logo
Biden team says diagnosis only made in last week amid Trump criticism

Biden team says diagnosis only made in last week amid Trump criticism

Euronews22-05-2025
Former US President Joe Biden's "last known" prostate cancer screening was in 2014, and he had never been diagnosed with the disease before last week, according to his office.
Biden's aides released the new details about his diagnosis amid intense scrutiny of his health during his presidency, and scepticism that the disease could have progressed to an advanced stage without being detected.
Although Biden's cancer can possibly be controlled with treatment, it has spread to his bones and is no longer curable.
The brief statement from Biden's office did not disclose the results of his 2014 prostate-specific antigen (PSA) blood test.
"Prior to Friday, President Biden had never been diagnosed with prostate cancer," the statement said.
Biden's cancer was announced on Sunday, prompting a wave of sympathy but also suggestions from some of his critics, including his predecessor and now successor Donald Trump, that the former president and his aides covered up the disease while he was in the White House given the severity of the cancer when it was announced.
Tuesday's statement appeared aimed at tamping down that speculation.
Asked about Biden during an appearance at the White House, Trump said, "it takes a long time to get to that situation" and that he was "surprised that the public wasn't notified a long time ago".
"It's a very sad situation and I feel very badly about it," Trump said.
A memo from the White House physician released following Trump's annual physical exam in April listed a normal PSA. Biden's White House doctor did not include PSA results in the health summaries he released.
Screening with PSA blood tests can lead to unnecessary treatment with side effects that affect quality of life, and guidelines recommend against prostate cancer screening for men 70 and older. Biden is 82.
When caught early, prostate cancer is highly survivable, but it is also the second-leading cause of cancer death in men.
About two in five teenagers in Europe are struggling with their mental well-being, a new analysis has found, with girls faring worse than boys in each of the 37 countries included.
Young people today face a host of stressors, including social isolation and disruptions to their schooling caused by the COVID-19 pandemic as well as socioeconomic instability and the ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza, according to the report, known as the European School Survey Project on Alcohol and Other Drugs (ESPAD).
The study, which has been following teens' alcohol, smoking, and drug habits for 30 years, included nearly 114,000 students aged 15 and 16 across 37 European countries.
For the first time in 2024, the report assessed their mental health as well.
To track teens' mental well-being, the survey asked students how their lives have been going lately; for example, how often they feel cheerful, wake up feeling fresh, and how interested they are in their daily lives.
The researchers converted those answers into an index score; students who scored above 50 out of 100 on the index were considered to have good mental well-being.
Overall, 59 per cent of teenagers met that threshold. But there were major regional differences across Europe, with teens in Nordic countries doing fairly well and those in Central and Eastern Europe faring worse.
Teenagers in the Danish territory of the Faroe Islands were the most likely to report good mental well-being (77 per cent), followed by Iceland (75 per cent), and Denmark (72 per cent).
Meanwhile, teenagers in Ukraine reported the worst mental health, with just 43 per cent classified as doing well. Ukrainian adolescents have limited access to mental health care, the report noted, leaving them to grapple with war-related trauma largely on their own.
The next-lowest rates of mental well-being were recorded in the Czech Republic (46 per cent), Hungary (47 per cent), Cyprus and Poland (49 per cent each).
'Mental health is deeply connected to the broader social environments in which young people grow up,' Kadri Soova, director of the advocacy group Mental Health Europe, told Euronews Health. She was not involved with the study.
Girls were worse off than boys in each of the 37 countries studied. Across Europe, 49 per cent of girls and 69 per cent of boys report good mental health.
The gender gaps were even more stark in some countries. In Italy and Poland, for example, about two-thirds of boys report good mental health, compared with one-third of girls.
In Sweden, the relatively high rate of teenage well-being overall (62 per cent) masks gender differences. About four in five boys had good mental well-being, compared with less than half of girls.
The poorer outcomes among girls 'signals the urgent need for targeted, context-sensitive responses,' Soova said.
Europe is not the only region grappling with a rising toll of mental health problems among youth. Over the past decade, the rate of young people with mental health disorders has risen in every part of the world, according to a recent analysis from the Lancet medical journal.
Soova called on policymakers to invest in mental health education and accessible support for young people.
'By addressing both traditional and emerging challenges from substance use to online risks, we can build environments where all adolescents have the opportunity to thrive in dignity and well-being,' she said.
If you are contemplating suicide and need to talk, please reach out to Befrienders Worldwide, an international organisation with helplines in 32 countries. Visit befrienders.org to find the telephone number for your location.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump and Putin wrap up Alaska meeting with no mention of ceasefire
Trump and Putin wrap up Alaska meeting with no mention of ceasefire

