Proposed Frederick planning budget includes new planner position, fee increases
The department's proposed fee schedule includes increases for historic preservation-related fees.
The planning budget is just one part of Mayor Michael O'Connor's proposed $238 million budget, due to be voted on by the full City Council at a May 15 meeting.
The planning budget includes around $2.8 million in expenditures, an approximately $290,000, or 11.5%, increase over the fiscal year 2025's approved budget expenditure of around $2.5 million.
Planning Department budget
The Frederick Planning Department's budget over time. Fiscal years 2021 through 2024 are what the Planning Department actually spent. Fiscal year 2025 is in progress, and the new fiscal year starts July 1.
The Planning Department projects also projects around $280,000 in revenue — the same as fiscal year 2025.
The proposed fee schedule for fiscal year 2026 includes a number of increases around Historic Preservation Commission filing fees, which are necessitated by inflation, City Clerk Phyllis Hane said during an April 3 City Council Government Operations Committee meeting.
This includes increases to filing fees to the Historic Preservation Commission for applications for complete or partial demolition of a historic structure, rehabilitation of historic structures, and additions to historic structures.
The proposed budget accounts for around $206,000 in salary increases over fiscal year 2025. This includes a new community planning & urban design planner position, according to a document provided at a Thursday City Council work session.
'[The position] is really needed to support our long-range planning functions,' Deputy Director of Planning Gabrielle Collard said Thursday at a City Council Land Use, Public Safety and Community Development Committee meeting.
Collard said the current number of planners — three — is 'probably not sufficient to do that.'
The budget also includes a proposal for $35,000 for the Sites of Enslavement Program's second phase, according to a document provided for a City Council work session.
The program started in 2024 and is meant to identify sites in the city associated with slavery.
In 2024, the city unveiled a marker in front of the historic Emancipation Association building at 160 All Saints St as part of the program.
On May 12 at 6 p.m., the city plans to host a symposium at the Visit Frederick building.
'That is going to be a summation of that phase one contact study,' Collard said. 'We hope that it will build a lot of enthusiasm for phase two moving forward.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
4 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Short-term home rentals are dropping in L.A. ‘The rules are too much'
For the last four years, Katherine Taylor rented out her Westside guesthouse on Airbnb. She came to rely on the extra income at a time when it felt like everything was getting more expensive. But this spring, she took the listing down. 'I'm out,' Taylor said. 'The rules are too much. All these new regulations kept popping up, and it felt like it was only a matter of time before I got fined.' Across the L.A. region, many people who rent out their homes for income seem to be changing their preferences. Short-term rentals are much more lucrative than longer stays, but the steady turnover often creates headaches for landlords, and increasingly they are in the crosshairs of local ordinances, including the risk of fines. Because of this and other factors, short-term rental registrations have dipped over the last year. Last July, there were 4,228 active Home Sharing registrations in the city of L.A., according to the Planning Department. This July, there were 3,972 — a 6% decrease. Short-term rental software platforms show a decrease in listings as well, to varying degrees. In analyzing a sample set of short-term rentals in the L.A. metro area, Hospitable estimated a 44% drop in listings year over year, with steady declines each month. AllTheRooms reported a 13% drop in Airbnb listings across L.A. County over the same stretch. The data sources vary, since companies have different access to listing data. AirDNA reported an 8% increase in Airbnb and VRBO listings in the L.A. metro area over the last year, but noted a decrease since January fueled by big drops in fire markets: a 56% decrease in Altadena, 36% decrease in Pacific Palisades and 25% decrease in Malibu. Expert opinions differ on the cause of the drop-off, but the fires are definitely a factor. Thousands of homes burned down in the Palisades and Eaton fires, taking many rentals off the market. But in the wake of the disaster, many short-term rentals were converted to mid- or long-term rentals to house fire victims. Other hosts are opting for mid-term rentals — stays of longer than 30 days but less than a year — independent of the fires. 