How smart people fall for conspiracy theories
Who falls into the rabbit hole of conspiracy theories and how can you reach them? That's the topic of a three-episode season of CNN's new narrative podcast series 'The Account.'
Donie O'Sullivan covers politics and technology for CNN and that intersection frequently leads him to stories about how misinformation spreads online.
What I found most compelling about this new series is the idea that it's frequently very smart people who fall for crazy-seeming conspiracy theories.
I talked to O'Sullivan about the podcast, how to have empathy for people who fall down rabbit holes and how conspiracy theories are influencing people at the top of government. Our conversation, edited for length, is below.
What is this about?
Wolf: This is a multi-part podcast about how people, including yourself, can fall for misinformation. What made you decide to pursue this?
O'Sullivan: We do a lot of these stories on conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorists, and I can't tell you how many hundreds, thousands of messages I've got from viewers saying, 'I have a loved one – friend, brother, sister, mom, dad – who is sort of falling down this rabbit hole, and I have no idea what to do.'
I never really had much of a solution for them. What I wanted to do with this was to try to come up with something that could help.
Psychologists and people who've gotten out of conspiracy theory rabbit holes themselves – they all talk about how empathy plays such an important role.
That way, when someone is ready to or wants to come out of it, that they know they have a loved one to come back to and that they can come out of the rabbit hole with dignity and not be told they're stupid, etc.
Smart people may believe outlandish things
Wolf: In fact, some of the experts tell you people who can fall into conspiracy theories are frequently pretty smart people. Explain that.
O'Sullivan: I think we have this idea – and in some ways it might be comforting to think –that it's only quote-unquote 'crazy' people that can find themselves in this situation. But it really isn't, and I know that from meeting many people over the years.
These are your moms and dads, brothers, sisters. A lot of times, it is people who have had some life event, a big change in their life, or a trauma, and whatever has happened, they are searching for meaning, purpose, answers; searching for community.
That is why 2020, with the lockdowns and the uncertainty about COVID and all of us just isolating and spending more time just with our screens, we saw conspiracy theories really flourish.
Wolf: It was like a collective life event.
O'Sullivan: Conspiracy theories can offer very easy answers to very difficult questions.
The edge of a rabbit hole
Wolf: You talk about yourself kind of teetering on the edge of rabbit holes. Was there a particular thing that you found yourself talking yourself out of?
O'Sullivan: Oh God, that's tricky. Less than me flirting with conspiracy theories and more that I can fall in a rabbit hole in my own mind – of depression and anxiety and believing irrational thoughts about myself that many people who struggle with depression would recognize… believing I'm a terrible person, or dwelling on things, beating yourself up irrationally.
The strange comfort of conspiracy theories
Wolf: I thought that was an interesting moment where you and one of the experts wonder if there's a sort of comfort in an evil conspiracy – because it places order on things, whereas reality, which can be very random, can make anyone feel powerless.
O'Sullivan: I think we want to find order, right? We want to think there's a reason why things are happening, and at least someone is in charge, even if that someone is evil. I think it's hard for us as human beings to really believe that things are random.
Going back to Covid. One of the big Covid conspiracy theories was that this was a man-made virus that was deliberately spread, right? There's somebody controlling it. It's not random. It's not an accident.
I think Covid is also a lesson for all of us, too, that just because people who normally are repeating conspiracy theories say something doesn't mean they're wrong. Looking at the Covid lab leak theory and the discourse around that, it's obviously changed a lot over the years. So this stuff, it's really, really tricky.
If you're just a regular person, you're up against it, right? It's a multimillion if not multibillion-dollar industry, disinformation, right? There's just so many people online, grifting and making a lot of money out of spreading misinformation. There's people thriving in this uncertainty and relying on it.
The business of pushing conspiracy theories
Wolf: That's almost a conspiracy theory in itself, the idea that misinformation is this organized business.
O'Sullivan: That's something I've been tracking for years. You only have to look at what Alex Jones' enterprise was valued at during the Sandy Hook parents trial a year or two ago. There's a lot of money in this. There's a lot of money in selling fear. If you listen to a lot of the you know, quote, unquote, 'independent, alternative' podcasts. They are telling you the world's about to end and telling you about all these evil forces, and then they're selling you doomsday type products that will help quell the fears that they are stoking, whether that be freeze-dried food or emergency kits. There's an enormous grift in this.
What about the conspiracy theorists at the top of government?
