Chinese HQ-22 air defense system has an American stamp! US firm develops surrogate model of SAM system
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
HQ-22 system overview
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Strategic significance and export
US surrogate model: Purpose and implications
In a significant development for defense industry and military preparedness, a U.S. company has successfully created a surrogate - an exact replica - of the Chinese HQ-22 surface-to-air missile (SAM) system. This surrogate model, created by Torch Technologies' Integration and Prototyping Center (TIPC), is intended to support the U.S. Air Force and allied forces in studying, training against, and developing countermeasures for one of China's most advanced medium- to long-range air defense systems.The HQ-22, known by NATO as the CH-SA-20 and also exported as the FK-3 , is a modern Chinese SAM system designed by Jiangnan Space Industry (part of China Aerospace Science & Industry Corporation Limited, CASIC). It represents a key advancement from earlier Chinese air defenses like the HQ-12 and HQ-2, with enhanced range, guidance technologies, and multi-target engagement capabilities.This isn't the first instance of the U.S. Air Force incorporating a replica of a Chinese surface-to-air missile system into its training program. Back in July, the service publicly unveiled a surrogate HQ-16 target vehicle designed to enhance advanced pilot training. The mock system was displayed at the Experimental Aircraft Association's annual AirVenture show at Wittman Regional Airport in Oshkosh, Wisconsin.The HQ-22 missile system features mobile, truck-mounted launchers typically consisting of four missiles each, mounted on heavy 8×8 wheeled vehicles. Each battery usually comprises multiple launchers and a multifunction radar system, notably the H-200 radar, capable of tracking and engaging up to six targets simultaneously with twelve missiles in flight provision.The missiles themselves have a range generally reported between 100 to 150 kilometers, capable of intercepting aircraft, helicopters, drones, and cruise missiles at altitudes from as low as 50 meters up to about 27,000 meters.Guidance is achieved through a dual method: for the early phase, command radio guidance directs the missile via ground systems, shifting to semi-active radar homing, specifically track-via-missile (TVM) mode in the terminal phase. This combined guidance improves the missile's resistance to electronic countermeasures and enhances accuracy against agile or stealthy targets.The missiles are launched at an angle (inclined launch) from transport-launch containers, facilitating rapid reload and protected storage during transport. The launcher vehicles feature self-contained power systems and are built on platforms with significant cross-country mobility and an operational range of up to 800 km.The H-200 radar uses a digitally controlled phased array antenna, allowing rapid beam steering and simultaneous tracking/guidance of multiple threats, enhancing battlefield situational awareness and engagement efficiency.The HQ-22 system was publicly unveiled at the 2016 China International Aviation & Aerospace Exhibition and entered service with the People's Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) around 2019. It was designed to replace older, less capable systems and to offer China a cost-effective but highly capable medium- to long-range air defense layer comparable in function to U.S. Patriot or Russian S-300 missile systems, though with some operational differences and advantages in electronic warfare resistance.Notably, the export variant FK-3 has been sold internationally; Serbia received FK-3 batteries in 2019, marking one of the first sales of Chinese long-range air defense systems to a European country.The newly developed surrogate model by the U.S. firm mimics the physical appearance, radar signature, and operational features of the HQ-22 system. While it is not an operational weapon, it serves as a realistic training target and intelligence tool, enabling U.S. operators and defense analysts to better understand the capabilities, operational patterns, and vulnerabilities of the system.Such surrogate systems play a critical role in preparing aircrews and missile defense personnel for potential engagements by providing live or simulated training with realistic enemy air defense emulation. The surrogate assists in testing tactics, countermeasures, electronic warfare techniques, and avionics designed to overcome Chinese air defense layers.According to defense experts, the HQ-22's layered radar and missile engagement zones are sophisticated, presenting a challenge that the U.S. Air Force seeks to replicate and eventually counter effectively through enhanced electronic and kinetic solutions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
16 minutes ago
- First Post
'Sovereignty violated, security undermined': China fumes after USS Higgins destroyer 'intrudes' into South China Sea
