'Labour must act on bin strikes or people will vote with feet' says Unite chief
The Birmingham bin strike has just entered its sixth month. It could be the straw that breaks the camel's back. Workers are being told to take up to £8,000 worth of pay cuts while councillors' allowances increase and government commissioners – brought in to control the council – earn an eye-watering £1,200 a day. In the last six months, not one Labour politician, either locally or nationally, has bothered to find out about the state of negotiations or even join them. Not one.
This, in a Labour -controlled council and with commissioners directly accountable to the Labour government to oversee decisions – a council that has spent tens of millions on a failed IT system, and many more other failed projects, and which is now asking workers to pay the price.
These workers, like so many others now, are scratching their heads and asking, "What the hell is Labour doing?" Instead of rolling up her sleeves and finding out what is going on, Angela Rayner – who has direct authority in the government for the commissioners – has not spoken to one single worker who is on strike. It seems she's too busy holding photo opportunities with agency staff, using Thatcher's laws to try to break the strike. Workers aren't stupid, they can see what is going on. It comes after Keir Starmer hails a major UK-France deal to tackle Channel small boat crossings.
These drivers are being told to accept their wage cuts or get out. Jobs some have been doing for more than 20 years. Their homes are now at risk because they can't pay their mortgages. Labour is effectively threatening these workers with "fire and rehire". Pure and simple.
All of this makes an absolute mockery of Labour's pledge to "make work pay". The government is failing to deliver for workers. From Grangemouth and now the Lindsey oil refinery, for example, too often Labour hasn't safeguarded Britain's industrial base. In Birmingham, Labour seem blinded by its own self-regard, lost in a toxic mix of arrogance and incompetence. It seems to expect Unite to roll over and allow this outrageous attack on workers to continue because the government wears a red rosette. Workers will always come first for me no matter the colour of the political rosette.
Last month, 800 Unite shop stewards at our biennial conference decided to suspend the Unite membership of Angela Rayner and re-examine our relationship with Labour. It should be a red flag warning. Everyone who is asking what on earth Labour is doing can't be wrong.
There are key moments for leaders when they need to see and feel the workers' mood music. This is not just a case of what I think, or what the workers in Birmingham think. There is now a groundswell against Labour, fast becoming irreversible damage. I'm not sure the penny has dropped within the ranks of the Cabinet. Workers will look for alternatives. Labour needs to wake up, and wake up quickly.
In Birmingham a Unite poll has revealed 77% of residents believe the government should do more to resolve the dispute. And 49% say they will be less likely to vote Labour at the next election if it continues to refuse to intervene.
It is a fact that millions of workers now feel politically homeless and are looking elsewhere to cast their votes. If Labour does not get a grip now and instead remains content with listening to those who tell it what it wants to hear, an even bigger vacuum will appear. One that will be large enough to swallow the party whole.
Tory austerity debt should be re-structured or cut
Thanks to years of Tory austerity, councils have been loaded with debt. Who pays for this? Residents and workers. Councils, in turn, pay the government interest, including in Birmingham where debt interest payments alone cost £9million a year.
It means the Labour government is making money from years of Tory austerity when council budgets were slashed, forcing many into debt to keep services running. The picture across the country is shocking. As of the end of 2023, councils pay the government more than £3billion a year in interest. A major part of the problem is that Labour charges councils more than it must pay out itself. We estimate local authorities pay an additional £450m a year in interest above the government's own borrowing costs.
This is a political instrument that Labour could change. During the financial crash RBS didn't pay any similar charges on its £45.5.bn bailout. It's time for different choices.
Workers and communities need to see and feel that Labour are on their side
The Tories left a mess, but Labour calls the shots now. Nobody thought one of its first acts would be to target pensioners and disability benefits. While hitting some of the poorest in society, the party failed to restore the cap on City bonuses. So hundreds of thousands of OAPs panicked with anxiety before the eventual U-turn, while the City racked up record bonuses of £7billion last year alone.
Failing Labour is losing millions of voters
Workers want real change and will look for alternatives. We voted for change, not fiscal rules. After years of austerity and now more than 12 months into a Labour government, it's hard to argue that change is on its way. But perhaps more worrying is the growing expectation this government will fail to make our lives better.
That's the reason that millions of workers are turning to Reform or considering a new Left party. Many now believe it is only Nigel Farage or Jeremy Corbyn that will deliver real change. Labour will get one shot to deliver. The party needs to change course and take it.
Increased defence spending must deliver jobs at home
When the government cut international aid at the same time as it committed to increased defence spending, I argued that it was presenting a false choice. If Britain wants influence overseas, then our aid budget is critical. Soft power is still important, even when you may need more combat drones. And when you commit to extra defence spending, it is just as important that the money to develop military production is spent in the UK, not overseas.
We must invest in Britain, in British jobs and British industry and be proud to do so. This country has an enormous skills base in sophisticated defence manufacturing, and it cannot be allowed to wither on the vine. On the contrary, while nobody welcomes global instability, increased spending should be on British manufacturing, securing tens of thousands of jobs.