Euronews

timean hour ago

  • Euronews

Trump and Putin wrap up Alaska meeting with no mention of ceasefire

As Donald Trump hosted Vladimir Putin for a historic summit in Alaska, Ukraine and Europe held their breath for what the meeting could bring. For the US president, the summit represented an unprecedented opportunity to establish himself as a peacemaker and push Russia to a ceasefire. For Putin, this was a chance to change tack despite his unwillingness to engage in direct negotiations with his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Ukraine's president was invited to the summit at the US military Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage on Friday. Still, Trump hopes he will be present for the next round of talks. Following the Trump-Putin press conference after the meeting, it is increasingly likely that there will be a second meeting after the negotiations in Alaska. Review the latest information and analysis on the Trump-Putin summit in Alaska as Euronews journalists around Europe brought you the latest developments on Friday night in the blog below:

Sylvie Kauffmann: 'Putin can pretend to negotiate and engage in endless talks that never lead anywhere'
Sylvie Kauffmann: 'Putin can pretend to negotiate and engage in endless talks that never lead anywhere'

LeMonde

time4 hours ago

  • LeMonde

Sylvie Kauffmann: 'Putin can pretend to negotiate and engage in endless talks that never lead anywhere'

A bilateral meeting lasting under three hours, followed by a 12-minute joint press conference with no announcements: The Friday, August 15, summit between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in Alaska left many questions unanswered. By Saturday morning, as European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky began reacting, Le Monde columnist Sylvie Kauffmann spoke with readers during our live coverage of the war in Ukraine. Pierre: Diplomacy is sometimes a theater, with each side seeking to claim success and assign blame in case of failure. Trump had gotten us used to breaking with tradition. Today, he is acting out a classic scenario. Isn't that already a sign that this summit has failed? Sylvie Kauffmann: Calling the summit a failure depends on what was expected of it. If people were hoping Vladimir Putin would commit to a serious ceasefire, then yes, it was clearly a failure. But I do not think that was a reasonable expectation. At this stage, with no results announced, it is neither a success nor a failure. We will have to judge based on the reactions of Europeans, so far very cautious, and the Trump-Zelensky meeting on Monday. There is, however, a significant risk, well known to Europeans: Putin can buy time by pretending to be ready to negotiate and engage in endless talks that never lead anywhere, while his army continues to gain ground and bomb Ukraine. That was essentially the tactic he used after the annexation of Crimea and the first invasion of Ukraine in 2014, during the Minsk negotiations with France, Germany and Ukraine. Let's discuss: How should we interpret the welcome given to President Putin as he came off his plane – with the red carpet, applause and a show of military strength featuring American jets in the background? S.K.: Trump is fascinated by Putin as a figure – he generally gets along well with "strongmen," but he is particularly interested in the Russian leader. He calls him by his first name, Vladimir, which he never does with Zelensky. All of this staging, on a US military base, was meant both to demonstrate American power to Putin and to treat him as the leader of another major power, worthy of every honor. This treatment is all the more ironic since Putin is not only the aggressor of an independent country, in violation of international law, but also subject to an arrest warrant for war crimes. Dodochampion: On the Russian side, did this summit have any other ambitions beyond relaunching Russia's international trade? S.K.: Putin's goal at this summit was first to gain respectability and second to buy time. On both counts, he succeeded: The welcome by the US president on American soil, with great ceremony, rehabilitated him on the international stage, even if he is a pariah in Europe. Furthermore, by engaging in this form of dialogue with Trump, he managed to get the ultimatums and the threat of further sanctions against Russia lifted – at least for the time being: Trump said on Fox News that the issue of sanctions was off the table for two or three weeks. That matters to Putin because the Russian economy is showing serious signs of weakness. And in the meantime, he can keep bombing Ukraine and continue his offensive in the east of the country. On the other hand, Putin failed to turn this meeting into a major Russo-American summit on economic and trade relations or on strategic dialogue regarding arms control. Nice: The statements from Trump and Putin were devoid of substance, suggesting there was no progress. On the US side, shouldn't this lead to a North Korea scenario – that is, the United States losing interest in the matter (and leaving it to the Europeans)? S.K.: Yes, that's possible. Several American experts have drawn a parallel with the 2018 Trump-Kim Jong-un meeting, in which Trump invested a great deal (with the difference that he also wanted to invite Kim to ride with him in The Beast, the presidential limousine, but at the time his advisers convinced him not to – which was not the case with Putin...). Then he lost interest in the North Korea issue after there was no progress. If Trump decides to lose interest in the Ukrainian issue, it will be up to the Europeans to handle it alone. The question then is what level of American military assistance they can still count on, particularly in intelligence and satellite reconnaissance. But they now know that under Trump, the US will disengage from Europe. Vice President JD Vance stated clearly last week that the US would no longer fund Ukraine's defense. So the dynamic is clear. Patrick: Don't you think Trump's attitude puts the US in a position of weakness? It's obvious Trump is afraid of Putin, which puts the latter in a position of strength, with the likely consequence of destabilizing the West for Russia's benefit. What cards does the West have left to ensure its own survival and that of Ukraine? S.K.: You raise a crucial point, but first, speaking of "the West" raises the question of whether that concept still exists under Trump. Clearly, the fate of Ukraine does not have the same meaning or importance for the current Washington administration as it does for the majority of Europeans. For Europe, Ukraine's survival as a sovereign and independent state is existential; for Trump's America, it is not. Yes, the American president is impressed by Putin, and that may seem like a weakness to us, but he sees Putin as a "strong" leader of another major power that, incidentally, has "a lot of land, a lot of rare earths and oil," and with whom he believes he can do "great things," as he has said. The cards the Europeans can play are unity and firmness, particularly in defense, a field where they have a lot of ground to make up, but which they have started to address. That will require significant political effort.

After the Trump-Putin summit, Europe must make a move
After the Trump-Putin summit, Europe must make a move

LeMonde

time6 hours ago

  • LeMonde

After the Trump-Putin summit, Europe must make a move

Everything unfolded just as the Europeans had expected. The summit on Friday, August 15, between Presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in Anchorage, Alaska, ended without any concrete prospects for a ceasefire in Ukraine. However, it worked to the advantage of the Russian president, who found himself rehabilitated on the world stage thanks to the event. The aggressor of an independent country, Ukraine, which he claims as his own, and wanted by the International Criminal Court for war crimes, Putin was treated on Friday by the United States with all the honors reserved for a respected leader of a major power. Greeted as he stepped off the plane by President Trump, invited to walk the red carpet with him to the American president's limousine and then invited inside, the Russian president clearly appreciated these gestures. To express his gratitude to Trump, he echoed two grievances dear to the Republican president: that the 2020 presidential election, won by Joe Biden, was fraudulent, and that the war in Ukraine would never have started if Trump had been president. As for the rest, while describing the meeting as very "productive" and on "the path to peace in Ukraine," Putin merely reiterated, during a brief joint appearance before the press, the "underlying causes" of his conflict with Ukraine. The talks lasted just over two and a half hours, whereas the Kremlin had planned for "six to seven hours" of discussions. The scheduled lunch did not take place, journalists were not allowed to ask questions and the exchanges apparently did not touch on commercial or economic matters, nor on arms control – contrary to Moscow's wishes. For his part, Trump showered "Vladimir" with praise, calling him "a strong guy (...) tough as hell." He spoke of a "very productive" meeting where there were "many points that we agreed on," except for one, "probably the most significant," which he did not specify. The American president, who had threatened Russia just a few days earlier with "very severe consequences" if it failed to achieve a ceasefire in Ukraine, stated on Fox News on Friday that the question of new sanctions was not under consideration for the time being, but that he might have to think about it in two or three weeks. In light of this lack of results, the ball is now in the Europeans' court. On Saturday morning, Trump briefed them, as well as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, on his discussions and the points of agreement he mentioned. Even before speaking to them, he offered this advice to Zelensky on Fox News after the summit: "Make a deal!" From the way Putin and Trump presented matters in Anchorage, it can be inferred that the proposed "deal" is not in Kyiv's favor. Echoing Trump, Putin said he hoped the Europeans "won't throw a wrench in the works and not make any attempts to use some backroom dealings to conduct provocations to torpedo the progress." Keen not to miss any chance to end the war, the Ukrainian president nonetheless responded positively to the idea of a three-way meeting with Putin and Trump, and decided to travel to Washington on Monday to discuss it. The scenario Europeans have feared – a settlement hashed out behind their backs by the Russian and American leaders – cannot be ruled out. However, unlike Trump, Putin acknowledged that they, together with Kyiv, have cards to play. The time has come to use them, and to do so with resolve.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store