Wolf: The entire time I was listening to this, I was thinking about Elon Musk, for instance, who pushes a version of replacement theory that fuels things he's doing to cut the US government. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. actively believes that Anthony Fauci was involved in a conspiracy around coronavirus vaccines. Kennedy wrote a book about it. Conspiracy theories are arguably pushing national policy at this point.
How do you apply empathy to a policy that you disagree with, that's being fueled by something that you know is factually inaccurate?
O'Sullivan: It sort of feels like we're through the looking glass in that way. Conspiracy theories are informing decisions, seemingly at the highest level of government. We even saw Trump talking about the photoshopped image on a man's hands.
For years, editors would always annoyingly ask me, as I'm doing these stories, 'Can we put something in at the end that's maybe a solution that could help people?'
And I was always very much of the opinion that, one, I don't have a solution because there's no easy solutions here. And two, it's not really my job, or the job of a journalist, to come up with solutions. I view my job as reporting on the phenomenon of misinformation, how people consume it and why they believe it.
So with that in mind, what we're putting forth in this series is not going to work for everybody. It might be helpful. But I think what we are trying to do is at least provoke people into thinking about, 'Okay, what is it that people are getting out of these conspiracy theories, or what are they lacking in their life that has led them down this path?'
But to the other question – there's a lot of conspiracy theories that are antisemitic or are targeting migrants or are homophobic. If you're part of those communities, I mean, how could you even imagine being empathetic to somebody who believes something that threatens your whole existence?
I don't want this to come off as a preachy type thing, telling people, 'Oh, have empathy.'
The series is about how you could have conversations at a family level and try to get in the headspace of a loved one who's gone down a rabbit hole.
For more CNN news and newsletters create an account at CNN.com

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
White House Gets Touchy About Trump's ‘One Hit Wonder' Kennedy Center Pick
The White House took umbrage after a guest on CNN said the Kennedy Center had chosen to honor 81-year-old Gloria Gaynor merely because she is a person of color. On August 13, President Donald Trump unveiled this year's Kennedy Center honorees, which include Gaynor, known for hit songs 'I Will Survive' and 'Eye of the Tiger.' Tia Mitchell, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution's Washington bureau chief, told CNN's This Morning Weekend Saturday that Gaynor had been selected because of diversity considerations. 'I do believe as much as the Trump administration has attacked [diversity, equity, and inclusion], they wanted a person of color on the list of Kennedy Center Honorees,' Mitchell said. 'The fact that Gloria Gaynor is the one person of color on the list indicates that they struggled ot find a person of color to agree to be on the list.' While the Center usually picks 'people who are icons in their genre of the arts' with 'a huge body of work,' Mitchell described Gaynor as 'basically a one-hit wonder.' White House Director of Communications Steven Cheung took Mitchell to task on X. 'Some dipshit named Tia Mitchell went on CNN to say legendary singer Gloria Gaynor doesn't deserve to be a Kennedy Center Honoree and only chosen because she's Black,' Cheung posted. 'Liberal 'journalists' will twist an inspiring story because it involves Pres. Trump.' 'Total TDS,' he added, employing the oft-used acronym for 'Trump Derangement Syndrome.' The other Kennedy Center honorees include action man Sylvester Stallone, the band KISS, country star George Strait, and English actor Michael Crawford. The View's Anna Navarro encouraged Gaynor to turn down the award, saying on X earlier this week, 'Don't do it, Gloria!' 'Look, the woman is a goddess and deserves all the flowers that come her way,' Navarro said. 'But I wish she wouldn't accept an award from the hands of a man who has attacked the rights and history of women, people of color, and LGBTQ.' Tom Cruise also reportedly turned down a lifetime achievement award from the Kennedy Center, The Washington Post reported.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
UK and EU at Zelenskyy's side in Washington for meeting with Trump
