak and subordinate China. This is one important reason among several why he hasn't acquiesced to American demands on trade and seems to be preparing for a prolonged standoff — something that probably wasn't part of Trump's initial plan. Xi's principles make it difficult for our transactional president to understand the man and predict his actions. Russian President Vladimir Putin is another example of someone Trump fundamentally fails to understand. Putin acts immorally but is still more principled than he is transactional. Trump's offer to reintegrate Russia into the world economy and deepen American economic ties with Russian companies might have worked to end the war in Ukraine if Putin were as transactional as Trump. Our president offered Putin an objectively good deal — an escape from relative isolation and a chance to increase Russia's national wealth and the personal wealth of its president and closest collaborators. But Putin is being honest when he says Ukraine should be part of Russia. He has so far been unwilling to accept Trump's generous offers because they don't comport with his principled belief. Like Xi, Putin refuses to accept even the appearance of Russian subordination to the West. His principled stand means Trump's transactional offers are unlikely to succeed. American interests are better served by forcing Putin's hand — by weaking Russia's economy and hurting it militarily by supporting Ukraine's resistance. Trump cannot easily see this because he doesn't understand how the Russian president sees the world. Putin is not primarily transactional — he pursues his principles until sufficient counterforce is applied. This is a different way of engaging with the world than Trump's dealmaking. It requires an American approach to Russia that Trump has so far failed to understand and embrace. Trump believes everyone has a price and will eventually make a deal. He has been successful because he has often been proven right in this. Consider, for example, the Republicans in Congress who sacrificed their principles to safeguard their reelections by supporting a fiscally irresponsible bill. Their actions once again affirmed Trump's instinct that everyone has a price. But not everyone is so transactional as that. Men like Musk, Xi and Putin see the world through a principled lens. As good as he is at dominating transactional people, Trump struggles to understand and then anticipate and control the actions of people who are primarily guided by principle. This has political consequences for Trump himself and geopolitical consequences for our nation. Until Trump better understands the motivations of principled people, our country will continue offering deals to people who are entirely uninterested. Trump is also risking his legacy and agenda by antagonizes potential critics like Musk by miscalculating their reactions when his actions violate their principles. One of Trump's most redeeming qualities is his honest desire for peace, but his transactional approach to America's adversaries will never create the stability he seeks. Just as he should have anticipated Musk's opposition to the spending bill, he should have anticipated Xi's intransigence on trade and Putin's desire to continue his war. The understanding that some people act on principle is a blind spot for our transactional president, and this makes it difficult for him to understand the principled parts of the world. Colin Pascal is a retired Army lieutenant colonel and a graduate student in the School of Public Affairs at American University in Washington. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Axios
21 minutes ago
- Axios
The cost of losing Indiana's international students
Indiana's nearly 30,000 international students contributed around $1 billion to the Hoosier economy during the 2023-24 school year. Why it matters: The Trump administration is halting student visa interviews and revoking visas for Chinese students amid a political pressure campaign against colleges and universities and a broader immigration crackdown. A big drop in international students could hurt college town economies, some of which are already struggling due to lower enrollment. The big picture: The student visa pause comes as the Trump administration has been criticizing U.S. colleges and universities for failing to crack down on what it describes as heightened antisemitism as students protest Israel's actions in Gaza. The State Department is considering broader vetting of student visa applicants' social media posts. The revocation of Chinese students' visas in particular is tied to concerns that their government is using them "to steal intellectual property on Beijing's behalf," a State Department official told Axios' Marc Caputo. By the numbers: Of the more than 1 million international students studying in the U.S. during the 2023-24 school year, about 12.5% were doing so at schools in California, 12.1% in New York and 8% in Texas. Massachusetts (7.3%) and Illinois (5.5%) round out the top five, per data from NAFSA, an international education nonprofit. Zoom in: Purdue led the state with approximately 12,000 international students, followed by IU Bloomington with 6,000. The latest: A federal judge recently extended a temporary order blocking the Trump administration from revoking Harvard University's ability to host international students. After Columbia University, Harvard became the administration's main target, with ongoing battles over federal grants, student visas and more. The other side: Detractors argue that making it harder for international students to come study in the U.S. harms the country's global image, and risks missing out on key talent in hot fields like artificial intelligence.