
Tesla's share price losing streak - Is Musk's Trump role distracting him from his day job of running EV maker?
Amid the market volatility sparked by Donald Trump's on-off tariff plans, during which the benchmark S&P 500 index fell by 3.1% last week and the Nasdaq entered 'correction' territory, no stock has been more badly hit than Tesla.
Shares of Elon Musk's electric vehicle maker have fallen for seven straight weeks, the longest losing streak since the company floated on the stock market 15 years ago, wiping out more or less all of the gains it enjoyed after Mr Trump was elected president in November last year.
Money blog latest
Since Tesla shares peaked at $479.86 each on 17 December, they have fallen by 45%, wiping more than $800bn from the company's stock market value.
To put it in context, that sum is roughly equivalent to Poland's annual economic output.
And there may be worse to come. Wall Street analysts have been rushing to downgrade Tesla stock.
A quarter of the 40 brokerages covering the stock currently rate it a "strong sell" with one of them - Guggenheim Securities - suggesting the shares could fall another 30% from here.
Reasons for share price drop
There are a number of reasons behind the fall. Those who deplore Mr Musk's political views and his close proximity to the Trump administration will doubtless cite this as the key factor.
It has certainly played a part. Mr Musk's recent antics, such as wielding a chainsaw on stage at a recent political conference and making a gesture on stage that some interpreted as a Nazi salute, have not endeared him or his companies to a swathe of the public both in the US and beyond.
There have been protests and outbreaks of vandalism at Tesla dealerships and EV charging points across the US while, in both Europe and China, Tesla orders in January were down 45% year on year.
Admittedly, a lot of the people staging protests at Tesla properties are unlikely to have been would-be buyers of the company's products, but the bigger problem is that Mr Musk now appears to be alienating customers who were previously loyal to the brand - as shown by the popularity, in the US, of Tesla bumper stickers with messages such as "I bought this before Elon went crazy" and "Anti-Elon Tesla Club".
0:42
Is Musk distracted?
Conversely, some investors who wholly approve of the work Mr Musk is doing for the Trump administration may also have concerns, notably that it is proving too much of a distraction from the day job of running Tesla.
Even before Mr Musk took the wheel at the US Department Of Government Efficiency (DOGE), there were already fears that he was being too distracted by his private companies, including the social media platform X, the aerospace and defence contractor SpaceX and his artificial intelligence business xAI.
X, on which lies peddled by the Kremlin about Ukraine are regularly amplified, may also be adding to the damage being done to the Tesla brand.
But Mr Musk's association with the Trump administration is only part of the reason for the recent declines.
Tesla shares could have been over-priced
Another key factor is that shares of Tesla were arguably over-priced to begin with.
In the two weeks following the US presidential election, Tesla shares shot up by 32%, adding $250bn to its stock market value.
To put that into context, that gain was equal to the entire stock market value of Toyota, the world's next biggest carmaker after Tesla.
At the time its shares peaked, Tesla shares were trading at 112 times expected earnings, compared with the 25 times or so that the S&P 500 was trading at and higher even than the company's average over the last five years of 93.
Again, to put things in context, Ford shares are valued at just eight times prospective earnings.
That exotic rating reflected the superlative growth prospects previously accorded to Tesla, in particular Mr Musk's pledges to launch a new cut-price electric vehicle and a fully autonomous ride-hailing service.
Competition from China
But investors are now reappraising those growth prospects as Tesla loses share of the electric vehicle market to rivals, such as China's BYD, which is also seen as outpacing the company on self-driving vehicle technology.
News on Tesla's planned new low-cost model remains elusive and, until it is launched, critics believe it has little hope of building share in burgeoning markets such as India.
Mr Musk always wanted Tesla to be seen as an AI and robotics company rather than an electric vehicle maker and that was part of the bull case for the stock.
Yet there are now fears that the company is investing too much in such projects and on its much-criticised Cybertrucks.
Another concern is that Tesla's core operations may be misfiring.
Results published at the end of January revealed that operating profits for the final three months of 2024 were down 23% on the same period a year earlier - which Tesla blamed on lower average selling prices on each of its Model 3, Model Y, Model X and Model S lines.
For the full year, deliveries of new vehicles were down on 2023, the first year-on-year fall the company has suffered.
And the operating margin, partly reflecting the sums Tesla is investing, were also lower.
