10-member committee to find out Saran's establishment date
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The responsibility of finding a suitable date has been given to the district development commissioner (DDC), Yatindra Kumar Pal along with nine other members, and the panel is hopeful of finding the district formation's date soon.
Saran DM Aman Sameer, after joining at Chhapra, was seriously trying to locate its date of establishment with the purpose of celebrating the day. Finally, he has set up a committee to find out or decide on Saran's formation date.
Many districts in the state have their establishment dates that can be readily found, while some do not have specific, officially recorded dates of creation. Such districts have adopted a suitable date and celebrate the day every year. Being one of the oldest districts in this state, Saran shares the same fate. Neither in the gazetteer of Saran nor in any govt records is its date of establishment mentioned.
East Champaran, which was carved out of Saran in 1869, has adopted Oct 2, the date of Gandhi Jayanti, as its establishment day.
Siwan, which was carved out of Saran (it was a subdivision of Saran) in 1972, also adopted Dec 3, birth anniversary of Rajendra Prasad, the 1st President of India, as its creation date. However, Saran has an interesting history. On Aug 12, 1765, the 'Diwani' of Bihar, Bengal, and Odisha was handed over to the East India Company by the Moghul Emperor. 'Diwani' refers to the right to collect revenue and manage the administration of a territory.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
There were eight Sarakars (equivalent to revenue districts), including Saran and Champaran.
According to the Hindi version of the Saran gazetteer (Srijan), written by the then Saran DM Deepak Anand, modern Saran was part of Kaushal Pradesh. He mentioned that in 1866, the British separated Saran and Champaran. It remained part of the Patna division till 1829 and later was transferred to the Tirhut division in 1908 after its formation.
At present, Saran is part of the Saran division, which was formed on April 23, 1981.
Chhapra: Saran administration has constituted a 10-member committee, including officials and some others, to find out the date of its establishment, or to suggest a suitable one with historical or other importance to adopt. The responsibility of finding a suitable date has been given to the district development commissioner (DDC), Yatindra Kumar Pal along with nine other members, and the panel is hopeful of finding the district foundation's date soon.
Saran DM Aman Sameer, after joining at Chhapra, was seriously trying to locate its date of establishment with the purpose of celebrating the day. Finally, he has set up a committee to find out or decide on Saran's formation date.
Many districts in the state have their establishment dates that can be readily found, while some do not have specific, officially recorded dates of creation. Such districts have adopted a suitable date and celebrate the day every year.
Being one of the oldest districts in this state, Saran shares the same fate. Neither in the gazetteer of Saran nor in any govt records is its date of establishment mentioned.
East Champaran, which was carved out of Saran in 1869, has adopted Oct 2, the date of Gandhi Jayanti, as its establishment day. Siwan, which was carved out of Saran (it was a subdivision of Saran) in 1972, also adopted Dec 3, birth anniversary of Rajendra Prasad, the 1st President of India, as its creation date.
However, Saran has an interesting history. On Aug 12, 1765, the 'Diwani' of Bihar, Bengal, and Odisha was handed over to the East India Company by the Moghul Emperor. 'Diwani' refers to the right to collect revenue and manage the administration of a territory. There were eight Sarakars (equivalent to revenue districts), including Saran and Champaran.
According to the Hindi version of the Saran gazetteer (Srijan), written by the then Saran DM Deepak Anand, modern Saran was part of Kaushal Pradesh.
