Ong Beng Seng sentenced: A timeline of his court case involving Iswaran
He had helped to arrange for Mr Iswaran to be billed belatedly for a sum of S$5,700 for a business class flight ticket from Doha to Singapore.
Ong had invited Mr Iswaran on that trip, at Ong's expense, and Mr Iswaran asked to be billed for it months later, after the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) discovered Mr Iswaran's name on the flight manifest while investigating a separate case.
Here's how events unfolded.
Jul 12, 2023: CPIB announces investigation involving Mr Iswaran
CPIB announced that Mr Iswaran was assisting with an investigation into a case uncovered by the agency. It did not elaborate on the nature of the probe as investigations were ongoing.
Then-Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said separately that the CPIB investigation would require Mr Iswaran and other individuals to be interviewed by CPIB. The bureau sits under the Prime Minister's Office.
Mr Lee instructed Mr Iswaran to take a leave of absence until the investigation was completed, with others covering his portfolios.
According to then-Deputy Prime Minister Lawrence Wong, the case was "completely driven by CPIB from the beginning" and that there had been no public complaint.
Property tycoon Ong Beng Seng was later seen entering and leaving CPIB headquarters.
Jul 14, 2023: HPL announces Ong Beng Seng's arrest
Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), which Ong co-founded, announced that he had been given a "notice of arrest".
The company said in the filing on the Singapore Exchange that Ong was also asked by CPIB to provide information in relation to his interactions with Mr Iswaran.
Ong is widely credited with playing a key role in a deal struck in 2007 between the Singapore Tourism Board and then-Formula 1 boss Bernie Ecclestone to bring the first night race to Singapore.
Mr Iswaran was actively involved in the government's engagements with F1, making appearances at press conferences where announcements about the event were made.
Aug 2, 2023: Ministerial statement
Mr Lee gave a ministerial statement in parliament addressing the probe involving Mr Iswaran.
He revealed that Mr Iswaran had been interdicted from duty with a reduced pay of S$8,500 a month until further notice.
Jan 18, 2024: Mr Iswaran charged
Mr Iswaran was charged in court, with a defence team led by top lawyer, Senior Counsel Davinder Singh.
On its end, the prosecution was led by Chief Prosecutor Tan Kiat Pheng.
Mr Iswaran was given 27 charges: 24 charges of obtaining a valuable thing as a public servant, two charges of corruption and one charge of obstructing the course of justice.
He pleaded not guilty.
The corruption charges alleged that in September and December 2022, Iswaran obtained from Ong more than S$166,200 to advance Ong's business interests in relation to a contract between Singapore GP and the Singapore Tourism Board.
Shortly after he was charged, Mr Iswaran's resignation from all official roles was announced.
Mr Iswaran also said he would return all the money received in his salary as a minister and allowances as an MP, from the beginning of CPIB's investigations in July 2023.
Mar 25, 2024: Mr Iswaran gets new charges
Mr Iswaran was handed eight new charges. He was accused of obtaining S$19,000 worth of items, including alcohol and golf clubs, from Mr Lum Kok Seng, the managing director of Lum Chang Holdings.
It was the parent company of Lum Chang Building Contractors, which was involved in several government projects. It won a S$325 million contract in 2016 for works to Tanah Merah Station and existing viaducts.
Aug 12, 2024: The first tranche of trial dates was fixed for Mr Iswaran's case for Sep 10 to Sep 13, 2024.
Sep 5, 2024: The Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) announces that the trial will be moved to Sep 24, 2024.
An AGC spokesperson said both the prosecution and defence had requested the court to adjourn the start of the hearing.
Sep 24, 2024: Mr Iswaran pleads guilty
In a surprise move, Mr Iswaran pleaded guilty on what was to be the first day of his criminal trial.
Two corruption charges were amended to lesser charges under Section 165 of the Penal Code, which forbids all public servants from obtaining any valuable thing from someone involved with them in an official capacity.
