logo
Trump stumbled on Epstein, and Rupert Murdoch has pounced

Trump stumbled on Epstein, and Rupert Murdoch has pounced

Trump needs these viewers to help him stay in power – aided by the fawning Fox talent who are so attuned to his cause that many have been recruited to senior roles at the White House, including Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth.
Murdoch also needs these viewers if he wants to remain such a rich and powerful political force in the US.
It means Murdoch has had to draw careful battle lines between his own media fiefdoms.
News Corp offered the full-throated defence of the WSJ story: 'We have full confidence in the rigor and accuracy of our reporting, and will vigorously defend against any lawsuit,' it said.
The WSJ doubled down, reporting that Attorney General Pam Bondi informed President Donald Trump in May that his name appeared multiple times in the government's files on Epstein.
The message from inside News Corp is Rupert and Lachlan Murdoch are determined not to cave in to Trump and will go to court if necessary.
Loading
The Washington Post quoted Rupert telling associates: 'I'm 94 years old, and I will not be intimidated.'
Meanwhile at Fox, the lawsuit and allegations have warranted a tepid mention at best.
Australian columnist Miranda Divine, now at News Corp's Republican mouthpiece, the New York Post, described the WSJ reports as a 'nothingburger'.
And if this delicate dance can be maintained, it will be lucrative for Murdoch.
Both News Corp and Fox shares hit record highs in February, just weeks after Trump's inauguration.
And there was no hiding Trump's role in the success of Fox News – the most profitable Fox Corp business – when Lachlan presented its most recent quarterly results in May.
'Nowhere is Fox's leadership more evident than Fox News,' he told analysts and investors. Ratings were up 30 per cent for the network in April, and it clinched top spot on prime-time ratings last week over mainstream networks such as CBS and ABC.
This is a feat unheard of for a cable news network. 'The momentum that we're seeing within Fox News, obviously driven first by really sort of record-setting audience and share, that's flown through nicely to the revenue line,' Lachlan said.
The problem for Rupert is that pandering to his Fox audience means pandering to Trump, and he has never been a fan of Trump's political aspirations.
Murdoch publicly supported other candidates during the 2016 campaign before embracing Trump when his candidacy became inevitable.
He has tolerated Trump's White House, and maintained close ties, but quickly tried to move the Republican base on to fresh leadership after the 2020 election loss.
Murdoch said at the time: 'We want to make Trump a non-person.'
That manoeuvre ended badly when Fox's acceptance of the result led to viewers defecting in droves to channels more loyal to Trump's claims that the election was stolen.
It promised to be a financial disaster and Fox scrambled back into favour with an about-face supporting the stolen election theory. It is still counting the cost.
In 2023, Fox paid Dominion Voting Systems $US787 million to settle claims the network promoted lies about the 2020 presidential election.
It still faces a multibillion-dollar lawsuit from another voting systems provider, Smartmatic, which will go to court next year if Fox does not make an offer to settle.
For Murdoch, the Epstein scandal serves as another opportunity to test Trump's hold on the Republican Party, and it should not prove as costly as the $US10 billion Trump headline suggests.
A quick look at the details of his case reveals problems, starting with the fact that it appears to fall over at the first hurdle of failing to notify the WSJ of the lawsuit at least five days before filing it.
Loading
But that is the least of Trump's issues.
'The complaint is full of sound and fury but lacks legal merit,' Leonard M. Niehoff, a University of Michigan law professor who specialises in media law, told The Washington Post.
'It shouldn't intimidate a news organisation with good lawyers. The Wall Street Journal has those.'
The high hurdles for Trump include having to meet the 'actual malice' standard which means proving the WSJ knew the information they published was false.
Ironically, this is what Fox was accused of doing in promoting Trump's stolen election claim in 2020.
That legal battle taught Murdoch a lesson on the damage that can be done by the legal discovery process, which produced embarrassing and costly revelations – including the contempt both Murdoch and Fox held for Trump's stolen election claims and the man himself.
A text surfaced from Tucker Carlson – a Fox network star at that time – referring to Trump saying, 'I hate him passionately'.
If Trump continues to pursue this case, the legal discovery process on his relationship with Epstein could further inflame his support base.
A clear opportunity to fatally damage Trump's political standing with the Epstein scandal could be the avenue Murdoch is looking to exploit.
And if it doesn't damage Trump? Both men are ruthlessly transactional and have made up before.
'We don't want to antagonise Trump further,' Murdoch said in a memo uncovered by the Dominion case.
Murdoch explained in a later deposition relating to that matter: 'He had a very large following, and they were probably mostly viewers of Fox, so it would have been stupid.'
And we know Trump's proven ability to chicken out and distract.
Loading
As he posted to Truth Social followers this week, survival comes first.
'Winning is important, but survival is even more important. If you don't survive, you don't get to fight the next battle.'
Wise words for both sides as his latest battle with Murdoch gathers a head of steam.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Here's what you should know about US President Donald Trump's new tariffs
Here's what you should know about US President Donald Trump's new tariffs