He mentioned that in 1866, the British separated Saran and Champaran. It remained part of the Patna division till 1829 and later was transferred to the Tirhut division in 1908 after its formation. At present, Saran is part of the Saran division, which was formed on April 23, 1981.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
7 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Five dangerous fault lines divide Trump and Zelensky
On August 18th Volodymyr Zelensky, Ukraine's president, will enter the White House to meet Donald Trump and discuss ending the war in Ukraine . For Mr Zelensky it is a perilous moment. Since Mr Trump met Vladimir Putin , Russia's president, in Alaska on August 15th, the American president has put intense pressure on Mr Zelensky, stating that he could 'end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to'. The leaders of Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Finland and the European Union fear the White House will sell out Ukraine and Europe, and are rushing to Washington to support Mr Zelensky. 'Never had so many European leaders at one time,' wrote Mr Trump. 'My great honour to host them!' What are the contours of the negotiations? In the past 48 hours there has been a swirl of speculation and public comments by Team Trump. It is hard to know what the president is thinking. But five critical issues for any peace deal are likely to be discussed: sequencing, territory, security guarantees, sanctions and recognition. In each case, America will struggle to bridge the demands of Mr Putin with those of Ukraine and Europe. Map Start with sequencing, where Mr Trump has already all but folded to Mr Putin, dropping his demand that Russia should agree to a ceasefire ahead of formal peace talks. The Kremlin is keen to negotiate while the fighting still rages. On Sunday Mr Zelensky insisted that Ukraine would not begin talks with Russia 'under the pressure of weapons'. But that position—already undercut by Mr Trump's cosy bilateral meeting with Mr Putin—can probably not withstand for long American pressure to force Ukraine to the table. If the discussion moves straight to 'final' peace talks, the second issue is terrain, or what Steve Witkoff, Mr Trump's envoy, calls 'land swaps'. Russia controls all of Crimea, which it seized and annexed in 2014. Mr Trump says that the peninsula will remain in Russian hands. But Russia also claims and has formally annexed four provinces in southern and eastern Ukraine which its troops do not entirely control (see map). One proposal, which Mr Witkoff hinted at on Sunday, is reportedly for Ukraine to cede Donetsk and Luhansk entirely to Russia, including the areas that it does not presently control—and which British defence intelligence suggests could require four-plus years and more than 1.9m casualties to take on present trends. In exchange Russia would freeze the front lines in Kherson and Zaporizhia. It would also withdraw from the pockets of territory that it controls in Sumy and Kharkhiv, two northern provinces. Much of this would be anathema to Ukraine. 'Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier,' Mr Zelensky has said. The terrain in question in Donetsk and to an extent in Luhansk, is especially important because it is heavily fortified by Ukraine's army. Without it Ukraine would find it harder to defend the rest of the country against future Russian attacks. How to make any agreement on borders binding leads to the third issue: security guarantees. America has suggested that Ukraine's membership of NATO (an aspiration the alliance promised in 2008 to fulfil and which is enshrined in the country's constitution) is off the table. Forswearing NATO membership for Ukraine has long been a key Russian demand. Yet on Sunday Mr Witkoff claimed that America could offer some kind of guarantee, modelled on NATO's Article 5, a mutual-defence clause. Marco Rubio, the secretary of state, put more emphasis on guarantees from Europe. 'It would be a very big move by the President if he were to offer a US commitment to a security guarantee. That will be his decision to make.' But the detail matters: in earlier talks, in 2022, Russia appeared to agree to international guarantees, but demanded a clause that would have given it a veto on any assistance to Ukraine. Closely related to that is the question of boots on the ground. Britain has said it could send troops to Ukraine as part of a peacekeeping force. But whether a European-only force is really credible is open to question. Very few troops have been promised for such a force, despite months of discussion. If America does not take part in a credible security guarantee European countries will push hard to at least secure promises about the supply of weapons from America. Mr Putin may try to push for limits on the flow of arms to Ukraine from the West. A priority for Russia is sanctions relief, the fourth issue. Mr Trump has used both threats of more financial warfare and the promise of future business deals as negotiating tools. On the one hand, he has threatened big importers of Russian oil, such as India, with swingeing tariffs. On the other, he and his team have dangled energy co-operation in the Arctic and other business partnerships. Russia's economy, which has weathered the impact of harsh Western sanctions since 2022, is beginning to feel the strain. Officials, who warn of a recession later this year, badly want the restrictions lifted. Here, Europe has some leverage. America would struggle to ease the economic strain on Russia without the full co-operation of Europe, which has a critical role in global banking, insurance, energy and shipping markets. Furthermore roughly two-thirds of the Russian central bank's foreign reserves that the West froze in 2022— thought to be worth more than $300bn—are are held in Brussels. Europe may be reluctant to release them if Mr Trump's deal weakens Ukraine. The final critical issue is recognition of any deal. Ukraine's constitution would require any 'land swap' to be put to a referendum, in which voters would almost certainly reject it. European leaders would be reluctant to endorse any deal that permanently recognises borders that have been altered by force. Whether America would do so for the sake of a peace deal is unclear. It is possible that America could recognise Russia's claim to Crimea, but not to other areas. Another fudge is for Europe to recognise the ceasefire line as a de-facto border without renouncing its view that Ukraine's pre-invasion border is the legitimate one. Mr Trump's meeting with Mr Zelensky and Ukraine's European allies will be a high-wire act of diplomacy. The brief, separate statements that Mr Trump and Mr Putin gave on August 15th, without taking questions from journalists, suggest that their plans are fragile. Mr Trump says he wants to bring the war to an end. For Ukraine and Europe the fear is that Mr Trump tries to force them to accept bad terms on the five key issues, and then threatens to abandon or punish Ukraine and Europe if they refuse. If this is how the talks turn out, Mr Putin will be the clear winner.
