
Trump promised riches from ‘liquid gold' in the US. Now fossil fuel donors are benefiting
Kelcy Warren was among the top donors for Donald Trump's 2024 White House bid, personally pouring at least $5m into the campaign and co-hosting a fundraiser for the then presidential hopeful in Houston.
Trump's win appears to already be benefiting Warren and Energy Transfer Partners, the pipeline and energy firm of which he is co-founder, executive chair and primary shareholder.
'We will be a rich nation again, and it is that liquid gold under our feet that will help to do it,' Trump said in his inaugural address.
Though domestic fossil fuel production reached record levels under Joe Biden, his policies to boost renewable energy still sparked fear among oil and gas companies, said Mark Jones, a political scientist at Rice University in Houston, Texas. 'There was a threat of moving toward a net zero world … maybe not now, but there was an idea that would happen if Democrats stayed in the White House,' said Jones.
For Warren and other oil billionaires, Trump removed that fear, Jones said.
Energy Transfer Partners reported a year-over-year increase in profits in the first quarter of this year. In an earnings call last month, company top brass praised the new administration and more supportive regulatory environment.
Among Trump's moves that have benefited the company: a day-one move to end Biden's pause on liquefied natural gas exports, which enables Energy Transfer to proceed with a long-sought-after LNG project in Lake Charles. On 13 May, Trump's Federal Energy Commission (Ferc) also granted a three-year extension for the LNG project, which the company said was necessary for the project to succeed.
In the week after the Ferc decision, Warren's wealth rose by nearly 10%, noted Sarah Cohen, who directs the climate and wealth inequality-focused non-profit Climate Accountability Research Project (Carp) at the Institute for Policy Studies.
'That decision wouldn't have been possible under Biden's LNG pause,' said Cohen, who calculated the change using the Bloomberg billionaires index.
Since that Ferc decision, Energy Transfer Partners has also secured a 20-year deal to supply a Japanese company with up to 1m metric tons of LNG a year.
Other Trump orders to 'unleash American energy' and declare an energy emergency to promote fossil fuels despite already booming production, for instance, are set to benefit Energy Transfer Partners by making it easier to expand the use all kinds of fossil fuels, thereby boosting the demand for pipelines.
Also fueling that demand: the projected boom in datacenters. Energy Transfer Partners has received requests to power 70 new ones, the Guardian reported in April, marking a 75% rise since Trump took office.
By appointing fossil fuel-friendly officials to top positions, such as the former energy CEO Chris Wright to head the energy department and the pro-oil and -gas Doug Burgum to the interior department, Trump has also 'showed his allegiance to companies like Energy Transfer Partners', said Cohen.
'They're really creating this environment that's great for oil and gas,' she said. 'The message is 'We'll give you what you want.''
Energy Transfer did not respond to requests from the Guardian to comment.
Warren ranks among the richest 500 people in the world, with Forbes placing his net worth at $7.2bn. He has long deployed his wealth to support the GOP, including by becoming the 13th-largest corporate funder to Trump's Make America Great Again Super Pac last year with a $5m donation.
He has also spent his fortune in more eccentric ways. His $30m, 23,000 sq ft Dallas mansion includes a movie theater and bowling alley, and among his other assets are a 8,000-acre ranch near Cherokee, Texas, which is home to zebras, javelinas and giraffes; a 20,000-acre golf resort in Lajitas, Texas; a private island near Roatán, Honduras; and numerous private aircraft, including a Dassault Falcon 900 jet.
A lover of folk music, Warren also started a record label in 2007 alongside singer-songwriter Jimmy LaFave, with whom he has also written songs. 'If you hear me now,' goes one song for which Warren penned the lyrics, 'maybe you could pull some strings.'
The pipeline mogul accumulated most of his wealth from Energy Transfer Partners, which owns and operates about 130,000 miles of energy infrastructure in the US. In recent months, the firm has been criticized by advocates for its successful lawsuit against the environmental non-profit Greenpeace, which in March yielded a verdict that threatens to bankrupt the organization.
Warren has long enjoyed a relationship with the president, donating generously to his first campaign and attending closed-door meetings during his first term. Though Warren is not known to have attended the infamous May 2024 meeting during which Trump asked oil bosses for $1bn and pledged to overturn environmental rules, he did co-host a fundraiser for the president in Houston weeks later.
He is one of a handful of the most powerful oil billionaires from Texas, where there are no limits on contributions to candidates and political committees.
'Texas has always been kind of a testing ground for the most extreme politics and issues that the Republicans pursue,' said Matt Angle, founder of the Lone Star Project, a Democratic Pac in the state. 'In Texas, people like him are used to being able to donate to get their way.'
Unlike some other Texas energy barons, such as the Christian nationalist Tim Dunn, Warren is not driven by dogma, said Jones.