'The short-term rental space got stuck. Regulations hit, and people are finding that the next best option is mid-term rentals,' said Jesse Vasquez, an entrepreneur who runs a mid-term rental summit every year. Vasquez said L.A. is the best market for mid-term stays because so many people visit the city for extended periods with no permanent plans: travel nurses, students, digital nomads or people working on long-term projects such as films or construction. He said mid-term rentals rake in about 15% to 20% less than short-term rentals, but in exchange, homeowners deal with less turnover. If a three-bedroom, two-bathroom house in a popular neighborhood can make around $10,000 per month as a short-term rental, it could still bring in $8,000 per month as a mid-term rental, Vasquez said. Last year, Airbnb Chief Executive Brian Chesky identified mid-term stays as a 'huge growth opportunity' for the company, and said such bookings make up 18% of the company's business compared with 13% to 14% before the pandemic. Mark Lawson used to rent out his San Fernando Valley home on VRBO for weekend stays, but last year he set the parameters to only accept bookings of 30 days or more. 'I got tired of having someone new in the house every few days,' he said. Short-term rentals have long been contentious. While advocates say sites such as Airbnb and VRBO offer income for homeowners and options for tourists, critics claim home-sharing removes long-term rentals from a market in the midst of a housing crisis. To prevent L.A.'s housing stock from being converted into short-term rentals, Los Angeles in 2018 passed the Home-Sharing Ordinance, which regulates short-term rentals by restricting hosts to renting out only their primary residences and requiring them to get a license. The regulatory framework worked — somewhat. Listings dropped 70% from 2019 to 2023, though much of the drop could be attributed to the pandemic. Last year, the restrictions spread to unincorporated areas in L.A. County, which previously weren't subject to the rules. But despite the new requirements, thousands of hosts still operate without a license, or fake their registration numbers, due to lack of enforcement. Last year, a report from the L.A. Housing Department said that as of October 2024, there were an estimated 7,500 violations of the Home-Sharing Ordinance, but only 300 citations. So in March 2025, the L.A. City Council approved a slew of recommendations to beef up the ordinance even more, arming the city with a war chest of new enforcement tools. The plan calls for 18 staffers to monitor violations and increased fines based on the square footage of the rental: $1,000 for rentals less than 500 square feet, up to $16,000 for homes greater than 25,000 square feet. The fines double and quadruple on the second and third violation, respectively. The recommendations even call for city staffers to go on spy missions in illegal rentals. Under the proposed plan, Housing Department staff would use prepaid cards to book home-sharing rentals and stay in homes to gather evidence that they're operating illegally. However, two months later, the city's $14-billion budget scaled back spending for many city departments. As a result, no new enforcement officers have been hired, and many of the plans have yet to be implemented. But simply the threat of higher fines and stricter enforcement has had a chilling effect. 'Talking to our customers, regulation is the biggest factor in short-term rental inventory decreasing,' said Derek Jones, Hospitable's vice president of sales and partnerships. 'L.A.'s ordinance combines all the strict rules from other markets around the country.' Jones said the potential for $1,000 fines — now able to be doled out without a warning beforehand — are causing some hosts to remove listings from the market out of fear, since the fines far exceed the nightly revenue brought in by the average listing. 'Housing is expensive already, then you add high penalties and zoning that limits supply,' Jones said. 'All that put together, it creates a market where housing investors are cautious to invest. And that proved to be the case this year.' Taylor is one such investor. She specifically bought her Westside home because it had a guesthouse she could rent. But she found herself frustrated by the maximum days she could rent it annually under the Home Sharing Ordinance — 120 days. Her space was larger than 500 square feet, so under the new rules, it could be subject to a $2,000 fine for the first violation, $4,000 for the second, and $8,000 for the third. Ultimately, she decided it wasn't worth the hassle. 'I'll keep an eye on how the city is enforcing the rules. Maybe I'll try it again someday,' she said. 'But for now, it's gonna stay empty.'
