logo
EU backs Trump Ukraine U-Turn but wants US to 'share burden' – DW – 07/15/2025

EU backs Trump Ukraine U-Turn but wants US to 'share burden' – DW – 07/15/2025

DW2 days ago
The European bloc welcomed a shift in US rhetoric on Ukraine but pressed Washington to chip in. The EU, however, failed to agree on a new round of sanctions on Russia.
The European Union's foreign affairs chief may be having something of an "I told you so" moment as US President Donald Trump reverses his past praise of Vladimir Putin and vows to ramp up pressure on Moscow.
"We see from the United States that they have also realized that Russia does not really want peace," Kaja Kallas told reporters in Brussels on Tuesday.
The former Estonian prime minister made a name for herself as one of Ukraine's staunchest political backers, and warned at this week's EU talks that Russia's bombing campaign had "reached record levels."
Kallas and many of her EU counterparts welcomed Washington's shift in rhetoric as they filed into a meeting. "What we experienced yesterday with the new messages from Trump was very, very important," Denmark's Lars Lokke Rasmussen said.
But some of the EU's top brass also had notes for the US on its latest announcements, including Washington's threat to slap 100% secondary tariffs on Russia and countries that trade with it unless a peace deal with Ukraine is reached by early September.
"The 50 days that Mr. Trump has announced is rather long," Dutch foreign minister Caspar Veldkamp said on the sidelines of Tuesday's talks.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Trump also made headlines Monday with an announcement that he'd be greenlighting sales of Patriot air defense systems and other arms to European countries to send on to Ukraine, just two weeks after Washington paused some arms shipments to Kyiv.
The new plan should speed up and expand deliveries of US arms which Ukraine says it needs as it faces increased Russian aerial attacks.
Some European countries have already been buying and sending US-made weapons to Kyiv, though the latest scheme could offer more certainty on the permissions needed to swiftly transfer the arms. A US commitment to sell replacements for American-made weapons sent to Ukraine could also encourage European states to ship more of their own military supplies.
NATO chief Mark Rutte said the deal would "work through NATO systems" and that European countries including Germany, Finland, Denmark, Sweden and the Netherlands were all interested in taking part.
But the US is yet to disclose more details of its new scheme and DW understands the technicalities of exactly how it will work are still being discussed.
Trump was, however, quick to cast the new deal as a lucrative business opportunity for the US, stressing Europe would foot the bill. And that seems to be raising some eyebrows among his counterparts across the Atlantic.
The EU's Kallas told reporters after Tuesday's meeting that she would like to see Europe and the US "share the burden" of arming Ukraine.
"If we pay for these weapons, it's our support — so it's European support — and we are doing as much as we can to help Ukraine. And therefore the call is that everybody would do the same," she said.
"If you promise to give the weapons then say that somebody else is going to pay for it, it's not really given by you, is it?" Kallas added.
Denmark's Rasmussen made a similarly veiled allusion. "We are providing a lot of funding for Ukraine to buy whatever weapons and ammunition they need … But I mean, I would very much like to see all our partners actually also contributing if we want this war to stop," he said.
While the US ranks as Ukraine's single largest donor since its full-scale invasion by Russia, the European Union as a whole has spent roughly the same amount as Washington over the same period, according to data from the Kiel Institute cited by Radio Free Europe. The EU outspends the US when the cost of hosting and assisting Ukrainian refugees is factored in.
EU states may be breathing a sigh of relief after the US policy shift, but policy analyst Torrey Taussig says it's too soon to judge whether Trump's stance has changed for good.
"There has been a seesaw approach to this relationship throughout the last several months of this administration, and I wouldn't be surprised if this relationship, the US-Ukrainian relationship, still has more turns that it can take," the former US government official turned Atlantic Council fellow told DW.
"I'm very reluctant to call this a strategic shift in the US-Ukrainian relationship," she added, though added that the two sides' ties now seem far more "positive."
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
With European countries racing to boost their own defenses amid pressure from the US and a broader rethink of the EU's geopolitical fragility, governments have been debating how much of a planned military spending splurge should go to US weapons.
Arms purchases, especially those involving large weapons systems, tend to lock the buyer into a years-long relationship with the seller, from production to delivery to future repairs.
Experts say ending Europe's dependency on the American-made weapons, logistics and intelligence capacities it lacks could take at least a decade — and with US foreign policy proving unpredictable, that leaves some worried.
EU heavyweight France has pushed for more European-only purchases, frustrating some other states which argued this only serves to slow down the process of getting weapons into European and Ukrainian hands.
The latest US-led plan may be seen by some as a blow to France's efforts, with the potential for more European money to flow toward US arms manufacturers.
As Europe nudges the US to do more to support Ukraine and punish Russia, the bloc's own efforts are faltering. Kallas said she was "really sad" that ministers failed to adopt an 18th round of EU sanctions on Moscow on Tuesday due to a holdout by Slovakia.
The landlocked central European state has been protesting planned EU laws to ban all sales of Russian gas, and Prime Minister Roberto Fico said in an online post on Tuesday that Slovakia had asked the EU to postpone the vote on sanctions while his government mulled its response to an exchange with the EU's executive aimed at ending the stalemate.
Kallas said she was "optimistic" an agreement could be struck among EU states in the coming days.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Does having a baby in Germany make it easier for parents to become citizens?
Does having a baby in Germany make it easier for parents to become citizens?