'Kelcy Warren is not necessarily ideological,' he said. 'He may be in sync with Trump on some other issues, but his support for Donald Trump is largely because of what Trump proposed to do [for] the energy sector.'
Sign up to This Week in Trumpland
A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration
after newsletter promotion
The reconciliation bill, which the House passed last month and the Senate is now debating, is also expected to be a boon to Energy Transfer Partners and Warren. Known as the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' act, it is expected to slash Biden-era incentives for renewable energy, tamping down competition in the energy market.
A number of more esoteric provisions in the bill will also prove beneficial for the company, according to a review by Carp shared with the Guardian. One provision in the House-approved version, for instance, would allow the Department of Energy to determine that a proposed LNG export facility is in the 'public interest' if the applicant pays $1m – something Energy Transfer Partners could afford to do. It's a 'pay to play' scenario, said Carp co-founder Chuck Collins.
Other provisions would expedite the build-out of LNG export infrastructure, force the government to hold lease sales for fossil fuels even when demand is low and reverse protections to allow drilling in some areas without any judicial review. Still others would stymy federal agencies' ability to implement new climate rules by requiring that major changes obtain congressional approval, allow gas developers to pay a $10m fee to bypass permitting processes, limit who can bring lawsuits over gas infrastructure and allow firms to pay taxpayers less to use public land, Carp found.
The bill is also set to hand fossil fuel companies massive tax breaks – including by extending tax cuts in the Trump-backed 2017 reconciliation bill, from which Energy Transfer Partners reported a tax benefit of $1.81bn.
In one example, the House's version of the bill would reinstate 100% 'bonus depreciation' for qualified properties, allowing companies such as Energy Transfer Partners to completely write off new infrastructure such as pipelines on their taxes, and see the benefits immediately. It's also expected to apply to private jets, Collins noted.
Other tax breaks in the proposal are expected to personally benefit ultrawealthy Americans such as Warren.
'The most wealth I've ever made is during the dark times,' Warren told Bloomberg a decade ago.
Under Trump, Energy Transfer Partners will also likely save money on pipeline safety compliance. Since the president re-entered the White House in January, enforcement from the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration has dropped. Across the pipeline industry, the PHMSA opened only four enforcement actions in April, and zero in March – marking the first month since the subagency's 2004 launch when no cases were initiated, E&E News reported.
'That fits right in with the philosophy or paradigm of the Trump 2.0 deregulation agenda,' said Carp's Cohen.
A lack of action from the body could lead to savings for Energy Transfer Partners, which has paid millions in fines to the PHMSA.
In March, Energy Transfer Partners also sued the PHMSA, claiming that its enforcement system is 'unconstitutional'. Success in the suit could mean the company is forced to pay fewer penalties.
Another Trump policy from which Energy Transfer Partners will benefit: an exemption for oil and gas from his new tariffs. The president provided the industry wide shield after a meeting with the American Petroleum Institute lobby group, of which Warren's company is a member.
The firm's profits may still be blunted by other tariffs, such as those on aluminum and other products needed for pipeline construction, but the energy sector expects those losses to be offset by the soon-to-be-passed reconciliation bill, Politico reported in April.
'The energy companies would prefer not to have the tariffs, sure,' said Jones. 'But those are not a negative that outweighs what they view as the existential threat that Democrats represent … the existential threat of net zero.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump shuts down reporter who asked whether he'll nuke Iran
By President Donald Trump hilariously shut down a reporter who asked a pointed question about a potential US strike on Iran - before mocking her right outside of the White House . The reporter, CNN 's Alayna Treene, asked Trump 'whether you are moving closer, or whether you believe the US is moving closer, to striking Iranian nuclear facilities.' 'Well, obviously I can't say that, right? You don't seriously think I am going to answer that question?' he said with a smirk. The president proceeded to laugh it off before offering up an impression of the reporter's question. "'Will you strike the Iranian nuclear component and what time, exactly, sir? Sir, would you strike it?'" Trump said. '"Would you please inform us so we can be there and watch?"' 'I mean, you don't even know if I may do it. I may do it. I may not do it,' he said of entering the conflict to side with Israel. 'Nobody knows what I'm going to do.' Treene, a White House reporter who made the Forbes 30 Under 30 media list in 2021, then took to both X and Instagram to talk up the exchange. 'Nothing's finished until it's finished.' As he spoke, missiles launched from Iran continued to target Israel, where the U.S. is currently coordinating planes and cruise ships to evacuate American citizen. Trump engaged in his remarks at a press conference meant to ring in the installation of two new White House flagpoles, where he clashed with Treene at another point as well. He went on to wax poetic about his supporter before bringing up how he 'won all seven swing states' over Kamala Harris. 'Report that,' he told Treene, who joined CNN in January 2023.