Mr Iswaran pleaded guilty to four charges under Section 165 and one charge of obstruction of justice, with another 30 charges taken into consideration.
None of the eventual charges proceeded with or taken into consideration were corruption charges.
The prosecution sought six to seven months' jail, while the defence sought no more than eight weeks' jail. Sentencing was adjourned to Oct 3, 2024.
Oct 3, 2024: Mr Iswaran gets jail
The judge sentenced Iswaran to a jail term of 12 months, almost double what the prosecution had sought.
Mr Iswaran's lawyer asked for the sentence to be deferred to Oct 7, stressing that this was subject to the defence taking instructions from Mr Iswaran, alluding to the possibility of an appeal.
He remained out on bail of S$800,000.
Oct 4, 2024: Ong charged
A day after Mr Iswaran was convicted, Ong was charged with two offences – for abetting Mr Iswaran in obtaining gifts as a public servant, and with abetting him in the obstruction of justice.
Oct 7, 2024: Mr Iswaran surrenders to begin jail term
On Oct 7, 2024, Mr Iswaran surrendered at the State Courts ahead of the 4pm deadline to begin his 12-month jail term.
He released a statement on Facebook before that, saying he would not be appealing the sentence handed down by the court.
He said it was important to him that the public prosecutor amended the charges against him under the Prevention of Corruption Act to those under Section 165 of the Penal Code, for the acceptance of gifts by public servants.
"I accept that as a minister what I did was wrong under Section 165. I accept full responsibility for my actions and apologise unreservedly to all Singaporeans," he wrote.
"My family's well-being and the emotional toll on my loved ones of a long trial extending well into 2025, and possibly beyond, has also weighed heavily on me.
"The past 15 months have already been most difficult. With this decision, I hope that we can put the pain and anguish behind us, move forward and rebuild our lives together."
Oct 30, 2024: Ong allowed to leave Singapore
Ong was granted an application to leave the country, but he had to furnish an additional bail sum of S$800,000, which meant he was on bail for S$1.6 million.
He was allowed to head to places like London, Boston and Spain for purposes including medical treatment and business.
Feb 7, 2025: Ong reportedly battling bone marrow cancer
CNA reported that Ong was battling bone marrow cancer, with one source saying he had multiple myeloma.
This is a rare type of bone marrow cancer characterised by abnormal expansion of malignant plasma cells in the bone marrow.
Feb 28, 2025: Guilty plea date set for Ong
Following a pre-trial conference, Ong was given the date of Apr 2, 2025, to plead guilty. This later fell through and a new date was fixed for Jul 3, 2025.
Jul 2, 2025: Guilty plea date adjourned again
A day before Ong was set to plead guilty, the hearing was adjourned and changed to a pre-trial conference on Jul 8, 2025.
The judiciary said that both the prosecution and defence had asked for more time to file submissions on sentencing.
Jul 28, 2025: New guilty plea date fixed
After another pre-trial conference on Jul 28, 2025, a new date for Ong to plead guilty was fixed for Aug 4, 2025.
Aug 4, 2025: Ong pleads guilty
After months of pre-trial conferences and several adjournments, Ong pleaded guilty to abetting Mr Iswaran in obstructing the course of justice.
A second charge will be taken into consideration, for Ong instigating Mr Iswaran to obtain flights and a hotel stay from him. This was when Mr Iswaran knew Ong had business dealings linked with Mr Iswaran's official functions.
While most of what Ong had done was already known, as it was reported during Mr Iswaran's case, the details of his medical ailments were new.
The defence, led by Drew & Napier's Senior Counsel Cavinder Bull, sought a stiff fine for his client and called for judicial mercy.
This refers to the discretionary power that Singapore's courts have to impose a sentence that is more lenient than what the circumstances of an offence would otherwise warrant, in recognition of exceptional mitigating circumstances.
Ong had incurable medical conditions, including advanced multiple myeloma. Prison would expose Ong to potential infections that could kill him, said the defence.