Local Germany

time15 minutes ago

  • Local Germany

Does having a baby in Germany make it easier for parents to become citizens?

If you're a foreigner – and not an EU citizen – in Germany and see it as your home for the foreseeable future, you might have thought about becoming a German citizen to guarantee your residency rights and gain some new ones in the process. The naturalisation process in Germany is complicated. Generally, you need to have been legally resident in the country for five years, be financially self-sufficient, and able to demonstrate a reasonable command of the German language, as well as German laws and norms. Will having a German born child could in your favour? Not necessarily. Having a German child won't fast track or guarantee your naturalisation process per se, but there are a few indirect advantages. Long-term residence, integration, and family ties (such as raising a child in Germany) can strengthen the parents' case for permanent residence or naturalisation over time. One thing that will definitely speed things up - effectively allowing you to apply for naturalisation after three years of residence (instead of five) - is being married to a German mother or father of the child. That's provided you've been married for at least two years. This is because marriage to a German citizen is considered an integration factor and shortens the minimum residence time. READ ALSO: How to become a German citizen through marriage Regarding your child's citizenship status, if they are born in Germany to at least one German parent they will automatically be considered German themselves. Alternatively, if they are born in the country and at least one parent has been legally resident in Germany for at least five years , then they may also automatically gain German citizenship. If not, they can apply for citizenship after they've been resident in the country for five years themselves - so from their fifth birthday if they stay in the country. Does having a child in Germany change my residency rights? Having a child born in Germany does not automatically change your rights to residency. You will have the same permit you did before, and if it was linked to employment, for example, you could still lose it if you lose your job. Any extensions will still be subject to the same conditions as before you had a child . A growing number of children are being born to international families in Germany. Photo: Kliimkin / Pixabay However, having a German child can improve your residence rights if you are not German yourself. Residence permits based on "family reunification" are granted for spouses, registered partners or unmarried minor children. And, as a non-German parent of a German citizen, you may be entitled to a residence permit to care for the child (under §28 Aufenthaltsgesetz – German Residence Act). READ ALSO: Reader question - Can you naturalise as German while on parental leave? Advertisement What about permits for the newborn? If at least one of the parents has legal residency in Germany, then a residence permit for the newborn will usually be issued automatically. However, if this doesn't happen, parents are responsible for applying for a permit for their babies before they turn six months old. If you're EU citizens, then you just need an Anmeldebescheinigung , which you'll get when you register the baby's birth. You need to do this at the Standesamt (registry office) within one week of their birth. READ ALSO: Who's exempt from taking a citizenship test for naturalisation? A matter of human rights Real-life cases and jurisprudence, along with international laws, make a big difference regarding children's rights. The respect for the child's best interests is enshrined in Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which deals with the right to respect for private and family life, home and correspondence. This can be argued when not granting a permit to a third-country national parent would endanger a child's welfare due to loss of contact. If a non-German child or their parent were at risk of expulsion from Germany, Article 8 could be invoked in a case arguing that residence should be granted because the child was already enrolled in school in the country, for example. Advertisement One notable case in 2015 involved a German minor who had been born to a foreign parent who did not have an independent residence permit initially. The court ruled in favour of the parent. The Berlin-Brandenburg Administrative Court ruled the parent's deportation unlawful on the grounds that it would effectively force their minor German child to leave Germany, thereby violating the child's right to reside in their home country and undermine their access to education, healthcare, and social services. This case is widely cited as a strong precedent in German administrative law protecting family unity and the residence rights of parents of German children.

