Man sentenced for classic car insurance scam involving fake thefts and forged documents
Danny Phipps, 32, of Lamberhurst, Kent, was sentenced at Maidstone Crown Court on Friday to 23 months' imprisonment, suspended for 24 months, for multiple offences involving fraudulent claims against Aviva and RSA over a 13-month period. He must also repay the money he obtained through the scam under a confiscation timetable set by the court.
The fraud centred on classic vehicles including two 1990 Ford Sierra Sapphire RS Cosworths and a 1976 Mk2 Ford Escort RS2000, which Phipps insured and described as being in 'immaculate' condition. Within weeks of taking out the policies between February 2019 and March 2020, he reported the cars stolen and lodged large claims.
Among them was a Ford Sierra Sapphire RS Cosworth, added to a multi-vehicle policy in January 2019. Just weeks later, Phipps claimed it had been stolen in Chatham, Kent, submitting paperwork showing a £15,000 purchase price. Aviva paid out £14,150 after deductions, but a forensic review later confirmed that supporting documents — including Metro Bank statements — had been falsified.
Carl Mather, special investigations unit manager at Aviva, said: 'The audacity of Danny Phipps' repeated attempts to defraud insurers reveals a brazen disregard for the law and is as shocking as it is disturbing. Aviva was the first to detect Phipps's bogus claims, along with the associated fake and tampered documents he used to support them.
'We then worked closely with the City of London Police, the Insurance Fraud Bureau, and other insurers to uncover the full extent of the scam. We have a duty to protect our customers from the harmful effects of fraud, which is why Aviva continues to invest in market-leading fraud detection capabilities.'
In another claim in September 2019, Phipps reported the theft of a second Ford Sierra RS Cosworth from London, asserting it had been bought for £20,000 weeks earlier. Aviva's investigation found multiple discrepancies, including misleading transaction details and a lack of genuine proof of purchase.
The case was referred to the City of London Police's Insurance Fraud Enforcement Department (IFED), where Phipps answered 'no comment' in interviews.
Phipps also attempted to defraud Aviva through a business equipment policy, reporting the theft of an iTALMEK IC1.8 steel-cutting shear worth more than £17,000 from his Citroen Berlingo in October 2019. The bank statement he provided as proof of purchase was later found to have been fraudulently altered — a pattern repeated across his claims.
Detective Chief Inspector Nik Jethwa, from IFED, said: 'Driven purely by greed, Mr Phipps deliberately targeted high-value vehicles to create the illusion of genuine thefts. Thanks to the diligence of our team and the close cooperation from both Aviva and RSA, we were able to expose the pattern and bring this matter to justice.
'This outcome is a testament to the hard work and determination of a wide range of professionals — officers, forensic accountants, insurance investigators and legal experts — whose coordinated efforts were essential in securing this conviction.
'Insurance fraud is not a harmless crime — it affects honest policyholders and puts strain on valuable public and industry resources.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Could a crackdown on ultra-fast fashion damage the UK economy?
The UK has become one of the biggest markets for ultra-fast fashion, including for China-founded Shein, which generated an estimated £1.5bn ($2bn) in UK revenue in 2023. With Shein reportedly exploring a London IPO, any potential shift in the UK's regulatory environment could materially affect its valuation, investor confidence, and growth trajectory. At the same time, other platforms such as Temu and Cider are rapidly expanding in the UK, drawn by relatively light-touch regulation and a digitally-savvy consumer base. With increasing focus on the industry's environmental impact, campaigners are calling for better regulation and more scrutiny of fashion retailers' conduct. If regulators do clamp down, striking the right balance between protecting the environment while minimising any economic fallout will be a tough challenge. After all, the Bank of England has already warned that economic growth is slowing and on top of that, the UK is grappling with a lack of investment, an exodus of millionaires, and a poor IPO outlook. Given that ultra-fashion is such a lucrative industry, increased regulation could signal further economic problems, despite its environmental merits. What is ultra-fast fashion? According to McKinsey & Company's State of Fashion report, ultra-fast fashion means making and selling new clothes within days by using data to spot trends quickly, flexible factories, and very cheap production. Read more: UK taxpayers 'subsidising' S&P 500, says LSEG boss The UK is the fourth-largest producer of textile waste in Europe, according to the Fashion Waste Index, which was produced by fashion retailer LABFRESH. The index showed that the UK generates 206,456 tonnes of textile waste each year and that, on average, each Brit discards 3.1 kg annually. Of the 3.1kg that is discarded, 0.3 kg is recycled, 0.2 kg is reused, 0.8 kg is incinerated, and 1.7 kg ends up in landfill. What could regulation do about it? Across the Channel, France faced a similar issue and has already started to take action. In a landmark move that could reshape global retail, it became the