A nation is known by the enemies it has
Listen to article
The Jaffar Express terrorist attack against Pakistan is a sad incident. The accusing fingers were raised toward Afghanistan. Later, India was mentioned as the culprit behind the terrorist attack by the terrorist group called Balochistan Liberation Army. They may label themselves with all kinds of fancy names but killing innocent people is the work of terrorists and cowards. And that is who they are.
However, I feel like Pakistan has lowered its game. We are displaying disgust toward Afghanistan in the same manner as we used to toward India, which by the way does not face the same aggressive attitude from Pakistan anymore. Until not too long ago, when terrorist attacks inside Pakistan would be orchestrated by India, not only did Pakistan globally shame India but everyone knew Pakistan would take revenge also.
Now, though, just a light critique of India happens followed by silence. And we as a nation have also subliminally accepted this new normal that criticising India is reserved for the highest foreign policy wins. That's the farthest we can go now. As long as we hear that the state does mention India in a negative light, we find solace in it. We feel like we are a proud nation. Whereas in India, the favourite pastime of their media is to keep bashing Pakistan as if they know there is not a thing Pakistan would say in response. The regime is too busy wearing western suits and making TikTok videos for self-promotion.
I remember during the 90s, when in a cricket tournament Pakistan would rest its lead players if the match would be against a significantly weaker team so as to not only ensure that the lead players would bring their A game against a tougher foe in the battles ahead but to also give an opportunity to some of the newer and weaker players to try their skills and talent. I feel like we have the weaker players in the government right now and so we are picking easier enemies to deal with and in the process are lowering the stature and standing of a nuclear-armed Pakistan.
Not too long ago, when Pakistan was almost always present in major US publications being blamed for creating instability inside Afghanistan and providing support for what the US at the time called armed terror groups. Pakistan always responded back aggressively with whatever extent it could. It targeted not only India but even the United States in its rhetoric. Movies such as Waar did not include India as the main target but rather the US. Despite the noise against Pakistan, it was fighting for its interests inside Afghanistan. Today, it seems to be fighting against its own interests.
I was listening to the basketball champion Michael Jordan in a Netflix documentary titled The last Dance. In one of the places, while talking about a tough game his team Chicago Bulls was playing in 1993, Jordan says he was happy about playing against a team that was the toughest competition at the time. It made them tough and elevated their game. That right there is the mindset Pakistan's regime doesn't have. You elevate your game when you take on tough enemies rather than finding a weak foe to shine your credentials with. That may allow them to gain some headlines in the nation's leading publications but it certainly is not good for the nation.
The mindset of the nation has sort of accepted the defeat. Pakistan cricket has nosedived tremendously. This was a team always among the top 3 in the world. The US travel ban alert, fake or not, laid bare some sad realities. The debate was whether Pakistan was in the yellow or the orange list. Almost nobody expected to be on no list at all. The defeatist mindset has engulfed the nation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
3 days ago
- Business Recorder
What Bilawal meant by calling Modi the ‘Temu Version of Netanyahu'
In a recent appearance at the United Nations Correspondents Association in New York, former Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari offered a sharp, if unconventional, critique of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, calling him the 'Temu version of Netanyahu.' The remark has raised eyebrows globally, not only for its political implications but also for its curious invocation of an online shopping app. At face value, the comparison draws a political parallel. Both Prime Minister Modi and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu are controversial figures, often criticized for authoritarian tendencies and heavy-handed military policies. Modi's record in Indian illegally occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK) and Netanyahu's aggression in Gaza have both drawn international condemnation. Bilawal's statement suggests that Modi is not just inspired by Netanyahu's model of governance, but is in fact a lower-grade replica – hence the 'Temu version.' Bilawal urges UN to press India for comprehensive dialogue But why Temu? For the unfamiliar, Temu is a Chinese e-commerce platform that has taken global markets by storm with ultra-low prices, an enormous product range, and aggressive digital marketing tactics. It briefly became the most downloaded app on both the App Store and Google Play in late 2022 – outpacing even TikTok and Instagram – thanks to its gamified shopping experience, viral referral incentives, and eye-catching bargains. Temu's appeal lies in its accessibility and affordability, particularly attractive in a time of global inflation. Many Pakistani consumers have also started browsing Temu for household goods, fashion items, and beauty products, often at a fraction of local market prices. While some rave about the quality exceeding expectations, others remain wary – reviews are mixed, with average consumer ratings hovering between 1.5 and 2.5 stars across review platforms. Temu has also faced skepticism regarding its marketing authenticity. A flood of overly enthusiastic posts across TikTok, Facebook, and Twitter – many with nearly identical wording – has prompted questions about the platform's credibility and transparency. So, when Bilawal invoked Temu in his analogy, the message was double-edged. On one level, it paints Modi as a cheap imitation of Netanyahu — not quite the original, but attempting to copy the same controversial blueprint. On another level, it plays into the perception (whether accurate or not) of Temu as a platform where the low price sometimes invites doubts about quality and ethics. That said, it's worth noting that this might have been an unintended jab at Temu, a brand that – for all its criticisms – is fast becoming a legitimate competitor in the global e-commerce space. For millions of consumers, especially in developing economies, Temu represents democratized access to a range of goods that were previously unaffordable. In contrast, the political parallel Bilawal draws is far less benign. The comparison suggests that India under Modi is adopting – and potentially exacerbating – the most hardline elements of Israeli policy, without the institutional or geopolitical clout that Netanyahu wields. The fusion of e-commerce metaphors with geopolitical commentary might seem unusual, but it reflects the evolving nature of global discourse – where consumer brands, digital platforms, and political ideologies increasingly intersect. In a media-savvy age, even a shopping app can become shorthand for international critique. Ultimately, Bilawal's quip was designed to provoke – and it succeeded. But whether that metaphor holds weight depends on how one views both Temu's value proposition and India's foreign policy ambitions. The article does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Business Recorder or its owners
