logo
I asked companies for prices of their new tech at Computex 2025 — but they're too tariff-ied to tell me

I asked companies for prices of their new tech at Computex 2025 — but they're too tariff-ied to tell me

Tom's Guide20-05-2025
Let me take you behind-the-scenes on what normally happens at press events like Computex 2025. We normally get information sheets a little ahead of time to tell you everything you need to know — most importantly, how much the thing is going to cost.
This year, however, companies have been a little more coy about these things. Either they've waited to tell us all in person at briefings, saying that they 'intend' to launch at X price, or they sent over press releases with no $ information whatsoever.
And that intrigued me, so I asked a bunch of company reps why that's the case and the reason is both quite simple but also kinda complex. Let me explain.
It's no secret that 'Liberation Day' on April 2 has caused some uncertainty — a list of 'reciprocal tariffs' put a lot of company stocks in free fall for a while.
Granted it's been lessened slightly after a 90-day pause on said tariffs, but the speed of which this story develops is putting companies firmly in the 'wait and see' category.
'With where we are now, I'd expect a lot of us to be waiting for the pause to end,' one rep (who wished to remain anonymous) told me. 'When that happens, we'll know for sure whether the tariffs are here to stay and plan accordingly — both in the way we manufacture these and how we price them.'
You see, most of the tech you see on the Computex floor is a culmination of an international effort, with elements coming together via manufacturing from a number of countries. And that makes pricing them a minefield, which a lot of companies fell for when announcing prices at CES 2025.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
A great example is the Asus Zenbook A14. I was fully ready to give it a high score based on that promised $899 price tag, as it has everything going for it to take on the M4 MacBook Air. But that price never materialized, and at the higher $1,099 cost, it just can't hang with one of the best laptops you can buy.
That's not to say we're all going down a road of rising prices here. There's a chance it could go in a more positive direction. The purpose of the tariffs, according to President Trump, is to re-open trading negotiations, and Taiwan was one of the first to respond in rounds of 'substantive' tariff talks with the U.S.
Dropping trade barriers with the home of advanced silicon production would be a significantly positive step forward, and as both sides continue to talk "with a view to actively seeking consensus and exploring further steps,' that's due for some cautious optimism.
Taking a step back, you start to see some of the moves being made to try and navigate this global uncertainty.
Whether it's Nvidia opening a new office in Taipei to sit on the fence between moving manufacturing to the U.S. and staying close to the huge silicon industry here in Taiwan, or other companies purely testing the water with products without announcing a firm launch date or price.
These are symptomatic of a larger worry on how that minimum 10% tax will affect the tech industry and its supply chain. I'm not going to say one way or the other, as when I do, something else changes, be it the U.S. Government's mind on the situation or some kind of deal to nullify them.
So all I'll say now is that we're kind of heading into an unknown, and after promising prices at CES only to have them retconned because of this situation, it's understandable that nobody wants to talk dollars and cents.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Exclusive-Trump administration to formally axe Elon Musk's 'five things' email
Exclusive-Trump administration to formally axe Elon Musk's 'five things' email

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Exclusive-Trump administration to formally axe Elon Musk's 'five things' email

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The Trump administration plans as soon as Tuesday to formally axe a program launched by billionaire former Trump adviser Elon Musk requiring federal employees to summarize their five workplace achievements from the prior week, two people familiar with the matter said. The Office of Personnel Management, the federal human resources agency that implemented Musk's push to slash the federal workforce, plans to announce the end of the "five things" email to HR representatives across the federal government later on Tuesday, the two people said, declining to be named because the matter was not public. While many federal agencies had already phased out compliance with the weekly email, the move, not previously reported, signals the Trump administration is turning the page on one of Musk's most unpopular initiatives following a dramatic row between the two men in early June. The White House and OPM did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Musk, who spent over a quarter of a billion dollars to help Trump win November's presidential election, led the Department of Government Efficiency's efforts to slash the budget and cut the federal workforce until his departure in May to refocus on his tech empire. Musk initially received a warm White House sendoff from Trump, but then incurred the president's wrath by describing Trump's tax cut and spending bill as an abomination. Trump pulled the nomination of Musk ally and tech entrepreneur Jared Isaacman to lead NASA and later threatened to cancel billions of dollars worth of federal contracts with Musk's companies after the blowup between the two men. The "five things" email, launched by Musk in February to boost accountability, sparked tensions with department chiefs who were blindsided by the weekend email mandating the move. It also fueled confusion among government workers who received mixed messages about whether and how to comply. Reuters reported in March that the White House installed two Trump loyalists at OPM to ensure better policy coordination between the White House and the agency. Scott Kupor, a venture capitalist who took the helm at OPM in July, foreshadowed the end of the initiative last month, describing processing of the weekly response emails as "very manual" and "not efficient." It is "something that we should look at and see, like, are we getting the value out of it that at least the people who put it in place thought they were," he said.

