Why a fake treatment might cure your flu … and which ones to avoid
Loading
Now that cold and flu season is here again, many of us are reaching for familiar remedies: lemon and honey tea, eucalyptus rubs, chicken soup, vitamin C. Maybe we don't expect them to cure us, but we do expect to feel better. And often, we do. That expectation is shaped by powerful subconscious forces – experiences, beliefs, memory and culture – that science shows can produce real effects. Placebo science is evolving rapidly, revealing how these forces work and how they're being amplified in our digital age.
The modern study of placebo effects began in the 1950s, when American anaesthetist Henry Beecher observed that wounded soldiers often reported pain relief after being given saline – believing it was morphine. His landmark paper, The Powerful Placebo, suggested that belief alone could trigger genuine physiological responses.
Since then, research has shown that expectations, context, and meaning can shape how we perceive symptoms and how our bodies respond. In the context of colds and flu, placebo effects can reduce symptoms like fatigue, cough, pain and headache. And while placebos don't directly eliminate viruses, symptom relief can have downstream effects – better rest, reduced stress and improved mood – which may, in turn, support immune recovery, reduced illness severity and faster healing. When we take a home remedy, we're not just ingesting 'active ingredients' – we're engaging powerful mind-body responses shaped by habit, memory and social learning. These aren't imagined – they're real biological responses, suggesting that mind and body are more connected than we once thought.
Loading
Vaccines, interestingly, operate in a different realm. Because they prevent illness rather than treat symptoms, they don't tend to trigger placebo effects. In fact, they're more associated with nocebo effects, where negative expectations cause real but non-specific symptoms such as headache or fatigue. An influential meta-analysis (a high-quality study that combines data from many trials to reveal overall patterns) of COVID-19 vaccine studies found that up to 76 per cent of systemic side effects, like headache and fatigue, were likely due to nocebo effects – not the vaccine itself – based on similar reports in placebo groups. Similar effects have been observed with flu vaccines. These negative symptoms aren't imagined either, but they are also shaped in part by expectation. But when symptoms are caused by nocebo effects rather than the vaccine itself, they can become powerful stories that influence vaccine hesitancy and public discourse, even amid overwhelming scientific evidence for vaccine safety and effectiveness.
If you're now feeling a little more pro-placebo, great – they're powerful allies. But in the age of social media, that same power can be shaped, and sometimes distorted, by the platforms we use.
If you're thinking your home remedy won't work because you know it's a placebo, think again. Open-label placebo studies – where people knowingly take an inert treatment – have shown surprisingly strong results. People with pain, fatigue, and Irritable Bowel Syndrome have found relief despite knowing the treatment was inert. The key is allowing people to value the ritual of treatment as much as the substance. In this way, many home remedies function as open-label cultural placebos. We may not believe they'll cure anything, but they give us hope and belief, which studies show leads to improvements in symptoms anyway.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
2 hours ago
- The Age
Got the flu? Why a fake treatment might be your cure … and which ones to avoid
A few months ago, on a long-haul flight at the start of a long-awaited trip to Europe, disaster struck: I caught the flu. My unwelcome new travel companion and I arrived at my friend's doorstep in Germany – sneezing, bone-tired and ready to throw in the towel. But my friend had a plan: a megadose of vitamin C, as recommended by two-time Nobel Prize laureate Linus Pauling. I took it, and within days I was back on my feet. What could have ruined the trip became a brief hiccup. Did the vitamin C work? Maybe. But having spent years researching the placebo effect, I suspected there was something else at play. Now that cold and flu season is here again, many of us are reaching for familiar remedies: lemon and honey tea, eucalyptus rubs, chicken soup, vitamin C. Maybe we don't expect them to cure us, but we do expect to feel better. And often, we do. That expectation is shaped by powerful subconscious forces – experiences, beliefs, memory and culture – that science shows can produce real effects. Placebo science is evolving rapidly, revealing how these forces work and how they're being amplified in our digital age. The modern study of placebo effects began in the 1950s, when American anaesthetist Henry Beecher observed that wounded soldiers often reported pain relief after being given saline – believing it was morphine. His landmark paper, The Powerful Placebo, suggested that belief alone could trigger genuine physiological responses. Since then, research has shown that expectations, context, and meaning can shape how we perceive symptoms and how our bodies respond. In the context of colds and flu, placebo effects can reduce symptoms like fatigue, cough, pain and headache. And while placebos don't directly eliminate viruses, symptom relief can have downstream effects – better rest, reduced stress and improved