7NEWS

time13 minutes ago

  • 7NEWS

Here's what you should know about US President Donald Trump's new tariffs

US President Donald Trump just set new tariffs for countries across the globe, solidifying his extreme break with America's long-standing trade policy. The new tariff regime will not go into effect Friday, as expected. Instead, the tariffs will be implemented on August 7 to give US Customs and Border Protection sufficient time to make the necessary changes to collect the new duties. The 'universal' tariff for goods coming into the US will remain at 10 per cent, the same level that was implemented on April 2. But that 10 per cent rate will apply only to countries with which the US has a trade surplus – countries to which the US exports more than it imports. That applies to most countries, a senior administration official said. A 15 per cent rate will serve as the new tariff floor for countries with which the US has a trade deficit. About 40 countries will pay that new 15 per cent tariff. That tariff will be lower for many of those nations than the April 2 'reciprocal' tariffs, but it will be higher for a handful. More than a dozen countries have tariff rates that are higher than 15 per cent, either because they agreed to a trade framework with the US or because Trump sent their leaders a letter dictating a higher tariff. The official said those countries have among the highest trade deficits with the US. The new trade policy also establishes a 40 per cent additional penalty on so-called transshipments. Those are goods that are shipped from a high-tariff country to a low-tariff country and then re-shipped to the US. The US already imposes penalties and fines for goods that Customs and Border Protection agents deem to be transshipped. The 40 per cent will come on top of that, a senior administration official said. Trump signed an executive order increasing the tariff rate on Canadian goods that aren't exempt from the USMCA free-trade agreement from 25 per cent to 35 per cent. The higher tariff rate will go into effect on Friday local time. A senior Trump administration official described conversations with Canada surrounding fentanyl and tariffs on products in their country as less constructive than with Mexico, which received a 90-day pause on higher tariffs. Ontario Premier Doug Ford said the higher tariff rate is 'concerning,' especially with other tariffs still in place. And the president and CEO of Canada's Chamber of Commerce called the statement released by the White House tonight 'more fact-less tariff turbulence.' Changes in tariffs On April 2, President Donald Trump declared a US economic emergency and announced tariffs of at least 10 per cent across all countries, with rates even higher for 60 countries or trading blocs that have a high trade deficit with the US. He deemed it 'Liberation Day'. Tonight, the president announced adjustments to some of those reciprocal tariffs ahead of his midnight deadline. Here's what is different: Angola: 32 per cent to 15 per cent Bangladesh: 37 per cent to 20 per cent Bosnia and Herzegovina: 35 per cent to 30 per cent Botswana: 37 per cent to 15 per cent Brunei: 24 per cent to 25 per cent Cambodia: 49 per cent to 19 per cent Cameroon: 11 per cent to 15 per cent Chad: 13 per cent to 15 per cent Côte d`Ivoire: 21 per cent to 15 per cent Democratic Republic of the Congo: 11 per cent to 15 per cent Equatorial Guinea: 13 per cent to 15 per cent European Union: 20 per cent to 15 per cent (for most goods) Falkland Islands: 41 per cent to 10 per cent Fiji: 32 per cent to 15 per cent Guyana: 38 per cent to 15 per cent India: 26 per cent to 25 per cent Indonesia: 32 per cent to 19 per cent Iraq: 39 per cent to 35 per cent Israel: 17 per cent to 15 per cent Japan: 24 per cent to 15 per cent Jordan: 20 per cent to 15 per cent Kazakhstan: 27 per cent to 25 per cent Laos: 48 per cent to 40 per cent Lesotho: 50 per cent to 15 per cent Libya: 31 per cent to 30 per cent Liechtenstein: 37 per cent to 15 per cent Madagascar: 47 per cent to 15 per cent Malawi: 17 per cent to 15 per cent Malaysia: 24 per cent to 19 per cent Mauritius: 40 per cent to 15 per cent Moldova: 31 per cent to 25 per cent Mozambique: 16 per cent to 15 per cent Myanmar: 44 per cent to 40 per cent Namibia: 21 per cent to 15 per cent Nauru: 30 per cent to 15 per cent Nigeria: 14 per cent to 15 per cent North Macedonia: 33 per cent to 15 per cent Pakistan: 29 per cent to 19 per cent Philippines: 17 per cent to 19 per cent Serbia: 37 per cent to 35 per cent South Korea: 30 per cent to 15 per cent Sri Lanka: 44 per cent to 20 per cent Switzerland: 31 per cent to 39 per cent Taiwan: 32 per cent to 20 per cent Thailand: 36 per cent to 19 per cent Tunisia: 28 per cent to 25 per cent Vanuatu: 22 per cent to 15 per cent Vietnam: 46 per cent to 20 per cent Zambia: 17 per cent to 15 per cent Zimbabwe: 18 per cent to 15 per cent