Reuters
18 minutes ago
- Reuters
US Supreme Court sets test for which courts can hear EPA cases
June 18 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court established rules of the road on Wednesday to determine when lawsuits challenging actions by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency related to air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions should be heard by regional appeals courts or an appeals court in Washington that often hears regulatory cases. The 7-2 ruling, opens new tab held that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, and not the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, is the proper court to hear a lawsuit by small oil refiners challenging the EPA's denial of waivers exempting them from national biofuel mandates. That meant that the 5th Circuit had no business ruling in 2023 that the EPA during President Joe Biden's administration had unlawfully denied the oil refineries waivers from a renewable fuels requirement that they blend ethanol and other biofuels into their fuel. Yet under the same test to assess venue that the justices announced in the refineries cases, they ruled, opens new tab 8-0 that a different set of lawsuits by the Republican-led states of Oklahoma and Utah and several energy companies including PacifiCorp challenging the EPA's "Good Neighbor" smog control plan were wrongly transferred to the D.C. Circuit. Both sets of cases turned on a provision of the Clean Air Act anti-pollution law that designates the D.C. Circuit as the exclusive venue for cases over "nationally applicable" EPA actions and rules but leaves cases concerning only local agency actions to regional federal appeals courts. Conservative Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for the Supreme Court's majority in the refineries' case, used his opinion to map out a test for how to interpret that provision and determine the proper venue for lawsuits challenging EPA actions. Thomas said that while the law presumptively routes cases concerning local agency actions to a regional appeals court, they still must be heard by the D.C. Circuit "if a justification of nationwide breadth is the primary explanation for and driver of EPA's action." That justification must supply a "core justification" for the EPA's action, Thomas said, as it did in the case of the six refineries, whose requests for biofuel mandate exemptions were denied based on an interpretation of the Clean Air Act that the agency applied to all refineries regardless of their geographic location. The ruling reversed a 5th Circuit decision in favor of the refineries on the merits after concluding that the EPA's actions were local or regional in nature, not national. "Allowing 12 different circuit courts to adjudicate SREs (small refinery exemptions) would result in a fractured and inconsistent body of law, causing chaos and confusion in the marketplace," biofuel groups Growth Energy and the Renewable Fuels Association wrote in a joint statement. Conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch, in a dissenting opinion joined by conservative Chief Justice John Roberts, said the test that the majority laid out was "both mistaken and likely to render simple venue questions unnecessarily difficult and expensive to resolve." They nonetheless concurred with the court's decision to reverse the conclusion by the Denver-based 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that the case by Oklahoma and Utah should be transferred to the D.C. Circuit. That case concerned a rule the EPA issued in March 2023 intended to target gases that form ozone, a key component of smog, from power plants and other industrial sources in 23 upwind states whose own plans did not satisfy the the Clean Air Act's "Good Neighbor" provision. Oklahoma and Utah were among 21 states whose air quality plans were rejected by the EPA under that policy. Numerous lawsuits followed, including by Oklahoma and Utah, who sought to challenge the decision in the Denver-based 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. While the 10th Circuit held the case belonged in the D.C. Circuit because it concerned a national policy, Thomas wrote that the 10th Circuit could hear the case because the EPA's action turned on state-specific factors. The Supreme Court last year blocked the Biden-era "Good Neighbor" rule from being enforced while litigation in the lower courts moved forward. The Trump administration has said it plans to repeal the rule.


Reuters
18 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump administration backs U.S. candidate to retain UN telecoms post
GENEVA, June 18 (Reuters) - The U.S. government on Wednesday backed a Biden-era nominee to stay in charge of a U.N. telecoms agency, underlining U.S. interest in global technologies in a relatively rare show of support for a multilateral body under the Trump administration. U.S. President Donald Trump has so far largely retreated from U.N. institutions: he has cut funding to aid agencies, plans to leave, opens new tab the World Health Organization and has not yet installed permanent U.N. ambassadors in New York or Geneva. But Secretary of State Marco Rubio endorsed U.S. candidate Doreen Bogdan-Martin for re-election to the International Telecommunication Union - a 160-year-old Geneva-based agency that sets standards for new technologies. "At a time when global networks and digital technologies are increasingly impacting the global economy, ITU needs the right leadership," Rubio said. The qualified radio operator who grew up in New Jersey and spent most of her career at the ITU, was elected the first woman to lead it in 2022, when she beat, opens new tab the Russian candidate after a campaign publicly endorsed by former President Joe Biden. As with many U.N. elections, nation state endorsement is a condition to run for the ITU election set to take place in 2026. The ITU has so far been spared most of the foreign aid cuts. Trump said in February that the United Nations had "great potential and ... we'll continue to go along with it, but they got to get their act together". Trump has said he wants his former national security adviser Mike Waltz to be his next New York U.N. ambassador.