Trump announces new tariffs across the globe, delaying deadline
To many, the tariff hikes do not come as a surprise, as Trump initially announced them in April. He had set a minimum 10% tariff on every country in the world and additional levies on dozens deemed the worst offenders, citing deficits and unfair trade practices with the US.
Trump delayed the deadline of the tariff implementation, dubbed "Liberation Day," several times, allowing trading partners to negotiate.
Some of them were able to negotiate an agreement and even reach tariff-reducing deals.
A 15% tariff rate for the EU, for example, was decided on after European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen reached a political agreement with Trump over the weekend.
Some countries, however, were unable to negotiate, injecting them with a new dose of uncertainty. And for some, higher tariffs were put into place than initially promised.
Brazil, with 50% tariffs on its imported goods, and Canada, with 35% are among the hardest hit, followed by 39% for Switzerland, 25% for India, and 20% for Taiwan.
Trump issued a separate order for Canada, stating a levy hike from 25% to 35%, citing the cross-border flow of fentanyl.
The announcement from the White House late Thursday said Canada had failed to 'do more to arrest, seize, detain or otherwise intercept ... traffickers, criminals at large and illicit drugs.'
Earlier on Thursday, the US president had also said Canada's announcement that it will recognise Palestine as a state as the reason it would be "very hard" for Washington to reach a trade agreement with its northern neighbour.
Similarly for Brazil, Trump's tariff decision seemed more about political revenge, as the Republican President directly linked the 50% rate to the trial against former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, which Trump called a "witch hunt".
The curveballs sharply contrast with Trump's decision on Mexico, to whom he granted a 90-day extension to continue trade negotiations.
Trump has previously said the tax increases on nearly $3 trillion worth of imported goods would bring new wealth, create new factory jobs, reduce budget deficits and get other countries to treat the US with more respect.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
24 minutes ago
- France 24
Academics warn Columbia University deal sets dangerous precedent
Academics from Columbia and beyond have expressed concerns that the deal -- which makes broad-ranging concessions and increases government oversight -- will become the blueprint for how Trump brings other universities to heel. The New York institution was the first to be targeted in Trump's war against elite universities, for what the US president claimed was its failure to tackle anti-Semitism on campus in the wake of pro-Palestinian protests. It was stripped of hundreds of millions of dollars of federal funding and lost its ability to apply for new research grants. Labs saw vital funding frozen, and dozens of researchers were laid off. But Columbia last week agreed to pay the government $200 million, and an additional $21 million to settle an investigation into anti-Semitism. According to Ted Mitchell, president of the American Council on Education, the lack of due process -- with the government slashing funding before carrying out a formal investigation -- left Columbia in an "untenable position." Columbia law professor David Pozen agreed, saying the "manner in which the deal was constructed has been unlawful and coercive from the start" and slamming the agreement as giving "legal form to an extortion scheme." Federal oversight The deal goes beyond addressing anti-Semitism and makes concessions on international student admissions, race and ethnicity considerations in admissions and single-sex spaces on campus, among other issues. Columbia also agreed to appoint an independent monitor to implement the deal, share ethnicity admissions data with the government and crack down on campus protests. Many of the provisions "represent significant incursions onto Columbia's autonomy," said Pozen. "What's happened at Columbia is part of a broader authoritarian attack on civil society," he said, pointing to similar pressures on law firms and media organizations to fall in line. According to the law professor, the deal "signals the emergence of a new regulatory regime in which the Trump administration will periodically and unpredictably shake down other schools and demand concessions from them." In the coming weeks, Pozen said he expected the "administration will put a lot of pressure on Harvard and other schools to follow suit." Harvard University has pushed back against the government, filing a lawsuit in a bid to reverse sweeping funding cuts. But Steven Levitsky, a professor of government at Harvard, said that "in terms of academic freedom and in terms of democracy, the (Columbia) precedent is devastating." - 'First round' - Education Secretary Linda McMahon said she hoped the Columbia deal would be a "template for other universities around the country." On Wednesday, McMahon announced a deal with Brown University to restore some federal funding and end ongoing investigations after the Ivy League school agreed to end race considerations in admissions and adopt a biological definition of gender. Brown President Christina Paxson admitted "there are other aspects of the agreement that were not part of previous federal reviews of Brown policies" but were "priorities of the federal administration." Harvard is reportedly considering forking out $500 million to settle, according to the New York Times. Others have made smaller concessions to appease the government, with Trump's alma mater the University of Pennsylvania banning transgender women from competing in women's sports, and the University of Virginia's head resigning after scrutiny over its diversity programs. Brendan Cantwell, a professor at Michigan State University who researches the history and governance of higher education, said government interference in universities "has not happened at scale like this, probably ever in American history." While some university staff see striking an agreement as the quickest way to reopen the federal funding spigot, Cantwell warned that concessions such as sharing ethnicity data from admissions could be "weaponized" and provide fodder for future probes. Levitsky agreed, saying: "Extortionists don't stop at the first concession. Extortionists come back for more." "There's a very high likelihood that this is just the first round," he said. Pozen noted that it will be harder for "major research universities to hold the line" compared to smaller colleges which are less reliant on federal funding. But Levitsky still urged Harvard to stand its ground and "fight back," including in the courts. "Fighting an authoritarian regime is costly, but that's what we have to do," he said. "This is an unprecedented assault, and universities need to work together."
