Bougainville independence talks may resume this week
Photo:
123RF / RNZ Pacific
There are hopes in Papua New Guinea and Bougainville that talks on the independence issue will resume this week.
Bougainville's autonomous government (ABG) wants a commitment from PNG that it will table the results of an independence referendum in its parliament.
The Bougainville politicians place a lot of credence in this referendum, which, while non-binding, had a 97.7 percent backing for Bougainville to become independent.
Ten days of meetings earlier this month at the New Zealand military camp at Burnham, near Christchurch,
failed to reach resolution
.
Former NZ Governor-General Sir Jerry Mateparae is the independent moderator appointed to mediate a political pathway between Bougainville and Papua New Guinea. 13 June 2025
Photo:
Autonomous Bougainville Government
The moderator, former New Zealand Governor General, Sir Jerry Mateparae, said that meeting concluded with a proposal for a '
Melanesian relationship agreement'
which, he said, would be debated by the leaders in the last week of June.
What is in that 'Melanesian relationship,' put forward by Bougainville, hasn't been made clear.
But Bougainville Attorney General Ezekiel Masatt, said the ABG will not be accepting the PNG suggestions of 'free association' or some sort of 'confederation' within PNG.
Meanwhile, a former PNG Chief Secretary, Isaac Lupari, said the National Constitution doesn't allow for any part of the country to secede, so it up to parliament to decide on Bougainville's status.
Sir John Kaputin, a former MP and the former State negotiator for PNG on the Bougainville Peace Agreement, has reminded leaders of the need for compromise.
He said: "It's a two-way thing that leaders of Bougainville must be serious about their leadership among our people and it's up for the National Government to listen to what they are proposing."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
10 hours ago
- RNZ News
LGNZ on govt's rate capping proposal
money local council 20 minutes ago The local government minister has confirmed he'll be taking a paper to cabinet before Christmas with a proposed model to cap rates. Local Government New Zealand and Selwyn mayor Sam Broughton spoke to Tuwhenuaroa Natanahira.
RNZ News
5 days ago
- RNZ News
More detail on gene tech regulations to come, as industry mulls opportunities
The Gene Technology Bill seeks to overhaul current law that restricts the use of gene technologies in New Zealand. Photo: 123RF The Gene Technology Bill was discussed at length at the second annual Plant Breeders' Forum in Ōtautahi Christchurch on Thursday, hosted by the New Zealand Plant Breeders and Research Association (NZPBRA). The bill sought to overhaul current legislation that restricted the use of gene technologies in New Zealand, the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act (HSNO) from 1996. The risks, opportunities and challenges of gene technologies were debated by hundreds during the select committee process, which drew 15,000 submissions. Many scientists said the effective near 30-year ban on the use of gene technologies like gene editing, transgenic breeding or other new breeding techniques used outside the laboratory held them back from progress, leaving them with the slower traditional breeding techniques. However critics - including conventional and organic farming and anti-genetic engineering (GE) movements - raised concerns about the co-existence of genetically-modified (GM) and non-GM crops on farms, market access, human and environmental health concerns from GM foods and via animal feed, and the controls and requirements for the use of these technologies outside the laboratory. Read more about the Gene Technology Bill: Biological chemist Professor Emily Parker chaired the Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment's gene technology technical advisory group. Speaking at the Plant Breeders' Forum, she said there had been significant scientific and technological advances since 1996 when the HSNO Act first came into force, and the current regulatory system was seen as a "significant barrier" to getting approval for genetic technology projects. "Primary legislation which is what is before the House at the moment, is the scaffold" she said. "But it will be underpinned by secondary legislation. This is regulations, notices, standards, things that are issued under secondary legislation. "That has a lot of detail about exactly how different activities are managed and there's a lot of technical detail in that, but I know that there will be a lot of interest by this community in that secondary legislation." Parker said the regulations, that were expected in the fourth quarter of the year, would go out for full public consultation. "It sets up a stand-alone regulatory regime; it creates what we call an authorisation framework to manage the risks of gene tech and enable their safe use," Parker said. "And we have international obligations, such as we're signatories to the Cartagena Protocol that we need to make sure we manage within that legislation." In 2000, New Zealand signed the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity, an international treaty which aimed to protect biological diversity and human health from the possible risks of importing or exporting living modified organism, including GMOs. Food Safety Minister Andrew Hoggard and his Australian counterparts have agreed to update the definitions for GM food in Australia and New Zealand. Photo: Cosmo Kentish-Barnes Parker said the new approach was modelled very closely to Australia's Gene Technology Act (2002) that was now under its third review. She said requirements for the use of new breeding techniques like gene editing would be specified, and whether they would be notified or non-notified with the public, based on where they fell in risk categories. "What will not be regulated is some organisms and gene technologies can be exempted under the regulations and there will be a set of non-regulated organisms and technology." Parker said she was unable to answer questions asked by a GE-Free New Zealand spokesperson at the forum, if activities exempted from the regulations would be required to feature on a public register, cover