Why don't all Africans have free movement within Africa?  – DW – 07/17/2025
Why don't all Africans have free movement within Africa?  – DW – 07/17/2025

DW

timean hour ago

  • DW

Why don't all Africans have free movement within Africa? – DW – 07/17/2025

The African Union's vision for seamless movement across the continent is facing challenges. The protocol that would allow Africans to move freely across borders remains largely unratified. The African Union's Protocol on Free Movement of Persons, adopted in 2018, aims to give Africans the right to live and work anywhere within the bloc. It was meant to complement the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) launched in 2019 and operationalized in 2021. But only four countries — Mali, Niger, Rwanda, and Sao Tome and Principe — have ratified the free movement protocol. Thirty-two other nations have signed the protocol, but it needs at least 15 ratifications to come into force. African Union (AU) officials are concerned about the slow pace towards ratifications and the implications for trade on the continent. "We know that without free movement of persons of goods and services, the ideals of AfCFTA would not be achieved," said Amma Adomaa Twum-Amoah, the AU's Commissioner for Health, Humanitarian Affairs and Social Development. "If they aren't able to move freely, then trading will become an issue," she told DW. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Security concerns top the list of reasons why African nations have been reluctant to ratify the protocol. "One of the things that they [African countries] usually mention is about security. If you open the borders won't people come in and terrorize and things like that?" Hardi Yakubu, movement coordinator of Africans Rising, an NGO that advocates for Pan-Africanism, told DW. Twum-Amoah echoed this sentiment, acknowledging that "for most member states, it is security." Margaret Kamar, a Kenyan senator and member of the Pan-African Parliament (PAP), the legislature of the African Union, added that the lack of harmonized border systems is another hurdle. "Everybody has small fears about security systems," she said. "At the border points, we realized that we have not harmonized the systems. When you open borders, you want to be sure that these rights to entry for any member of the partner states can be accounted for because you must account for the people." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video There's also the issue of revenue. Many African governments rely on the income generated by visa application fees. A visa-free regime, they fear, could mean financial losses. But Twum-Amoah disagrees. "The idea of losing money, I really don't subscribe to it." Rwanda is being held up as a success story following its ratification of the protocol. The East African nation has also integrated its border systems to track entries efficiently — whether by land or air. "Rwanda has integrated their systems completely. Whether you enter Rwanda through a bus or through the airport, they can track you. So, we found that this is something that other countries can learn from," Kamar said. In terms of losing revenue from a visa-free policy, Kamar Rwanda cautioned against such fears. "Rwanda is a very good example where they increased the number of tourists and earned more from their expenditure inside the country than the $200 [$173], they would have been chasing, looking for a visa," she added. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video To address the slow pace of ratification, the AU has launched a peer-to-peer learning initiative to foster dialogue between nations to share best practices and address mutual concerns related to free movement. The first session was held in Accra, Ghana, earlier this month and more are planned. Twum-Amoah noted that "we need to also undertake a bit of education to let them [countries] know that" there are solutions. "We came up with some conclusions and one is to ensure that member states are all on the same page, exchange ideas so that we can move this protocol forward," she added. Twum-Amoah said solutions can be found for the challenges member countries have identified. "There are ways and means that we can do it, if we all work together." Kamar remains hopeful. "We realized that most of the challenges are actually the same between most of the partner countries," she said, adding that there would be the need to sell the idea to all African countries stressing the importance of ratifying the protocol. "You cannot have an African Continental Free Trade Area without a free movement of people because people must move with their goods," she concluded. "So, we cannot say we are going to trade freely if you are not moving. The movement of people must accompany them." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video

Trump tariffs: SE Asia worried as US targets transshipments – DW – 07/17/2025
Trump tariffs: SE Asia worried as US targets transshipments – DW – 07/17/2025

