logo
Trump's threats to pull aid if Egypt, Jordan don't accept Palestinians could lead to new alliances, experts say

Trump's threats to pull aid if Egypt, Jordan don't accept Palestinians could lead to new alliances, experts say

Yahoo14-02-2025

Despite President Donald Trump's push for the forcible displacement of Palestinians from Gaza -- a move that, if carried out, would be a violation of international law that some experts and U.S. allies have called ethnic cleansing -- he is facing significant pushback from allies and states in the region.
There is "zero possibility" that Palestinians will be forcibly displaced from Gaza and into Jordan and Egypt, one expert told ABC News.
"I see no scenario where this happens," Brian Katulis, a senior fellow for U.S. foreign policy at the Middle East Institute, a nonpartisan think tank, told ABC News. "This is their home. They've endured so much to stay in their home, even if their home -- literal homes, family homes -- have been destroyed."
"It's a model that just won't work in today's Middle East," Katulis said, referring to the forced displacement of Palestinians.
MORE: Trump sanctions against ICC could 'erode international rule of law,' court warns
"The risk is that [this] comes at a very uncertain time with the ceasefire and hostage release deal on thin ice, and it actually serves to distract from the important work of trying to keep that process moving forward -- to get hostages released and much-needed aid into the people ... and to actually try to move forward to something that is realistic," Katulis said.
Trump at one point threatened to withdraw aid to Egypt and Jordan if they didn't agree to take in Palestinians, though less than 24 hours later, he said, "I don't have to threaten that, I don't think. I think we're above that."
"The point of this is to ostensibly force Egypt and Jordan to accept all of the Palestinians currently living in the Gaza Strip, so they can engage, so the U.S. can annex the territory. I think it's safe to say it's a non-starter for the Saudis," Daniel Drezner, a professor of international politics at Tufts University's Fletcher School, told ABC News.
"The Jordanians, in particular, need the money. They're not oil rich, and same with Egypt, but in some ways the expectation would be that if Trump actually threatened to cut them off, they would likely turn first to Saudi Arabia and the Emiratis," Drezner said.
Arab nations quickly rejected Trump's proposal to forcibly displace Palestinians and relocate them in neighboring states, with several calling it a hard line.
"The Foreign Ministry affirms that Saudi Arabia's position on the establishment of a Palestinian state is firm and unwavering. HRH Prince Mohammed bin Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, Crown Prince and Prime Minister clearly and unequivocally reaffirmed this stance," Saudi Arabia said last week, just hours after Trump called for the displacement of Palestinians from Gaza.
MORE: Hamas says it will release hostages as planned on Saturday
As much as a bind Jordan is in, it is unlikely that it would accept anything along the lines of what Trump proposed, Drezner said, adding the proposal is worse than losing the $1.5 billion in annual aid that it receives from the U.S.
"The question is the extent to which the Saudis are willing to bankroll both the Jordanians and the Egyptians," Drezner said.
"Pay attention to how the Gulf states are reacting to all this, because they're the ones that are simultaneously most likely to be able to resist Trump's pressures, and also it will send a regional signal to Egypt and Jordan as to what their options are," Drezner said.
After Trump's comments, Egypt expressed its support for the legitimate and inalienable rights of the Palestinian people, calling for the need for a two-state solution and the establishment of an independent Palestinian state.
As Trump continued to double down on forcing out the Palestinians, Egyptian President Abdelfatah El Sisi announced he will indefinitely postpone his plan to visit Trump at the White House. According to Saudi-owned Al Arabiya News, Sisi said he won't attend any White House talks if the displacement of Palestinians in Gaza is on the agenda.
"They're probably trying to figure out how do they reposition themselves in light of Trump's incendiary remarks, because they come directly at odds with Egypt's own positions on this issue and its national security interests. And I don't think they want to be put in any sort of position to actually directly challenge Trump right now until they assess," Katulis said.
"[Egypt]'s security aid from the U.S. is part of a package that came out of the Israel-Egypt peace treaty. And if Trump wants to play games with that, he's actually going to undercut a lot of America's long-standing traditional security relationships in the region," Katulis said.
Egypt also announced it plans to host a meeting with Arab states in Cairo later this month where they will discuss a counterproposal.
After meeting with Trump, King Abdullah of Jordan said in a statement he "reiterated Jordan's steadfast position against the displacement of Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank. This is the unified Arab position. Rebuilding Gaza without displacing the Palestinians and addressing the dire humanitarian situation should be the priority for all."
Trump appeared to walk back his threat of withdrawing aid after his meeting this week with King Abdullah resulted in the news that Jordan would take in 2,000 sick Palestinian children for treatment.
"This is a replay of what we've seen with regard to threatening Canada and Mexico [with tariffs] -- it's the shining orb strategy. It turns out if you offer Trump like a pretty gaudy but not terribly significant concession, he'll back down," Drezner said.
MORE: Egypt to offer Trump Gaza reconstruction plan without Palestinian displacement
"Jordan can never agree to this -- to Trump's proposal -- that would be the end of the regime. And that's the fundamental thing that I assume someone must have told Donald Trump," Drezner said.
In addition to opposing the forced displacement of Palestinians, Jordan and Egypt also have strains on their economies and taking in millions of refugees could potentially produce more economic and security challenges.
For the last 20 years, Jordan has faced an influx of refugees from Iraq and Syria, which has strained their economy and their social fabric, according to Katulis.
Egypt's economy has also faced strains, with the Egyptian pound being depreciated several times in recent years. According to the World Food Programme, from January 2016 to January 2025, the Egyptian pound was devalued by 84.5% relative to the U.S. dollar -- a move that governments use to increase its competitiveness or trade balance. And the U.S. dollar appreciated by 543.8% relative to the Egyptian pound during that same time period, based on the official exchange rate, according to the World Food Programme.
Taking in all Palestinians living in Gaza could also pull other countries into a confrontation with Israel, Drezner noted.
"There is no scenario whereby the Palestinians that are displaced are not going to want to return. Essentially, you're introducing the possibility of violent non-state actors to operate within your territory," Drezner said.
While Egypt and Jordan are most likely to look to Gulf states for alternate sources of aid, other international actors could also fill a gap created by the U.S. if Trump follows through on his threats.
"I'm not sure Russia is really in all that strong a position, particularly in the Middle East, since they lost their last port [when the regime fell in Syria] and we just saw what happened to Bashar Al Assad. I'm not sure that [Vladimir Putin]'s necessarily a reliable benefactor," Drezner said.
"It would make much more sense to make a pivot towards China, in no small part because, among other things, China actually has reasons to want to be involved in the region, given their various energy demands," Drezner said.
But, Jordan and Egypt rely on military supplies from the U.S. and the West.
"The longer-term issue is that you can argue that the militaries in both Jordan and Egypt are a little bit stuck in that they rely primarily on U.S. weaponry. So to engage in a radical pivot means that in some ways you're also weakening your own coercive apparatus at the same time," Drezner said.
It would take time before the militaries would be prepared to use weaponry from a different source, and weapons from another source would likely also be incompatible with their existing military stock, according to Drezner.
"It would be hard to pivot to either Russia or China as your primary arms manufacturer," Drezner said.
Trump's threats to pull aid if Egypt, Jordan don't accept Palestinians could lead to new alliances, experts say originally appeared on abcnews.go.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NATO commits to higher spending sought by Trump and mutual defense
NATO commits to higher spending sought by Trump and mutual defense

