Rajya Sabha MP Randeep Surjewala calls for central intervention to end Punjab-Haryana water dispute.
Chandigarh: Amidst the war of words between Punjab and Haryana over the issue of releasing water, Rajya Sabha MP and AICC general decretary
Randeep Surjewala
on Sunday asked the chief ministers of the two neighbouring states, Bhagwant Mann and Nayab Saini, to forego political collusion and consider the larger public interest.
Surjewala, who was interacting with media persons here on the ongoing tussle between the two states over Bhakra waters, specifically targeted Union minister Manohar Lal Khattar, urging him to fulfil 'Rajdharma' to ensure Haryana's right to water. At the same time, he also urged PM Modi to issue directions to Punjab under Article 257 of the Constitution to ensure Haryana's right to water.
Notably, for the past week, Punjab reduced the release of water to Haryana from BBMB to 4,000 cusecs, claiming that Haryana exhausted its quota in March. "The Modi govt should hand over the security of
Bhakra Nangal Dam
to CISF, and the Govt of India should retrieve control of Bhakra Nangal Dam from the illegal occupation of Punjab Police," said Surjewala.
Surjewala claimed there is a severe
water shortage in Haryana
, and listed the districts suffering the most. Surjewala also claimed that this has led to the unannounced rule of the water tanker mafia in the state. This comes along with the threat of a drought-like situation for districts where cotton and maize are to be sown.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
AI guru Andrew Ng recommends: Read These 5 Books And Turn Your Life Around in 2025
Blinkist: Andrew Ng's Reading List
Undo
"Amidst the severe water crisis in Haryana, the chief ministers of Punjab and Haryana, Mr Bhagwant Mann and Mr Nayab Saini, are busy only in rhetoric and writing 'love letters' to each other. Alternatively, they are seen together in Chandigarh getting photographed or hugging each other. Punjab chief minister Mann is intoxicated with power," said Surjewala.
"Nayab Saini, instead of getting Haryana's rights settled from the central BJP govt, especially Prime Minister Narendra Modi and power minister Manohar Lal Khattar, is only pretending to take action by sometimes calling an all-party meeting and sometimes finding excuses to go to court. Their malintent is clear – play politics and fool the people," added Surjewala.
Surjewala said that the attitude of the BJP govt at the Centre is even more shocking. "The Modi govt is sleeping at the wheel as if it has nothing to do with Punjab or Haryana. BBMB (Bhakra Beas Management Board) is a project of the central govt. The BBMB board is formed by the power ministry of the country, whose minister is Manohar Lal Khattar. The power ministry also has direct control over BBMB. The Bhakra Dam is also completely under BBMB and the ministry of power, Govt of India," he said.
"What is the reason that the Modi govt is not issuing directions to the Bhagwant Mann govt to remove Punjab police from the dam site?" he questioned.