first country to directly crack down on the ultra-fast fashion industry with sweeping environmental reforms. Passed by the French Senate in June, the legislation introduces a €5 eco-tax per clothing item in 2025. This is set to double to €10 by 2030 and bans advertising for brands that fail to meet sustainability standards. The new French law also mandates 'eco-score' labels to measure garments' environmental impact and fines influencers who promote disposable fashion. The move marks a direct regulatory challenge to high-turnover, low-cost brands. Emily Carr, policy adviser at Green Alliance, told Yahoo Finance UK: 'British people think the government needs to step in to make the fashion industry more sustainable – previous polling for Green Alliance showed that seven in 10 would support environmental impact labelling for clothing.' France's policy has already caught the attention of British campaigners and green industry groups calling for stronger enforcement under the UK's Environment Act and reforms to its Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) framework. 'The Environment Act 2021 gives the government lots of the powers it would need to catch up. For example, it could use powers in the Act to design an EPR scheme for textiles that penalises low-cost, low-durability products, like the French eco tax aims to do. Through this Act, the government has all the powers it needs, it just needs to show ambition by using them,' said Carr. These reforms could make producers and platforms financially responsible for the full lifecycle of the products they sell – from design to disposal. Dr Sarah Gray, lead analyst at Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP), a UK-based climate action NGO that works to reduce waste and promote a circular economy, told Yahoo Finance UK: 'Referring to last year's progress report for the UK Textiles Pact, we're seeing incremental improvements – but rising sales volumes are cancelling out the environmental gains.' Read more: What are share buybacks? WRAP and members of the UK Textiles Pact are working to define what a successful EPR system would look like. Dr Gray said that while strong models exist in France, the Netherlands, and Australia, the UK still needs clarity on product scope, eco-fee modulation, and how revenue would be collected and distributed. A circular economy strategy for England is expected this autumn, and with the climate crisis intensifying, calls for legislative urgency are growing louder. Influencers also play a crucial role in promoting ultra-fast fashion. France's new law proposes a full ban on advertising and influencer marketing for such brands. If passed, the content would be banned, with violations carrying fines of up to €100,000. According to WRAP, eco-scores and advertising bans such as those included in France's new law would be technically feasible within the UK framework, though it would be up to the government to legislate such measures. In a statement to Yahoo Finance UK, a spokesperson for Shein said: "The proposed bill, as currently defined, does not meet its stated objective of reducing the environmental impact of the textile industry… It inadvertently penalises French consumers, especially in the context of inflation.' Stocks: Create your watchlist and portfolio The company defended its approach, pointing to its 'demand-driven' model, which it said avoids overproduction. Shein proposed an alternative: a Sustainable Textile Transformation Roadmap — a framework focused on unsold inventory thresholds, responsible sourcing, and measurable sustainability goals. If the UK becomes subject to similar regulations as France, ultra-fast fashion brands may face a costly reckoning — reengineering supply chains, scaling back stock keeping units (SKUs), or absorbing eco-tax compliance costs that would squeeze already thin margins. Ultra-fast fashion may be big business and an important part of the UK's retail landscape but concerns about its environmental impact are not likely to disappear any time soon. How a potential clampdown on its practices could impact both the industry and the wider UK economy remains to be seen. Read more: The 'cheapest' stocks on FTSE 100 as UK blue-chip index Should you invest in gold? How to start investing with an employee share schemeError in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What having children later in life means for your money
There are plenty of dads who will be collecting their pension at the same time they're collecting their kids from school, because last year saw a baby boom for fathers over 60. It's not just A-list actors and rock stars who are having children later in life, it's a growing trend among the rest of us too. But if you're planning on postponing having children, it's worth considering what this means for your money. Recent figures from the Office for National Statistics showed that in 2024, the number of births fell for parents under 30, but rose for those aged 30 and over. The largest rise in births for the year was among mothers aged 35-39. Meanwhile, there was a 14.2% rise in births where the dad was over 60. The rise in much older fathers is likely to owe much to those getting remarried after a divorce and starting a second family, but there are plenty of good reasons why those with more traditional set-ups also postpone starting a family. Read more: How to get the best currency exchange deal for your holiday money Runaway rents and sky-high property prices mean more