The prosecution did not object to judicial mercy being exercised and asked for the maximum fine to be imposed instead.
Had it not been for Ong's medical conditions, his offence would have warranted eight weeks' jail, said Deputy Chief Prosecutor Christopher Ong, also a senior counsel.
The judge reserved her sentence, adjourning the case to Aug 15, 2025.
Aug 15, 2025: Ong sentenced to S$30,000 fine
Ong was fined S$30,000 for abetting Mr Iswaran in the obstruction of justice. The second charge was taken into consideration.
Principal District Judge Lee Lit Cheng agreed with the prosecution and defence that judicial mercy was justified, and said a jail sentence would carry a "high and increased risk" of endangering Ong's life.
In issuing the maximum fine, Judge Lee said this was in place of the jail term that the offence would ordinarily demand.
She added that a starting sentence of 15 weeks' jail would have been appropriate for Ong.
After a discount for pleading guilty rather than claiming trial, Judge Lee said the appropriate sentence for Ong was three months' jail. His medical condition was factored into reducing this to a fine, she added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
English, physics, chemistry: These tutors take O-level exams every year
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox (From left) Mr Linus Lin, Ms Ho Meng Yeng and Mr Ivan Lim pictured with their O-level certificates on Aug 5. SINGAPORE – When Mr Ivan Lim applied to work at tuition centre Keynote Learning Hub two years ago, he had an unusual job interview. 'I was asked, 'Would you mind taking the O-level exam as a private candidate?'' recalls the 38-year-old English tutor, a former international school teacher. 'It was a very strange interview question.' He is one of three tuition teachers at Keynote Learning who sit the Singapore-Cambridge General Certificate of Education Ordinary Level (GCE O-level) examination every year, usually in the subjects they teach. The practice is 'strongly encouraged' at the tuition centre at Ang Mo Kio for its full-time tutors, says Mr Linus Lin , 44, co-founder and head of department for science. Mr Lin himself has sat the O-level examinations 10 times since 2015, usually taking two to four subjects each time, while Ms Ho Meng Yeng, 45, another co-founder at Keynote Learning and its head of English, has been sitting the English language O-level paper since 2013, sometimes taking literature as well. The trio are taking their O-level exams again in 2025. The centre's other four tutors are part-time staff and do not take these exams. Keynote Learning offers group tuition, online and in-person, for primary and secondary school levels in English, science, mathematics and Chinese. Fees start at $240 for four weekly lessons for primary school pupils. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World Trump advises Ukraine's Zelensky to 'make a deal' with Russia after meeting Putin World Made-for-TV pageantry in Alaska as Trump brings Putin in from the cold Singapore Nowhere to run: Why Singapore needs to start protecting its coasts now Singapore Using nature, multi-use structures among solutions being studied to protect Singapore coastlines Life Switching careers in middle age and beyond: How these Singapore professionals did it Singapore HSA evaluating rapid urine test kits to enable faster detection of etomidate, found in Kpods Asia Move over, Labubu – Chiikawa is the new craze in Hong Kong Choosing the right kind of pen The idea to take the exams originated from Ms Ho even before Keynote Learning was launched in 2016. She and Mr Lin, whom she influenced in this regard, have been friends since the early 2000s. Ms Ho, a former Ministry of Education secondary school teacher, took the English and literature O-level exams in 2013 because she wanted to be 'really in touch' with the syllabus changes that year. She was working as a private tutor by then, and was not briefed by education authorities on the changes, unlike school teachers. After 12 years of taking O-level papers and having had the jitters while waiting for the oral exam, she knows how to advise her own students, some of whom have told her they 'blank out' during the exam, or get palpitations when they feel anxious. She guides them on how to stay calm during the oral exam, by teaching them square breathing, also known as box breathing. This deep-breathing relaxation technique involves inhaling, holding one's breath and exhaling for equal counts, typically for four seconds each time. Ms Ho Meng Yeng, a former