China has accused the United States of violating its sovereignty and undermining its security after a US warship entered the waters off the Scarborough Shoal in the South China Sea, which China claims and calls Huangyan Island. The international community largely recognises the Philippines' claim on the island. The photograph shows the guided-missile destroyer USS Higgins conducting an independent deployer certification exercise off the coast of Southern California on April 30, 2015. (Photo: US Navy) China on Wednesday said that a US warship violated its sovereignty and undermined its security by 'intruding' into its territorial waters in the South China Sea. China said that USS Higgins, a destroyer part of the Japan-headquartered 7th Fleet of the US Navy, intruded into its territorial waters off the 'Huangyan Island' and was driven by Chinese navy. The United States has rejected the accusation. The navy mobilised forces to monitor, track, warn, and drive away USS Higgins, spokesperson Senior Colonel He Tiesheng said in a statement in in Chinese. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Huangyan Island' is what China calls the Scarborough Shoal, which is disputed between China and the Philippines. Much of the international community, including the United States and India, has recognised the Philippines' claim to the island, which considers it to be a part of its exclusive economic zone (EEZ). 'The path of the US warship seriously violated China's sovereignty and security, severely undermined peace and stability in the South China Sea, and contravened basic principles of international law and international relations. The Southern Theater Command Navy will maintain high alert at all times, resolutely safeguard national sovereignty, security, and regional peace and stability,' the Chinese statement further said. US rejects China's charge The United States has rejected China's version of events and the accusation and said USS Higgins was sailing in line with the international law. The USS Higgins was conducting a 'freedom of navigation operation' in accordance with international law, Sarah Merrill, a spokesperson for the 7th Fleet, told CNBC. 'China's statement about this mission is false…The United States is defending its right to fly, sail and operate wherever international law allows, as USS Higgins did here. Nothing China says otherwise will deter us,' Merrill further said. World rejects China's claims on Scarborough Shoal China lays claim to Scarborough Shoal, which it calls Huangyan Island, as part of its broader claims to nearly the entire South China Sea on the basis of its self-claimed maritime border based on self-written 'nine dash lines'. The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) rejected Chinese claims to the South China Sea and the Scarborough Shoal in 2016 under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). The PCA ruled that there was no legal basis to 'nine dash lines' and territorial claims arising from it. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The PCA further held that China had violated the Philippines' sovereign rights in its EEZ by interfering with fishing and petroleum exploration and building artificial islands. The United States, India, Australia, Japan, the United Kingdom (UK), and the European Union (EU) have supported the PCA ruling, essentially supporting the Philippines' claim on Scarborough Shoal.
Mint
16 minutes ago
- Mint
ONGC Q1 net profit drops 10 pc on lower oil prices
New Delhi, Aug 13 (PTI) State-owned Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) has reported a 10 per cent decline in its June quarter net profit on lower oil prices and stagnant production from its aging fields. The company reported a net profit of ₹ 8,024 crore in the first quarter of 2025-26 fiscal year, compared to ₹ 8,938 crore earning in the same period last year, a company statement said. The firm realised USD 67.87 for every barrel of crude oil it pumped out of ground and below seabed from sale to refiners, who convert it into fuels like petrol and diesel, as compared to USD 80.64 per barrel realisation in April-June 2024. Price of natural gas, which is used to generate electricity, produce fertiliser or turned into CNG and piped cooking gas, marginally rose to USD 6.64 per million British thermal units in Q1 from USD 6.5 in last year. ONGC said gas from new wells it drills is eligible for a 20 per cent premium over the government set price, called APM. "ONGC is actively working to boost output from such wells. In Q1 of 2025-26 (FY'26), revenue from new well gas stood at ₹ 1,703 crore, delivering an additional ₹ 333 crore compared to the APM gas price," the statement said. The company produced 4.683 million tonnes of crude oil in Q1, almost the same as last year's 4.629 million tonnes. Gas output too was almost unchanged at 4.846 billion cubic meters in the quarter. During the quarter, the firm made two discoveries of hydrocarbons in the Mumbai offshore. Other highlights of the quarter included commencement of production from the PY-3 field -- a joint venture of ONGC, Hardy Exploration & Production (India) Inc, and Invenire Petrodyne Ltd located offshore in the Cauvery Basin on the east coast of India. The field is producing 4,000 barrels of oil per day and 88,000 standard cubic meters a day of gas. Also, North Karanpura CBM block was put on production. "ONGC commenced the supply of treated natural gas from its newly established gas treatment facility at Palatana, Tripura on June 9. 2025. The gas is being supplied to the city gas distribution (CGD) network in the Gomati through GAIL, enhancing the region's access to cleaner fuel," the statement said. The firm said it has got special dispensation from the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas for selling gas to Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Ltd (RRVUNL) at USD 6.5 per mmBtu from Jodhpur. RRVUNL conveyed their consent for offtake of around 0.1 million standard cubic meters per day of gas using the existing GAIL gas pipeline. ONGC and its overseas subsidiary, ONGC Videsh signed an MOU for coordinated marketing functions. "This MoU is the first step towards enhancing operational synergy and optimizing marketing efficiencies for ONGC and its group companies."