liability, or feature on the label . Last month, Food Safety Minister Andrew Hoggard and his Australian counterparts agreed to update the definitions for GM food in Australia and New Zealand, which saw food made with the addition of new or novel DNA no longer being required to state that on the food label. Parker said the public would be able to have their say on the upcoming details. "There will be a lot more opportunity to comment and to have feedback on how the scheme is being used, how this framework is going to be populated, and whether that appropriately manages to be suitable for human health and for the environment." The roll-out of the legislation, if it was accepted by Cabinet, will be a multi-government agency effort. The Ministry for Business and Innovation was the lead government agency, the Environmental Protection Authority will be the regulator, and the Ministry for Primary Industries will be the enforcer. The gene-editing technique CRISPR, was launched by the forestry institute Scion in May last year. Photo: 123RF One technique of interest that arose among many scientists at the event was gene-editing technique CRISPR, that forestry institute Scion launched in May last year. Geneticist Sai Arojju of the Radiata Pine Breeding Company - the only one in New Zealand - said CRISPR and RNA techniques were of interest to the industry - that started using genomic selection in 2022. "In terms of accelerated genetic gain, we feel like adopting new technologies is the way to go," he said at the forum. "Genomics is one example that I've shown you and the remote sensing is the other way that we can sort of accelerate those genetic gains in our breeding programme. "We are keeping an eye on the new technologies as well, for example, CRISPR, how does it fit into our breeding programme, and RNA is the other technology which can be used as a disease control, basically." However, the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) Board abandoned discussions around genetic engineering in forestry in 2023, and decided not to investigate GM trees. "The decision considered the different views in FSC's membership around the learning process, the division this brings to FSC as well as the potential risk to FSC's mission and reputation. The decision was made by consensus, with two board members expressing reservations about the process," it said in a statement in March 2023. Null segregants descended from genetically modified organisms (GMO) that were considered transgenes, but do not contain those modifications anymore, were no longer considered GMO. Jazz apples took around 15 years to come to market, using traditional breeding techniques cross-breeding Braeburn and Royal Gala cultivars. Photo: CC 1.0 BY-SA / Daderot Molecular biologist Dr Revel Drummond of Plant and Food Research - now the Bioeconomy Institute - said conventional breeding was done in multi-year stages for apples, which took a "a very long time". He said using null segregants could accelerate one stage of the breeding process, from around five years for apples, to just one. "A null segregant is simply something that used to be transgenic and no longer is, so we've taken the transgenic part out of the equation by crossing it away," he said. He said the method was useful, like a "trick" where instead of waiting four or five years for an apple through traditional breeding, it could be cut down to one year. "Now you could do a breeding cycle per year in a fruit tree," he said. "Annual breeding makes a lot of sense here." Jazz apples, for example, were considered one of New Zealand's relatively faster genetic developments taking around 15 years to come to market, using traditional breeding techniques cross-breeding Braeburn and Royal Gala cultivars. Forage breeding was a significant sector that contributed hugely to agricultural success, and had been developed in Aotearoa for the past century. Germplasm - or genetic resources such as seeds, tissues or DNA sequences - was described as "the lifeblood of our industry," by Dr Derek Woodfield, the now retired general manager at PGG Wrightson Seeds. Woodfield said ryegrass and associated endophytes made up around 60-70 percent of the overall forage breeding effort in New Zealand, driven by the need to increase livestock production. "Animals cannot compensate by eating more poor quality forage, they will just grow slower and so the aim of forage breeding is to have high quality forage and high amounts of it to drive animal performance." He said consolidation and rationalisation of the sector had concentrated breeding efforts, listing three of the four main forage breeders as internationally-owned. CropMark, the event sponsor, was the only one that remained New Zealand-owned, he said. "I think we have a huge risk in our forage industry from overseas ownership of our core breeding programmes," Woodfield said. "We are susceptible to overseas investors deciding we are not profitable enough or they're reducing their investment or changing the way in which we do it. "Now they'll only do that for sensible reasons, economic reasons, we hope. But you know we do have to work out what that means long-term for New Zealand." The Health Select Committee declined to comment on how the 15,000 Gene Technology Bill submissions were split in terms of support or opposition, ahead of the release of its report to Cabinet due on 22 August. The second and third reading of the bill was expected later this year, before the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator was tipped to go live in 2026. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
5 days ago
- RNZ News
Six years after referendum, Bougainville's quest for independence still faces roadblocks