European leaders including Keir Starmer will join Volodymyr Zelenskyy at a White House meeting with Donald Trump on Monday in an extraordinary joint effort to push back on a US-backed plan that would allow Russia to take further Ukrainian territory. As well as the UK prime minister, the French president, Emmanuel Macron, Germany's chancellor, Friedrich Merz, Italy's PM, Giorgia Meloni, and the Finnish president, Alexander Stubb, will all accompany Zelenskyy in the Oval Office. Nato's secretary general, Mark Rutte, and the European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, will also attend. The unprecedented show of support seems designed to prevent a repeat of the public mauling experienced by Zelenskyy during his last trip to the White House, in February, when Trump and the US vice-president, JD Vance, accused him of ingratitude and disrespect and told him: 'You're not in a good position. You don't have the cards right now.' Trump, after his summit on Friday with Vladimir Putin in Alaska, has reportedly endorsed the Kremlin's one-sided plan to end the war in Ukraine. It includes Kyiv giving up territory that Russia has been unable to seize and no ceasefire until a final deal has been agreed. Posting on Truth Social, Trump accused the media of misrepresenting his 'great meeting in Alaska' – an encounter widely seen as a victory for Putin and a humiliation for the US president. On Sunday, Trump claimed he had made 'big progress' on Russia, without giving details. European leaders on Monday will reaffirm their support for Ukraine's territorial integrity and argue against a land swap plan that rewards Russian aggression. They will also seek further clarity on what security guarantees the US is willing to offer in the event of a settlement. In a conciliatory statement announcing his visit to Washington, Starmer praised Trump for his 'efforts to end Russia's illegal war in Ukraine'. At the same time, Starmer reasserted Europe's red lines. He said the 'path to peace' could not be decided without Zelenskyy and said Russia should be 'squeezed' with further sanctions. Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff told CNN that Putin had agreed for the first time for the US and Europe to provide protection to Ukraine as part of a deal. This would be outside the auspices of Nato but would be the equivalent of the alliance's article 5 self-defence pact, Witkoff indicated. Speaking in Brussels alongside von der Leyen, Zelenskyy rejected Putin's latest demand for more land. The Russians want Ukraine to cede the entirety of the Donetsk region, including a number of Ukrainian-controlled cities, as well as Luhansk province, which Moscow mostly occupies. Zelenskyy said Putin had been trying for 12 years to fully capture Donetsk oblast, without success. He said the current frontline should form the basis for negotiations, adding that territory could only be discussed in a three-way format with Kyiv at the table. A powerful Ukrainian army was the best security guarantee, he added. Starmer, Merz and Macron hosted a video call with European allies on Sunday before their Washington trip. 'Ukraine must be a steel porcupine, indigestible for potential invaders,' von der Leyen said, stressing there could be no Russian-mandated limits on Ukraine's armed forces. According to the New York Times, Trump told European leaders he believed a peace deal could be negotiated if Zelenskyy agreed to give up the Donetsk region. They were unconvinced. The EU shares the Ukrainian view that Putin would use any new territory as a springboard for a further attack. Two sources with direct knowledge of the talks in Alaska told the Guardian that Putin had offered to freeze the frontline in southern Ukraine if he got Donbas. The plan would mean thousands of civilians would be forced to abandon their homes in key eastern cities such as Kramatorsk and Sloviansk, which have withstood years of Russian attacks. Before Friday's Alaska summit, Trump said he wanted an immediate ceasefire. Over the weekend, however, the US president endorsed Russia's demand for a peace deal first and a truce second. Ceasefires 'often times do not hold up', Trump said in a social media post. Trump also appears to have dropped his threat of economic penalties on countries that buy Russian oil if Moscow refuses a deal. He has repeatedly threatened to impose secondary sanctions, setting various deadlines and failing to follow through when they expire. Trump on Sunday expressed his frustration at recent media coverage. 'It's incredible how the Fake News violently distorts the TRUTH when it comes to me,' he posted. 'There is NOTHING I can say or do that would lead them to write or report honestly about me. I had a great meeting in Alaska on Biden's stupid War, a war that should have never happened!!!' He added: 'If I got Russia to give up Moscow as part of the Deal, the Fake News, and their PARTNER, the Radical Left Democrats, would say I made a terrible mistake and a very bad deal.' Speaking to the BBC, the former British defence secretary Ben Wallace described Trump's apparent support for Putin's demands as 1930s-style 'appeasement'. He said the strategy – with pressure piled on Ukraine to agree – may save lives 'in the short term' but in the long term 'would probably put us at greater risk'. A joint statement issued by European leaders on Saturday said they were 'ready to work with US President Trump and Ukrainian President Zelenskyy towards a trilateral summit with European support' but 'it will be up to Ukraine to make decisions on its territory. International borders must not be changed by force.' They said they welcomed 'President Trump's efforts to stop the killing in Ukraine, end Russia's war of aggression, and achieve just and lasting peace'. Zelenskyy said in a statement after his conversations with Trump and the European leaders: 'The positions are clear. A real peace must be achieved, one that will be lasting, not just another pause between Russian invasions. Killings must stop as soon as possible, the fire must cease both on the battlefield and in the sky, as well as against our port infrastructure. All Ukrainian prisoners of war and civilians must be released, and the children abducted by Russia must be returned.' Related: Donald Trump reportedly delivered letter from first lady to Vladimir Putin Olga Tokariuk, a fellow at the Centre for European Policy Analysis, said Zelenskyy had a 'difficult task' in Washington. He had to 'demonstrate that Ukraine wants peace, but not at any cost, to ensure Ukraine still gets US support,' she said. At the same time he could not make concessions 'unacceptable for Ukrainians'. Trump was unlikely to treat Zelenskyy with the 'same friendliness as Putin', she predicted. 