LeMonde
an hour ago
- LeMonde
In Brazil, Lula resists pressure from the Trump administration
Donald Trump appears willing to go to any length to defend his ally Jair Bolsonaro. On Wednesday, July 30, the US Department of the Treasury announced new sanctions against Judge Alexandre de Moraes, who is overseeing the trial for the attempted coup by the far-right president who served from 2019 to 2022. Accused by Washington of leading a "witch hunt," the judge –who was already banned from entering the United States starting on July 18 – has now had his assets frozen on US territory and is barred from conducting financial transactions with American citizens and businesses. A few hours later, Trump also signed an emergency executive order to impose 50% tariffs on goods imported from Brazil, as he had announced on July 9. Describing Brazil as posing "an unusual and extraordinary threat (...) to the national security, foreign policy and economy of the United States," Trump ultimately excluded 694 products from the measure, which is now set to take effect on August 6, five days later than originally planned. These new retaliatory measures, however, have not swayed the Brazilian government. On X, President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva quickly defended Brazil's sovereignty and expressed his support for Judge de Moraes. "Brazil is a sovereign and democratic country that respects human rights and the independence of powers; it is unacceptable for the American government to interfere in the Brazilian judiciary," he declared on Wednesday. Earlier in the day, before the executive order was announced, the Brazilian president also urged his US counterpart, during an interview with the New York Times, not to "mix everything together": "If he wants to have a political fight, then let's treat it as a political fight. If he wants to talk trade, let's sit down and discuss trade." "These sanctions are absolutely unprecedented," said Marco Antonio Carvalho Teixeira, a political scientist at the Getulio Vargas Foundation. "There is no historical precedent for such foreign interference in Brazil, aimed at favoring a political group close to the [US] president," the researcher explained.
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
Sensible and steely: how Mexico's Sheinbaum has dealt with Trump
The pair are known to get along despite sitting on opposite sides of the political aisle, earning Mexico's first woman president the epithet of "Trump whisperer." At least three times now, the US president has granted Mexico tariff relief and Trump has described Sheinbaum as a "wonderful woman" to the envy of a host of other world leaders who have found exchanges with Trump can be tetchy. On Thursday, Trump agreed to delay by 90 days a 30 percent general tariff on imported Mexican goods, just hours before it was to take effect. It was the outcome of the ninth phone conversation between the two leaders since Trump returned to power in January with a strong rhetoric against undocumented migrants and fentanyl flowing from America's southern neighbor. How did she do it? "With a cool head," the president herself told reporters Friday. The 63-year-old physicist and dedicated leftist added that she avoids "confronting" the magnate, all the while insisting on Mexico's sovereign rights in dealing with a man known to respect strong leaders. Sheinbaum has said that Mexicans should "never bow our heads" and Trump has acknowledged her mettle, remarking: "You're tough" in one phone call, according to The New York Times. "Mexico represents a lot to the United States... they are aware of that," Sheinbaum explained. 'Ability to convince' Thanks to the USMCA free trade agreement between Mexico, the United States and Canada, nearly 85 percent of Mexican exports have been tariff-free. And while a 30 percent general tariff has been delayed, for now, Mexico's vital automotive sector is the target of a 25 percent levy, albeit with discounts for parts manufactured in the United States. Its steel and aluminum sectors, like those of other countries, are subject to a 50 percent tariff. Mexico's government nevertheless claims the latest delay as a victory. "Without being sycophantic, I can tell you that the way our president handles her conversations, her approach, the firmness with which she defends Mexico's interests, her ability to convince President Trump, is very significant," Secretary of Economy Marcelo Ebrard, who leads trade negotiations, told reporters Thursday. Give and take Sheinbaum seems also to have adopted a give and take approach, deploying thousands of border troops to assuage Trump's concerns about migration and drug flows. The president insists she has "not yielded anything" in negotiations with Trump, and talks are ongoing between the neighbors for a security agreement to tackle the problem of fentanyl and drug trafficking. Sheinbaum has also raised the possibility of importing more US products to reset the trade balance. Some fear the Mexican leader is merely buying time. The latest tariff delay "does not solve the issue of uncertainty; we return to the starting point," Diego Marroquin, a trade expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, told AFP.
