logo
South Africa grappling with US tariffs

South Africa grappling with US tariffs

Russia Today6 days ago
South African President Cyril Ramaphosa has conceded that South Africa is grappling with the United States' decision to impose a 30% tariff on local imports, but insists the country is not alone in facing mounting global trade challenges.
In his weekly newsletter, Ramaphosa described the new US tariffs as a stark reminder of the urgent need to adapt to increasingly turbulent headwinds in international trade.
'The US is South Africa's second-largest trading partner by country, and these measures will have a considerable impact on industries that rely heavily on exports to that country and on the workers they employ, as well as on our fiscus,' he said.
Sectors such as agriculture, automotive and textiles have historically benefited from duty-free access to the US market under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), which now faces disruption.
Ramaphosa said that South Africa's trade relationship with the US has historically been complementary, saying local exports 'do not compete with US producers and do not pose a threat to US industry'.
'Largely, our exports are inputs into US industries and therefore support the United States' industrial base,' he said.
'South Africa is also the biggest investor from the African continent into the US, with 22 of our companies investing in a number of sectors including mining, chemicals, pharmaceuticals and the food chain.'
The 30% tariff was recently announced by the Trump administration and will take effect on 7 August.
South Africa is the only country in sub-Saharan Africa singled out for the steep tariff, reflecting deteriorating relations between Pretoria and Washington.
Other African countries, such as Lesotho and Zimbabwe, will face a 15% tariff from the same date.
The announcement is a significant blow to South Africa's economy, particularly as the government had been working to strengthen trade ties with the US.
This included deals on liquefied natural gas imports, easing poultry import regulations and investments in US industries.
Ramaphosa defended South African imports, arguing they ultimately benefit US consumers through greater variety and lower costs.
'For example, citrus production is counter-seasonal and does not pose a threat to US production,' he said.
'Furthermore, production by US companies has been on the decline due to low yields, citrus greening disease and other factors unrelated to competition from imports.'
South Africa, the world's second-largest citrus exporter, has helped to stabilise supply and prices in the US market.
'We have been engaging the United States to enhance mutually beneficial trade and investment relations. All channels of communication remain open,' said Ramaphosa.
'Our foremost priority is protecting our export industries.'
He said the government would continue to engage with US officials while also accelerating efforts to diversify export markets, particularly within Africa.
'With a view to helping our producers and exporters aggressively explore alternative markets, we have established an Export Support Desk to assist affected producers,' he said.
Ramaphosa added that details of a support package for companies, producers and workers impacted by the tariffs would be announced soon.
He said the intervention would also assist industries seeking to expand into regions such as the rest of Africa, Asia, the Middle East and other existing trade agreement markets.
'Strengthening regional value chains will be key to building resilience for our export markets in the longer term,' he said.
'Much as strengthening and establishing alternative value chains will take time, this moment presents us with an opportunity to push forward with the implementation and expansion of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA).'
Ramaphosa stressed the need to reduce South Africa's dependence on specific export markets, calling it a 'strategic imperative' to build economic resilience.
'In the coming months, we will be scaling up our trade missions into new markets in Africa and beyond, as well as the National Exporter Development Programme, whose aim is to grow the pool of export-ready companies,' he said.
Relations between South Africa and the US have been under strain since Donald Trump's return to office.
Trump has opposed several South African policies, including land expropriation, which he controversially claimed allowed land to be taken from white farmers.
The Presidency has firmly denied such claims, including that one of genocide on white farmers.
Ramaphosa met with Trump in May in a bid to mend relations, but no progress was made as things had gone worse.
Despite growing tensions, Ramaphosa insisted that South Africa is not alone in facing high tariffs.
'A number of export-reliant developed and developing economies, including several on the continent, are also grappling with these measures,' he said.
'The international trading system is changing. Complacency will not serve us, and building resilience is imperative.'
Meanwhile, the Minister of Departments of Trade, Industry and Competition Parks Tau and Minister of International Relations and Cooperation Ronald Lamola will be having a joint press briefing on Monday morning to address the issue of high tariffs.
The briefing will take place at 10 a.m. at the Germiston Civic Centre, in Ekurhuleni.
Meanwhile on Saturday, ANC NEC member Dr Kgosientsho Ramokgopa told journalists there had been a 'spirited and robust' discussion on the US tariffs.
He said negotiations between the US and South Africa were ongoing, and expressed confidence that the two nations 'would be able to find each other'.First published by IOL
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Trump wants Putin in Alaska – and not anywhere else
Why Trump wants Putin in Alaska – and not anywhere else

