Who is Brad Nall? Des Moines man seen tearing down anti-Trump posters in viral video launches GoFundMe
Viral video
The incident took place on a bridge in Des Moines, Iowa, where a group of protesters had displayed signs equating President Donald Trump with Adolf Hitler. In the viral clip, Nall is seen aggressively tearing down the posters while the protesters shout at him and hurl expletives. At one point, he appears to push one of the women. As he finishes ripping down the signs, he walks away laughing and heads toward his pickup truck.
The video quickly spread across social media platforms, garnering millions of views. Supporters of Trump praised Nall's actions, calling him a 'patriot,' while critics condemned his behavior as aggressive and potentially criminal.
One person wrote on X, 'Whoever the gentleman is in Des Moines, Iowa, thank you for tearing down their signs; if they can put them up illegally, then you can take the signs down.'
Another commented, 'Nice to see patriots taking action."
A third person wrote, 'Disgusting.'
Another person commented, 'He should be arrested for assault.'
Also Read: Hillary Clinton says she'd nominate Trump for Nobel Peace Prize on one condition: 'My goal here is…'
GoFundMe launched
Following the viral attention, Nall launched a GoFundMe campaign titled 'Justice for Fed Up Patriot,' which was later taken down by the platform. He then created a second fundraiser called 'Support for Patriot Standing for Trump.'
In his message on the page, Nall wrote, 'I am just an ordinary working man who took a stand against people who want to try to slander President Trump's name and malign him with Adolf Hitler. I did not harm anyone, but I got maced as I was walking away. I'm sure they will pursue some kind of charges. I see these kinds of ridiculous signs everyday and I just got fed up with the lies. I work hard for my family and feel like our President is a good person who is on our side, America's side for once.'
He added, "I've lived and worked in Des Moines my whole life. Protests happen all the time. But illegally covering the bridges in ridiculous propaganda comparing Trump to Hitler is crossing the line. I didn't put my hands on anyone. I took the signs down. They maced me as I was walking away. Calling me a pedophile over and over like deranged lunatics. They're harassing me, my job, and my family as well as completely innocent people who had old phone numbers and addresses of mine because the lunatics were trying to doxx me. Now they're trying to sue me in civil court, because there wasn't cause for a criminal charge, and they are insane with hatred and brainwashing. Thank you for your support! I appreciate all the messages! God Bless.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
12 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Three Republican-led states to send hundreds of National Guard troops to Washington
Three Republican-led states said Saturday (August 16, 2025) that they were deploying hundreds of National Guard members to the nation's capital to bolster the Trump administration's effort to overhaul policing in Washington through a federal crackdown on crime and homelessness. West Virginia said it was deploying 300 to 400 Guard troops, while South Carolina pledged 200 and Ohio says it will send 150 in the coming days, marking a significant escalation of the federal intervention. The moves came as protesters pushed back on federal law enforcement and National Guard troops fanning out in the heavily Democratic city following U.S. President Donald Trump's executive order federalising local police forces and activating about 800 District of Columbia National Guard members. By adding outside troops to the existing D.C. Guard deployment and federal law enforcement presence, Mr. Trump is exercising even tighter control over the city. It's a power play that the President has justified as an emergency response to crime and homelessness, even though city officials have noted that violent crime is lower than it was during Mr. Trump's first term in office. National Guard members have played a limited role in the federal intervention so far, and it's unclear why additional troops are needed. They have been patrolling at landmarks like the National Mall and Union Station and assisting law enforcement with tasks including crowd control. The Republican Governors of the three states said they were sending hundreds of troops at the request of the Trump administration. West Virginia Governor Patrick Morrisey said he directed 300 to 400 Guard troops to head to Washington, adding that the state 'is proud to stand with President Trump in his effort to restore pride and beauty to our nation's capital.' South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster said he authorised the deployment of 200 of his state's National Guardsmen to help law enforcement in Washington at the Pentagon's request. He noted that if a hurricane or other natural disaster strikes, they would be recalled. Ohio Governor Mike DeWine said he would send 150 military police from the Guard to 'carry out presence patrols and serve as added security' and that they were expected to arrive in the coming days. His statement said Army Secretary Dan Driscoll requested the troops. The activations suggest the Trump administration sees the need for additional manpower after the president personally played down the need for Washington to hire more police officers. A protest against Mr. Trump's intervention drew scores to Dupont Circle on Saturday (August 16, 2025) before a march to the White House, about 1.5 miles away. Demonstrators assembled behind a banner that said, 'No fascist takeover of D.C.,' and some in the crowd held signs saying, 'No military occupation.' Morgan Taylor, one of the protest organisers, said they were hoping to spark enough backlash to Mr. Trump's actions that the administration would be forced to pull back on its crime and immigration agenda. 