New York Post
14 hours ago
- New York Post
Mayor Eric Adams deserves credit for his stunning housing wins
It's odd how little credit Mayor Eric Adams gets for his relentless, steady and successful drive to get more housing, including more affordable homes, built in New York City. In under four years, he's arguably done more than his predecessors achieved in the previous two decades, winning changes that will make a huge difference in the long term rather than offering empty promises of instant miracles. The latest: The City Council just OK'd Adams' plan to rezone Midtown South, opening the door for nearly 10,000 new housing units, 2,800 of them affordable, in an area that was largely zoned for (outdated) industrial uses. Advertisement Some of those units will come from converting commercial space to residential, an obvious next step for older, vacant office buildings. All told, Adams' rezoning push starting in 2021 has cleared the way for 100,000 new units to be built across the city, with 30,000 more on the way if the City Council approves his plans for Jamaica and Long Island City. Advertisement That's more housing gained via zoning changes than added in the Bloomberg and de Blasio years combined. Another unheralded gain, from years of steady effort and deft alliances: getting the Legislature to lift the floor-area-ratio cap of 12, which arbitrarily restricted the height of residential buildings. Between the mayor's massive City of Yes package, which the council approved last year, and other efforts, including the preservation of about 134,700 existing units, City Hall counts the number of units added to or kept in the Big Apple's housing supply under Adams at about 426,000. Yes, that includes the totals from proposals that still need to go through the approval process — and a good chunk, like those enabled through rezoning, won't be fully realized for years. Advertisement It doesn't help when lefty ideologues sabotage projects like the Brooklyn Marine Terminal, which would offer 6,000 new units, because they'd rather have no new housing than let any market-rate apartments get built on public land. But the mayor's full-court press means he's already changed the city's long-term housing landscape for the better even if some plans fall through — and he could do even more in a second term. We know: 'Methodical' doesn't match the Adams' image, but perhaps that's because so little of the local media pays attention to day-in-day-out reality; it's so much easier to fawn over, say, Zohran Mamdani's flashy promises to freeze rents. Advertisement Even though the mayor's strategy, unlike Mamdani's, works. Freezing rent on rent-regulated apartments would force more landlords to abandon their buildings altogether or allow units to fall into disrepair, making the city's housing situation worse. Meanwhile, Adams is dramatically boosting supply, which will organically push rents lower over time. In a city where hysterically anti-development progressives constantly do their best to thwart common-sense housing fixes, Adams' success in ushering in lasting change is stunning. And though the fruits of his labor will take time to fully appear, generations of New Yorkers will benefit. As the mayoral race exits the summer 'silly season,' perhaps voters will start to realize who's actually delivering the housing solutions New York needs.
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Monaco billionaire developer says he's bailing on Carmel-by-the-Sea, a 'strange community'
Patrice Pastor spent big bucks on Carmel-by-the-Sea, in part because of cherished childhood memories, vacationing with his father in this charming, if quirky, coastal town. But after snapping up more than $100 million in properties in the area in recent years, the Monaco billionaire has grown increasingly infuriated by delays on his development projects, including a mid-sized retail and residential development that he has been trying to get approved. After six years of hold-ups and redesigns on that project — due, he said, to townsfolk endlessly nitpicking his plans — he has decided to bail on Carmel. "It's time to leave this strange community, if you can call it a community," Pastor said in a statement after the City Council this month delayed taking any action on the development, which he named the JB Pastor project in honor of his great-grandfather. City officials, he wrote, have used "reasons that are akin to a schoolyard" to stand in his way, and it is time, he said, to "reconsider my investment in Carmel." Read more: Why is a Monaco billionaire buying so many properties in Carmel and Big Sur? In Carmel-by-the-Sea, development — including upgrades to private homes — is notoriously slow. This wealthy Monterey County enclave strictly regulates architecture to maintain the much-vaunted "village character" of a place filled with cottages, courtyards and secret passageways. Residents in the one-square-mile town, population 3,200, have long sought to keep out the so-called trappings of city life. They have no street addresses, instead giving their homes whimsical nicknames like Almost Heaven and Faux Chateau. And they have no streetlights or sidewalks in residential areas. Over the last decade, Pastor has bought at least 18 properties, including The Hog's Breath Building, the site of the pub once owned by actor and former Carmel-by-the-Sea mayor Clint Eastwood; and the L'Auberge Carmel hotel, which houses a Michelin-star restaurant. In 2023, he paid $22 million for Cabin on the Rocks, the only oceanfront home ever designed by architect Frank Lloyd Wright. Last year, the California Coastal Commission approved his 'visionary plan' to restore public access at Rocky Point, a seaside property he bought for $8 million in nearby Big Sur with views of the picturesque Rocky Creek Bridge. In Carmel-by-the-Sea — where, according to Zillow, the average home price is $2.3 million — Pastor's purchases have become a source of intrigue, and, for some, downright suspicion. Pastor is the scion of a powerful real estate family that built much of mega-rich Monaco, a dense, one-square-mile nation on the French Riviera. His defenders in Carmel-by-the-Sea have questioned whether he has been discriminated against because he is too rich. "We are not treated the same as everyone else," Pastor wrote this month. "I suppose