mood – which may, in turn, support immune recovery, reduced illness severity and faster healing. When we take a home remedy, we're not just ingesting 'active ingredients' – we're engaging powerful mind-body responses shaped by habit, memory and social learning. These aren't imagined – they're real biological responses, suggesting that mind and body are more connected than we once thought. Loading Vaccines, interestingly, operate in a different realm. Because they prevent illness rather than treat symptoms, they don't tend to trigger placebo effects. In fact, they're more associated with nocebo effects, where negative expectations cause real but non-specific symptoms such as headache or fatigue. An influential meta-analysis (a high-quality study that combines data from many trials to reveal overall patterns) of COVID-19 vaccine studies found that up to 76 per cent of systemic side effects, like headache and fatigue, were likely due to nocebo effects – not the vaccine itself – based on similar reports in placebo groups. Similar effects have been observed with flu vaccines. These negative symptoms aren't imagined either, but they are also shaped in part by expectation. But when symptoms are caused by nocebo effects rather than the vaccine itself, they can become powerful stories that influence vaccine hesitancy and public discourse, even amid overwhelming scientific evidence for vaccine safety and effectiveness. If you're now feeling a little more pro-placebo, great – they're powerful allies. But in the age of social media, that same power can be shaped, and sometimes distorted, by the platforms we use. If you're thinking your home remedy won't work because you know it's a placebo, think again. Open-label placebo studies – where people knowingly take an inert treatment – have shown surprisingly strong results. People with pain, fatigue, and irritable bowel syndrome have found relief despite knowing the treatment was inert. The key is allowing people to value the ritual of treatment as much as the substance. In this way, many home remedies function as open-label cultural placebos. We may not believe they'll cure anything, but they give us hope and belief, which studies show leads to improvements in symptoms anyway. If you're now feeling a little more pro-placebo, great – they're powerful allies. But in the age of social media, that same power can be shaped, and sometimes distorted, by the platforms we use. It is well known that the placebo effect is stronger when treatment is recommended by an authority figure or trusted expert. In my case, my friend's firm belief – backed by Pauling's scientific cred – likely shaped my response. Now, social media influencers sharing health hacks can, unfortunately, act as powerful placebo catalysts. When an influencer swears a remedy cured their flu, pain or chronic condition, their message – liked, shared and algorithmically boosted – shapes expectations at scale. The algorithms themselves tend to show us more of what we already believe, reinforcing the illusion of consensus. Social media doesn't just spread health trends – it amplifies placebo effects in ways we're only beginning to understand.
7NEWS
18 hours ago
- 7NEWS
Golfer says he ‘overdosed' on creatine during BMW Championship
American golfer Ben Griffin got the shakes at the BMW Championship — though it wasn't necessarily because of nerves, but rather due to swallowing a 'large rock' of creatine. World No. 17 Griffin said that he 'started getting super shaky' and 'felt like I had tremors' on Sunday after accidentally swallowing a large amount of the supplement. Creatine 'contributes to rapid energy production and may enhance power or speed bursts requiring short periods of anaerobic activity,' according to Harvard Health, and usage of the supplement is common among gym enthusiasts as there is evidence it 'can hasten muscle recovery after strenuous exercise.' 'I've taken it on the golf course before. It's fine,' Griffin said, per the PGA Tour. 'I started taking it after my second shot, and I accidentally swallowed one of the big rocks in my water bottle. I've never overdosed on creatine before, but I think I did in the moment because I didn't really drink any water after that. I basically just inhaled a snowball,' the two-time PGA Tour winner explained. Griffin said that he usually takes 15mg of the supplement daily, but on this occasion, he estimates he accidentally ingested that amount at one time. 'I was physically shaking like I've never felt before,' Griffin said. 'And I don't normally miss a lot of short putts. It was really a weird situation.' The golfer said that his caddie intervened by making him drink water and calming him down. Griffin was six over par for the first three holes — carding a triple-bogey, double-bogey and bogey — and thought about withdrawing from the tournament, but after that, he said the physical effects started to wear off. He then made seven birdies and signed for a one-under 69, finishing tied for 12th in an impressive comeback. 'It was probably more just a little bit flustered. I was fine after the second shot on two. And then it was — I felt good so I went about my day and got it back to under par,' he said. The golfer said he will be limiting his intake of the supplement in future, calling the events of the day a 'pretty crazy story.' 'I don't think I'll be taking too much creatine in the future. I will take it, but not in the amount that I probably did on the golf course, which wasn't probably a healthy amount.'