MSID:: 120874361 413 |
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
35 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Manoj Jha questions Centre's intentions for caste census
Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader and Rajya Sabha member Manoj Jha on Monday (June 9, 2025) raised serious concerns over the Centre's intentions for the caste census. Mr. Jha said the policies of Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) were not only anti-reservation, but also conspiring to mislead the Backward Classes (BC) and Extremely Backward Classes (EBC). He alleged that the government was pretending in the name of a caste census, and there was a lack of transparency in the entire process. 'After the painful incident of Pahalgam, suddenly the Prime Minister realised that it is necessary to conduct a caste census as per the demand of most of the people, so he announced it in a hurry. But the move, character and face of the BJP, which has always been anti-Bahujan and against reservation, is now visible,' Mr. Jha said while addressing the press at the party office in Patna. 'Our national president Lalu Prasad ji has been warning that those who follow Bunch of Thoughts politics on the ideas of Guru Golwalkar can never be serious about reservation, which is now clearly visible,' he added. Mr. Jha asserted that the Centre wanted to create confusion in the name of the caste census and questioned the reason behind the government announcing that population figures for OBCs would not be released. He added that such figures were necessary as per Article 340 of the Constitution, he added. 'When the castes are counted and the figures are not revealed, then which policy will be implemented towards reservation and increasing the reservation in the private sector? NITI Aayog and other agencies can work on planning, social, economic upliftment and increasing reservation on the basis of data only when the data comes from the government level,' Mr. Jha said. Accompanied by the party's chief spokesperson Shakti Singh Yadav and national vice-president of the party Uday Narayan Choudhary at the press briefing, Mr. Jha pointed said that besides party leader Tejashwi Yadav, leaders from the Congress, Samajwadi Party and Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) were also in favour of the figures being published. Mr. Choudhary, on the other hand, said that the caste census was a hoax and nothing had been disclosed in this regard. He explained that the caste survey was conducted in Bihar under pressure from Mr. Yadav. Still, the 65% reservation benefit was not being given because the intention of the BJP and the Nitish Kumar government was not right, he charged. Tejashwi's demands Earlier in the day, in a post on X, Mr. Yadav addressed Chief Miniser Kumar about responding to his letter dated June 5 on increasing the reservation to 85% for all deprived classes in Bihar. 'Nitish ji you did not respond to my letter, is it because you have no answer or your officials do not show you the letters? The parties that beat the drum of social justice, on whose strength the Modi government is running, why are they failing to include the 65% reservation limit increased by our government in the 9th Schedule of the Constitution?' Mr. Yadav asked. 'The Chief Minister Nitish Kumar, Union Minister Chirag Paswan, Jitan Ram Manjhi, Upendra Kushwaha should speak out on the issue of reservation against this injustice faced by Dalit, Adivasi, backward, and extremely backward classes. Politics is not just about clinging to power,' he added. Mr. Yadav further said, 'If all these people cannot even get this small demand fulfilled by the Prime Minister, then their politics and staying in such an alliance is shameful. If Nitish Ji is unable to speak on this issue in front of the Prime Minister and Home Minister, then he should call a special one-day session of the Assembly, and then see how we get it implemented.'
Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Pete Hegseth faces hiring woes: At least three prospects say no to joining former Fox host at the Pentagon
The White House wants to hire a new chief of staff and top advisers for Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, but it's hard to find anyone who wants the job. At least three people have already refused to take jobs under Hegseth, as per reports. These Pentagon jobs are normally considered important and attractive, but not this time. Hegseth fired two of his senior aides in April on live TV, accusing them of leaking classified info in a Fox News interview. After that, his chief of staff was removed, and a press aide quit, saying the office was in "total chaos", as stated by an NBC News report. Vice President JD Vance and Trump's chief of staff Susie Wiles are helping Hegseth find new staff, but he and the White House don't agree on who should be hired, Hegseth has rejected some of the White House's picks, and the White House has blocked some of his choices. Some people were not picked for the job because they didn't fully support the MAGA. Play Video Pause Skip Backward Skip Forward Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration 0:00 Loaded : 0% 0:00 Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 1x Playback Rate Chapters Chapters Descriptions descriptions off , selected Captions captions settings , opens captions settings dialog captions off , selected Audio Track Picture-in-Picture Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas Prices In Dubai Might Be More Affordable Than You Think Villas In Dubai | Search Ads Get Quote Undo The exit of Hegseth's Team In April, two of Hegseth's close friends, Dan Caldwell and Darin Selnick, were removed from the Pentagon because of a leak investigation. They, along with Colin Carroll, said the process was unfair and that they weren't told what the allegations were. Hegseth later went on Fox News and blamed Caldwell, Selnick, and Carroll for both the leaks and the NYT story, but didn't give any proof, as mentioned by the Fox News. In May, the White House removed Hegseth and his lawyer, Tim Parlatore, from managing the investigation. The job was handed over to Deputy Defense Secretary Stephen Feinberg, which showed the White House doubted Hegseth's fairness. Live Events As no proof of leaks was found, officials started thinking maybe the firings were a mistake. Infighting among remaining Hegseth staff continues, and Hegseth is now mostly isolated, working with only a small group of close advisers, as stated by NBC News report. Hegseth's new pick rejected too Hegseth now relies on Ricky Buria, a former military aide who hoped to become his chief of staff. But the White House said no, since Buria was seen as inexperienced and had privately criticized Trump and Vance. The fights inside his office have delayed the 'Golden Dome' missile defense project, Trump's big national defense idea. There's still no Pentagon budget, and Republicans in Congress are frustrated. Some officials, including Vance, are worried this report could hurt Hegseth even more. But Hegseth's allies believe he'll stay in the job despite everything, according to the NBC News report. FAQs Q1. Why is Pete Hegseth struggling to hire staff? Because of past firings, office problems, and fights over who should be hired. Q2. Who decides on Hegseth's new team? Both Hegseth and the White House want a say, but they don't agree.
