Sir Keir Starmer slaps down Labour peer after she calls for controversial Foreign Office statue to be torn down
Baroness Debbonaire branded the 1912 bronze 'a shocking piece of sculpture' and said it was 'not helpful' for Britain's relationship with India.
Clive of India was an East India Company clerk who became Governor of Bengal and led Britain's expansion in the subcontinent.
But he is also blamed for mismanaging the Bengal famine, which killed millions.
His name was stripped from a house at his former private school in the wake of the Black Lives Matter movement.
The former shadow culture secretary and Bristol MP told a book festival: 'I'm not sure that a statue of Clive should really have any place outside the Foreign Office.
'I walk past it and the frieze shows happy, smiling people really delighted to see him.
"And that's just not historically accurate.
"It's not helpful for our current relationship with India and it is deeply unhelpful to see India as a country that Britain civilised.'
But the PM's spokesman distanced himself from her comments yesterday, saying: 'I'm not sure you achieve very much by going round taking statues down, but I haven't seen that.'
Baroness Debonnaire has previously campaigned against monuments, demanding slave trader Edward Colston's statue be removed two years before it was toppled in Bristol in 2020.
At the time she said: 'Having statues of people who oppressed us is not a good thing to be saying to black people in this city.'
2
Statue of Edward Colston is thrown into river after being pulled down in Bristol
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
9 minutes ago
- The Independent
Sturgeon sought counselling after ‘breaking down' at Covid inquiry
Nicola Sturgeon has told how she went for counselling for the first time after breaking down in tears while giving evidence to the UK Covid-19 Inquiry – with the former first minister saying she was 'really worried' at the time that she might not be able to stop crying. She said crying at the inquiry in January 2024 was 'such a raw moment'. As Scotland's longest serving first minster, she was in charge of the country when the pandemic hit. She gave hundreds of televised daily media briefings, updating the country on the fight against the virus. But she also came in for criticism for some decisions, such as transferring elderly hospital patients into care homes early in the outbreak without Covid tests being done on them. She became tearful when she gave evidence to the inquiry as she told how 'of the many regrets' she has, 'chief of those is that we didn't lock down a week, two weeks earlier than we did'. Ms Sturgeon, speaking as her memoir Frankly was published, said she had 'spent so long' preparing to give evidence to the inquiry, and 'thinking so deeply about all the decisions I had taken, the ones I thought were right, the ones that with hindsight maybe weren't'. She told the BBC Newscast podcast: 'I don't think I properly prepared myself for the emotional impact of sitting in an inquiry. 'I had been through a pretty torrid time in the months leading up to that. 'I had worried that I might get emotional, but in that moment it wasn't just the breaking down and starting to cry, in that moment I was really worried I wasn't able to stop crying. 'It was just such a raw moment.' Ms Sturgeon continued: 'In the period since standing down, lots of difficult stuff had happened. That was my lowest moment. 'It just in that moment felt I was very, very close to the edge, I just lost all sense of perspective, all sense of who I was.' Adding that she was 'in a really bad state' at that time, Ms Sturgeon said: 'For the first and only time in my life I actually went for some counselling because I felt I needed something to help me regain that sense of equilibrium and perspective on life.' She said a friend had 'persuaded' her to do this, and she is 'glad' she did it. 'Thankfully, reasonably quickly I managed to regain a firmer footing on life,' Ms Sturgeon said. She also stressed she did her 'best' during the Covid pandemic, but 'like leaders everywhere, I didn't get everything right'. She added: 'I absolutely, and I can hand on heart say this, I did my best every single day.'
The Independent
9 minutes ago
- The Independent
Cutting throats comment made ‘in heat of moment'
A Labour councillor who called for far-right protesters' throats to be cut at an anti-racism protest told police the 'ill-advised' comments were made 'in the heat of the moment', a court has heard. In the wake of rioting following the Southport murders, Ricky Jones, 58, described demonstrators as 'disgusting Nazi fascists', his trial at Snaresbrook Crown Court was told. A video showing Jones, who at the time was also employed as a full-time official for the Transport Salaried Staffs Association (TSSA) union, addressing the crowd in Walthamstow, east London, on August 7 last year went viral on social media after the protest. Wearing a black polo top and surrounded by cheering supporters, the now-suspended councillor said: 'They are disgusting Nazi fascists. We need to cut all their throats and get rid of them all.' He also drew his finger across his throat as he spoke to the crowd. Jones was arrested on August 8 last year and interviewed at Brixton Police Station that night. A prepared statement submitted on Jones' behalf at the police station read: 'Yesterday at a rally in Walthamstow, I made a comment on microphone to a large crowd. 'I accept that these comments were particularly ill-advised. 'I was referring specifically to an incident the day before where some far-right activists had stuck a 'National Front Rights for Whites' sticker on a train and hidden a razor blade behind it in order that anyone trying to remove it would injure themselves. 'This had made me very upset. I grew up in the 1960s and 1970s when the National Front were very active and I experienced a great deal of racism in my youth. 'I did not intend for my comments to be taken literally by anyone and I did not intend to encourage or incite anyone to commit violence against any other. 'I am, however, extremely sorry for making the comments which were made in the heat of the moment and I very much regret having done so. 'I was not invited to speak on microphone until the last minute and I had not planned or thought about what I was going to say in advance.' Jones, who has been a borough councillor in Dartford, Kent, since 2019, was suspended by the Labour Party the day after the alleged incident. A medical report by experts from the prosecution and defence agreed that Jones 'suffers from a number of neurodivergent challenges', jurors were told as part of agreed facts. These include 'impaired verbal comprehension potentially leading to misunderstanding the impact of his words' and 'slower cognitive processing meaning he may not have evaluated the situation in real time'. Jurors were also told testing had established Jones suffers from 'impulsivity increasing the likelihood of reactive speech' and 'emotional arousal which can override deliberate decision-making'. The agreed facts read by prosecutor Ben Holt stated: 'The experts agree that these challenges may contribute to impulsive verbal responses in emotionally charged situations. 'These challenges can impair his ability to plan responses and inhibit inappropriate remarks. This could lead to Ricky Jones making regrettable statements when he is unprepared.' The prosecution's medical expert, Dr Scott Mackenzie, said Jones' difficulties appeared 'functionally on the milder side as demonstrated by his ability to successfully work in senior roles where he has to speak publicly'. The defence's medical expert Dr Alison Beck said Jones' difficulties were 'statistically and clinically significant'. The demonstration had been organised in response to plans for a far-right march outside Waltham Forest Immigration Bureau, jurors were told. It followed the nationwide violent disorder that occurred last summer after the Southport murders. Jones, of Dartford, denies one count of encouraging violent disorder. Judge Rosa Dean told jurors on Tuesday morning that a person had 'tailgated' them into a secure area of the court on Monday after CCTV footage was reviewed. The judge added: 'It's perfectly clear that the person who tailgated has absolutely nothing to do with this case and that person is not welcome in this court.'
Daily Mirror
10 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
'Labour must act on bin strikes or people will vote with feet' says Unite chief
As Birmingham's bin strike enters the sixth month, Real Britain guest columnist Sharon Graham, general secretary of trade union Unite, says workers are not being supported. The Birmingham bin strike has just entered its sixth month. It could be the straw that breaks the camel's back. Workers are being told to take up to £8,000 worth of pay cuts while councillors' allowances increase and government commissioners – brought in to control the council – earn an eye-watering £1,200 a day. In the last six months, not one Labour politician, either locally or nationally, has bothered to find out about the state of negotiations or even join them. Not one. This, in a Labour -controlled council and with commissioners directly accountable to the Labour government to oversee decisions – a council that has spent tens of millions on a failed IT system, and many more other failed projects, and which is now asking workers to pay the price. These workers, like so many others now, are scratching their heads and asking, "What the hell is Labour doing?" Instead of rolling up her sleeves and finding out what is going on, Angela Rayner – who has direct authority in the government for the commissioners – has not spoken to one single worker who is on strike. It seems she's too busy holding photo opportunities with agency staff, using Thatcher's laws to try to break the strike. Workers aren't stupid, they can see what is going on. It comes after Keir Starmer hails a major UK-France deal to tackle Channel small boat crossings. These drivers are being told to accept their wage cuts or get out. Jobs some have been doing for more than 20 years. Their homes are now at risk because they can't pay their mortgages. Labour is effectively threatening these workers with "fire and rehire". Pure and simple. All of this makes an absolute mockery of Labour's pledge to "make work pay". The government is failing to deliver for workers. From Grangemouth and now the Lindsey oil refinery, for example, too often Labour hasn't safeguarded Britain's industrial base. In Birmingham, Labour seem blinded by its own self-regard, lost in a toxic mix of arrogance and incompetence. It seems to expect Unite to roll over and allow this outrageous attack on workers to continue because the government wears a red rosette. Workers will always come first for me no matter the colour of the political rosette. Last month, 800 Unite shop stewards at our biennial conference decided to suspend the Unite membership of Angela Rayner and re-examine our relationship with Labour. It should be a red flag warning. Everyone who is asking what on earth Labour is doing can't be wrong. There are key moments for leaders when they need to see and feel the workers' mood music. This is not just a case of what I think, or what the workers in Birmingham think. There is now a groundswell against Labour, fast becoming irreversible damage. I'm not sure the penny has dropped within the ranks of the Cabinet. Workers will look for alternatives. Labour needs to wake up, and wake up quickly. In Birmingham a Unite poll has revealed 77% of residents believe the government should do more to resolve the dispute. And 49% say they will be less likely to vote Labour at the next election if it continues to refuse to intervene. It is a fact that millions of workers now feel politically homeless and are looking elsewhere to cast their votes. If Labour does not get a grip now and instead remains content with listening to those who tell it what it wants to hear, an even bigger vacuum will appear. One that will be large enough to swallow the party whole. Tory austerity debt should be re-structured or cut Thanks to years of Tory austerity, councils have been loaded with debt. Who pays for this? Residents and workers. Councils, in turn, pay the government interest, including in Birmingham where debt interest payments alone cost £9million a year. It means the Labour government is making money from years of Tory austerity when council budgets were slashed, forcing many into debt to keep services running. The picture across the country is shocking. As of the end of 2023, councils pay the government more than £3billion a year in interest. A major part of the problem is that Labour charges councils more than it must pay out itself. We estimate local authorities pay an additional £450m a year in interest above the government's own borrowing costs. This is a political instrument that Labour could change. During the financial crash RBS didn't pay any similar charges on its £ bailout. It's time for different choices. Workers and communities need to see and feel that Labour are on their side The Tories left a mess, but Labour calls the shots now. Nobody thought one of its first acts would be to target pensioners and disability benefits. While hitting some of the poorest in society, the party failed to restore the cap on City bonuses. So hundreds of thousands of OAPs panicked with anxiety before the eventual U-turn, while the City racked up record bonuses of £7billion last year alone. Failing Labour is losing millions of voters Workers want real change and will look for alternatives. We voted for change, not fiscal rules. After years of austerity and now more than 12 months into a Labour government, it's hard to argue that change is on its way. But perhaps more worrying is the growing expectation this government will fail to make our lives better. That's the reason that millions of workers are turning to Reform or considering a new Left party. Many now believe it is only Nigel Farage or Jeremy Corbyn that will deliver real change. Labour will get one shot to deliver. The party needs to change course and take it. Increased defence spending must deliver jobs at home When the government cut international aid at the same time as it committed to increased defence spending, I argued that it was presenting a false choice. If Britain wants influence overseas, then our aid budget is critical. Soft power is still important, even when you may need more combat drones. And when you commit to extra defence spending, it is just as important that the money to develop military production is spent in the UK, not overseas. We must invest in Britain, in British jobs and British industry and be proud to do so. This country has an enormous skills base in sophisticated defence manufacturing, and it cannot be allowed to wither on the vine. On the contrary, while nobody welcomes global instability, increased spending should be on British manufacturing, securing tens of thousands of jobs. It's not complicated.