Ministry of Education secondary school teacher, took the English and literature O-level exams in 2013 because she wanted to be 'really in touch' with the syllabus changes that year. ST PHOTO: MARK CHEONG She has views on the type of pen to use because 'handwriting matters'. She recommends using a pen with a fine 0.38mm nib for English Paper 2 – all the better to cram more words in the space provided in the exam booklet – and a 0.5mm ballpoint pen that flows well for the masses of writing required in Paper 1. Going into battle together Mainly, the tutors say they take the O-level exams repeatedly to empathise more fully with their charges. Working through 10-year series, compilations of national examination papers like the O- and A-levels, pales in comparison to the 'live action' of the exam hall. Mr Lin, who has been a tuition teacher since his 20s, says: 'I experience the change in the way the questions are designed and phrased over the years. The 10-year series is helpful but the difference is doing it at your own pace and taking the exam under time pressure. I can understand what my students are going through.' 'After the exam is over, it's easier to discuss the paper and how we have done. I can tell lots of stories afterwards and remind them not to make mistakes. It's also useful to teach them about handling anxiety and time management,' he says, describing himself and his students as 'war mates'. Mr Lim, who took the English paper in 2023 and 2024, adds: 'The first time I took the O-level paper was an eye-opener. I thought, 'Most educators are war theorists.'' His right hand ached badly after the writing-heavy Paper 1 in the first English language exam he took, which features Situational Writing and Continuous Writing. Mr Ivan Lim took the English paper in 2023 and 2024. ST PHOTO: MARK CHEONG After decades out of school, he was asked to respond to a statement like 'All you need to succeed in life is a positive attitude'. Mr Lim realised then that the O levels are 'quite demanding in terms of students' maturity'. 'I doubt I was so introspective at 16,' he reflects. The grades a tuition teacher gets The three tutors' result certificates, seen by The Straits Times, are a sea of A grades, mostly A1s (75 per cent and higher), followed by A2s (70 to 74 per cent). Their grades dip, sometimes drastically, when they embark on what they call 'experiments' and 'challenges'. For instance, in 2020, Ms Ho decided to 'leave all the difficult questions blank', resulting in a C6 grade, which ranges from 50 to 54 per cent. 'It was like a wake-up call for the very weak students at the beginning of the following year,' she says. Mr Lin has tackled different self-imposed 'challenges' in the 10 years he has taken the exams, often in response to students' questions. In 2016, he took the English paper in addition to the two subjects he teaches, physics and chemistry. 'In science, we need to have a good command of English to express our answers well. English was my worst subject in school. I hope it can be a message to my students that as long as you're willing to continue to improve, you can still achieve,' says Mr Lin, who got an A2 that year for English. His worst English grade as a student was C6. Mr Linus Lin once took a combined social studies and history paper to see what it was like, since social studies did not exist as an O-level subject when he was young. ST PHOTO: MARK CHEONG In 2020, besides English, physics and chemistry, he took the biology O-level exam, a subject he had never studied in school, because his students often ask him if physics or biology is 'easier'. (He found the latter easier to score well in.) While he usually does not study for the exams since he teaches the subjects, he spent several days mugging for the biology paper, for which he got a B3. He once took a combined social studies and history paper to see what it was like, since social studies did not exist as an O-level subject when he was young. The O-level examination fees for private candidates differ according to subject and citizenship. For example, Singapore citizens pay $105 each for subjects such as English and chemistry, and $100 for a humanities subject like combined social studies and history. While Keynote Learning foots the bill for the subjects the tutors teach and take exams in, Mr Lin paid his own fees for subjects he does not teach, like English and humanities. Mr Lin, who has been mistaken for an invigilator during one of his papers, says: 'Every time I take the exams, I feel happy because it's like I am 16 again.'