India.com
38 minutes ago
- India.com
Troops Deployed, Teargas Fired – Is LA Under Trump's Martial Law? California Guv To Sue US Prez Over Immigrant Raids
Los Angeles (United States): Governor Gavin Newsom has announced a lawsuit against President Donald Trump over what he calls an 'illegal and authoritarian' deployment of the National Guard in Los Angeles. The decision has led to an escalation of the already strained relationship between California and the federal government. What began as a wave of protests against immigration raids has now snowballed into a full-blown constitutional showdown between Sacramento and Washington. Over the weekend, Los Angeles erupted as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents arrested dozens of undocumented immigrants from city streets. The sweeping raids triggered mass protests. Demonstrators blocked freeways and clashed with the police – demanding an end to what they called a 'militarised war on migrants'. By Monday, nearly 2,000 National Guard troops had been dispatched to the city under direct orders from the White House – a move Governor Newsom says was made without his knowledge or consent. 'This is not only about California. This is about a president who believes he can federalise any state's National Guard, bypassing governors, the Constitution and the people. It is illegal. It is immoral. And we are going to court,' Newsom said in an appearance on MSNBC. The governor took to social media as well and warned that Trump's executive order could set a dangerous precedent. 'What he has done in L.A., he can now do in any state. We will not allow California to be his testing ground for tyranny,' he wrote on X (formerly Twitter). Former Vice President Kamala Harris, who is a California native, too joined the chorus and accused Trump of 'manufacturing a crisis to inflame division and distract from his own failures'. The protests began last Friday after ICE conducted raids in several neighborhoods. The crackdown led to the arrest of at least 44 undocumented immigrants. Demonstrators quickly flooded the streets and accused federal authorities of targeting vulnerable communities and acting with little regard for due process. The police responded with tear gas, flash-bang grenades and rubber bullets. The unrest intensified over the weekend and prompted Trump to invoke what he called a 'necessary federal intervention'. 'These are not protesters, they are insurrectionists. Governor Gavin Newsom and 'Mayor' Bass have lost control of their city. They should apologise to the people of Los Angeles for this disaster,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. However, city officials flatly rejected Trump's narrative. While coordinating emergency response efforts, LA Mayor Karen Bass condemned the federal intervention as 'reckless and inflammatory'. Legal experts say Newsom's lawsuit could spark a constitutional battle over the limits of federal power. While the president does have authority to federalise the National Guard in rare situations, doing so without state consent – particularly for domestic law enforcement – is legally murky. 'Trump is testing the boundaries of presidential power in ways we have not seen in decades. If the courts side with Newsom, it could rein in executive overreach. If they don't, it could open the door to more unilateral deployments in the future,' said Dr. Emily Serrano, a constitutional law professor at UCLA. As tensions continue to rise in the streets and now in the courts, Los Angeles has become the latest flashpoint in the nation's deepening political divide. Whether this battle is resolved by judges or ballots remains to be seen. But for now, California is sending a message it will not back down.