Russia Today

time39 minutes ago

  • Russia Today

Why Trump wants Putin in Alaska – and not anywhere else

The choice of Alaska as the venue for the August 15, 2025, bilateral summit between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin carries a rare blend of symbolism. It reaches deep into the past, reflects the current geopolitical balance, and hints at the contours of future US–Russia relations. From the standpoint of historical memory, there is hardly another place in the United States that so clearly embodies the spirit of neighborliness and mutually beneficial cooperation lost during the Cold War. From 1737 until 1867, this vast, sparsely populated land was known as Russian America – a semi-exclave of the Russian Empire, separated from its Eurasian heartland yet sharing a border with another state. Tsar Alexander II's decision to sell Alaska to the United States for $7.2 million was one of the most debated diplomatic transactions of the 19th century. In St. Petersburg, it was clear: if left unattended, Alaska would likely fall into the hands of Russia's main rival at the time – the British Empire. Handing it over to Washington was not an act of weakness, but a calculated investment in future relations with a nation whose Pacific ambitions did not yet collide with Russia's. In the 20th century, this symbolic connection gained new meaning. During World War II, the city of Fairbanks – with a population of just thirty thousand – became a major hub in the Lend-Lease program, a massive US military aid effort that supplied the Soviet Union with aircraft, equipment, and materials. Alaska's airfields served as a key route for delivering American planes to the Eastern Front. Even today, Alaska remains the 'most Russian' of US states: home to Old Believers – descendants of 19th-century settlers seeking religious freedom – with functioning Orthodox churches and place names like Nikolaevsk, Voznesensk, and Upper and Lower Russian Lakes, linked by the Russian River. But the choice of Alaska is more than a nod to history; it is also a political calculation. Trump clearly has no intention of sharing the spotlight with intermediaries such as Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the president of Türkiye, or Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the president of the United Arab Emirates and one of the most influential figures in Middle Eastern politics. Both men have played high-profile roles as international brokers, but their involvement would inevitably shift the tone and priorities of the summit. Trump has chosen the most geographically remote state in the union – thousands of miles from any Euro-Atlantic capital – to underline his distance both from his Democratic opponents at home and from NATO allies who, acting in Kiev's interests, will seek to undermine any potential breakthroughs. There is also a practical side: Alaska's low population density makes it easier for security services to minimize the risk of terrorist attacks or staged provocations, while sidestepping the legal complications posed by the International Criminal Court's arrest warrant. In 2002, the United States withdrew its signature from the Rome Statute and it does not recognize the ICC's jurisdiction on its soil. There is another crucial dimension: Alaska is America's only truly Arctic region. In a world where the Trump administration has been exerting pressure on Canada and Greenland to bring them under firmer US influence, the high north is becoming a strategic theater. Russia and the United States have overlapping interests here – from developing the Northern Sea Route, which partly runs through the Bering Strait, to tapping offshore oil and gas reserves. The Lomonosov Ridge, an underwater formation in the Arctic Ocean claimed by Russia as a natural extension of its continental shelf, is a case in point. Joint Arctic projects could turn the region into one of the most prosperous in the world, but under a different scenario it could just as easily become a stage for nuclear weapons tests and air defense drills. Ukraine will loom large over the summit agenda. Western media outlets have already floated the possibility of territorial swaps – for example, the withdrawal of Ukrainian forces from Donetsk People's Republic in exchange for Russian concessions in the Sumy, Kharkov, Dnepropetrovsk, and Nikolaev regions. Even Western analysts have called such a deal a diplomatic victory for Moscow, noting that the unoccupied territory Russia would gain would be four times the size of the areas it might cede. Alaska is a fitting place for such discussions: its own history is a vivid reminder that territorial ownership is not an immutable historical-geographic constant, but a political and diplomatic variable shaped by the agreements of great powers in specific historical moments. The summit in Alaska is more than just a meeting between two leaders. It is a return to the logic of direct dialogue without intermediaries, a reminder of historic ties, and a test of whether Moscow and Washington are willing to work together where their interests not only intersect, but could align. Alaska's story began as Russian, continued as American – and now has the chance to become a shared chapter, if both sides choose to see it as an opportunity rather than a threat.

Zelensky not invited to Putin-Trump summit
Zelensky not invited to Putin-Trump summit

Russia Today

time7 hours ago

  • Russia Today

Zelensky not invited to Putin-Trump summit

Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky has not been invited to attend next week's summit between Russian President Vladimir Putin and his US counterpart Donald Trump in the US, the Washington Post has reported, citing an official briefed on the negotiations. On Friday, Trump announced he would meet Putin on August 15 in Alaska. In the hours after the announcement, several outlets reported that Zelensky might take part in some form, with a senior White House official telling CBS News the planning was 'still fluid' and that Zelensky could be involved. However, the Washington Post has reported that no invitation has been extended to Zelensky so far. Reuters has also said, citing sources, that the White House is still considering inviting him, but is currently focused on organizing a bilateral meeting, at Russia's request. Putin has said he will not rule out a meeting with Zelensky, but the Kremlin has stressed that the conditions for such talks have not been met. Trump has suggested that upcoming negotiations could involve 'some swapping of territories to the betterment of both.' However, on Saturday, Zelensky rejected any land-swap proposals, citing limitations imposed by Ukraine's constitution. The Washington Post has noted that, given the strained relationship between Trump and Zelensky after their tense Oval Office meeting earlier this year, Zelensky's refusal to consider territorial concessions could risk potential blowback from Trump, who has previously described him as difficult to negotiate with. Russian officials have repeatedly said that any peace deal must address the root causes of the conflict and reflect the realities on the ground, including the status of Crimea as well as the Donetsk, Lugansk, Zaporozhye and Kherson regions, which joined Russia after referendums in 2022.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store