we are now at the point where we need to accept we are not wanted and draw the necessary conclusions." The city has rejected several of Pastor's design proposals, including multiple pitches for a mixed-use development on the site of what locals call The Pit. Pastor bought the massive, unsightly hole in the ground — the site of a downtown construction project whose previous owners ran out of money seven years ago — for $9 million in 2020 and is still trudging through the city's permitting process. Pastor, in his statement, called the delays with that project a "grotesque situation." The latest opposition to his JB Pastor development may have been the final straw. Pastor's most recent plans call for a 12,971-square-foot, two-story complex on Dolores Street that includes eight upstairs apartments, roughly 5,100 square feet of ground-level retail space, and a dozen parking spaces. Plans submitted to the city in 2021 called for the demolition of a former bank annex once used as a community room. Because it was less than 50 years old, it did not qualify as a historic structure — but after it turned 50 in October 2022, the Carmel Historic Resources Board voted to add it to the city's historic resources list. Pastor agreed to build around the annex. Then, another issue arose: The project would require the removal of a small concrete wall, decorated with exposed aggregate and inlaid rocks, built in 1972 by a man local historians dubbed the 'father of stamped concrete.' In the fall of 2023, the City Council said the wall was too important to be moved and sent Pastor's company back to the drawing board. This April, the city's Planning Commission approved the project, marking a major milestone. Two weeks later, 11 residents and business owners filed an appeal. They argued that the development, which includes three buildings, exceeds the city's limit of 10,000 square feet. Each building is smaller than that. But the opponents said that since two buildings are connected by a second-story exterior walkway they should be considered a single structure — one bigger than 10,000 square feet. They also argued that the site would not have enough parking and that planned rooftop gardens would not meet the city's landscaping requirements because they would not be on the ground floor. "The plans that were submitted and approved in April are still outside of the guidelines and the rules of the city's codes," Courtney Kramer, one of the appellants, said during a City Council meeting Aug. 4. She said it was frustrating to residents who have "been through excruciating renovation projects and followed the rules" to see certain projects get a pass. City codes, she said, "need to be applied consistently in order to preserve this village in the forest." During the six-hour meeting, the City Council delayed making a decision on the appeal, putting everything on hold again. Ian Martin, one of the appellants, said in an interview Friday that the push-back against Pastor's projects is "absolutely nothing personal at all" and that longtime locals also go through the same long process. "Of course, Clint Eastwood was so frustrated with the planning process that he ran for mayor," Martin said. "Pastor is not being singled out." Eastwood, who was mayor in the 1980s, ran for office after fighting with the City Council over what he said were unreasonable restrictions on the design of an office building he wanted to erect. Pastor now owns that building. Martin said that of the 11 appellants, two are former City Council members and three, including himself, are former planning commissioners. They are "very well versed in the general plan and the municipal code and the design guidelines," he added. The group, he added, is "not opposed to the project." They just believe it has to play by the rules. Chris Mitchell, managing director of Esperanza Carmel LLC, the local branch of Pastor's international real estate company, said in a statement that "this process has made a mockery of the city's own rules." "Our project was reviewed for six years, redesigned five times, and approved by the Planning Commission and City staff," he wrote. He called the appeal a "last-minute" political maneuver and stall tactic. "The message from City Council is clear: it doesn't matter how much you follow the rules, if your business is not wanted here, you won't be treated fairly,' Mitchell wrote. The city administrator, city clerk and members of the City Council did not respond to requests for comment. Read more: There are no street addresses in Carmel-by-the-Sea. Some say it's time to change Karyl Hall, co-chair of the Carmel Preservation Assn., said Pastor has bent over backward to listen to the community and to design — and redesign — his projects with the town's traditional architectural styles in mind. Hall, a retired research psychologist, is an adamant supporter, albeit a surprising one. Hall believes modern architecture — which she describes as "Anywhere, USA" buildings with sterile facades and box-like structures — poses an existential threat to Carmel-by-the-Sea. She co-founded the preservation association in response to the first proposal for The Pit: a contemporary design approved by the Planning Commission for the previous owners that she called "the ice box." Hall said she was heartened by Pastor, who proposed more traditional buildings. In an interview Thursday, she said some in town believe "that one person who owns so many properties is kind of scary." But the billionaire, she said, has been treated unfairly. 'The one thing we can always count on with him, which is why I've been supportive, is he's done quality work and he's done work that reflects Carmel's character," Hall said. "You can't say that about most of the developers who move in here. They just want to make big bucks." It remains unclear what Pastor means by "leave" Carmel. Will he halt his ongoing projects? Or sell his properties? Tim Allen, a real estate agent who has handled most of the billionaire's local purchases, said Thursday that Pastor is weighing his options. 'We need new infrastructure. We need new housing — it's mandated by the state. He's building these things," Allen said. "I hope this town rallies around Patrice, or he's gone." Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times. Sign in to access your portfolio