young people living at home for longer – 28% of people aged 20-34 live with their parents – rising to 34% of young men. It makes it difficult to find the space to start a family. Couples are also more likely to live together for longer before considering marriage or children, so even after they move out, they're not in a rush to have kids. There are some benefits to waiting, because you've had time to build your financial resilience, so you have more to draw on during the expensive early years. However, there are also some challenges you need to plan for. On average, your offspring will move out at the age of 24. If you're in your mid-40s when they're born, you may already be above state pension age. Typically, the 'empty nest' period is when people prioritise pension savings. If it doesn't arrive until you're retired, you need to work harder on your pension while you're younger, and keep up consistent pension payments throughout as many of your years as parents as you can. Your own parents will be older too, so they may not be able to help with grandchildren and you might need to factor childcare costs into your plans. They may actually need more support themselves, so talk to them about the potential costs of care, and the part they expect you to play. Becoming a sandwich carer is always challenging, but doing so without warning makes it even more difficult. Read more: Should parents help their kids with student loans or a mortgage deposit? If parents are much older – including those in their 60s – consider how you'll cover household costs in retirement and whether you have enough in your pension or SIPP to cover the expensive years of parenting. If you plan to keep working later in life, you also need a plan B, in case your health forces you to stop work. You need to think about insurance cover too. Parents need to have life insurance in place to ensure their children are supported for as long as they need it if they were to pass away. They should also consider critical illness cover and income protection – both of which provide support if you suffer an illness or injury and can't work. It's vital to make a will too, including details of who will take care of your children if something was to happen to you. It's not a nice thing to have to think about when you're looking forward to a joyous birth of a child, but the earlier you consider the challenges and make plans for it, the more chance you can weather your children's early years in your golden years without stretching your finances to breaking more: How to get the best currency exchange deal for your holiday money How to build passive income Do you trust your partner enough to give them money for tax purposes?Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Chilling google reviews by Anita Rose killer show he visited village multiple times
Chilling Google reviews left by the killer of a mother-of-six show he visited her village multiple times before the attack and commented on dog walkers. Roy Barclay viciously assaulted Anita Rose on her morning dog walk on July 24 last year and left her for dead on a country path in Brantham. Barclay was given a life sentence with a minimum mandatory term of 25 years at Ipswich Crown Court on Wednesday. Roy Barclay was jailed at Ipswich Crown Court. (Image: Suffolk Police) Before the murder and during his time on the run on Suffolk's most wanted criminals list, he avoided being recalled to prison for two years by sleeping in makeshift camps. During this time, Barclay left a large digital footprint, leaving hundreds of reviews on Google Maps. One review, which Google says was last edited a year ago, shows that Barclay visited Decoy Pond, which is just 8 minutes away from where Anita Rose was found. Google Maps shows that Roy Barclay left more than 40 reviews in the area near where Anita Rose lived over a three-year period. (Image: Google) Analysis shows the photos were posted between April and July - the month he murdered Anita Rose. The review said: "Decoy Pond is a very scenic, tranquil place. "Despite its ugly surroundings, Decoy Pond somehow manages to remain a secluded spot, even when there's the frequent noise from the nearby mainline railway embankment." Meanwhile, another review, which was marked two years ago, showed he visited Pattles Fen in the north of the village. The review said: "It's really for dog walkers, with just the one path that meanders around & comes out pretty well where it began." Ms Rose was attacked by Barclay in Brantham while she was on her morning dog walk. (Image: Suffolk Police) He also reviewed the Cattawade Picnic site, which is just a 22-minute walk from the site where Anita Rose was killed. In total, Barclay wrote 598 Google reviews and posted over 4,175 photos between 2022 and October 2024, predominantly rating sites in East Anglia. He reviewed the area around Brantham, East Bergholt and Manningtree more than 40 times over that period. He posted pictures of churches, Amazon lockers, libraries, beaches, council buildings, statues and more, earning himself a 'Level 8' contributor status (the highest being level 10). After the murder, he also wrote consistently about Flatford in his final reviews. "It's a beautiful, unspoilt rural idyll that somehow exists in its own timelessness, as if awaiting the return of John Constable," he wrote in a review in October 2024. Six days later, on October 21, Barclay was arrested at Ipswich County Library and was subsequently charged with murder.