Indian Express
16 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Lesson for India in the China-EU freeze: Proceed with caution
The 50 per cent tariff shock on Indian exports to the United States has rattled exporters and policymakers alike. Garment manufacturers are scouting for alternative markets, while jewellery exporters are checking if their orders still stand. Meanwhile, the government plans credit measures to support SMEs and exporters who now potentially face a loss of their largest market. India now finds itself in a strategic bind. These developments come barely weeks before Prime Minister Narendra Modi's maiden visit to China since the Galwan clashes of 2020. The outreach aims to stabilise supply chains and secure critical technologies. Yet it coincides with Washington, India's key trading partner, tightening the screws over Delhi's Russia links, leaving India little room to manoeuvre. This is not dissimilar to the position the European Union finds itself in, vis-à-vis China and the United States. A summit marking 50 years of diplomatic ties in July ended in disappointment for Brussels. EU leaders raised concerns over China subsidising its EVs, market access issues, industrial overcapacity, and Beijing's support for Russia. On the other hand, President Xi Jinping warned against EU interference and criticised its de-risking policies. The EU-China diplomatic freeze has lessons for India. Only months earlier, with Donald Trump threatening sweeping tariffs on both the EU and China, Brussels and Beijing looked poised for closer ties. But that changed quickly when Trump paused tariffs on Chinese goods and Washington and Beijing agreed to resume cooperation on AI and critical minerals. The promise of renewed access to the US market dulled Beijing's appetite for compromise with Europe. Once China secured breathing space with Washington, it turned up the pressure on Brussels. It implemented anti-dumping tariffs on European brandy and expanded procurement restrictions on European medical equipment. The Chinese Commerce Minister called for the removal of EU sanctions on two Chinese banks alleged to have assisted Russia. Chinese export controls on rare earths were strengthened, and data localisation requirements affecting EU cloud and fintech companies were enforced. The EU and the US could have coordinated their leverage against China. Instead, the EU is under pressure from both sides, following the signing of a trade deal that imposes a 15 per cent tariff on its exports to the US. After years of border tensions and curbs on Chinese investment, New Delhi appears to be testing a modest thaw in relations. External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar's visit to Beijing in July coincided with the reopening of the Kailash Mansarovar Yatra, the resumption of direct flights, and the reinstatement of tourist visas for Chinese citizens. This revival is driven less by breakthroughs on the border and more by economic reality. The bilateral trade deficit reached a record $99.2 billion in FY25. Imports of solar components, lithium-ion batteries, electronics, and critical intermediaries surged by more than 25 per cent year-on-year. China's dominance in key sectors, such as EV components, green tech, APIs, and telecom equipment, keeps it entrenched in India's efforts to develop its own ecosystem. India is also exploring ways to ease curbs on Chinese investment, particularly in high-tech sectors. But this re-engagement is happening in the context of unresolved strategic issues. Despite an agreement last October, de-escalation along the LAC remains incomplete. Confidence-building measures are still minimal. And public sentiment remains wary. In this context, China may interpret India's opening as a sign of constraint rather than strength. If Beijing could pivot so quickly against the EU once Washington reopened its doors, it could just as easily do the same with India. India's best opportunity to avoid Europe's fate lies in direct negotiations with Chinese firms, ensuring a durable channel of communication, even when geopolitics turn cold. This does not necessarily mean filling out the calendar with high-level dialogues or offering joint ventures with Indian firms, to which Chinese companies may not freely transfer the latest technologies. Instead, India should identify critical supply chains integral to achieving its goals of economic growth, such as EV batteries, displays, EMS and connectors, solar wafers, precision machinery, and tooling. Subsequently, it should engage in dialogue with Chinese brands that have a strong global presence and established connections with upstream players in these fields. With strategic plans spanning two to three decades, these organisations are likely to assess commercial opportunities in India pragmatically and navigate political considerations in both countries as needed. India needs to establish a dedicated, multi-agency team to engage directly with key Chinese firms essential to its industrial goals. This team should comprise supply chain experts, Indian OEMs, state government representatives, and embassy staff, rather than general-purpose investment promotion bodies. Their focus should be on building strong, ongoing relationships with 25-30 major companies through private discussions and practical collaboration, rather than public initiatives. Currently, there is no coordinated outreach with these firms, and policies regarding Chinese companies in India are so unclear that only intermediaries can profit. To attract long-term investment, India needs to offer transparent and predictable guidelines that specify permitted activities, sectors, compliance requirements, and incentives. This clarity will encourage companies to invest, localise, and train for the future, resulting in knowledge and technology transfer. Not because it is mandated, but because companies will need to build for the long term. The Chinese establishment is likely to continue viewing India primarily from a strategic perspective. But when its firms and their shareholders stand to lose money by pulling out, the resistance to weaponising market access or regulatory tools will come from within. In a relationship marked by asymmetry, impassive commercial engagement may be India's strongest safeguard. The writer is Director, Geopolitics and Policy, at Koan Advisory Group, New Delhi. These are his personal views