The Hindu
7 minutes ago
- The Hindu
From The Hindu, August 19, 1925: China's coastal traffic
Canton, Aug 18: The Chinese authorities have drawn up rules with regard to the coastal navigation, providing that steamers of any nationality except British and Japanese shall be allowed to run to and from any ports provided that they omit Hong Kong. All steamers entering that port must be inspected by a picket of Anti Imperialist Union. The export of foodstuffs or any other raw material from island will not be allowed.
Hindustan Times
37 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Zelensky, Trump keen on trilateral talks with Putin to bring end to war
WASHINGTON: President Volodymyr Zelensky and President Donald Trump expressed hope that Monday's critical talks with Ukrainian and European leaders at the White House could lead to trilateral talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin to bring an end to Russia's war on Ukraine. U.S. President Donald Trump, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and Finland's President Alexander Stubb walk during a meeting, amid negotiations to end the Russian war in Ukraine, at the White House in Washington, D.C., on August 18 (REUTERS) Monday's hastily assembled meeting comes after Trump met on Friday with Russian President Vladimir Putin and has said that the onus is now on Zelensky to agree to concessions that he said could end the war. 'If everything works out today, we'll have a trilat,' Trump said at the White House, referring to possible trilateral talks among Zelensky, Putin and Trump. 'We're going to work with Russia, we're going to work with Ukraine.' Zelensky also expressed openness to trilateral talks. 'We are ready for trilateral as president said,' Zelensky said. 'It's a good signal about trilateral. I think this is very good.' Ahead of the meeting, however, Trump suggested that Ukraine could not regain Crimea, which Russia annexed in 2014, setting off an armed conflict that led to its broader 2022 invasion. Trump first held one-on-one talks with Zelensky. The two were then scheduled to gather with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, French President Emmanuel Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Italian Premier Giorgia Meloni, Finnish President Alexander Stubb and Nato secretary-general Mark Rutte. The European leaders were left out of Trump's summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin last Friday, and they want to safeguard Ukraine and the continent from any widening aggression from Moscow. Many arrived at the White House with the explicit goal of protecting Ukraine's interests — a rare show of diplomatic force. By coming as a group, they hope to avoid debacles like Zelensky's February meeting in the Oval Office, where Trump chastised him for not showing enough gratitude for US military aid. Trump said on Monday that his country will be involved in providing security guarantees as part of a peace agreement on ending Russia's war. Trump said that while European countries are 'the first line of defence because they are there, they are Europe, we're going to help them out also. We'll be involved.' Meanwhile, Trump repeated his view that a ceasefire was not necessary to end the Russia-Ukraine war, echoing earlier comments that brought his position more in line with Russian President Vladimir Putin, who he met last week. 'I don't think you need a ceasefire,' Trump said, sitting alongside Zelensky at the White House. 'I know that it might be good to have, but I can also understand strategically why one country or the other wouldn't want it. You have a ceasefire and they rebuild and rebuild and rebuild and you know maybe they don't want that.' Russian attacks, including on an apartment block in Kharkiv city, killed 14 people across Ukraine, authorities said on Monday. The early-morning drone attack on Kharkiv reduced part of a five-storey residential building to rubble and sparked fires on at least three floors, governor Oleg Synegubov said on Telegram.