USA Today

time8 minutes ago

  • USA Today

NATO commits to higher spending sought by Trump and mutual defense

While Trump got what he wanted at the brief NATO summit, his allies will be relieved he committed to the fundamental principle of collective defense. THE HAGUE, June 25 (Reuters) - NATO leaders on June 25 backed the big increase in defense spending that President Donald Trump had demanded, and restated their commitment to defend each other from attack. While Trump got what he wanted at the brief summit, tailor-made for him, his NATO allies will be relieved that he committed to the fundamental principle of collective defense after less clear-cut language on June 24. In a five-point statement, NATO endorsed a higher defence spending goal of 5% of GDP by 2035 - a response not only to Trump but also to Europeans' fears that Russia poses a growing threat to their security following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. More: Israel-Iran ceasefire seems to hold as Trump lands in Europe for NATO summit The 32 allies' brief communique added: "We reaffirm our ironclad commitment to collective defense as enshrined in Article 5 of the Washington Treaty – that an attack on one is an attack on all." Asked to clarify his own stance on Article 5, Trump said: "I stand with it. That's why I'm here. If I didn't stand with it, I wouldn't be here." Macron brings up trade war at NATO summit Trump had long demanded in no uncertain terms that for other countries step up their spending on defense to reduce NATO's heavy reliance on the U.S. Despite an appearance of general agreement, French President Emmanuel Macron raised the issue of the steep import tariffs threatened by Trump, and the damage they may do to transatlantic trade, as a barrier to increased defense spending. More: Can Trump pull off peace plans, trade deals at the G7? What to know about the summit "You cannot come to us as allies and ask that we spend more, tell us we will spend more at NATO - and do a trade war. It's an aberration," he told reporters. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, who hosted the summit in his home city of The Hague, said NATO would emerge as a 'stronger, fairer and more lethal' alliance. He had earlier acknowledged that it was not easy for European countries and Canada to find the extra money, but said it was vital to do so. "There is absolute conviction with my colleagues at the table that, given this threat from the Russians, given the international security situation, there is no alternative," the former Dutch prime minister told reporters in his home city of The Hague. The new spending target - to be achieved over the next 10 years - is a jump worth hundreds of billions of dollars a year from the current goal of 2% of GDP, although it will be measured differently. Countries would spend 3.5% of GDP on core defence - such as troops and weapons - and 1.5% on broader defence-related measures such as cyber security, protecting pipelines and adapting roads and bridges to handle heavy military vehicles. All NATO members have backed a statement enshrining the target, although Spain declared it does not need to meet the goal and can meet its commitments by spending much less. More: Trump says US strike impaired Iran's nukes. What does Pentagon say? Live updates Rutte disputes that but accepted a diplomatic fudge with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez as part of his efforts to give Trump a diplomatic victory and make the summit go smoothly. Spain said on June 25 that it did not expect its stance to have any repercussions. Trump meets Zelenskyy after summit Rutte kept the summit and its final statement short and focused on the spending pledge to try to avert any friction with Trump. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy had to settle for attending the pre-summit June 24 dinner rather than the main meeting on June 25, although he met Trump separately after the conference ended. The Kremlin on June 24 accused NATO of being on a path of rampant militarization and portraying Russia as a "fiend of hell" in order to justify its big increase in defense spending.

