Jannik Sinner rehires the fitness coach he fired for playing a role in his doping case
The move comes after Sinner recently removed fitness coach Marco Panichi and physiotherapist Ulises Badio from his team.
"Umberto has played an important role in Jannik's development to date, and his return reflects a renewed focus on continuity and performance at the highest level,' a statement from Sinner's team said Wednesday.
Last year, Sinner tested positive twice for a trace amount of an anabolic steroid in March; the case wasn't made public until August, shortly before the U.S. Open, which he ended up winning for the second of his four Grand Slam titles.
He initially was completely cleared, based on the defense that he accidentally was exposed to the banned substance, Clostebol, via a massage from his then-physiotherapist, Giacomo Naldi. Sinner said his fitness trainer at the time, Ferrara, purchased a product in Italy and gave it to Naldi for a cut on Naldi's finger. Naldi then treated Sinner while not wearing gloves.
Sinner then fired Naldi and Ferrara, and Ferrara was hired briefly by Matteo Berrettini, another Italian player.
The World Anti-Doping Agency appealed the exoneration, and Sinner agreed to serve a three-month ban that ended right before the Italian Open in May of this year.
Sinner, who won Wimbledon this month, will return to action at the Cincinnati Open next month as he prepares to defend his U.S. Open title.
___
AP tennis: https://apnews.com/hub/tennis
Andrew Dampf, The Associated Press
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Conor McGregor loses appeal over civil sexual assault case, potential perjury probe still active
Conor McGregor has lost his appeal against the civil jury finding in favor of an Irish woman, Nikita Hand, who claimed she was raped by the UFC star in Dublin hotel in December 2018. The three-judge Court of Appeal dismissed all grounds for appeal Thursday in Dublin. Hand was present for the ruling, McGregor was not. McGregor denies Hands' claims, insisting they had 'vigorous' and consensual sex. As part of his appeal, McGregor's team claimed that the trial judge incorrectly directed the High Court civil jury to decide whether he 'assaulted,' rather than 'sexually assaulted' Hand. Justice Brian O'Moore — who sat on the three-judge panel alongside Justice Isobel Kennedy and Justice Michael McGrath — said the appeal court had no doubt that the effect of the civil court judge Justice Alexander Owen's charge was that Hand's allegation against McGregor was that he raped her. O'Moore claimed it was 'unreal' to suggest the jury would have been confused due to the 'brutally clear' way the trial judge had framed the allegation. Another core ground of the appeal was that the trial judge had erroneously permitted a line of questioning pertaining to McGregor's multiple 'no comment' responses he gave to investigating officers after providing them with a preprepared statement in response to the allegations. This ground was also dismissed as the Court of Appeal offered various instances where the trial judge warned the jury about not making adverse inferences against McGregor from his no comment replies. The jury were also told to disregard certain "no comment" answers as having no evidential value. According to the judge, with regard to his appeal efforts, McGregor failed to show a real risk of an unfair trial and his side had not been deprived of the right of an effective cross-examination. Hand's lawyers opposed the appeal and urged the court to allow the November 2024 jury decision that McGregor had assaulted her — and its award of €250,000 damages to her — to stand. An order requiring McGregor to pay Hand's estimated €1.3 million ($1.58 million) legal costs was stayed pending the outcome of the appeal. The court today ordered that Hand should get her costs in the High Court and appeal court against McGregor. Withdrawn evidence McGregor had initially sought to introduce new evidence to the appeal from a couple, Samantha O'Reilly and Steven Cummins, who were neighbors of Hand's at the time of the incident. O'Reilly, in a sworn affidavit, claimed to have witnessed Hand being pushed and potentially kicked by her then-partner hours after she returned home from the hotel where a civil jury found that she was raped by McGregor. Claiming she saw the incident take place from her own home, O'Reilly swore that although she did not see any blows being landed, by the body movement of Hand's partner, she believed that he kicked Hand after he pushed her. Hand described O'Reilly's and Cummins' claims as 'lies.' Earlier this month, McGregor's legal team told the Court of Appeal that they were withdrawing the application to submit the claims as new evidence. In response to this, Hand's lawyers asked that the matter be referred to the Director of Public Prosecutions to investigate perjury. The three-judge court confirmed that it would be referred to the DPP. According to the Irish Times, 'the normal procedure when such referrals are made is that the materials are sent by the DPP to An Garda Síochána (Irish police) and the latter then considers whether they involve possible perjury.'