'It's hot, but I'm glad to be here. It's good to see all these people out here,' she said. 'I can't believe that this is happening in this country at this time.' Fuelling the protests were concerns about Mr. Trump overreaching and that he had used crime as a pretext to impose his will on Washington. John Finnigan, 55, was taking a bike ride when he ran into the protest in downtown Washington. The real estate construction manager who has lived in the capital for 27 years said Mr. Trump's moves were 'ridiculous' because crime is down. 'Hopefully, some of the mayors and some of the residents will get out in front of it and try and make it harder for it to happen in other cities,' Mr. Finnigan said. Jamie Dickstein, a 24-year-old teacher, said she was 'very uncomfortable and worried' for the safety or her students given the 'unmarked officers of all types' now roaming Washington and detaining people. Ms. Dickstein said she turned out to the protest with friends and relatives to 'prevent a continuous domino effect going forward with other cities.' Federal agents have appeared in some of the city's most highly trafficked neighbourhoods, garnering a mix of praise, pushback and alarm from local residents and leaders across the country. City leaders, who are obliged to cooperate with Mr. Trump's order under the federal laws that direct the district's local governance, have sought to work with the administration, though they have bristled at the scope of the president's takeover. On Friday (August 15, 2025), the administration reversed course on an order that aimed to place the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration as an 'emergency police commissioner' after the district's top lawyer sued. After a court hearing, Mr. Trump's attorney general, Pam Bondi, issued a memo directing the Metropolitan Police Department to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement regardless of any city law. City officials say they are evaluating how to best comply. In his order Monday (August 11, 2025), Mr. Trump declared an emergency due to the 'city government's failure to maintain public order.' He said that impeded the 'federal government's ability to operate efficiently to address the nation's broader interests without fear of our workers being subjected to rampant violence.' In a letter to city residents, Mayor Muriel Bowser, a Democrat, wrote that 'our limited self-government has never faced the type of test we are facing right now.' She added that if Washington residents stick together, 'we will show the entire nation what it looks like to fight for American democracy — even when we don't have full access to it.'
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
12 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Explained: Why Donbas is central to Putin's Ukraine peace offer with Trump
Russian President Vladimir Putin has made the future of Ukraine's eastern Donbas region the centrepiece of a possible peace deal with US President Donald Trump. At the Alaska summit on Friday, he reportedly pressed for Ukrainian withdrawal from Donetsk and Luhansk in exchange for halting further advances and freezing the frontline. But Kyiv and its allies have rejected the demand, saying Ukraine's territorial integrity cannot be compromised. Here's why Donbas is central to the negotiations and what is at stake. What's the latest According to The Guardian, Putin told Trump that Russia would agree to halt offensives in southern Ukraine's Kherson and Zaporizhzhia if Kyiv ceded Donetsk and Luhansk. Luhansk is almost fully under Russian control, but parts of Donetsk, including the strategic cities of Kramatorsk and Sloviansk, remain in Ukrainian hands. These are heavily fortified positions that Ukraine has defended at high cost. After the meeting, Trump told European leaders that he supported the plan, The New York Times reported citing officials. He is expected to present the proposal to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during his visit to Washington. Putin described the summit as 'sincere and substantive', according to Russia's TASS news agency. Why Donbas matters to Putin The Donbas (short for Donets Basin) is Ukraine's industrial heartland. It stretches across the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, bordering Russia. The area is rich in coal and heavy industry, making it critical to Ukraine's economy. Control over Donbas would give Russia a near-complete grip on eastern Ukraine and deprive Kyiv of an energy powerhouse. The region also carries deep strategic value. Analysts at the Institute for the Study of War describe Donetsk as a 'fortress belt', where Ukrainian forces have built layered defences since 2014, reported The Independent. These include trenches, bunkers, minefields, and fortified urban zones that have blunted Russia's advances for over a decade. Elina Beketova of the Centre for European