Sydney Morning Herald
a day ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Why a fake treatment might cure your flu … and which ones to avoid
A few months ago, on a long-haul flight at the start of a long-awaited trip to Europe, disaster struck: I caught the flu. My unwelcome new travel companion and I arrived at my friend's doorstep in Germany – sneezing, bone-tired and ready to throw in the towel. But my friend had a plan: a megadose of vitamin C, as recommended by two-time Nobel Prize winner Linus Pauling. I took it, and within days I was back on my feet. What could have ruined the trip became a brief hiccup. Did the vitamin C work? Maybe. But having spent years researching the placebo effect, I suspected there was something else at play. Loading Now that cold and flu season is here again, many of us are reaching for familiar remedies: lemon and honey tea, eucalyptus rubs, chicken soup, vitamin C. Maybe we don't expect them to cure us, but we do expect to feel better. And often, we do. That expectation is shaped by powerful subconscious forces – experiences, beliefs, memory and culture – that science shows can produce real effects. Placebo science is evolving rapidly, revealing how these forces work and how they're being amplified in our digital age. The modern study of placebo effects began in the 1950s, when American anaesthetist Henry Beecher observed that wounded soldiers often reported pain relief after being given saline – believing it was morphine. His landmark paper, The Powerful Placebo, suggested that belief alone could trigger genuine physiological responses. Since then, research has shown that expectations, context, and meaning can shape how we perceive symptoms and how our bodies respond. In the context of colds and flu, placebo effects can reduce symptoms like fatigue, cough, pain and headache. And while placebos don't directly eliminate viruses, symptom relief can have downstream effects – better rest, reduced stress and improved mood – which may, in turn, support immune recovery, reduced illness severity and faster healing. When we take a home remedy, we're not just ingesting 'active ingredients' – we're engaging powerful mind-body responses shaped by habit, memory and social learning. These aren't imagined – they're real biological responses, suggesting that mind and body are more connected than we once thought. Loading Vaccines, interestingly, operate in a different realm. Because they prevent illness rather than treat symptoms, they don't tend to trigger placebo effects. In fact, they're more associated with nocebo effects, where negative expectations cause real but non-specific symptoms such as headache or fatigue. An influential meta-analysis (a high-quality study that combines data from many trials to reveal overall patterns) of COVID-19 vaccine studies found that up to 76 per cent of systemic side effects, like headache and fatigue, were likely due to nocebo effects – not the vaccine itself – based on similar reports in placebo groups. Similar effects have been observed with flu vaccines. These negative symptoms aren't imagined either, but they are also shaped in part by expectation. But when symptoms are caused by nocebo effects rather than the vaccine itself, they can become powerful stories that influence vaccine hesitancy and public discourse, even amid overwhelming scientific evidence for vaccine safety and effectiveness. If you're now feeling a little more pro-placebo, great – they're powerful allies. But in the age of social media, that same power can be shaped, and sometimes distorted, by the platforms we use. If you're thinking your home remedy won't work because you know it's a placebo, think again. Open-label placebo studies – where people knowingly take an inert treatment – have shown surprisingly strong results. People with pain, fatigue, and Irritable Bowel Syndrome have found relief despite knowing the treatment was inert. The key is allowing people to value the ritual of treatment as much as the substance. In this way, many home remedies function as open-label cultural placebos. We may not believe they'll cure anything, but they give us hope and belief, which studies show leads to improvements in symptoms anyway.