It all adds up to an unpleasant cocktail for investors.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
9 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘Political pawns': Morale among California National Guard and Marines deployed in LA is underwater, report claims
The 4,000 California National Guard troops and 700 US Marines sent to Los Angeles in response to the ongoing anti-immigration raid protests are reportedly suffering from low morale, according to members of the veterans community, amid allegations of a chaotic initial deployment and widespread concerns of the military being drafted into domestic law enforcement. 'Among all that I spoke with, the feeling was that the Marines are being used as political pawns, and it strains the perception that Marines are apolitical,' Marine Corps veteran Janessa Goldbeck, who runs the Vet Voice Foundation, told The Guardian. 'Some were concerned that the Marines were being set up for failure. The overall perception was that the situation was nowhere at the level where Marines were necessary.' 'The sentiment across the board right now is that deploying military force against our own communities isn't the kind of national security we signed up for,' added Sarah Streyder of the Secure Families Initiative in an interview with the outlet. Controversy has followed the deployment since President Trump first federalized the California National Guard and ordered the state troops into Los Angeles on Saturday and a battalion of Marines was activated two days later. California has sued the Trump administration over deploying the Guard, alleging the decision has 'caused real and irreparable damage' to both Los Angeles and the state's larger sovereignty. Governor Gavin Newsom has also accused the White House of sending in thousands of troops without adequate provisions or training, sharing photos obtained by The San Francisco Chronicle of guardsmen sleeping head-to-foot on bare floors. 'You sent your troops here without fuel, food, water or a place to sleep,' he wrote on X. 'Here they are — being forced to sleep on the floor, piled on top of one another.' 'This is what happens when the president and (Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth) demand the National Guard state assets deploy immediately with no plan in place … (and) no federal funding available for food, water, fuel and lodging,' a source involved in the deployment told the Chronicle of conditions during the early stages. 'This is really the failure of the federal government. If you're going to federalize these troops, then take care of them.' U.S. Northern Command later said the photo showed soldiers who weren't current on a mission in what were only temporary accommodations due a 'fluid security situation.' When asked for comment, a spokesperson for U.S. Northern Command pointed to a website for Task Force 51, which is coordinating the protection mission in Los Angeles. 'The Soldiers and Marines have contracting for billeting, latrines, showers, handwashing stations, food service, full laundry service, bulk ice, and bulk fuel,' the website reads, in regards to troop conditions. 'While awaiting fulfillment of the contract, Soldiers and Marines have adequate shelter, food, and water.' Federal officials say the military members in Los Angeles will not be formally arresting protesters, though they might temporarily detain individuals to stop threats or interference against federal agents, and they have authorization to provide security to federal buildings and operations. U.S. Northern Command shared a photo Thursday showing Marines training in non-lethal tactics with riot shields, and the military has said the troops could deploy within the next 48 hours. President Trump has faced larger criticisms for allegedly politicizing the military in response to the protests, including upset over a campaign-rally style speech about the crisis in front of jeering troops at Fort Bragg in North Carolina. Base officials reportedly screened the crowd for those who disagreed with Trump and asked them to alert their superiors so others could be put in their place during the speech.


Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Tesco basks in the sun as sales surge - but boss warns Labour tax hikes are fuelling inflation
Cyber security drive The boss of Tesco said cyber security was a top priority after a high-profile attack on Marks & Spencer. 'This is probably top of my inbox on a daily, weekly basis. We stay on top of cyber all the time,' said Ken Murphy. 'We have invested continuously in upgrading our cyber capabilities, because this is a moving target.' M&S was attacked over Easter by hackers who stole the data of millions of customers. It only restored online shopping this week after 46 days. The Co-op and Harrods have also recently fallen victim to cyber attacks. Recent warm weather has given Tesco a boost as shoppers snap up its picnic food and summer clothing. Britain's largest supermarket said sales in the UK rose 5.1 per cent to £12.3billion in the 13 weeks to May 24. 'The summer weather, the good weather, is definitely helpful,' said chief executive Ken Murphy. But with a supermarket price war raging, he warned the grocery market was 'intensely competitive'. And he said Labour's tax increases were fuelling inflation. 'There are definitely continued inflationary pressures on the market,' said Murphy. 'I think you've got to look at things like the impact of all the new taxation and regulatory costs on the industry.' Total sales across the Tesco business, which includes stores in Ireland and central Europe, rose 4.6 per cent to £16.4billion in the first quarter. And its market share in the UK has risen to 28 per cent as its premium range drove sales up. But Tesco stuck to profit guidance for the year of between £2.7billion and £3billion, given the fierce supermarket rivalry. 'We're seeing intense competition from all aspects of the market,' said Murphy. 'Our guidance reflects that and continues to reflect that.' In April, Murphy warned that Tesco was ready to take a £400million hit to profits this year as the competition hots up. Speaking yesterday, he said he was 'pleased' with the group's performance as it attracted new customers by matching prices at Aldi on more than 600 items. Customers are dining at home more and eating more fresh food, according to Murphy. But supermarkets and their supply chains have had to grapple with higher cost pressures in the wake of measures introduced in Chancellor Rachel Reeves's autumn Budget. A sharp increase in employer National Insurance Contributions (NICs) and a big increase in the national minimum wage have hit businesses. Retailers face a £5billion higher bill after the Budget, according to the British Retail Consortium. Tesco said it will pay an extra £235million in the current financial year as a result of the NICs hike. The supermarket announced earlier this year that it would be cutting 400 jobs and Murphy has also refused to rule out further losses. Rising commodity prices for goods such as cocoa, meat and poultry are also piling on the 'greatest pressure' to food prices, he said. The supermarket is the 'best-in-class player' in UK food, said the Royal Bank of Canada's analysts Manjari Dhar and Richard Chamberlain. 'It has done well to gain market share in recent years, but we note a step up in competitiveness by some key peers may mean that further gains are more difficult to come by,' the pair added. Garry White, chief investment commentator at Charles Stanley, said: 'Britain's largest grocer has delivered a resilient performance despite a price war initiated by Asda and waning consumer confidence.' Tesco shares rose 1.6 per cent, or 6.3p, to 391.6p yesterday.