Express Tribune
4 days ago
- Express Tribune
America protects Israel by killing democracy
Listen to article I was once talking to an old Pakistani man who had been living in America since the 60s. We tend to believe that somehow we have more authentic knowledge of things than the older folks just because we have better sources of information at our disposal. However, I believe the opposite is true. The people before us may not have been getting their information as quickly as we do, but they sure had a better understanding of things, especially politics. This old man was telling me about George Bush, the senior one. He was saying that the main reason Bush had lost was because he got tough with Israel by trying to prevent it from building settlements inside the occupied territories. The Israeli lobbies inside the United States got into action and punished him. I laughed off the old man's argument by saying that a foreign country and a mere lobby cannot be so powerful that they'd influence an American presidential election. Boy, was I naive? I spent years after that watching every single American politician, not just the presidential candidates, never forgetting to express their support and love for the state of Israel. It is as if they are required to sing this anthem or else they'd be deemed traitors and be disqualified either from the office they are holding or from the race to win that office. Sure enough, the last sentence is not really untrue. What startled me recently have been two facts about the power of Israeli lobbies inside America: the pressure on TikTok and a song Michael Jackson once wrote but never became public. TikTok is perhaps the only mainstream platform that allows for the broadcast of videos that clearly show the brutality that Israel unleashes against innocent Palestinian children. Every other platform you have ever known suppresses any content that is even remotely critical of Israel or sympathetic toward Palestine. That's why it had to be pushed around. Michael Jackson wrote a song in 1993 called 'Palestine, Don't Cry' in which he expressed support for the cause of Palestine, showed solidarity with the Palestinian people, and highlighted the miseries of the Palestinians at the hands of Israeli society. From what I understand, Sony refused to publish the song, which was heavily pressured by the United States, which was heavily pressured by the Israel lobbies. Even George Bush had expressed his helplessness and sorrow at the extreme power AIPAC had inside America when he visited the presidential library at Texas A&M in 2005. That song by the mega superstar of the day would have created a tremendous impact in support of Palestine because Jackson was loved and almost worshipped by many Americans at the time. A superstar of his height would have done the same for Palestine, which the other MJ (Michael Jordan) did for the shoe brand Nike, which was a small and about-to-die brand. Today Palestine could have been what Nike is; supported and adored by millions of Americans. But the cunning Jewish society of Israel knew this and their even more cunning supporters in the form of lobbies in America understood the potential devastation in the form of blowing Israel's fake victimhood cover. America was allowed to use rockstars and pop stars in politics such as having them endorse candidates and hold concerts to motivate people to come out to vote during elections. However, the same could not be allowed in support of Palestine because that would create an American citizenry, which would become informed about the truth that Israel was an illegal state established over the land of Palestine and that it kills its way through expanding and grabbing more and more land every single day. A genuine democracy made up of informed citizenry would result in the death of Israel because Israel would no longer enjoy the unconditional support of the American might. Things that could have happened. History that could have been redirected. And the present that could have been beautiful.
Express Tribune
5 days ago
- Express Tribune
'Sana's murder a case of repeated rejections'
Islamabad police on Tuesday claimed to have arrested the prime suspect in the murder of popular TikToker Sana Yousuf within 20 hours of the incident, saying the teen was killed for repeatedly rejecting the advances of the suspect. According to the police, the killing occurred in an upscale area of the capital, where a masked and armed assailant entered her home in the evening and opened fire before fleeing the scene. Sana was rushed to a nearby hospital but succumbed to her injuries. Police initially termed the incident a targeted killing and accelerated their investigation. According to Inspector General of Islamabad Police Ali Nasir Rizvi, authorities employed modern technology, including CCTV footage and geo-fencing, to trace the suspect's movements and phone activity. Calling it a high-profile case with significant public pressure, the IG stated that law enforcement officials worked tirelessly and made the arrest using all available resources. The arrested individual has reportedly confessed during initial interrogation, and police have recovered the weapon used in the crime along with the victim's mobile phone. A case has been registered, and officials say the charge sheet will soon be submitted to the court. Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi praised the police for their prompt action, saying the resolution demonstrates that there is no place for lawlessness in the country. Meanwhile, social media users have reacted strongly, demanding justice and the harshest possible punishment for the perpetrator. Followers and supporters of Sana Yousuf have appealed to the government for exemplary action to deter such crimes in the future. Police assure that the case is being handled as a model investigation and that judicial proceedings will be expedited to deliver justice to the victim's family. Hailing from Chitral, Sana was a populer TikTok star. Her body was transferred to Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS) for a post-mortem examination. Initially, the police said they were investigating the incident but have not yet been able to apprehend the suspect. They also said the suspect may have been a guest at the victim's house at the time of the murder. "The suspect entered the house, fired multiple shots, and then fled the scene," said police. Sympathies and condemnations poured in following the brutal murder. "A young woman Sana Yousaf full of dreams, hope, and courage was silenced simply for daring to exist online. Her presence on social media was met with violence, and her life was stolen in cold blood. She deserved to live. To thrive. To speak. We must mourn her. And we must rise," a netizen said.