Trump's tariff war: Canada expected to keep NAFTA 2.0 'carve-out' in new U.S. trade deal
Trump's tariff war: Canada expected to keep NAFTA 2.0 'carve-out' in new U.S. trade deal

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's tariff war: Canada expected to keep NAFTA 2.0 'carve-out' in new U.S. trade deal

A new Canada-U.S. trade deal will likely carry forward the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) tariff exemptions currently shielding most Canadian exports from American tariffs today, says Deloitte Canada chief economist Dawn Desjardins. She's optimistic that Canada can avoid the economic hit that may be in store for other U.S. trading partners. U.S. President Donald Trump has set July 9 as the deadline for countries to ink a trade deal in order to avoid his 'Liberation Day' tariffs, many of which are higher than the baseline 10 per cent levy the White House has applied to most countries. For Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney and Trump agreed on the sidelines of the recent G7 meeting in Alberta to strike a deal by July 21. 'Our baseline view assumes that at a minimum, we continue to operate with our CUSMA carve-outs. Meaning, the vast majority of Canadian goods that we sell into the U.S. will continue to be tariff-free,' Desjardins told Yahoo Finance Canada in an interview earlier this week. 'The sounds we're hearing seem to be moving in the right direction. Obviously, [I have] no inside information. It's just an assumption that we will not be severely hit by 25 per cent tariffs across the board.' While Trump has ramped up tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum, as well as the auto sector, economists say Canada achieved the lowest U.S. tariff rate among major trade partners when CUSMA-compliant goods were exempted on April 2. On Wednesday, RBC Economics estimated that roughly 86 per cent of Canadian exports should ultimately be able to access the U.S. market duty free under current trade rules. RBC expects the share of CUSMA-compliant trade to rise rapidly from 50 per cent in March. Trump signed CUSMA, also known as United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, into U.S. law on Jan. 29, 2020. The deal was dubbed 'NAFTA 2.0' or 'New NAFTA,' as it replaced the North American Free Trade Agreement implemented in 1994. 'I'm a little surprised that we were already front and centre in terms of the initial tariffs being applied to Canada, given that we have that trade agreement,' Desjardins said. 'The element of trust that we have with our biggest trading partner has been quite damaged by this.' Deloitte Canada's latest economic forecast, published on Wednesday, calls for that damage to result in a 'modest recession' in the second and third quarters of the year. Ontario and Quebec are due to be hardest hit, given their weight in the manufacturing sector. Statistics Canada's latest GDP reading shows the economy grew at an annual rate of 2.2 per cent in the first quarter. Earlier this month, the Bank of Canada warned the economy will be "substantially weaker" in the second quarter of 2025, versus the start of the year as the full impact of U.S. import tariffs hits Canadian businesses. Deloitte sees Canada's real GDP growth rising 1.1 per cent in 2025, before accelerating to 1.6 per cent in 2026. 'As we move forward, and we have more clarity, whatever clarity looks like, but more clarity on our relationship with the U.S., and how the [Canadian] government is actually going to get into action, these are going to be the things that lift us as we go into 2026,' Desjardins said. Canadians will have to wait until the federal government's fall budget for more details on Carney's plans to spend billions on building housing inventory, advancing infrastructure projects, and investing in Canada's military. 'There's a lot in the hopper,' Desjardins added. 'There are just so many underlying factors at this stage that could have either a temporary or short-term impact, or be more persistent.' Deloitte Canada's optimistic take on rebuilding Canada-U.S. trade links comes on the heels of a similar analysis by the Canadian arm of fellow accounting giant PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) released last week. 'Canada is maybe in the best position of any other country,' Michael Dobner, PwC Canada's national leader of economics and policy practice, told Yahoo Finance Canada last Tuesday. 'The negotiation between Canada and the U.S. may further cement Canada's position over other countries as an exporter to the U.S.' Jeff Lagerquist is a senior reporter at Yahoo Finance Canada. Follow him on X @jefflagerquist. Download the Yahoo Finance app, available for Apple and Android. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store