Policy Analysis told The Independent that losing Donbas would be 'catastrophic' for Ukraine, as it could shift the front 80km west and open a direct path for Russia to advance towards Kharkiv, Poltava, and Dnipro. Backstory: Donbas under fire since 2014 The battle for Donbas is not new. Russia first moved into the region in 2014 after annexing Crimea. Moscow-backed separatists declared the so-called Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics, sparking a long-running conflict. By the time of Russia's full-scale invasion in 2022, Moscow already controlled more than a third of eastern Ukraine. According to Reuters, Russia holds almost all of Luhansk and about 75 per cent of Donetsk today. Ukrainian forces retain control over approximately 6,600 sq km in Donetsk, where battles remain intense. Despite Russia's gains, Kyiv has used fortified cities and terrain to hold back advances. Trump's shifting stance Trump's position after Alaska marked a shift. According to Reuters, Trump told Zelenskyy Putin had offered to freeze most frontlines if Ukraine ceded Donetsk. He argued that a direct peace deal would be more durable than a ceasefire, writing on Truth Social: 'The best way to end the horrific war … is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement.' This aligns closely with Moscow's narrative. Russia has long insisted that Kyiv concede territory and abandon its Nato membership ambitions. While Putin publicly praised the talks, Kremlin aides signalled no readiness to compromise on core demands. How Ukraine reacted Zelenskyy has repeatedly vowed that Ukraine 'will never leave' Donbas. He warned that ceding the region would allow Russia to use it as a springboard for future offensives. 'Donbas for the Russians is a springboard for a future new offensive,' he said, stressing that giving up fortified positions would undermine Ukraine's security. Ukraine has also stressed that conceding land would violate its constitution and embolden Russia. Zelenskyy has insisted any settlement must include robust security guarantees, with Western backing, to deter renewed aggression. What is European allies' position? European leaders have rejected territorial concessions. On Saturday, they reiterated that Ukraine's borders must not be altered through force. Germany's foreign minister said European partners might join Monday's White House meeting, while Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer warned of fresh sanctions on Russia if fighting continues. Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney also welcomed signals from Trump on security guarantees, calling them 'essential to any just and lasting peace'. European leaders, however, have cautioned that Ukraine's right to seek Nato membership cannot be restricted, another sticking point for Moscow. What's next Zelenskyy is expected to meet Trump in Washington to respond to Putin's proposal. A three-way summit has not been agreed, but European leaders are watching closely. Any peace framework will hinge on whether Kyiv can secure ironclad guarantees and resist pressure to cede territory. For Ukraine, holding Donbas is about more than land. It is about defending a strategic shield, protecting its industrial base, and preventing Russia from advancing deeper into the country. For Putin, gaining full control of Donbas would cement Russia's grip on eastern Ukraine and strengthen his hand in any future negotiations.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
12 minutes ago
- First Post
Of jets, handshakes and smiles: How Putin steamrollered Trump and deflated his deal-making hyperbole
Donald Trump called the Alaska summit hoping for a breakthrough he could tout for his domestic audience and impress upon the Nobel committee. Instead, he was bulldozed by the Russian president Westerners often struggle to grasp Russian psychology. As biographer Richard Lourie observes in his book Putin: 'America's experts know Russia, they just don't know Russians.' That gap becomes sharper when the subject is Vladimir Putin, a former KGB spy trained to mask his fragility and exploit the vulnerabilities of his opponents. This ignorance was on full display in Alaska, where US President Donald Trump hosted Putin for peace talks on Ukraine. The summit was choreographed as a display of American might:B-2 bombers thundered overhead and F-22s lined the runway as Trump clasped Putin's hand with a practised tug meant to project dominance—as though optics alone could substitute for substance. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But for Putin—an intelligence veteran skilled in reading and exploiting weakness—the theatrics must have bordered on the absurd. Each flyover, each staged handshake, and each show of strength would have highlighted Washington's insecurity. True strength does not need to be advertised—it imposes itself. Trump's 'show of power' revealed the innate American anxiety, and his pompous vanity showcased the inner decay. Behind closed doors, the optics gave way to reality. For nearly three hours the two men spoke, but when they emerged, Trump appeared like a surrendered general, admitting, 'We didn't get there.' His self-proclaimed reputation as master dealmaker was punctured, and he conceded, 'There's no deal till there is a deal.' Putin, by contrast, walked away without ceding an inch. Moscow gained everything it sought: An end to Putin's diplomatic isolation in the Western world, the optics of equality with the president of the world's sole superpower, and the widening of cracks in transatlantic relations, besides Ukraine being pushed further into despair—excluded from the talks and left alone to lick its wounds. The meeting vindicated what everyone knew except, of course, Trump: That tariffs don't stop war; it didn't during Operation Sindoor, and it won't in Ukraine. More importantly, it showed the American dispensation that it was left with fewer cards, especially after the initiation of the tariff war, more so amidst the rebellions led by Bharat and China, along with other Brics nations such as Brazil and South Africa. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Know Your Enemy Coming back to the Alaska summit, had Trump studied Putin more closely, he might have avoided such puerile missteps. He would have known that the Russian President is at his best when pushed to a corner, thanks to his street-fighting experience during his childhood in Leningrad. As Lourie writes: 'The lesson that the streets of Leningrad taught was simple, and it stayed with Putin his whole life: The weak get beaten. Weakness is both disgrace and danger.' That street code shaped Putin's worldview and his political tactics. 'The streets of Leningrad taught me one thing: if a fight is unavoidable, throw the first punch,' the Russian president would concede much later in an interview. Putin thrives on others' aggression, and in Alaska, Trump provided him just that. However, Putin's drive is not just personal psychology. As historian Orlando Figes writes in The Story of Russia, Ukraine is an 'existential war' for him—he will fight until he can claim a credible victory. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Ukraine being non-negotiable for Russia makes Putin doubly lethal—and an almost impossible war for the West to win. Ukraine's importance comes from the fact that it has always been central to Russia's identity, both historically and strategically. 'All Russian history flowed from Kiev. Every schoolchild learned: Kiev is the mother of Russian cities, Ukraine is Russia's breadbasket,' Lourie notes. During the Soviet Union's 75 years, Ukrainian leaders—including Khrushchev, Brezhnev and Chernenko—ruled for three decades. A Missed Opportunity At the heart of the Ukraine conflict lies Russia's enduring apprehension of encirclement by the US-led North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (Nato). Lourie recalls how, in 1990, US Secretary of State James Baker promised Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev that if Moscow pulled its forces from East Germany and allowed reunification, Nato would not move 'one inch east'. In the three decades since, Nato has expanded not by inches but by hundreds of kilometres. The policy was so fundamentally flawed that it had even drawn criticism from George Kennan, America's foremost Russia strategist and author of the Cold War containment doctrine. Kennan called Nato's enlargement 'the most fateful error of American policy in the post-Cold-War era', predicting it would revive 'nationalistic, anti-Western and militaristic tendencies in Russian opinion'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The Ukraine war is a making of the West's own folly, envy, and ambition. In his first presidential term, Putin actually sought integration with the West. He frequently emphasised that Russia was part of European culture and even entertained the idea of joining Nato or the EU. But the Western European nations rebuffed him—repeatedly. Orlando Figes describes this rejection as part of a 'recurring pattern running right through Russian history since at least the eighteenth century'. Russia 'sought respect and recognition as part of Europe, but when humiliated, it turned inward, rebuilt, and armed itself against the West'. Putin soon realised Russia's destiny couldn't lie with the West, possibly inspired by thinkers like Nikolai Danilevsky. Figes writes, 'His (Putin's) thinking here was possibly derived from Danilevsky's Russia and Europe, written in the wake of the Crimean War, in which the Pan-Slav thinker had maintained that Russia was a distinctive multicultural civilisation, neither understood nor recognised by Europe, which saw it only as an aggressor state and wanted to diminish it.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Western condescension—rooted in a sense of cultural and even racial superiority—pushed Russia to reposition itself, not as European but as a Eurasian power. It started looking afresh at its Asian roots and allies. Conclusion There's no solution to Ukraine without understanding these moot points and differences. Peace comes through negotiations, understanding and fair play, sometimes imposed through the barrel of a gun. It just cannot happen because a leader is in a hurry to gain Nobel nominations or even impress his domestic audience. Trump went to Alaska hoping for a breakthrough he could tout to his domestic audience and impress upon the Nobel committee. Instead, he was steamrolled. For Putin, it was a win-win situation. He secured global legitimacy, widened Western divisions, and strengthened the impression that Russia dictates terms on the Ukrainian issue while Washington scrambles to catch up. However, we are yet to hear the last word on Ukraine—and of course, the Trump-Putin saga. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