'The US under Trump is no longer willing to stand by its democratic allies, while instead it is embracing the tyrants,' she added. Additional reporting by


Forbes
3 hours ago
- Forbes
Trump-Zelenskyy Meeting: What To Know As Macron, Meloni, Starmer And More Will Attend
Leaders from major European allies, NATO and the European Union are traveling to Washington, D.C., to join Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at his Monday meeting with President Donald Trump—setting up what appear to be crucial talks as Trump pushes for a ceasefire in the war in Ukraine that has been raging since the Russian invasion in 2022. Leaders from the EU and NATO will join the Ukrainian president at the White House. Getty Images Zelenskyy will travel to meet with Trump at the White House on Monday. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte will reportedly take part in the talks, as well as leaders of individual allied nations including French President Emmanuel Macron, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Finnish President Alexander Stubb. Trump administration officials have provided few details about what concessions the Russians may have offered at the negotiations in Alaska on Friday, but speaking to CNN on Sunday morning, U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff described the Trump-Putin meeting as 'game-changing.' Witkoff said the Trump administration would likely discuss Ukraine exchanging territory with Russia, what he called a 'fundamental issue' for the Russians, but the administration would not make any decisions for Ukraine when it came to territory. 'We intend to discuss it on Monday,' Witkoff told CNN's Jake Tapper. The special envoy did not offer concrete details on what concessions the Russians may have offered in terms of territory, but added 'that discussion is going to specifically be detailed on Monday, when President Zelenskyy arrives with his delegation and some of the other European leaders,' Witkoff said. 'And, hopefully, we can cut through and make some decisions right then and there on that.' Russia illegally annexed the Ukrainian territory Crimea in 2014, and three years after its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russia controls the majority of the Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions. The Trump administration said the Russians may support Ukraine signing a future security deal with the U.S. and European allies—but even with the security guarantees, convincing the Ukrainians to cede territory could prove difficult for the Trump administration. Zelenskyy has consistently rejected peace offers that include territorial exchanges in the past, and reiterated this sentiment in a statement posted on social media Sunday, shortly after meeting with European leaders in Brussels. 'There is clear support for Ukraine's independence and sovereignty,' the Ukrainian president said. 'Everyone agrees that borders must not be changed by force.' What Is Article 5? The Trump administration says that Russian negotiators indicated they would agree to allow Ukraine to sign a future security agreement with the U.S. and European allies—one that would offer similar protections like those outlined in Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, the document that forms the basis of NATO. Article 5 guarantees that if one NATO member is attacked, it is considered an attack on all member states, and all member states are compelled to take necessary action to 'restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.' Witkoff told Tapper the administration got the Russians to agree to allow the U.S. and European nations to 'effectively offer Article 5-like language to cover a security guarantee.' However, he was adamant that this would not amount to Ukraine actually joining NATO—something he said the Russians still viewed as a 'red flag.' The special envoy did not elaborate on the details of the guarantee. European leaders are trying to avoid a repeat of the tense press public meeting Zelenskyy held with Trump and Vice President JD Vance in February, Reuters and other outlets reported Sunday. However, Secretary of State Marco Rubio rejected this notion while speaking to CBS News' Margaret Brennan on Sunday morning. 'We've been working with these people for weeks,' Rubio said. 'They're coming here tomorrow because they chose to come here tomorrow. We invited them to come.' Rubio said the Trump administration was focused on hammering out a peace deal. 'Look, our goal here is not to stage some production for the world to say, oh how dramatic he walked out,' he said. 'Our goal here is to have a peace agreement to end this war.'