Third person sentenced in relation to Awarua fire
A third person has been sentenced in relation to a wildfire that burned through a peat wetland in Southland during a total fire ban.
The person pleaded guilty to allowing a fire lit by another person to get out of control.
She has been convicted and discharged in the Invercargill District Court.
In January, one offender was sentenced to seven months' home detention, and to pay reparations of $10,000, and the other was sentenced to 200 hours' community work and 12 months' supervision, and reparations of $10,000.
The fire was lit in the Awarua Wetlands in Southland on 2 April 2022 during a prohibited fire season which meant a total fire ban was in place.
Fire and Emergency deputy national commander Steph Rotarangi said firefighters fought the fire for more than a week.
It burnt through 1330 hectares and had environmental and financial consequences in an internationally recognised conservation area.
"Given the significance of the impact of the Awarua Wetlands fire, and the fact the area was under a total fire ban, we considered it appropriate to prosecute three individuals for the fire," she said.
This was the second prosecution under the Fire and Emergency New Zealand Act 2017 - the first resulted in an $18,000 fine for an unauthorised burn-off.
The Department of Conservation's southern South Island operations director Aaron Fleming said the fire caused significant damage to the biodiversity and ecosystem of the wetlands, released vast carbon emissions, and seriously set back conservation work in the area.
Photo:
Supplied / Ngāi Tahu
"Awarua Wetlands is one of the largest remaining wetland complexes in this country and was recognised as New Zealand's first Ramsar Convention on Wetlands site of international importance in 1976," he said.
"The fire burned about 980ha of wetland plants, which is an important habitat for threatened species like matuku-hūrepo/Australasian bittern and other birds, plants, insects, lizards, and fish. It also injured or killed a high number of animals."
Weeds like gorse and Spanish heath were already beginning to invade the burned areas, in some places outcompeting native plants.
It was estimated about 104,000 tonnes of carbon emissions were released into the atmosphere from this fire - equivalent to driving about 409,829,000 kilometres in an average petrol car.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
11 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Hawke's Bay fires: Fine criticised as ‘economic incentive to burn'
Smoke from fires burning in the Longlands area, in Hastings, exceeded the National Environmental Standard for air quality. Photo: Rex Graham / LDR A fine given to a person for starting a smoky burn-off near Hastings is being described by an advocate as giving them "an economic license to burn". The fire in the Longlands area on July 27 was judged to have been a breach of Hawke's Bay Regional Council airshed rules and led to a $300 fine. On the same day, a National Environmental Standard air pollution breach was recorded in Hastings, of 51 micrograms of particulate matter per cubic metre. The limit is 50 micrograms. Photo: Former Hawke's Bay Regional Council chairman Rex Graham, who regularly sends photos to the Hawke's Bay Regional Council, captured an image of smoke drifting across Longlands and said it was one of the worst he'd seen. "$300 is not a deterrent. It's actually an economic incentive to burn," Graham said. "I rang the Pollution hotline. This was one of the worst examples of air pollution that I have seen this year, which is saying something considering the extent of this activity," Graham said. "This fire was in blatant disregard and abuse of our community's air quality and the law. "The smoke was drifting towards Hastings, completely covering the entire region between Railway Rd and Havelock North," Graham said. "It was difficult to drive on Riverslea Rd heading back into Hastings due to limited visibility." Hawke's Bay Regional Council said its pollution response team investigated a complaint regarding smoke in the Longlands Rd area on July 27. "As a result of that investigation, enforcement action has been taken and a $300 fine issued." HBRC compliance manager Matt Wilkinson said it was frustrating that the council's ability to deter this behaviour was constrained by the fines set at a national level. "But we acknowledge the changes made by the government, coming into effect in September, which lifts the infringement fines to $600 for individuals or $1200 for companies as a move in the right direction of discouraging burning in or near airsheds." Graham said those planned increases were not high enough and would still encourage fires to save money. Air pollution records published in Hawke's Bay Today on Friday, August 8, show the National Environment Standard air quality was also exceeded in Hastings on July 26 (54 micrograms). In a twelve-month period in 2023-2024, HBRC received approximately 80 complaints of burning during winter. More than 70 infringement fines were issued. Orchard burn-offs are allowed under the Regional Air Quality rules, but they must meet specific conditions. Christian Jirkowsky moved from Austria to Hawke's Bay in 2007 and has more than 30 years experience in the power and heat generation sector, where wood, biomass, and fossil fuels are utilised for energy production. Jirkowsky said it was scientifically proven that even brief exposure to fine particles (PM 2.5 and PM1) and aerosols emitted from open wood burning increases the risk of non-accidental and respiratory-related fatalities. "This is why most developed countries have banned open burning and apply severe consequences for violations," he said. "Wood smoke exposure induces airway irritation, causes lung damage, and substantially increases the likelihood of developing asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and heart attacks," Jirkowsky said. An airshed is a legally designated air-quality management area. In New Zealand, regional councils and unitary authorities have identified areas to be managed as airsheds for the national environmental standards for air quality. The majority of airsheds may have levels of pollutants that exceed the national environmental standards for air quality. Some airsheds are also identified based on factors such as: the number of people living in the airshed now or in the future, unique weather patterns and geography and local air emissions, such as local industrial activity, which need to be specifically considered and managed. HBRC says airshed rules exist because smoke from backyard fires in urban areas, though they may seem minor, adds up quickly. On cold, still days, it lingers and affects air quality. "If everyone lit backyard fires, it would quickly become a serious pollution issue. These rules help protect our whānau and community from the harmful health effects of smoke, especially in winter when it gets trapped close to the ground." LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