OpenAI, Google, Anthropic AI models added to government purchasing system
OpenAI, Google, Anthropic AI models added to government purchasing system

The Hill

time17 minutes ago

  • The Hill

OpenAI, Google, Anthropic AI models added to government purchasing system

Artificial intelligence (AI) models from OpenAI, Google and Anthropic have been added to a government purchasing system, allowing federal agencies to buy and use the AI products. The General Services Administration (GSA) announced Tuesday that ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude had been added to the agency's Multiple Award Schedule for purchase. 'America's global leadership in AI is paramount, and the Trump Administration is committed to advancing it,' GSA acting administrator Michael Rigas said in a statement. 'By making these cutting-edge AI solutions available to federal agencies, we're leveraging the private sector's innovation to transform every facet of government operations,' he continued. This follows the addition of xAI's Grok to the GSA schedule, which it announced last month after unveiling a new suite of products for U.S. government customers and scoring a Pentagon contract alongside the three other tech firms. The agency pointed to President Trump's AI Action Plan for the new additions to its purchasing system. The AI framework, released last month, called for accelerating AI adoption in the federal government. It specifically advocated for the creation of an AI procurement toolbox managed by the GSA that would 'allow any Federal agency to easily choose among multiple models in a manner compliant with relevant privacy, data governance, and transparency laws.' The recommendations for federal AI adoption represent one small portion of Trump's wide-ranging AI Action Plan, which also called for limiting state and federal regulations, fast-tracking permitting for data center and energy construction and creating export packages of U.S. technology.

VFW had a seat at the table. Now they're trying to flip it.
VFW had a seat at the table. Now they're trying to flip it.

The Hill

time17 minutes ago

  • The Hill

VFW had a seat at the table. Now they're trying to flip it.

Too many of America's disabled veterans continue to struggle to access the VA disability benefits they've earned. The consequences are stark: 33,000 veterans are homeless, and an average of 17 die by suicide each day. While the Trump administration has made incredible strides in cutting the VA claims backlog by 25 percent since January, Congress must take further action to ensure that our veterans no longer have to fight and claw for the benefits that are often the difference between life and death. That's why I introduced the CHOICE for Veterans Act of 2025 — a bill that protects veterans from fraud and exploitation and ensures they have the right to choose how to navigate the benefits process. My legislation allows veterans to choose help from accredited private claims agents if they prefer, all while keeping in place the full range of free support options — such as those offered by Veterans Service Organizations like the VFW. The CHOICE for Veterans Act includes strong safeguards: no upfront fees, mandatory disclosure of free alternatives, capped fees and no payment unless benefits are secured. This ensures that veterans don't go into debt to file claims. The CHOICE for Veterans Act of 2025 is about trust, transparency and real choice. I spent months in conversation with the major Veterans Service Organizations like the VFW and American Legion. I directly addressed their legitimate concerns about fraud and exploitation. My office invited them in, listened carefully, and incorporated into the bill strong language that addressed every objection they raised. Their input helped shape the final version of the CHOICE for Veterans Act of 2025. That's why the VFW's recent public opposition is so frustrating. They know that the bill doesn't put veterans in debt because they helped shape the very safeguards it includes. The truth is, the CHOICE for Veterans Act contains some of the strongest financial protections ever included in legislation designed to serve our veterans. The bill was crafted to expand access to disability claims services by offering accredited private help without removing any existing options. Veterans can still work with Veterans Service Organizations or file claims on their own — that hasn't changed. This bill simply ensures the right to seek specialized assistance. Nothing in the bill eliminates current options. The claims assistance system remains intact, with the added benefit of giving veterans the choice of specialized assistance. No two disability claims are the same, and they shouldn't be treated as such. The VFW's claims are misleading and directly contradicted by the bill's text. The CHOICE Act clearly requires that veterans are informed of all available free options at every step of the claims process. This includes the VA itself and the Veterans Service Organizations that veterans have always had access to. Veterans deserve honesty about what this bill actually does — and it's time for the VFW to stop misleading them. If a veteran does choose to work with a paid consultant, the rules are strict. No upfront fees are allowed. Veterans cannot be charged one penny until their claim is resolved in their favor. When a claim is resolved, a veteran must be given the option to pay in installments that don't exceed their monthly increase from the VA, and no interest can ever be charged on payment plans. Veterans secure lifetime benefits in exchange for a limited, interest-free fee, paid only to accredited experts. Our goal has always been to expand access to benefits through an all-of-the-above approach that protects disabled veterans from poverty, debt and exploitation. These protections are not hidden, nor are they optional. They are mandated by the bill. What veterans are asking for is simple: faster results and fewer delays. They want someone who can help them navigate a complex process without making it worse. This is a recurring issue I hear from veterans in my district. The political games and false narratives surrounding the CHOICE for Veterans Act must stop. This issue is far too important to be bogged down by mis- and dis-information campaigns. As a proud veteran myself, I look forward to the day when President Trump signs this bill into law, so we can begin to seriously confront the crises facing disabled veterans in America.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store