Massey University's Anna Powles says Bougainville's independence is an incredibly challenging issue. Photo: BenarNews / Stefan Armbruster As the Papua New Guinea region of Bougainville prepares to elect a new government, front and centre is the issue of independence. There have been plenty of discussions on the matter, most recently when both governments gathered at Burnham in Christchurch. These negotiations come on top of a resounding result in a referendum on independence conducted in Bougainville in 2019. RNZ Pacific spoke with Anna Powles, an associate professor in defence and security studies at Massey University, to get her view on what is going on. (This transcript has been edited for brevity and clarity.) DON WISEMAN: It's coming up to six years since the referendum, and I'm just wondering what sort of progress has been made toward this quest for independence. Has any been made? ANNA POWLES: Well Don, this is an incredibly challenging issue. As you said, we're coming up to the six year anniversary of the referendum, where around 97 percent of Bougainville's population voted for independence. But, as we know, that referendum was not binding and so we now find ourselves in 2025 where Bougainvillean and Papua New Guinean parties met in Burnham army base to work through these issues, and they ultimately came up with the Melanesian Agreement. They signed that in June this year, which really tried to shift the progress forward in terms of trying to seek a solution to an issue which dates back to pre-independence for Papua New Guinea. Photo: Supplied DW: Yes, well, this Melanesian solution that sounds like the solution you have when you haven't got a solution. It doesn't seem to amount to much to me, as an outsider. AP: Well, it was remarkable on a couple of points. Firstly, Papua New Guinean Prime Minister James Marape referred to Burnham as a spiritual home of the Bougainville peace process. And yet, on the other hand, you have the Bougainville President Ishmael Toroama saying very clearly that the independence was non-negotiable, and setting out a number of terms, including the fact that Bougainville was to become independent by the 1st o September 2027. If Papua New Guinea did not ratify that Bougainville would make a unilateral declaration of independence, which is not the first time Bougainville has done that either. In 1990, the Bougainville Revolutionary Army (BRA) made a unilateral declaration of independence, and similarly, back in the 1960s as well. DW: Yes, and they have a habit of not going very well, these unilateral declarations, in various situations around the world. Do they? They don't work. AP: No, and that's where there is effort, through the joint moderation meeting process, to try and find solutions to the question of Bougainville's political status, either within the broader Papua New Guinean state - you currently have the Autonomous Province. There have been a number of options which have been touted, similar to, for instance, free association like Cook Islands' relationship with New Zealand, for example. But none of these options have really gained a lot of ground at all. DW: And they haven't gained ground because they exclude sovereignty, and that's their critical thing. They want to be able to join the UN and bodies like that, don't they? AP: Exactly. And these talks come on the eve of Bougainville's presidential elections, which take place on the fourth of September this year, less than a month away. The question of Bougainville's future, both its political future, but also its economic future, are issues which are top of mind, very much so, as voters go into this election. What is of concern here is that there are still a lot of outstanding issues within Bougainville itself relating to the Bougainville crisis and the years of conflict. It's very hard to see a potential way forward here, as Papua New Guinea has also been fairly clear in terms of its own position of not letting Bougainville break away fully. DW: Yes, PNG has really not given any ground at all have they, since the beginning of this process? AP: No, and they have concerns, that, and these are long standing concerns, and we've seen a number of different Papua New Guinean Prime Ministers reiterate the concern that if Bougainville was to become fully independent, that that could potentially lead to a cascade of claims by other states, for instance. And that has always been very much at the heart of Papua New Guinea's concern. DW: Now one of the key campaigners for the presidential election, veteran politician Joe Lera, who's been the regional MP in the PNG parliament in the past, he says, on the quest for independence that the current government has been far too strident, and he thinks they've got to take a more conciliatory approach towards Port Moresby, and it sort of makes sense, doesn't it? We have had these dramatic statements coming from Ishmael Toroama at the beginning of the various talks that have been held, laying out where they're going, where they want to go, or where they intend going, before anyone's heard from the other side. It seems like a back to front negotiation tactic. AP: Well, it certainly limits the ability for either side to actually negotiate. Lera has made that comment recently that there is strong support for Bougainville and independence. Very, very strong support. We saw that with the 97.7 percent voter turnout in favor of independence for Bougainville, but that the process itself needs to be rethought through. The process needs to allow for far greater negotiation than we're currently seeing with these declaratory declared positions, as you say from the outset. There's not a lot of wiggle room there to move, and this is where there is some source of frustration around that. So while there's a demographic that Toroama is appealing to, in terms of being very strident on independence, there's still a process that needs to be worked through, and for as long as that I can remember, and there has always been discussion about a Melanesian solution to this issue, but these kinds of declarations are not facilitating that. DW: What do they precisely mean by a Melanesian solution? AP: Well, finding a distinctly Melanesian approach or a Melanesian solution to the issue. Now, what that looks like I'm not sure. There's been various discussions over the years about what that would look like - what it would look like for Bougainville to remain part of Papua New Guinea in a way. But Bougainville is already autonomous, although, key areas like foreign policy, for instance, still fall under Papua New Guinean responsibility. It is unclear what that would potentially look like, but finding a way which is ensuring that the process is peaceful to reach that outcome, and that is going to become increasingly challenging.