RNZ News
41 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Pre-schoolers learning the power of worm farms
South Auckland pre-schoolers are learning the value of getting their hands dirty to grow fresh fruit and veggies, and the awesome power of the humble earthworm to get it to go absolutely gangbusters. Kids at the Barnardos Early Learning Centre in Otara are stuck in to school's veggie garden and worm farm, learning how to transform food waste into healthy vegetables. Felix Walton reports. Tags: To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
RNZ News
6 hours ago
- RNZ News
Te Arawa Lakes Trust calls for stronger partnership to protect Rotorua lakes
Lake Rotoiti, which is connected to Lake Rotorua by a small channel. Photo: RNZ/ Libby Kirkby-McLeod Te Arawa Lakes Trust says it has no "exclusive seat at the table" when it comes to Crown-led water management, as ongoing issues with the Ōhau Diversion wall raise concerns about the water quality of Lake Rotoiti. The trust are owners of the lake bed under the Te Arawa Lakes Settlement Act, and are calling for greater recognition of its role as kaitiaki and a more meaningful seat at the decision-making table. The Ōhau diversion wall stretches across 1.3 kilometres and was built in 2008 to improve the water quality of Lake Rotoiti by stopping nutrient-rich water flowing in from Lake Rotorua. However, holes have appeared near the surface of the wall, raising concerns about increased algal blooms and water quality. The $11 million structure was expected to last 50 years but showed signs of corrosion as early as 2014. The Ōhau channel diversion wall was built in 2008 to divert polluted nutrient-rich water from Lake Rotorua, which otherwise flowed into Lake Rotoiti through a small channel, but critics say holes from corrosion allows water through. Photo: Supplied Chairman Wallace Haumaha said the ongoing issues with the Ōhau Channel diversion wall were "yet another symptom of a broken, Crown-led water management system that continues to ignore our role as kaitiaki". Earlier this year, the Bay of Plenty Regional Council said it would "accelerate" trials to address the problem. Haumaha welcomed this progress but said all voices, especially those of mana whenua, needed to be part of the decision-making process. "As we work together to find solutions, it is vital that all voices, especially those of kaitiaki and local communities, are included in the decision making processes that impact our waterways and the wellbeing of our people," he said. Under the Te Arawa Lakes Settlement Act, the trust is responsible for the rights and obligations that come with lakebed ownership, including existing structures, commercial activities, and public utilities. In June, over 60 Māori land trusts, representing more than 150,000 landowners, hapū and iwi, filed legal proceedings in the High Court against the Crown. They allege the government has repeatedly failed to uphold Māori rights and responsibilities over freshwater. Te Arawa Lakes Trust is a part of this claim. "This is about restoring balance and our ability to exercise proper kaitiakitanga. Māori have never relinquished our relationship with our ancestral waters," Haumaha said. "This collaborative approach is the driving force behind the coalition Wai Manawa Whenua, which brings together Māori landowners, hapū, iwi collectives, and national organisations such as the Federation of Māori Authorities (FOMA) who together have filed legal proceedings in the High Court to hold the Crown accountable to ensure that Māori rights and responsibilities over freshwater are upheld, fostering a responsible stewardship that benefits everyone," Haumaha said. In a statement to RNZ, Toi Moana Bay of Plenty Regional Council chief executive Fiona McTavish said the Ōhau diversion wall remained "structurally sound and is compliant with its resource consent," though microbial corrosion has created holes in the top metre of the sheet piling. "It continues to divert most of the flow from the Ōhau Channel (Lake Rotorua) to the Kaituna River, bypassing Lake Rotoiti." McTavish said the water quality of Lake Rotorua has "markedly improved" since the Ōhau wall was installed in 2008, due to alum dosing, catchment land use and land management change. "This means that even without the corrosion, the wall would not be having the same water quality benefit as it did when it was installed." Potentially toxic algae bloom was found near Ohau Channel. Photo: Supplied / Bay of Plenty Regional Council Last week, McTavish said the regional council adopted a strategy which uses a "dynamic adaptive pathway approach to decision making," focussing on making decisions in a flexible way that adapts to changing circumstances, rather than relying on rigid, long-term plans. "This enables regional council to make the best informed and most timely decisions about the ongoing investment in the wall, ensuring those decision are good environmental decisions that will deliver water quality benefits, but are also financially practical. "Under this strategy, decisions about the future of the wall are timed to consider updated science and engineering advice, community voices and alignment with central government expectations." She said making good environmental, but also financially sensible decisions was critical. "We want to ensure that any investment delivers the outcome the community desires, is based on the best information and is not unnecessarily rushed." McTavish said Ngāti Pikiao Environmental Society, representing mana whenua Ngāti Pikiao and Te Takinga, had been briefed and "continue to support the wall so long as it is providing benefit to lake water quality." "Regional council staff will continue to work with Ngāti Pikiao Environmental Society on the decision making in respect of the wall and ensure that decisions made about the wall are informed by the best available science regarding water quality." The working relationship between Te Arawa Lakes Trust and regional council governance, leadership and staff continues to be productive and positive, McTavish said. "Regional council staff have briefed Te Arawa Lakes Trust kaimahi regarding the wall and sought their guidance on how Te Arawa Lakes Trust would like to provide advice regarding the issue. "TALT staff have advised they will brief their Komiti Taiao as a first step, we have offered support for this briefing and await further direction from Te Arawa Lakes Trust kaimahi." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