Aussie activists ‘psychologically brutalised' by Israeli soldiers
Aussie activists ‘psychologically brutalised' by Israeli soldiers

Sky News AU

time35 minutes ago

  • Sky News AU

Aussie activists ‘psychologically brutalised' by Israeli soldiers

A pair of Aussie activists have touched down in Sydney after they spent several weeks in Israeli Defence Forces custody after a failed mission to supply food and aid to the starving people of Gaza. Journalist and filmmaker Tan Safi and activist Robert Martin were part of a 21-strong crew that set sail aboard the 'Handala' as part of a humanitarian mission. Since Israel began military operations in Gaza in October 2023, 60,000 Palestinians have been killed in a campaign that prominent Israeli humanitarian organisations labelled as 'genocide' on Monday. While speaking to the media at Sydney Airport on Friday morning, the pair said they were 'psychologically brutalised' by their captors. 'We were in international waters at the time, and we were taken completely against our will and just brutalised psychologically in every way,' Safi said. 'We were on a hunger and water strike, but the only time they offered food was once and it was a tomato about (the size of a golf ball),' she said. In a video published on Sunday, Safi said she had been 'abducted' by the Israeli military, and urged supporters to 'put pressure on the Australian government to sanction Israel'. The Freedom Flotilla departed from Syracuse, Italy, on July 13, fully equipped with humanitarian supplies, en route to Gaza. Free Gaza Australia, the Australian branch of the Freedom Flotilla Coalition (FFC) that organised the expedition, said the cargo of the Handala 'carried desperately needed lifesaving humanitarian cargo, including baby formula, food, and medical supplies, to the Palestinian people in Gaza'. At about midnight on July 26, the Handala was intercepted by the Israeli military about 80km miles off the coast of Gaza – an area that is considered to be international waters. Footage shows the moment Israeli troops boarded the flotilla, brandishing assault weapons and pointing them in the direction of flotilla activists who sat in the middle of their ship with hands outstretched. The crew had agreed before their arrest they would engage in a hunger strike in solidarity with Palestinians. Every crew member has now been deported to their country of residence or are in the process of repatriation. In a social media post on Friday morning, Free Gaza Australia said plans were already under way for another expedition to Palestine. 'Robert and Tan are home and we're already preparing the next Freedom Flotilla boat to break the siege of Gaza. We sail until Palestine is free,' it said. Allegations have also surfaced of other Freedom Flotilla crew members being abused by IDF soldiers. The FFC said US crew member Chris Smalls was beaten, kicked and choked by at least seven IDF soldiers as he and the other crew members were being detained in the only physical display of brutality catalogued by members of the Flotilla. Among the activists was Greta Thunberg, who has since been sent back to Sweden by Israeli authorities. Originally published as Aussie activists 'psychologically brutalised' by Israeli soldiers

Australia ‘looking good' after tariffs held at 10 per cent
Australia ‘looking good' after tariffs held at 10 per cent

Sky News AU

time43 minutes ago

  • Sky News AU

Australia ‘looking good' after tariffs held at 10 per cent

Former Trump trade adviser Kelly Ann Shaw shared her views on how Australia has lucked out in remaining at a 10 per cent tariff rate. 'Australia is looking pretty good right now compared to other governments, and I think you should be feeling very good about where you landed in terms of this new us tariff structure,' Ms Ann Shaw told Sky News Australia. 'This is one of the most interesting dynamics in the world, you have two of the world's largest economies, both nuclear powers, both who have expressed an interest in not decoupling but also de-risking from one another from strategic supply chains. 'I do think that where the US-China relationship is right now is somewhere between a 30-55 per cent average tariff rate is likely where it's going to stay for the foreseeable future."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store