Reuters
22 minutes ago
- Reuters
Exclusive: After Trump feud, role of Musk's SpaceX in Golden Dome missile shield in question
WASHINGTON, June 12 (Reuters) - The role of Elon Musk's SpaceX in an ambitious new U.S. missile defense system is in question following the dramatic feud last week between the billionaire entrepreneur and President Donald Trump, according to three people familiar with the project. The White House until recently had considered a plan for SpaceX, Musk's rocket and satellite venture, to partner with software maker Palantir (PLTR.O), opens new tab and drone builder Anduril to construct crucial elements of the project, dubbed "Golden Dome." The administration had instructed the Pentagon to prioritize a network of satellites for the purpose, these people said. But a new framework for the system, which would seek to track and prevent possible missile attacks against the United States, is now being considered that could reduce the role of SpaceX. One possibility, the three people said, could initially forego SpaceX's satellite capabilities and focus on the expansion of existing ground systems for missile defense instead. In a statement, a White House spokesman said "the Trump Administration is committed to a rigorous review process for all bids and contracts." A senior Defense Department official said the Pentagon "has no announcements regarding future contracts associated with the Golden Dome effort." SpaceX, Anduril and Palantir didn't respond to requests for comment. A reduced role for SpaceX would represent the first known setback to Musk's huge volume of business with the U.S. government since his break with Trump last week. The shift in plans, especially for a project that Trump has touted as paramount for U.S. defense strategy, also underscores the highly personalized nature of the president's leadership, aerospace and defense experts said. "That people guiding the program or building it are approved based on their political affiliation signals a real concern that the project itself is very politicized and not being conducted on the technical merits," said Laura Grego, a missile defense expert and research director at the Union of Concerned Scientists, a non-profit based in Cambridge, Massachusetts. In its statement to Reuters, the White House said any decision would be made "prioritizing the best deal for America and leveraging the most advanced and innovative technology." Trump in May said the defense shield should be operational by the end of his presidency, January 2029. But industry experts have said that timeframe, and a projected cost of some $175 billion, could be too optimistic. The change in the proposed "architecture" of the system, the three people said, could have the political advantage of allowing the current administration to deliver at least a portion of it. It isn't clear how soon a final decision on the project could come or whether the ultimate role of any company, including SpaceX, has been determined. Trump's efforts to roll out the project fast have led to uncertainty about the project's details and a scramble by contractors to be involved, industry experts and some of those involved in its development told Reuters. "To this day, no one knows what the requirements are," said one of the people familiar with the process. "There isn't a coordinated effort with a true vision. All of these companies are just grabbing at this pot of money." SpaceX, Anduril and Palantir were all founded by entrepreneurs who have been major political supporters of Trump. The three companies had previously met with top administration officials and decisionmakers from the Defense Department to discuss Golden Dome, according to people familiar with those discussions. Before his high-profile falling out with the president, Musk served as a key Trump advisor and donated more than a quarter of a billion dollars to help elect him. But the recent dispute, which included Musk calling for Trump's impeachment and accusing the president of improper involvement with disgraced financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, triggered the change in direction, the three people told Reuters. "Because of the blowup, the Pentagon has been given the space to look at other alternatives," one of the people said. In recent days, Musk has sought to temper the dispute, saying he regretted some of his comments and taking down some of his social media criticism of Trump, including the call for impeachment. Earlier this week, Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that Trump appreciated Musk's apology and that she was unaware of any administration efforts to review Musk contracts because of the dispute. Reuters couldn't determine whether Musk's conciliatory overtures might improve SpaceX's chances of winning Golden Dome contracts or securing further new business with the U.S. government. SpaceX had pitched for a part of the Golden Dome initiative called the "custody layer," a constellation of between 400 and 1,000 satellites that would detect missiles, track their trajectory, and determine if they are heading toward the U.S., Reuters reported in April. In a January 27 executive order, Trump mandated the selection of a proposed "architecture" for Golden Dome and an implementation plan by the end of March. The order called a missile attack "the most catastrophic threat facing the United States."