It's not complicated.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
22 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Lord Sawyer obituary
It is only the passage of time that has revealed the extent of the role played by Tom Sawyer, the former Labour general secretary, who has died aged 82, in the regeneration of his party before its triumphant return to power in the 1997 general election. He used his authority as a distinguished trade union leader and his credibility as a one-time stalwart of the left to show the Labour party membership a way out of the political wilderness. It was his unseen hand that drew the route map. It was his work on the party's national executive committee (NEC) that secured a radical review of Labour's policies, specifically its previous commitments to unilateralism and opposition to Europe, after its humiliating third consecutive general election defeat in 1987. And it was he who recognised the need to modernise the party culture to reflect the politics of the time; he saw that this should address its approach to wealth creation and enterprise, and then effectively erected the scaffolding to remodel Labour's own constitution. His aim was to present Labour as an attractive and credible future government, with a realistic agenda that came from a process of democratic policymaking, while simultaneously avoiding the constant political divisions that had historically been publicly aired at party conferences. This was the origin of what became known as 'partnership in power', for which Sawyer prepared the ground as chair of the NEC's influential home policy committee from 1987 and delivered when Tony Blair won the leadership in 1994 and appointed Sawyer general secretary. He was a genial man who exuded the calm common sense for which he came to be lauded by successive Labour leaders and it was, perhaps, precisely because of his experience as a leftwing trade unionist, who had led his members out on strike, that he recognised the importance of consensus. He was close to Neil Kinnock and would quote the then Labour leader's salient comment that 'only people with very shallow convictions are afraid of compromise'. Sawyer's particular skill lay in persuading others to an agreed position without seeming to promote his own viewpoint. Kinnock regarded him as a bridge who could 'bring people over' and would quote him the Welsh proverb: 'A fo ben, bid bont' (He who would be a leader, let him be a bridge). The wellspring of Sawyer's politics was a belief in social justice. He was born in Darlington, in the streets behind the town's one-time major employer, the Cleveland Bridge Manufacturing company – famed for building the Sydney Harbour Bridge – the son of a railway worker and a domestic cleaner employed by a local doctor. He went to Dodmire primary school, Eastbourne comprehensive school and attended Darlington Technical College aged 13 to 15. He then became a 'Stivvie', apprenticed to Robert Stephenson and Hawthorns, Darlington's famous locomotive builders, but was unemployed with a wife and son when the company closed five years later. He moved his family to find work in the booming motor industry, with Lockheed Brakes in Leamington Spa, and most significantly for his career took an interest in trade unions, joining the Amalgamated Engineering Union (AEU). His mentor, Geoff Thatcher, was a shop steward who looked like Karl Marx and opened a door in the young Sawyer's mind by lending him books and political pamphlets. He was a shop steward himself within two years. Returning to his home town for a job at Cummins' Darlington engine plant, he joined the Transport and General Workers' Union (TGWU) in order to secure union recognition for the white-collar workers. He became secretary of the Darlington Trades Council, met the local Labour MP and joined the Labour party in 1968; three years later he answered a Tribune advertisement for a post as a trade union official with the National Union of Public Employees (Nupe), taking a pay cut of a third of his £1,500 salary. He became deputy to his lifelong friend, Rodney Bickerstaffe, and in 1975 succeeded him as Nupe's northern region organiser. In 1981, he followed Bickerstaffe to London to become his deputy general secretary at Nupe headquarters, which in turn gave Sawyer his place on the Labour NEC. Sawyer was already far-sighted as a young, leather-jacketed, leftwing activist, seeing the need to move trade unionism onwards from its cloth-cap image. He had become a night-time student with the Workers' Educational Association, was reading widely – cultivating an interest that would lead to a 5,000-book library and a fascination for antiquarian literature. As a union official he was involved in the 1973 ambulance workers' strike in County Durham, in the 1974 widespread industrial action that led to the 'three-day week' and the collapse of the Heath government, and in the 'winter of discontent' public sector strikes of 1978-79, which contributed to the fall of the Callaghan government. But he had also developed a concern for society that stretched beyond pay and conditions. This he articulated in a speech at the 1987 Labour conference, when he spoke movingly about his vision of a society where skills and wealth were harnessed to social need, deference replaced with dignity and fear with a sense of security. By this time Sawyer had become a focal member of the party 'soft left'. He rejected the mindset of the union left, which had sought a general strike in support of the mineworkers' year-long action in 1984-85, categorising it as the 'worst kind of gesture politics', but the crucial issue for him became his membership of the party inquiry into entrysim by the Trotskyist group, Militant – notably in Liverpool. His own conversations in the course of the inquiry led him to form a radically differing view from his NEC leftwing former associates, and his was the majority casting vote in 1986 in favour of expulsion of Militant members. Sawyer played an important role in the 1993 formation of Unison: the amalgamation of Nupe with the Confederation of Health Service Employees (Cohse) and the National