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The EU's growing list of online platforms under investigation
The list of online platforms suspected of breaching the EU's rules keeps growing. The latest to join the list: Temu. The European Commission says that under the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA) the Chinese e-commerce platform doesn't properly assess risks arising from illegal products sold on its website, including baby toys and small electronics. 'The Commission has adopted a preliminary decision under the Digital Services Act legislation when it comes to TEMU, where we have announced to that online marketplace that according to us it is in breach of the DSA when it comes to risks on the marketplace relating to the selling and dissemination of illegal products,' Commission spokesperson Thomas Regnier told Euronews. "The DSA is one of our tools to protect consumers across Europe. To protect them from what, when it comes to online marketplaces? Illegal products that are sold online. Algorithmic content that is thrown at you and that you don't even determine if you want to see it or not. When it comes, for example, to advertisement or gamification of certain systems on these online platforms. These are risks that we need to mitigate. To protect our consumers online," he added. Not only Temu The probe comes amid broader concerns that some online marketplaces allow the sale of goods that would not meet EU safety or regulatory standards if sold in physical stores. So far, including Temu, the Commission has opened 14 proceedings against 10 online platforms. Each case focuses on different aspects of compliance, ranging from product safety to content moderation and the protection of minors. The ongoing proceedings include X, which has been issued with preliminary findings over its compliance with obligations concerning the 'dissemination and amplification of illegal content.' There are also ongoing procedures against Tik Tok concerning, among other things, its risk management of addictive design and harmful content. Also under the spot is the protection of minors, on which preliminary findings have been reached, and election integrity. The TikTok Lite case was closed after TikTok offered commitments. The Commission found AliExpress (AliExpress) was not taking enough measures to counter illegal products. The Chinese company finally offered commitments and the Commission issued preliminary findings on other grievences. And according to an ongoing file, Meta's services Instagram and Facebook are also under scrutiny in cases related to the protection of minors, as well as on election integrity. Finally, there is a case open for the websites Stripchat, Pornhub, XNXX, Xvideos related to the protection of minors. Consumer Groups Call for Action The wave of investigations comes amid growing pressure from consumer protection groups, who argue that the DSA must be backed by real enforcement to have meaningful impact. 'The preliminary findings of the European Commission on Temu is a positive first step for European consumers. Last year, the European Consumer Organisation (BEUC) launched a complaint against TEMU because they are not doing enough to protect consumers against illegal and unsafe products that can be bought through their website,' Agustín Reyna, director general of European Consumer Organisation BEUC, told Euronews. 'What is at the stake is the safety of consumers. Because when consumers buy something online, they expect it to be safe. They don't wonder whether there are illegal chemicals being used in the production of these goods, or whether a certain product or household appliance might explode, or that a kid might choke with a toy. They expect the product to be safe, regardless of how cheap it might be, but they expect it to be safe. What we have identified with our members of all the national consumer organisations -that they have conducted mystery shopping exercises, testing over these products through Temu - is that you can buy and be exposed to a significant amount of illegal products. And the company today is not doing enough to protect consumers,' he added. According to the consumer organisation, the challenge now is to try to make the law work in practise. The legislation has been in place for nearly a year and a half, but so far none of the Commission probes have been wrapped up and no sanctions have been imposed yet. But with these platforms becoming very popular with Europeans the topic is urgent. 'Just to give you an idea, every year the number of parcels that enter into the EU through TEMU doubles. So we're talking about a significant number of products that enter the EU which are not compliant. And consumers do not know about that,' concluded the Director of BEUC. France Moves to Regulate Ultra Fast Fashion The investigation into Temu also comes at a time when EU member states are stepping up efforts to rein in ultra-fast fashion — a business model many experts say fuels overconsumption, environmental harm, and the exploitation of legal grey zones. In May 2024, France proposed groundbreaking legislation targeting ultra-fast fashion platforms. The French government explicitly named companies like TEMU and Shein as examples of platforms disrupting sustainability efforts, using aggressive social media marketing and gamified shopping to encourage impulse buying and throwaway culture. While the French proposal is still under negotiation, it reflects a growing consensus that ultra fast fashion — especially when delivered through unregulated online platforms — poses not just consumer safety risks, but also serious environmental and social concerns. It seems that a European Response is needed to a global problem. The convergence of issues — from illegal product sales to environmental destruction — has prompted calls for a more unified EU response. Experts say that relying on fragmented national enforcement is no longer viable in the face of global platforms that operate across borders, largely unchecked. As the Director General of BEUC put it, 'Europe can't win this battle one country at a time.' The Digital Services Act is a start. But for many, it's just the beginning.
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
West Ham forward Lucas Paqueta cleared of spot-fixing charges
West Ham forward Lucas Paqueta has been cleared of alleged spot-fixing after being accused of deliberately receiving yellow cards to influence betting markets. The English Football Association confirmed Thursday that an independent panel had found the charges unproven. 'Lucas Paqueta denied the charges against him, and the Regulatory Commission found them to be not proven following a hearing,' the FA said in a statement. The ruling brings to an end a long-running case against the Brazil international, who was charged in May 2024. The FA had claimed the 27-year-old Paqueta intentionally sought to be booked in four separate games — against Leicester, Aston Villa, Leeds and Bournemouth between November 2022 and August 2023 'in order for one or more persons to profit from betting.' Blackstone Chambers, representing Paqueta, said it was understood to be the longest case in FA history. Paqueta was charged with breaches of FA Rule E5 related to integrity of matches and competitions. The rule sates a participant 'shall not, directly or indirectly, seek to influence for an improper purpose the result, progress, conduct or any other aspect of, or occurrence in or in connection with, a football match or competition.' The panel did uphold two charges against Paqueta for failing to answer questions and provide information to the FA's investigation. The governing body said it would determine an appropriate sanction at the earliest opportunity. Full reasons for the verdict have not yet been published. ___ AP soccer:
