logo
Alaska is a 'strategic' location for Trump-Putin summit

Alaska is a 'strategic' location for Trump-Putin summit

But Alaska itself is preparing to play an increasing role on the world stage as climate change opens up new shipping routes close to the North Pole as Russia, China and the United States contest the polar seas for dominance.
More: It was sold in 1867, but some Russians want Alaska back from the US
Alaska Sen. Dan Sullivan, a Republican, said in a statement that picking Alaska was natural: His home state is "the most strategic place in the world."
The United States bought Alaska from Russia in 1867 under what was dubbed "Seward's Folly" by the then-Interior secretary William Seward, who persuaded Congress to pony up the equivalent of $160 million in today's dollars.
Trump has visited Alaska several times as president, pushed for expanded oil, gas and mining permits there, and even got funding for new polar icebreakers, a popular stance in a state he won with 54% of the vote in 2024.
The face-to-face meeting between the men was billed as a "listening exercise" by the White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt.
"The goal of this meeting for the president is to walk away with a better understanding of how we can end this war," Leavitt told reporters during an Aug. 12 news briefing.
Safe space for Putin
Historians and political scientists say the location offers a surprising variety of benefits, chief among them the fact that no one is likely to try arrest Putin there.
The two men are meeting as part of Trump's efforts to end Russia's invasion of Ukraine, which prompted the International Criminal Court to issue an arrest warrant for Putin after indicting him for war crimes.
"I don't think it's a good time for him to go to Europe," former Alaska Lt. Gov. Mead Treadwell said of Putin.
In addition to the arrest warrant, the Russian strongman might have trouble flying over Europe and Canada, both of which have closed their airspace to Russian aircraft. The United States has done the same, but Trump is apparently waiving that Biden-era ban for Putin's visit. Trump's flight from Washington, DC, will take about seven hours.
Some experts have also criticized Trump's decision to host Putin on U.S. soil - no matter how far it is from the White House - because it legitimizes the Russian leader. Putin last year received 87% of the votes cast in the Russian presidential election, a statistic one elections expert likened to the "sham" elections held in African dictatorships.
Closer than most people realize
Because Russia and Alaska are separated only by a narrow stretch of the Bering Sea - yes, there are places where you can really see Russia from your American house - the logistics of getting both men there are relatively simple, Russian presidential assistant Yuri Ushakov told the BBC.
The closest distance between the two countries are the tiny islands of Little and Big Diomede.
Little Diomede is American, while Big Diomede is Russian, although families have long been split between the two, a reflection of Russia's former ownership of Alaska. The two islands are just three miles apart. The two mainlands themselves are only 55 miles apart where Alaska's Seward Peninsula and Russia's Chukotka Peninsula sit on opposite sides of the Bering Sea.
The National Park Service's Bering Land Bridge National Preserve exists in part to highlight how the two peninsulas were once connected, allowing ancient peoples to migrate from the Eurasian landmass east into North America.
"It seems quite logical for our delegation simply to fly over the Bering Strait and for such an important and anticipated summit of the leaders of the two countries to be held in Alaska," Ushakov said.
Because Alaska was once part of Russia, some cultural ties also remain: There are about 80 Russian Orthodox churches and chapels still standing across Alaska, many of them on the state's western islands and peninsulas close to the Bering Sea. The first Russian Orthodox Church was established in on Kodiak Island in 1794, and Holy Resurrection Orthodox Cathedral still holds services there.
During the Cold War, the threat of Soviet invasion from the west prompted heavy defense investment in missile-warning systems in Alaska, along with marine and air patrols that continue to this day. The base where Putin and Trump are meeting is home to fighter aircraft like the F-22 Raptor, which is used to intercept Russian military planes as they fly close to the border.
Russian invasion pushed Ukrainians to Alaska
While there has long been a Russian community in Alaska, several hundred Ukranian refugees have also moved there under federal humanitarian programs following Russia's 2022 invasion. Trump put that program on indefinite hold upon taking office.
Trump is meeting with Putin without Ukranian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, a move that has concerned some European leaders who have pledged their unconditional support in his country's efforts to repel Russia.
European leaders have expressed concern that Trump would pressure Ukraine to make too many concessions to Putin. But Treadwell said he believes everyone can agree that ending the war should be a top priority, and if this meeting in Alaska is what it takes, it's worth it.
"There are a lot of former Russians who live in Alaska and a lot of former Ukranians who live in Alaska," he said. "If this leads to peace, I think we'd all be very happy."
Alaska has long been a stopover for diplomatic missions
In addition to its strategic military importance, Anchorage is a familiar stopover for diplomatic missions traveling between Europe and Asia.
In 1971, President Richard Nixon met with the Emperor of Japan on the tarmac in Anchorage as Hirohito traveled to Europe for meetings. It was the first time a reigning Japanse monarch had stepped foot on foreign soil, Nixon said, according to his presidential library. Nixon also noted their meeting took place approximately equidistant from the White House as to Tokyo.
Pope John Paul II stopped in Anchorage in 1981 on his way back to Rome from Japan, touring the city and meeting with the faithful. He also met with President Ronald Reagan in Fairbanks in 1984.
In 2021, then-Secretary of State Anthony Blinken met with his Chinese counterparts for several days of trade talks held at a hotel that was considered the midpoint between the two country's capitals.
Trump-Putin meeting comes during Alaska's busiest season
While the White House has not discussed the reason for having the meeting on the military base, one factor may have played a key role: This is Alaska's tourist season and every place else is booked solid.
More than 2 million tourists visit Alaska annually, the vast majority of them traveling via cruise ships and the historic Alaska Railroad from Anchorage to Denali National Park, according to state statistics.
Trump early on in his administration named Denali back to its former name of Mount McKinley, which President Barack Obama had renamed to honor Alaska Native people. Trump said he was changing the name back to honor the tariff-loving former President William McKinley, who was also responsible for adding Hawaii, Guam and several other territories to the United States.
Federal officials have warned that passenger and cargo flights to Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport may be affected by temporary flight restrictions during the Trump-Putin meeting on Aug. 15 and early Aug. 16.
August is the airport's second-busiest month behind July, according to airport officials. The flight restrictions will also impact the adjacent Lake Hood Seaplane Base, the world's busiest seaplane base.
Although many other presidents have taken their counterparts on sighteeing trips, or used state visits to do their own tourism, there's little indication Trump and Putin will be taking the time to go fishing or land on a glacier. Intead, Trump said he expects to know "probably in the first two minutes," whether he can reach a deal with Putin.
Treadwell, who was the state's lieutenant governor from 2010-2014, said there could be another reason for Trump to agree to meet at JBER: the sprawling 36-hole Moose Run Golf Course. Along with sand traps and water hazards, he said, players there must periodically avoid moose and bears.
"In the summer here, you can play golf until almost midnight, but I doubt he'll have time for that," he said. "I think people of all political stripes hope this meeting will produce peace."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump gave Putin the spotlight and left us all guessing
Trump gave Putin the spotlight and left us all guessing

Times

time29 minutes ago

  • Times

Trump gave Putin the spotlight and left us all guessing

There was a rare sight on Friday: Donald Trump playing second fiddle. The US president seemed a little out of character as he shared a stage in Alaska with Vladimir Putin following three hours of talks. Rather than his usual bombastic self, Trump appeared rather demure, even a little shy, as he let Putin go first. As a Fox News anchor put it shortly after: 'There were a few things that were very unusual. You had Putin come out and address the press first. We are on US soil here.' Putin set the tone, switching to English to suggest that next time they met, they took the show to Mother Russia. The next thing: no questions. Usually, Trump cannot stop talking to the travelling press pack about anything and everything: world peace, Joe Biden, Jeffrey Epstein's staffing arrangements. But in the 12-minute press conference, and again later on Air Force One, he declined to stop for a group chat. Hacks had been told that if things went well, there would be an opportunity for a Q&A. Instead, 300 journalists travelled to Alaska to hear an uninterrupted history lesson from Putin. Trump wanted a breakthrough. Putin wanted a show. In the end, it seems it was Putin who got what he came for. The question is why Trump suddenly became camera-shy. Did he feel unprepared after the talks were cut short (closer to three hours than the planned six) and failed to lead to a breakthrough of a ceasefire? Or is this something else altogether: a new, more mature Trump who wanted to keep his cards close to his chest until he had spoken to President Zelensky and others? It was after he had left Alaska that Trump started to return to type. In a Truth Social post, he explained that after 'a great and very successful day' in Alaska he no longer wanted a ceasefire, despite talking about the need for one only a few hours before. Instead, he decided the bigger prize is Putin's own preference: a comprehensive peace deal. This is not, of course, the first time Trump has moved the goalposts or torn up a deadline. He has previously taken the view that US foreign policy ought to be unpredictable, leaving opponents guessing. But all the same, some of his closest allies are now guessing as to how this will all pan out. 'I took it as a display of strength towards a resolution,' says one Republican. While the public comments from European leaders, including Sir Keir Starmer, have been positive, there is growing pessimism about what that resolution may look like. 'The fear is that warm words on a security guarantee will be used to bully Zelensky into giving Putin what he wants,' says one figure close to the negotiations. 'Putin is currently claiming land that he has taken, plus more.' The audience that matters most to Trump politically is the one back home. Although there is less concern in the United States than in Europe about carving up Ukraine, Trump wants to show that he is a winner and a dealmaker. On that front, the trip was not immediately helpful. Even the usually friendly right-wing media have raised questions about the optics of gladhanding Putin — on a red carpet — while getting nothing material in the process. At least, not yet. 'This was the single worst American-Russian meeting in living memory,' says Joel Rubin, a former deputy assistant secretary of state in the Obama administration. 'It was a far cry from summits of the past. It began as two equals and ended as a lopsided affair where the target coming in' — namely Putin — 'was the victor. The world now has no idea what Donald Trump wants. And apparently, neither does he.' A senior Republican is more positive: 'This outcome is the best, as we didn't go backwards on our commitment to Ukraine. Now let's see how hard Putin hits Ukraine this week and how Trump reacts.' Trump eventually declared it a successful meeting (a 'ten') where they agreed to 'go directly to a peace agreement' rather than 'a mere ceasefire agreement'. He sees himself as a peacemaker. 'President Trump has brokered, on average, about one peace deal or ceasefire per month during his six months in office,' said Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, last month. 'It's well past time that President Trump was awarded the Nobel peace prize.' JD Vance, the vice-president, has long opposed funding the Ukraine conflict and led opposition in Congress under Biden. His views have not changed, even if he has softened his tone when dealing with European counterparts. This was very in tune with the Maga base, which explains why they were the most enthusiastic audience for the Trump-Putin meeting, sharing pictures of four F-35s and a B-2 Spirit bomber over Putin's head when he stepped on to American soil. 'He displayed military power. He flexed hugely on Putin and he pulled him in for the handshake,' says one Maga figure with links to the administration. They view the meeting as a welcome route out of a conflict the US should never have been involved in and the beginning of a pivot closer to Russia. For some in the base, they admire Putin's crusade for 'traditional values' and see Ukraine as overly liberal in comparison. Others dislike Zelensky personally, sometimes for his fashion choices but also as they associate him with Trump's first impeachment in 2019. (It was an infamous conversation with Zelensky that triggered it.) Then there is the fact that Hunter Biden, a Maga enemy, had business dealings with Ukraine. Those happiest about Trump's Putin bromance are those who are the most relaxed about the conflict ending at any cost. As journalists and foreign policy specialists critiqued Trump's summit, a tribal instinct kicked in with his base. The Maga influencer Charlie Kirk is among those to quote Putin approvingly for saying he would not have started the war if Trump had been in office. Though one insider admits: 'It's easy for Putin to say that now.' A Republican staffer adds: 'The vibe is very positive. The general vibe is that for three years no progress was made, and now there might finally be some progress.' Over the past few months, Republican voters seemed warm to Ukraine's cause, perhaps as Trump's language towards Putin hardened. 'Americans tend not to have strong, fixed opinions on foreign policy,' the Republican pollster Daron Shaw notes. 'They often follow cues from their party's leaders.' A recent poll conducted by the Chicago Council on Global Affairs showed that 51 per cent of Republicans now support continued military assistance to Ukraine, a big jump from 30 per cent only five months ago. Of Maga Republicans, 49 per cent support military aid, compared with 57 per cent of non-Maga Republicans. On economic aid, only 35 per cent of Maga Republicans support it, compared with 57 per cent of non-Maga Republicans. So far, no one in the party has come out hard against Trump since the meeting. But it is the old-school Republicans who harbour the greatest concern about where this all might lead. 'Trump clearly expects Ukraine to give up significant territory,' says one senior Republican. 'European countries are arguing against that, and that will give Zelensky the room to object to Trump's proposed deal.' Longstanding Ukraine supporters such as Brian Fitzpatrick, a Republican congressman from Pennsylvania, stress that no deal is possible without Zelensky. 'This simple fact remains: true and lasting security can only be achieved with our allies, most importantly with Ukraine, at the table,' he says. 'Ukraine's sovereignty and freedom are not bargaining chips. They are principles that must be defended.' Lindsey Graham hedged his bets, saying the Russia-Ukraine war could end before Christmas — but only if Zelensky joins the next round of Putin-Trump talks. Graham, a Trump ally and staunch supporter of Ukraine, is viewed as a bellwether for the GOP. 'Make no mistake, this war is a war of aggression by Putin against Ukraine. However, I have always said Ukraine will not evict every Russian soldier and Putin is not going to take Kyiv,' Graham said in a post on social media platform X. 'The key to ending this war honorably and justly is to create an infrastructure of deterrence that Biden and Obama failed to do — which will prevent a third invasion.' In the end, Trump left Alaska with little beyond an extraordinary photo op: a Russian president on US soil, a stealth bomber overhead and a press corps denied its questions. Whether this becomes the start of a grand bargain or another dead end in US diplomacy depends on what he does next. For now, America's allies are left guessing. And so, perhaps, is Trump himself.