Association of Local Government Employees (Nalgo) to form a 1.3 million-member giant. He left the union the following year to become Labour's general secretary, but first helped the Labour leader, John Smith, to deliver the one-member, one-vote reform at the 1993 Brighton conference. He was interested in new methods of managing change in large organisations and took advice on the creation of Unison from Cranfield School of Management, a strategy he would subsequently extend to his Labour party constitutional reform during his four years as general secretary. On stepping down from that post in 1998, at Tony Blair's request, he became a life peer. He did not take an active role in the House of Lords, but delighted in his post as a visiting professor at Cranfield School of Management from (1999-2013). He was chancellor of the University of Teesside (2005-17) and president of the William Morris Society (2018-23). He was a popular chair of the Notting Hill Housing group and a non-executive director of Investors in People UK (both 1998-2005). He was also a director of the Britannia Building Society (1999-2009), chaired the Reed Health Group (2001-03) and the Royal Mail Partnership Board (2001-07). Tom Sawyer adopted the name of Mark Twain's fictional hero as a boy. In 1962 he married Sylvia Park and they had son, Mark; they later divorced. He is survived by Liz (Elizabeth), a former nursing sister and shop steward who became his second wife, their sons, Jack and Tom, and Mark. Tom (Lawrence) Sawyer, Lord Sawyer, trade unionist and politician, born 12 May 1943; died 3 August 2025
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
JD Vance delivers special message from Trump to US troops based at UK RAF base
JD Vance delivered a message from Donald Trump to American troops stationed at a British navy base during his visit to the UK. Speaking at RAF Fairford on Wednesday (13 August), the US vice president said that Trump was 'damn proud of the good job you do every single day'. Reciting the US president's message, Vance said: 'We're proud of you, we're grateful to you, we know it's not always an easy job, it's often long hours but I hope you know that the peace and prosperity and safety of your countrymen depends on you.' The Gloucestershire base houses troops from the United States Air Force's 501st Combat Support Wing and the 99th Expeditionary Reconnaissance Squadron.
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Sturgeon's ‘Stalinist' approach disastrous for SNP, claims Joanna Cherry
Nicola Sturgeon's 'Stalinist' approach to leadership had 'disastrous' consequences for the SNP, former SNP MP Joanna Cherry has told an audience at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival. Speaking at an on-stage conversation with Matt Forde on Wednesday, the lawyer said Ms Sturgeon's top-down approach lay behind the party failing to recognise concerns around gender self-identification, and its failure to achieve Scottish independence post-Brexit. She said that unlike her predecessor Alex Salmond, Ms Sturgeon had shut down debate within the party on strategy and policy discussions, and that 'it was her way or the highway', and dissenters were viewed with 'deep suspicion'. The former Edinburgh South West MP added that she had never been friends with Ms Sturgeon, but that their differences were political rather than personal. 'I've never been close to her. This is not a personality clash. This is a clash based on the way that we do politics,' she said. 'I believe in open debates and discussion. And I don't think she does. I think she was Stalinist in the way in which she ran the party and the country.' She also criticised Ms Sturgeon's strategy for securing a Scottish independence in the post-Brexit period, when she said she 'repeatedly' pursued a mandate for a second referendum from the UK Government without considering a plan B. 'The ideal thing would have been to get a second referendum, but it was unwise to close down other options, and we needed to discuss other options,' Ms Cherry said. 'She never wanted to discuss a plan B, and she never wanted to discuss the possibility of treating an election as a de facto referendum. 'And when she eventually decided to do that, it was only because she'd run out of options, and she did it without any debate or discussion.' She added: 'The reason that I feel that her strategy failed and was so wrong was it was very narrow, and she repeatedly banged her head off the brick wall of the British Government's refusal to grant a section 30 order, rather than having a multi-faceted strategy to put pressure on them to do so, whilst also having a back-up plan if they said no. 'A more skilled politician of the sort of person that Alex Salmond was would have had that kind of a plan, and she didn't have it.' Ms Cherry also described the independence referendum in 2014 as a 'flowering of ideas' that had come about from the 'grassroots up'. She said: 'I think Nicola and her husband, as chief executive of the party, set out to undermine that grassroots power because it scared them, and to make everything imposed in the top-down, and that has had disastrous results for the SNP and for the independence movement.' Ms Cherry also said it was 'irritating' that in her recent autobiography Ms Sturgeon conceded some of the problems with gender self-identification were valid, given, she said, there had been multiple attempts to get her to 'press pause' on the policy at the time. These included, she said, an open letter in the Scotsman newspaper in 2019 by herself and 'quite a few other SNP MPs, MSPs and councillors', and separate calls from herself for a citizens' assembly to examine the issue. She said of Ms Sturgeon's response: 'Not only did she close her ears to them, she demonised those of us who raised concerns. 'She said first of all that our concerns weren't valid. And then she actually compared us to the far-right, said we're misogynist, racist, homophobes.' Joanna Cherry was first elected to the UK Parliament in 2015, and was her party's spokesperson for justice and home affairs until 2021. She lost her seat to Labour in the 2024 general election.