AsiaOne
4 hours ago
- AsiaOne
Johor drivers plan to form association over crackdown by Singapore on cross-border ride-hail services, Malaysia News
Ride-hailing and chartered car drivers in Johor are planning to form an association following the recent crackdown by Singapore's Land Transport Authority (LTA) over illegal cross-border services. Sin Chew Daily reported that the goal of the organisation is to get the attention of Malaysian Transport Minister Anthony Loke Siew Fook towards the drivers' plight. One driver, surnamed Lim, told the Malaysian media outlet that documents had already been submitted to the Registrar of Societies to form the association, and that at least 1,000 of the over 4,000 estimated cross-border drivers in Johor had expressed their support. While agreeing that many drivers do operate cross-border services illegally, Lim highlighted the importance of the service to Johor's tourism industry, and added that drivers were willing to comply with regulations should a pathway be provided for them to offer cross-border rides legally. "Once the cross-border transport service is legalised, then we can negotiate with Singapore," Lim said. "The purpose of forming the association is to gather feedback and collective strength to negotiate with the relevant ministries and accelerate the implementation of favourable and friendly policies." [[nid:721305]] Currently, offenders who illegally provide ride-hailing services may be fined up to $3,000 and/or be jailed for up to six months in Singapore. Their vehicles may also be forfeited. Sin Chew also spoke to a tour operator surnamed Lee, who has been a cross-border driver for 15 years and has been detained by enforcement officers four times since 2017. He said: "We hope that through the association, we can meet with Transport Minister Anthony Loke and Johor Menteri Besar (chief minister) Onn Hafiz bin Ghazi to present our ideas to them." Onn Hafiz previously posted on Facebook on Aug 1 that he had discussed a proposal for cross-border e-hailing services during a meeting with Singapore's Acting Transport Minister Jeffrey Siow. But the LTA said that no decision had been made, adding: "While we are open to ideas to improve the cross-border commuting experience, we would like to clarify that LTA has no plan to fully liberalise cross-border point-to-point transport via ride-hail services." Instead, the LTA added that it was exploring ways to enhance its existing cross-border taxi scheme, which allows a licensed fleet of up to 200 taxis from Singapore and Johor Bahru each to ferry passengers between the cities. Singapore-registered vehicles seized in Johor Meanwhile, Johor's Road Transport Department (JPJ) recently announced that it had seized four Singapore-registered vehicles, The Star reported. "The drivers were ferrying tourists from Singapore and other nationalities into Johor during ongoing operations in Johor Bahru starting on Aug 9," said JPJ's director-general Aedy Fadly Ramli. The drivers, who are Singaporeans in their 30s or 40s, did not possess the relevant permit to operate e-hailing services, nor did they have Malaysian road tax or public service vehicle registration, he said. When asked if the seizures were due to LTA's recent crackdown, Aedy Fadly said: "That is the LTA's duty. This is carried out by JPJ with a different modus operandi, not as a reaction to LTA's operations." [[nid:720818]] drimac@
CNA
4 hours ago
- CNA
Trump says he does not believe Xi will act on Taiwan
WASHINGTON: United States President Donald Trump said on Friday (Aug 15) that Chinese President Xi Jinping told him China would not invade Taiwan while Trump is in office. Trump made the comments in an interview with Fox News, ahead of talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin over Moscow's invasion of Ukraine. "I will tell you, you know, you have a very similar thing with President Xi of China and Taiwan, but I don't believe there's any way it's going to happen as long as I'm here. We'll see," Trump said during an interview on Fox News' "Special Report". "He told me, 'I will never do it as long as you're president.' President Xi told me that, and I said, 'Well, I appreciate that,' but he also said, 'But I am very patient, and China is very patient.'," Trump said. The Chinese Embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Trump and Xi held their first confirmed call of Trump's second presidential term in June. Trump also said in April that Xi had called him but did not specify when that call took place. China views Taiwan as its own territory and has vowed to "reunify" with the democratic and separately governed island, by force if necessary. Taiwan strongly objects to China's sovereignty claims. Although Washington is Taiwan's main arms supplier and international backer, the US - like most countries - has no formal diplomatic ties with the island.