Forget rows about interest rates — we should watch out for AI
Forget rows about interest rates — we should watch out for AI

Times

time38 minutes ago

  • Times

Forget rows about interest rates — we should watch out for AI

The US president and the chairman of the Federal Reserve board are at swords drawn over the relation between changes in interest rates and job creation. While the president concentrates on defenestrating bureaucrats who report fewer jobs than he believes exist, and the chairman of the Fed ponders the significance of 'cracks' in the labour market, artificial intelligence is making those concerns pale into insignificance. Morgan Stanley estimates that these large models that are equipping machines to perform tasks typically associated with human intelligence will gobble $3 trillion of capital in the next three years. It is the double-digit unemployment gorilla sitting in congressional hearing rooms, in the Fed board room and at the dining table at Mar-a-Lago. Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, a powerful creator of AI systems, estimates that AI will wipe out half of all entry-level white-collar jobs in the next one to five years, and drive the unemployment rate to as high as 20 per cent. Indeed, even now, recent college graduates — unemployment rate 6.5 per cent — are complaining of extreme difficulties in finding jobs. McKinsey, the management consultancy, reckons that AI could automate 30 per cent of hours currently worked across the US economy by 2030, and that 60 per cent will be significantly altered by AI tools. JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon says: 'AI is everywhere … it hedges our equity portfolios … there's nothing it's not going to touch.' Gone will be bank tellers, data entry clerks, administrative assistants and executive secretaries. More optimistic observers point out that when Henry Ford reduced the horse from a major means of transportation to dressage, starring roles in cowboy movies, and polo, consumers wanted, then needed cars — and more than one — creating millions of jobs for auto workers and mechanics. When Thomas Alva Edison created the light bulb he relegated candlemakers to making scented gifts, while creating jobs for manufacturers of those bulbs and enabled students to engage in myriad night time activities, including, but not limited to, studying. When Steve Jobs created the iPhone and thin Macs, he replaced latter-day Bob Cratchits with spread sheets, and AT&T repairmen with programmers and manufacturers of computers, carrying cases, ergonomic chairs. The supply of each invention created its own demand, along with the burning desire for their add-ons. Apple AirPods, anyone? We do not yet know whether the beneficent effects of this new force will be outweighed by its ability to seize control of its creators. But the speed with which AI is penetrating almost every phase of economic life, and uncertainty about just what products it will create or make newly affordable for consumers, make it unwise to mumble something about the historic fecklessness of Luddites and do nothing. The potential transition costs will be too high, the potential strains on society and the pressures on politicians too great for a policy of benign neglect. Imagine this: in the morning strange metal objects directed by AI 'agents', software systems capable of planning and reasoning, are directing machines, usually robots, that are mowing your lawn and cleaning your pool. An AI agent-directed drone has deposited the book you ordered on your doorstep after an AI-directed robot selected it from the bottom of a pile in a huge warehouse. You enter an AI- directed driverless car that delivers you to your golf club while you adjust the Metaglasses that have replaced iPhones and read news reports written by an AI agent specially for you, based on your recent purchases, travels, conversations at home and other personal data sprinkled by you across the internet. No waiting for a sci-fi future; it has arrived. The question, where have all the workers gone? The answer, AI agents have replaced them, every one. Some experts, including Jamie Dimon, believe the past is prologue: AI will create more jobs than it will destroy, proving John Maynard Keynes right again when he wrote almost 100 years ago, that 'technological unemployment … is only a temporary phase of maladjustment.' Possible. But even so, there will be high transition costs for which policies must be thought through before the full blast of AI makes itself felt. Government budgets already under strain will make it difficult to supplement the incomes of displaced workers, at a time when an ageing population places greater demand on the existing social safety net. Past efforts at retraining programmes have largely failed, and must be reshaped. Taxes will be needed to transfer some of the benefits of AI to the adversely affected. But without destroying incentives to retrain and find work, as would a universal basic income — no work required — being mooted by some guilt-ridden Silicon Valley magnates. Add measures that provide incentives to accelerate the development of new products and the consequent new jobs for humans, and the higher incomes capable of financing the amelioration of the costs of change. Make fast write-offs of research and development costs and investment a permanent feature of the tax code. I leave the question of regulating scams, abuses, of what Amodei calls 'extreme blackmail behaviour' and robots that are capable of assassinating their creators to others. irwin@ Irwin Stelzer is a business adviser