DW

timean hour ago

  • DW

Trump tariffs: SE Asia worried as US targets transshipments – DW – 07/17/2025

The US wants to crack down on Chinese goods in disguise — and Southeast Asian countries are caught in the crossfire. Earlier this month, Washington announced a new US–Vietnam trade deal, under which Vietnamese exports to the US will face a 20% tariff, down from the threatened 46%. However, "transshipped" goods would be subject to a 40% levy. In international trade, this refers to goods that are shipped from the origin country to an intermediate location, only to be relabeled or tweaked and exported again to the final destination. The US tariffs on transshipments are widely seen as a push to curb other countries' economic relations with China. For years, Bejijng has been accused of re-routing goods through Southeast Asian countries before export to the US to dodge high tariffs. This week, US President Donald Trump announced that he had also reached an agreement with Indonesia's President Prabowo Subianto that would see the tariff rate on Southeast Asia's largest economy drop from the previously threatened 32% to 19%. Commenting on the Indonesia agreement on social media, Trump noted that "if there is any Transshipment from a higher Tariff Country, then that Tariff will be added on to the Tariff that Indonesia is paying." In April, Trump's influential trade adviser Peter Navarro dubbed Vietnam "essentially a colony of communist China." "Vietnam sells us $15 for every $1 that we sell them and about $5 of that is just Chinese product that comes into Vietnam, they slap a 'Made in Vietnam' label on it and they send it here to evade the tariffs," Navarro added. In 2024, Vietnam imported $144 billion (€124 billion) worth of goods from China and exported $136.6 billion worth of goods to the US. The Vietnam agreement was the third trade deal the US president has reached, after deals with the UK and China. Several Southeast Asian states reliant on exports to the US, such as Thailand and Cambodia, are racing to finalize terms before the new deadline of August 1 arrives. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Much depends on how Washington defines transshipment. In one scenario, Washington could use a narrow classification and apply it only to Chinese products imported into a country solely for relabeling and re-exporting to the US. In other words, the more egregious cases involve Chinese goods being shipped into Southeast Asian ports, literally labeled as "Made in Vietnam" or "Made in Cambodia," and then re-exported. If this definition is adopted, analysts agree that it would have little impact on Southeast Asian countries, as they derive almost no financial benefits from these types of zero-value-added goods and are also interested in ending this practice. Vietnam had already established new mechanisms to combat fraud and illegal transshipment before the US agreement was announced. In May, Thailand's Department of Foreign Trade announced that it would strengthen inspections for transshipment and expand the watch list of products at risk of circumvention from 49 to 65 to address US concerns. However, Washington could also decide to be punitive and define "transshipment" as any good that contains a certain percentage of inputs and components from China. This could spell economic calamity for Southeast Asian nations. Given that most Vietnamese-manufactured goods contain some percentage of Chinese inputs, a low threshold definition could mean that most exports are subject to the 40% tariff rate, rather than the lesser and more internationally competitive 20%. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Moreover, many US companies like Apple, Google, Nike, and Gap with factories in Vietnam also still rely on Chinese inputs. "If a Samsung phone assembled in Vietnam is comprised of 75% imported components, is it a Vietnamese product?" pondered Zachary Abuza, a professor at the National War College in Washington. "The Trump administration clearly wants to target China, but the reality is Vietnam is highly dependent on inputs from China for its manufacturing sector," he told DW, adding that while Hanoi also wants to reduce this dependency, it cannot achieve that in a year or two. Le Hong Hiep, a senior fellow at the ISEAS — Yusof Ishak Institute's Vietnam Studies Program in Singapore, believes that a very broad definition of transshipment is not likely. Vietnamese officials and US importers, as well as US multinational corporations with manufacturing operations in Vietnam, have strong incentives to oppose a strict or overly broad definition, he noted. He says that the US is targeting transshipments for two main reasons. "Economically, they aim to gradually decouple China from the global economy, or at least from the Southeast Asian countries that maintain robust trade ties with Washington," he told DW. "In the long run, this is expected to weaken China's economy and constrain its rise," he added. For instance, the threat of higher tariffs for transshipments will pressure Southeast Asian manufacturers to diversify their sources of inputs and components away from China. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The second objective, said Hiep, is to generate diplomatic tensions between Southeast Asian nations and China, especially if these countries comply with the US' imposition of higher transshipment tariff rates. "Such frictions may work to Washington's advantage by strengthening its position in the ongoing competition with China for regional diplomatic and strategic influence," said Hiep. After the US and Vietnam reached an agreement earlier this month, Beijing responded by saying that Southeast Asian countries shouldn't agree to terms that come at the expense of China. "Should such a situation arise, China will never accept it and will take resolute countermeasures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests," a spokesperson for the Chinese Ministry of Commerce said at the time, according to the Reuters news agency. It remains unclear what countermeasures Beijing had in mind, but an aggressive response could harm the interests of Southeast Asian states, including Vietnam, that are engaged in escalating territorial disputes with Beijing over the South China Sea.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store