PM to speak with allies, amid reports Trump mulling Russian land grab in Ukraine
PM to speak with allies, amid reports Trump mulling Russian land grab in Ukraine

The Herald Scotland

time43 minutes ago

  • The Herald Scotland

PM to speak with allies, amid reports Trump mulling Russian land grab in Ukraine

The video conference of allies who plan to keep the peace in Ukraine comes ahead of Volodymyr Zelensky's White House meeting with Donald Trump on Monday. The one-on-one in the Oval Office could pave the way for a three-way meeting alongside Russian leader Mr Putin, the US President has said. The Russian and American leaders met on Friday at a military base in Anchorage, Alaska, for a summit to broker an end to the war in Ukraine. Several news outlets have cited sources which claimed that during the negotiations Mr Putin demanded full control of Donetsk and Luhansk – two occupied Ukrainian regions – as a condition for ending the war. President Donald Trump and Russia's President Vladimir Putin held a press conference in Anchorage, Alaska (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson) In exchange, he would give up other Ukrainian territories held by Russian troops. Other outlets reported that Mr Trump is inclined to support the plan, and will speak to Mr Zelensky about it on Monday when they meet in the Oval Office. Sir Keir commended Mr Trump's 'pursuit of an end to the killing' following a phone call with the US President, Mr Zelensky and Nato allies on Saturday morning. But he insisted Ukraine's leader must not be excluded from future talks to broker a peace in Ukraine. The Prime Minister and European leaders appeared increasingly confident that Mr Trump will offer a 'security guarantee' of air support to back up allied troops on the ground in Ukraine, should they be deployed to keep the peace. In this photo taken and distributed by Russian Defense Ministry Press Service on Friday, Aug. 15, 2025, a Russian tank fires during a practice at a training ground during on an undisclosed location in Ukraine. (Russian Defense Ministry Press Service via AP) But Mr Trump also appeared to have a change of heart on what he wants to achieve from the talks, indicating that he wants a permanent peace settlement rather than a ceasefire, echoing the sentiment of Mr Putin. The Alaska summit was 'timely' and 'useful', Mr Putin said after he left. Experts have warned the face-to-face summit has risked legitimising the Russian leader, who has been made a pariah by the international community for invading Ukraine. Ukraine's President Mr Zelensky warned Russia may ramp up its strikes against his country in the coming days 'in order to create more favourable political circumstances for talks with global actors'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store